Chris court appearance

Status
Not open for further replies.
sociopaths can feel fear

autism is characterized by low empathy among other things, and is usually separated from sociopathy

While there is quite a bit of overlap between the Antisocial Behavior Disorders that both sociopaths and psychopaths fall under, it would seem that Chris falls more under the “sociopath” side of the fence.
 

While there is quite a bit of overlap between the Antisocial Behavior Disorders that both sociopaths and psychopaths fall under, it would seem that Chris falls more under the “sociopath” side of the fence.
tbf I don't know anything about Chris, I just joined this forum to tell Republicans they would lose Georgia in 2020 prior to that state being determined
 
Some of you autists are so focused on Chris-chan you don’t see the larger issues.

Yup, as Tucker Carlson said the decision was reversed, but and here’s the key part: Many other trannies are housed in female prisons.

He uses Chris-chan as a springboard to talk about a societal problem. That’s what journalists and commentators do.

What did you expect? Tucker Carlson to go into a ten minute long recap of the liquid Chris saga?
I would expect him to talk about a case of it actually happening (if there are so many cases of it)instead of spending time talking about a case of it NOT happening.
"Find out after the break about the propensity of the new Ford Bronco to explode if they get rear-ended! (five minutes later) It turns out they don't, but, ya know... some car out there might"
That brings up a question, is there any written down legal proof that Barb does actually have Dementia? or is it just all claimed?

View attachment 2421097
No. Many of the 'circle' around Chris have seriously doubted claims that she's lost it and instead claimed she has been faking it. There is no evidence up to now that she has been diagnosed but that might simply be because she has never been neurologically examined. Given the language of statements and the one-sided charges I think they may have decided she's incompetent. But because it's health info we may not find out much unless it goes to trial or Chris tweets about it somehow.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Giovanni
Not trying to show a heart, but where is his mom? Is she in the custody of adult protective services? Does she have any extended family? I hope resources are made available for her care and protection away from the RAPING ASS MENTALLY ILL INCEL!
Barb has a hole in her heart that goes all the way to China.

 
I would expect him to talk about a case of it actually happening (if there are so many cases of it)instead of spending time talking about a case of it NOT happening.
"Find out after the break about the propensity of the new Ford Bronco to explode if they get rear-ended! (five minutes later) It turns out they don't, but, ya know... some car out there might"

No. Many of the 'circle' around Chris have seriously doubted claims that she's lost it and instead claimed she has been faking it. There is no evidence up to now that she has been diagnosed but that might simply be because she has never been neurologically examined. Given the language of statements and the one-sided charges I think they may have decided she's incompetent. But because it's health info we may not find out much unless it goes to trial or Chris tweets about it somehow.


"Faking it".... Faking for Who? What would Barb gain from faking dementia?
 
Not trying to show a heart, but where is his mom? Is she in the custody of adult protective services? Does she have any extended family? I hope resources are made available for her care and protection away from the RAPING ASS MENTALLY ILL INCEL!
I'm sure Barb is in someone's care... The real question is what is the status of Clover?
 
"Faking it".... Faking for Who? What would Barb gain from faking dementia?
The prevailing theory is that she’s entirely faking it, or hamming it up in front of the camera to appear as sympathetic as possible when Chris uses her to e-beg.

Personally I’m starting to doubt it; in the leaks Chris definitely vividly describes the rape/molestation of a person who’s clearly not all there mentally - and unlike in the e-begging videos I see no reason for him to exaggerate her mental decline in those conversations.
 
IOJkHpD.jpg






  • Christine Chandler, known as Chris Chan, continued to interrupt her bond hearing to brag about their Internet fame and correct the judge's pronoun use
  • In court, Chandler stomped her feet and demanded to be taken home
  • Chandler's bond was denied and she's held at Central Virginia Regional Jail
  • She allegedly raped her 79-year-old mother, who is believed to have dementia
  • Chandler was arrested after allegedly admitting the crime in a leaked phone call
  • Chandler found internet fame through 'Sonichu' drawing and in-depth documentary chronicling how Internet trolls accoster her online for years


Haven't read through the 150+ pages. So ignore if already posted.

I really don't understand how this trans thing works. So we go along with what they say until they go to jail, then we decide..No, you're actually a guy, because it would be dangerous to put you in a women's prison. So we throw that out the window and basically just retrofit reality to whatever conveniences us the most?
 
If Chris is found to be innocent, I will lose whatever faith in humanity I have left.
I hate this thread so much

You're not found innocent. You're found not guilty.

Maybe if we bring back trial by ordeal we can make pronouncements of innocence before the LORD, but not today. Not guilty means "if you would hesitate before an important life event" (i.e. consenting to surgery for a loved one where they can not consent for themselves) THE HESITATION IS THE REASONABLE DOUBT. That you would hesitate BUT DO IT ANYWAY is enough to find the defendant not guilty.
 
How long till they run a segment on Chris and his late stage troonery?

Either you have the attention span of well.. Chris-Chan, or you deliberately missed the part where he uses it as a springboard to talk about the problem in general and interviews some broad from some women’s organization.

So no, it wasn’t retarded.

It’s like those segments when they talk about asphalt being warm enough to fry eggs on.

“Hurr-durr that’s retarded! Nobody does that, people have pots and pans!”

Except they use that shot to talk about a local heatwave, global warming or the dangers of forest fires or whatever.

I know some of you faggots for whatever reason don’t like Tucker Carlson, but in this case he isn’t doing anything that journalists and commentators haven’t done for ages.
Agreed, I take Tucker getting the name wrong as just a case of the old farts running fox news being out of touch and getting their info on Chris from old meme sites cause "hey those memes are what the kids are into right?" That aside you also have to consider this is a story of one retarded ape in the middle of bumfuck nowhere who just happens to be a troon. I get them using him as a springboard both because they can't meme and because Chris has always been the ultimate case for why troon rights should be taken away and why we should bring back sterilization to anyone with an IQ below a functional level.
 
There's a understandable misconception with autism; Violent emotional and physical actions they might display are a result of their autism.

While it's not common, it's is possible that people with autism can have a 'double hit'. On top of their autism, they also show clear patterns of sociopath or psychopath behaviors.

Chris is a double hit. The incident at GameSpot alone is enough to warrant that assertion.
 
Maybe if you hadn’t cut off my post mid sentence in order to try and push a claim I never made, you might have noticed that I wrote “journalists and commentators”,
That's like saying "cherries and blueberries are red". If you're engaged in punditry, as Carlson is, you're not doing journalism. I replied to exactly the bit that was incorrect. But fine, if you're going to be autistic about quoting:
He uses Chris-chan as a springboard to talk about a societal problem. That’s what journalists and commentators do.
No. This is what only commentators and pundits do. It's not the job of a journalist to use anything in particular to talk about a societal problem, since that is literally a difference between doing journalism and doing something else.

-

I hope the motherfucker isn't going into a female prison. I haven't the past few pages.
He isn't. VA law says you have to have had the surgery before you get put in the opposite sex's housing unit. They don't care about pronoun idiocy, they care about rapes and pregnancies.
 
Last edited:
Constantly interrupts the court to brag about being the world renowned creator of Sonichu, possibly while also claiming to be a an all powerful goddess with psychic powers AND stomping around like a little brat demanding his Legos back.


What did Chris THINK was going to happen? They probably denied bail to discipline him for being a menace and because even if Chris had any money left they were worried he'd be lynched the minute he tried to return home.
 
Good and evil are instrinsic qualities. Morality isn't just a byproduct of evolution but a major driver of evolutionary processes in all social species, above all in humans where our natural environment is one formed almost exclusively by human action. Personality, the basis for all moral action, is heritable. Even when looking at really granular data such as political preference, a heritability of .4 has been observed.

Most people fall well within a range of normalcy where it doesn't make much sense to split hairs over the adaptive value of for example adding an inch to your dating profile but every so often you get people that stand out, far beyond the scope of ordinary human interaction. This is where you find Barb who would threaten suicide if any element of her precious hoard was disturbed and her even worse off son who was beyond help from the moment he was born.
I beg to differ i personally believe everything traces back to something. If you would allow me to go off topic for an example the vikings in the eyes of the english were pretty much the embodiment of evil where as to themselves the killing and plundering was not evil. This came from living in places where fertile ground was not as abundant as in england leading to a warrior culture that vieuws conquest as an honorable deed and a moral good or rather neutral. I personally believe culture dictates morally to a large extend. If people want me to stop discussing this just neg rate this and i'll stop i'm just very interested in this topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back