Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow a 4 sentence news article. How informative. The BigBlackCock news is a joke, I love how British people pretend it's so much better than any other country's news.


This is my main conspiracy theory here. I think they realize there's more side effects than they predicted with this rushed mRNA bullshit so they need to hedge their bets. If most people (95%+) are vaccinated, and they're still getting sick or having side effects, they can just blame the antivaxers. "Oh you must've gotten COVID from some CHUD in 2021 who didn't follow the rules and now you're paralyzed on the left side of your face. Sorryy!"
I saw the exact same thing in an image that was retweeted by someone skeptical of the vaccine: they theorized that the push to get everyone vaxxed is so that there can be no control group in this experiment, therefore they'll have a harder time proving adverse effects. Basically, if everyone is vaccinated, then we'll never truly be able to compare studies.
 
The comments are a goldmine
Would he defied Abbott if he was a Democrat? I have some doubts.

Btw, I guess it's ok for Dems to be anti-vaxx when Trump was president. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/msnbc-host-it-was-ok-be-anti-vaxxer-when-trump-was-president

MSNBC host Joy Reid conveniently explained away the fact that back in September and November 2020 she put out anti-vaccine statements, saying it was ok to do it then because Donald Trump was the President.



“I have taken a lot of heat for having said back in September that, if Donald Trump remained president, I wouldn’t trust anything that was coming out in terms of vaccines that he was offering, and that it was difficult to trust the CDC after he had warped it so thoroughly, and that, even if he wasn’t president, it would be difficult to restore that kind of trust,” Reid said recently.

Here’s an example of anti-vaxxer Reid back then:

During a broadcast last week Reid declared “I said that because, in my mind, a psychopath was president. And if a psychopath is telling you, this vaccine — which is really for my reelection — is what you should take, there’s a good reason not to trust that,” she continued.

“But now there’s not a psychopath in the White House,” Reid clarified.

She then asked Trump’s stranger hater niece Mary Trump “Do you think that there’s some way to shift, kind of, the attitudes of people who are just hesitant, based on the fact that, ‘Look, guys, there’s not a madman there now?”

“You can trust the government when it’s in the hands of someone sane,” Reid further added.
 
Just a reminder that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been suspended from Twitter for a week for saying that the vaccines do not stop the spread of COVID, even though that's literally what the director of the CDC said two days ago. But MTG is bad, therefore she is spreading misinformation because vaccines good!

Twitter MTG 2021-08-09_22-15.png

 
This is why going to a birth center with hippie midwifes seems more of a safe choice right now, though even there they would ask you about a flu shot.
Of course, there are other considerations besides vaccinations and masks, but it is really hard to trust anyone in medical profession right now, even though there are true and honest medical workers out there.
I do wonder about the secondhand effects of people like us losing any kind of trust in medical professionals or even developing an aversion. I live in a shitty-enough area that any doctor I see is going to be aggressive about vaccination and I have thus avoided medical care I really should be getting just because I don't want to deal with it and I know I'm going to actually explode on anyone who doesn't take no for an answer. I can't be the only one, and I wonder what that means for people like us in terms of say, getting cancer detected early enough to be treatable and the like.
 
Would he defied Abbott if he was a Democrat? I have some doubts.

Btw, I guess it's ok for Dems to be anti-vaxx when Trump was president. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/msnbc-host-it-was-ok-be-anti-vaxxer-when-trump-was-president
I really believed the coof was super serious until the BLM protests. Once the Democrats made excuses for super spreader events because they were for a "good cause", and acted like covid was magically able to detect that they people were "good" and not infect them, I stopped being afraid of the coof.

I 100% agreed with Dems back then that the vaccines couldn't be trusted -- not because they were "Trump vaccines" but because they were rushed. I haven't changed my mind about that. I caved and got the vaccine just to shut up my family, but I still think it is a bad idea and I wouldn't encourage anyone else to do the same. If someone wants to get it, that's their right -- but I'm absolutely 100% against mandates for an experimental vaccine that hasn't been tested nearly enough to say that it is actually safe long term. It's pure madness that we already have 70% of adults in the US (and who knows how many kids) at least partially vaccinated. If this vaccine does end up causing damage in the long term, we are fucked.
 
The comments are a goldmine
Yeah, I noticed that when checking news for my area. All the bootlickers are at the top of the comments, and you have to scroll reeeeeeally far down to see people calling anyone who imposes measures a tyrant. Is this a trick to get dissenters to believe they're alone or that their opinion is a minority and the majority rules?
 
I saw the exact same thing in an image that was retweeted by someone skeptical of the vaccine: they theorized that the push to get everyone vaxxed is so that there can be no control group in this experiment, therefore they'll have a harder time proving adverse effects. Basically, if everyone is vaccinated, then we'll never truly be able to compare studies.
The glowniggers at (((Pfizer))) terminated their own control group by vaxxxing them up nice and good after 6 months, for the public good of course.

Alright, the minister conference decreed that unvaccinated people need to be tested to do literally anything besides go to work, stay in their homes, or go to the supermarket if the incidence rises above 35. Also, from October on tests will not be free anymore.
If you want to do anything but be a worker drone, you'll either pay extra every single time, or you'll have to undergo a medical treatment even you don't want or need it.

Anyone recommend a good country to emigrate to? I cannot, with a clear conscience, remain and support this state any longer.
Nothing worth doing has anyone present to check your test results. Free yourself from the zogbot consumption matrix and enjoy the natural world.
 
Wow a 4 sentence news article. How informative. The BigBlackCock news is a joke, I love how British people pretend it's so much better than any other country's news.


This is my main conspiracy theory here. I think they realize there's more side effects than they predicted with this rushed mRNA bullshit so they need to hedge their bets. If most people (95%+) are vaccinated, and they're still getting sick or having side effects, they can just blame the antivaxers. "Oh you must've gotten COVID from some CHUD in 2021 who didn't follow the rules and now you're paralyzed on the left side of your face. Sorryy!"
I think it's not even side effects, just that the vaccine might be practically useless. So they need to shift the blame to the unvaccinated spreading the virus and creating more escape variants to explain why the vaccine doesn't work or require constant updates.
 
So now that it's schooltime in parts of the country, thousands of panicked parents are yanking their children out of the classroom and chimping out all over social media because muh kids can't be vaccinated.
I wonder how many of these people were the same people bouncing and squeaking over the fact virtual learning was less than ideal for K-12 students and that in-person learning had to return ASAP.

Btw, there's one more reason why people don't trust the CDC a lot.
The same thing is true with my State's health department and local media. Recently, the health department's COVID numbers are released in three-day aggregate totals and the media twists the numbers to make them sound as scary as possible. As an example, the most recent report I heard claimed there was 2700 new cases IIRC. Only after pausing did the newscaster state this was over a three-day span. And only after that was it mentioned that there were only eight deaths during that same 3 day period. The way it's presented, COVID sounds far more serious and ominous than if it was reported as 1 death out of every 337 cases over the previous three days.

It's even more of a pain in the butt because it's store by store. So I can go through one place just fine, then get stopped at the door of another when I need to shop at multiple places in the same mall.
The piecemeal mask requirements concern me. I believe I pointed out that all of the restrictions associated with my paying side gig downgraded from absolute requirements to recommendations that were up to personal preference.

With the concerns over COVID Delta, I can see myself having to contact sites in advance to see what if any restrictions they may have in place that go above and beyond any mandates from the locality, health department, state, etc. It's going to be a mess especially since some sites aren't quick to return confirmation calls/e-mails if they bother to do so at all. I can easily people being turned away if they don't have a mask and it wasn't communicated in advance that Site X requires anyone entering to wear one indoors.

asically, if everyone is vaccinated, then we'll never truly be able to compare studies.
Agreed. Those that can't get vaccinated for legitimate reasons such as health issues don't seem provide enough of a sufficient control group to understand the impact of vaccines on the average person.

I do wonder about the secondhand effects of people like us losing any kind of trust in medical professionals or even developing an aversion.
I see it as a double-edged sword. Someone who loses trust in a medical profession tends to be skeptical in my experiences. It can be good in that it allows them to think more for themselves and question anything that seems out of the ordinary.

Given that critical thinking is deemphazied and frowned upon at present, though, I can see the healthcare field doing more to double down on the "trust the science" narrative even though medicine is not an exact science in that different people respond differently to the same treatment. No disease has a single cure; COVID is no different even if the powers that be think otherwise.

I don't want to deal with it and I know I'm going to actually explode on anyone who doesn't take no for an answer.
It doesn't help that there's plenty of people who don't take no for an answer outside of COVID. I think it's gotten much worse over the past year and a half in terms of people being more persistent when they don't hear what they want.
 
Jesus, seeing all these comments of people's workplaces requiring the injection. Makes my heart hurt for you all, truly. I am very glad that I work from home, it was totally worth the significant wage cut to stay at home and not have co-workers to deal with, no bus rides every day (which will be even more fantastic come winter; I'll be cozy in my office with my coffee watching my SO trudge through the snow lol). I admit sitting at home is getting to me, though.

Was going to go on a boat cruise on the lake this weekend but I don't know if they're going to be requiring masks and I refuse to wear one. I also was making plans with a friend to go to Mexico next spring, but again the whole vax thing came up and reminds me once again of how much of our freedoms have been taken away. I've thrown in the towel and waving the white flag insofar as socializing for the rest of the year. :(

I am afraid once FDA approval moves through for the vax and as winter approaches, we're in for an even WILDER ride. Thankful we have this place to speak freely about this crime against humanity while simultaneously being entertained as we rot away within our collective four walls.

my niggas.
 
Free yourself from the zogbot consumption matrix and enjoy the natural world.
I wish I could just build a shed somewhere but I can't. Where am I supposed to go. In an American forest maybe but here they will find out about some "nut" living in the woods and I will be pulled out of my little shed by the popo. I wanna work but if they will force me to take it (in the future?) I will have to comply. I just don't wanna end up in the maelstrom of never ending vaccinations.

Also in: I found out that Andy "kill all grandma's" Cuomo resigned. LOL
 
Yeah, I noticed that when checking news for my area. All the bootlickers are at the top of the comments, and you have to scroll reeeeeeally far down to see people calling anyone who imposes measures a tyrant. Is this a trick to get dissenters to believe they're alone or that their opinion is a minority and the majority rules?
Yeah. I noticed the media's been going after res states like texas, my home state i live, saying cases are surging because abbot doubled down on not forcing people to wear mask and locking down. Considering my family thinks he's trying to kill everybody, I'm not surprised people on that video are wanting the unvaccinated to die while simultaneously crying about the "GOP NOT CARING ABOUT SAVING LIVES."
 
So, was the "we need to get 70% of the nation vaccinated" just a frog in boiling water argument? Because according to Biden himself, we got to his 70% although a couple weeks late. Now it's not good enough unless we get to 100%. So why wasn't the original goal just 100%? Was this always the plan or did something genuinely change? Like the Delta variant came out of nowhere and the CDC never expected another strand even though that's literally how every virus works?
 
So, was the "we need to get 70% of the nation vaccinated" just a frog in boiling water argument? Because according to Biden himself, we got to his 70% although a couple weeks late. Now it's not good enough unless we get to 100%. So why wasn't the original goal just 100%? Was this always the plan or did something genuinely change? Like the Delta variant came out of nowhere and the CDC never expected another strand even though that's literally how every virus works?
It's a manipulation tactic that works on several different levels.

1. If you out of the gate claim you're going to need 100% you're going to need to go straight for mandating the product, possibly risking early pushback even from people who would have otherwise been good goys for the reason below.

2. If you set the goal at a realistic level and institute an us vs them dichotomy a significant number of people will show up to just about anything you want because they want to own the trumpists/be good boys and girls.
2a. If you set the goal at a realistic level you can persuade otherwise hesitant people by dangling the carrot - come on goy, we're at 65% - do your part to get your life back.

3. Now that you have a significant part of the population pozzed you can really ramp up the us vs them dichotomy by blaming the evil redneck buckbreakers for refusing to Trust Science
 
So, was the "we need to get 70% of the nation vaccinated" just a frog in boiling water argument?
Yes.
really believed the coof was super serious until the BLM protests. Once the Democrats made excuses for super spreader events because they were for a "good cause", and acted like covid was magically able to detect that they people were "good" and not infect them, I stopped being afraid of the coof.
Same, man. I was shook as fuck right up until that happened and then I abruptly realized it was all fucking bullshit and did a complete 180.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back