[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mephistophwis said:
Hey Louis Herz. She is playing you like a fiddle. Everything she says is lie. Being Poor. Her Daddy is not rich and is a hobo in Mexico. All lies.
View attachment 2422638
Here is her grandpas Obit. Just like in the audio logs from her class assignment, he, like her dad, is also from Pittsburgh, PA.

Notice the Children: Michael A. Janke and his wife Mary Beth of CT and his daughter Isabella... WOW much coincidence...

Here is Michael A. Janke (co founder of Silent Circle) Confirming who is wife is:
View attachment 2422656

Here is pic of their mansion in New Mexico:
View attachment 2422662
Step-moms pet pig:
View attachment 2422665

Ask yourself this...what is the chance that a Mike Janke that is married to a Mary Beth Janke and has a single daughter named Isabella and it's not the same person?

Also, Isabella Loretta Janke...probably should have listened to your Dad dipshit.
View attachment 2422698
Click to expand...
Also don't forget that her step mother MB Wilkas is tagged in pictures of her and her art on facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10203324471821212&set=a.10203324477381351
 
i almost don't want to know but what exactly did bella do to that poor dog....it looked like she trapped it between two heavy rocks and abandon it but now im hearing she killed the dog?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Femboy Hooters
Holy fuck, Managed to catch up with the thread after a while and having to take a break here and there. and now I feel like getting a few drinks in me to make my brain become smooth to ease the headache of seeing all this shit about Bella.

I feel like I'm watching the most beautiful trainwreck trying to do everything to hit the breaks before it crashes into the station.

Ya'll are beautiful fucking bastards for putting up with wading through all this waist high-shit to document everything. I do not envy you, but god damn I would buy you a beer if I could. Or maybe a pizza if you prefer.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Neverending23, In the Air of the Night, ToMendAndDefend and 7 others
Haumeapapillonfig said:
As someone who has been “exposed” online on the scale of millions of views before, I wanted to provide a first hand perspective of what it’s like and the torture Bella is deservedly going through. I quickly found that I was writing a novel though, so I want to stress the one point that I don’t think many people recognize.

One of the worst parts of this sudden and abrupt merger of your online life and your real life is the forced recognition of your actions. If she’s anything like me, then part of the way that she was able to justify or live with herself through all of the horrible things she’s done is with the mentality that the online world is not the real world. It’s easy to believe that you can do whatever depraved shit that you want, and as soon as you don’t want to deal with it you can just nuke the account. Your sins are washed clean. It was never real. You can go on living your happy life and forget everything bad you’ve done. As much as you all want to believe she is a demented person who lives her day to day life constantly thinking evil thoughts - it’s probably not true. There is probably a very normal portion of her that lives the majority of her day like a regular person while she occasionally taps into her darkest desires through a different part of her brain, usually online. Many of you are pointing out how insane it is that she’s still using discord rather than more personal conversation methods after all of these leaks, and I strongly believe this is because she’s still trying to maintain the idea that everything happening is just this online person, not who she really is. It is an incredibly effective coping mechanism.

Once your doxxed though? That entire safety net is ripped away. The mental division you created is removed and you are forced to recognize and deal with all of your actions. And when I say this I don’t mean dealing with the external consequences of your actions - not things like public ostracization or even legal consequences. Those pale in comparison to the mental effects. It’s the mental toll of coming to accept that those twisted actions are part of who you truly are, not just a separate online persona. Fuck all matters about your parents finding out or being kicked out of school, the worst part of this is finding a way to live with yourself after your mental escape route has been closed.

You’ve always recognized that the things you’ve done are bad, but you’ve done so in a disassociative way, almost as if you’re looking at someone else. But when that someone else is doxxed as being yourself? You’re immediately flooded with years of grief and remorse over all of your actions. The full weight of your deprivation hits you all at once as your personal day of reckoning comes and you struggle to understand how you’ve done all of this. You lose recognition of who you even are and before long you have only one self evident truth. You hate yourself.

I say all of this to let you all know - none of your insults or the external consequences of your doxing mean anything to her in comparison to the things she is thinking about herself now. I know she is trying to cover things up and misdirect with disinfo, but that is surface level. On a much more real level she is slowly beginning to navigate the crumbling of her mental psyche as her internal coping mechanisms are ripped away from her. Her self loathing will destroy all motivation and ambition that she has and she will fill her days looking for ways to numb the world around her in an attempt to forget who she is. One of the only things that brings me joy in my personal experience of this is knowing that there are people like her who are experiencing it even worse than me.

Bella, I genuinely hope that this is all just me projecting my own situation, but if not, I wish you luck in your journey of self hatred.
Click to expand...
Great post mate. Take care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: derivativeHack and Pointless Sperg
under_scores said:
I generally agree, but I do worry about the YouTubers. Pieces of shit with hundreds of thousands, or millions, of subs could certainly do a lot of work in flipping the script if they did a piece defending Bella. They're already trying to wring Chris of as much clout as they can, generally without knowing shit beforehand, and if this comes under their radar, it could be a disaster. I'm hoping 15k Kiwi posts overshadows such a scenario, but I'm a minus at heart. Optimism isn't easy here.
Click to expand...
Apperantly she's talked with Ready to Glare, Blaire White, and Mutha. I doubt Mutha will want to touch this after the whole pronoun pushback he got.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: ToMendAndDefend, Mexican Molotov Marauder, Basalasas and 4 others
SilenceIsViolence said:
You are looking at this from a (god I hate this word) Neurotypical lens. Worry is an emotion that's formed up of self-reflection and anxiety. One becomes worried when they project their fears onto a future situation. Bella doesn't self-reflrect, anxiety is forgein to her, and fear isn't an emotion that is present in her mind. "But why would she hide herself if she wasn't fearful?" - because in her mind, this is what "smart" people do and she wants nothing more to be seen as smart, she still has an ego. Even the most foaming at the mouth rebbiter who finds this posts will have to admit "she was smart enough to use lots of different accounts" and in a 30 page summary of how shit she is, that would be the only sentence Bella remembers.
Click to expand...
This is exactly why all the people saying she has BPD (or just generalizing as "cluster B") annoys me slightly.
People with BPD come off as batshit crazy drama queens because they can't regulate their emotions, can't handle criticism, and they're terrified of abandonment.
But people with ASPD? They're literally what you think of when you hear the term "sociopath". They're arrogant, remorseless, manipulative, have no regard for the law, social norms, or the feelings of others, etc.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Sir Yarnsalot, ToMendAndDefend, gaybodybuilder and 5 others
not very concrete said:
Tbh it’s weird that she hasn’t run to daddy and try to get help from him

unless she’s completely terrified of doing that and he somehow still doesn’t know what’s going on
Click to expand...
Despite having a cybersecurity agency, glowdad seems incredibly offline. He won't know until she's on the news, she asks for his help or TTU calls him, which is unlikely considering she's an adult. I've seen people faking still going to college for YEARS after dropping out and getting expelled as mommy and daddy pay all their expenses.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: In the Air of the Night, LemmeSee, not very concrete and 1 other person
StraightShooter2 said:
Greeks are "white" anyway, just like most "whites" aren't "Anglo-Saxon" or even from the same ethnicity.

The stupidity of some people knows no bounds.


Only by the most inclusive definitions mainly.

Beyond that, they're not "white" anymore than Arabs or North Africans are.
Click to expand...
That explains the autism surrounding DCAU Lex Luthor's ethnicity.
DiscoRodeo said:
Farms appear to be under a DDOS attack.

Bellagate saga evolves, the internet autists take on the glowies in this latest development in kiwifarms firsts.

More later.View attachment 2420784
Click to expand...
How the fuck does a fat retard coerced by a psycho 56% bitch to fuck his mom leading to glowing DDoSes?
 
Bucky Badger said:
As an newfag, what does it mean? we dead?
Click to expand...
I checked 5-6 pages to see if anyone answered you (there has been 100+ pages since I read this thread last). A warrant canary is a device used to inform the userbase if there have been legal requests (warrants, affidavits , subpeonas, etc) without exposing the site owner to legal liability. If any legal requests are made, Null will remove the page (i.e., a canary in a coal mine).
The Electronic Freedom Foundation said:
What is a warrant canary?

A warrant canary is a colloquial term for a regularly published statement that a service provider has not received legal process that it would be prohibited from saying it had received. Once a service provider does receive legal process, the speech prohibition goes into place, and the canary statement is removed.

Warrant canaries are often provided in conjunction with a transparency report, listing the process the service provider can publicly say it received over the course of a particular time period. The canary is a reference to the canaries used to provide warnings in coalmines, which would become sick before miners from carbon monoxide poisoning, warning of the danger.

How might a warrant canary work in practice?

An ISP might issue a semi-annual transparency report, stating that it had not received any national security letters in the six month period. NSLs come with a gag, which purports to prevent the recipient from saying it has received one. (While a federal court has ruled that the NSL gag is unconstitutional, that order is currently stayed pending the government’s appeal). When the ISP issues a subsequent transparency report without that statement, the reader may infer from the silence that the ISP has now received an NSL.

Why would an ISP want to publish a warrant canary?

“Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” – Justice Louis D. Brandeis.

We are in a time of unprecedented public debate over the government’s powers to secretly obtain information about people. The revelations about the massive NSA bulk surveillance program have raised serious questions about whether these powers are necessary, legal and constitutional. Secret surveillance violates not only the privacy interests of the account holder, but the speech interests of ISPs who wish to participate in these public debates.

Why should we care about publicizing secret legal process like national security letters?

As part of the reauthorization of the Patriot Act in 2006, Congress directed the DOJ Inspector General to investigate and report on the FBI’s use of NSLs. In three reports issued between 2007, 2008 and 2010, the IG documented the agency’s systematic and extensive misuse of NSLs.

The reports showed that between 2003 and 2006, the FBI’s intelligence violations included improperly authorized NSLs, factual misstatements in the NSLs, improper requests under NSL statutes, and unauthorized information collection through NSLs. The FBI’s improper practices included requests for information based on First Amendment protected activity.

In December 2013, the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies recommended public reporting—both by the government and NSL recipients—of the number of requests made, the type of information produced, and the number of individuals whose records have been requested.

As discussed below, NSLs are just one type of gagged legal process. Similar problems persist in other forms of secret process.

Is it legal to publish a warrant canary?

There is no law that prohibits a service provider from reporting all the legal processes that it has not received. The gag order only attaches after the ISP has been served with the gagged legal process. Nor is publishing a warrant canary an obstruction of justice, since this intent is not to harm the judicial process, but rather to engage in a public conversation about the extent of government investigatory powers.

What are some of the gagged legal processes that an ISP might receive?

An ISP may be gagged from stating it has received any one of several types of national security letters, orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (like the Section 215 orders used for the bulk call records program and the Section 702 orders used for the NSA’s PRISM program), or even an ordinary subpoena when accompanied by a gag order pursuant to the Electronic Communication Privacy Act. The government has issued hundreds of thousands of these gagged legal requests, but very few have ever seen the light of day.

What does the government say is permissible for recipients of gagged legal process?

The government allows ISPs to report receipt of gagged legal process in ranges of 1000, starting at 0, for six-month periods. So if an ISP received 654 NSLs, it could report 0-999. If the companies choose to report FISC requests and NSL requests combined, they can use ranges of 250, again starting at 0. For example, Apple reported receiving 0-249 national security requests in the first half of 2013 and AT&T reported 0-999 content FISC orders, 0-999 non-content FISC orders and 2000-2999 NSLs for the same period.

While the government-approved ranges all start at zero, publication of a range indicates that the ISP has received at least one, as otherwise the ISP would have no obligation to follow the government’s formula.

In contrast to the government-approved ranges, warrant canaries can be much more specific, making the it easier to determine what sort of legal process an ISP has been served with.

What’s the legal theory behind warrant canaries?

The First Amendment protects against compelled speech. For example, a court held that the New Hampshire state government could not require its citizens to have “Live Free or Die” on their license plates. While the government may be able to compel silence through a gag order, it may not be able to compel an ISP to lie by falsely stating that it has not received legal process when in fact it has.

Have courts upheld compelled speech?

Rarely. In a few instances, the courts have upheld compelled speech in the commercial context, where the government shows that the compelled statements convey important truthful information to consumers. For example, warnings on cigarette packs are a form of compelled commercial speech that have sometimes been upheld, and sometimes struck down, depending on whether the government shows there is a rational basis for the warning.

Have courts upheld compelled false speech?

No, and the cases on compelled speech have tended to rely on truth as a minimum requirement. For example, Planned Parenthood challenged a requirement that physicians tell patients seeking abortions of an increased risk of suicidal ideation. The court found that Planned Parenthood did not meet its burden of showing that the disclosure was untruthful, misleading, or not relevant to the patient’s decision to have an abortion.

Are there any cases upholding warrant canaries?

Not yet. EFF believes that warrant canaries are legal, and the government should not be able to compel a lie. To borrow a phrase from Winston Churchill, no one can guarantee success in litigation, but only deserve it.

What should an ISP do if the warrant canary is triggered?

If an ISP with a warrant canary receives gagged legal process, it should obtain legal counsel and go to a court for a determination that it cannot be required to publish false information. While some ISPs may be tempted to engage in civil disobedience, EFF believes that it is better to present the issue to a court, to help establish a precedent. If you run an ISP with a warrant canary and receive gagged legal process, contact info@eff.org if you would like help finding counsel.

How often should an ISP publish the warrant canary?

Various ISPs have published canaries on a wide range of schedules. To allow time to file a case and for the court to rule on the important legal questions, we suggest at least few months between the transparency report and the time period covered.

Who has issued warrant canaries?

A number of service providers have issued warrant canaries, including:

  • Apple (“Apple has never received an order under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act.”)
  • Electric Embers ("Since our beginnings in 2003, we have received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.")
  • Espionageapp.com (“We have not placed any backdoors into our software and have not received any requests for doing so. Pay close attention to any modifications to the previous sentence, and verify the signature of this "watch zone" by viewing the page source. Our public GPG key can be found using this ID: A884B988”)
  • Lookout (“Furthermore, as of the date of this report, Lookout has not received a national security order and we have not been required by a FISA court to keep any secrets that are not in this transparency report.”)
  • MagusNet (picture of a warrant canary with the statement, “No Warrants. No Searches, No Seizures [sic] at Magus Net, LLC.”)
  • Pinterest. (“National security: 0”)
  • Rise Up (“Riseup has not received any National Security Letters or FISA court orders, and we have not been subject to any gag order by a FISA court.”)
  • Rsync.net (“No warrants have ever been served to rsync.net, or rsync.net principals or employees. No searches or seizures of any kind have ever been performed on rsync.net assets . . . .”)
  • Tumblr (“As of the date of publication of this report, we have never received a National Security Letter, FISA order, or any other classified request for user information.”)
  • Vilain (“THE FBI HAS NOT BEEN HERE (watch very closely for the removal of this sign).”)
  • Wickr (“As of the date of this report, Wickr has not been required by a FISA request to keep any secrets that are not in this transparency report as part of a national security order.”)
Update April 21, 2014: Updated link and quote for Rise Up's policy, added Electric Embers.
(Source)
(Archive)
Click to expand...
Pointless Sperg said:
This entire thread must be nothing but trauma for @lemmiwinks
Click to expand...

Dumb beast said:
Despite having a cybersecurity agency, glowdad seems incredibly offline.
Click to expand...
He doesn't necessarily have to be an engineer or anything. His connections and security clearance are his most important assets for these companies.

I don't know if he is or isn't a cryptography expert, but generally these people are active in open-source because it is important for this area of tech. I checked around on GitHub (there are 5 Michael Janke's, but none appear to be him) and PLOS but did not see any references to his name.

I would not consider that definitive, especially since it was at like 3am but if you want to figure it out, research journals might be a good place to start.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Bucky Badger, In the Air of the Night, ToMendAndDefend and 13 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back