Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

Mikoyan said:
This would require people to take action, who might be shouted down with SUPPORT THE COMMUNITY if they tried.

Ironically the most vengeful spergs wouldn't be deterred - continuing the cycle of the worst people in the fandom being the ones to drive change.
Click to expand...
It would also require the consumer protection orgs to give a damn... not likely on Terf Island.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
Shaka Brah said:
I cannot imagine this is legal in the UK, but furries are too poor and too retarded to sue.
Click to expand...
It's not legal. The vaccination can't be given to minors yet because of insurance and they don't know when the rollout will begin. So if 16+ have paid for the ticket and are being denied then there is no reason they can't go through their bank to get a refund the hard way.

Vaccine info sauce dropped today: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-58080232.amp


What is with the limey furries and stealing money from people who attend their events anyway? Didnt confuzzled take like 30% off the refunds for some bullshit reason?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Greywolf, Wheezy Asthmatic, Shaka Brah and 1 other person
camopattern said:
It's not legal. The vaccination can't be given to minors yet because of insurance and they don't know when the rollout will begin. So if 16+ have paid for the ticket and are being denied then there is no reason they can't go through their bank to get a refund the hard way.

Vaccine info sauce dropped today: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-58080232.amp
Click to expand...
I totally expect Barkade to use this as yet another excuse...

camopattern said:
What is with the limey furries and stealing money from people who attend their events anyway? Didnt confuzzled take like 30% off the refunds for some bullshit reason?
Click to expand...
It was weird. Hotel fees were refunded in full or furfags could donate them to the con (hundreds of Her Maj's poonds). Con attendance fee they kept a percentage or the ff's could donate the lot. Options varied from getting 50-70% back to getting nothing back.

"Sponsors" lost more than regular attendees because the sponsor fee was lumped in with the attending ticket for the refunds. So that was a gold plated "fuck you all!" to people deluded enough to pay extra for ... whatever it is that gets spent on. It's not like they'll tell you. "Top secret business, private members club, only for staff". It's like a furfag Freemasons.

As I've said before, it takes years for anyone who's not 'in the fucking group' to get from joining the con to actually getting a thankyou let alone a badge. But if you can suck dick you'll get pulled on straight away and given full staff privs, early reg at other cons, the works. You won't even have to do anything.

This is why the staff list is secret.. because there are so many "head of dept X -> is fucking -> head of dept Y" relationships it was looking skeevy (because it is). 200 staff too - maybe 60-70 actually do anything useful.

The only good thing is they beat JFTW ... that's the one that said the hotel wouldn't refund them until someone actually called the hotel ... and found out the con had already been refunded.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Aunt Carol, KiwiFuzz, The Rabbit Holes and 2 others
A truthteller said:
God's law is not man's law. Man's law cannot give anything that is good. God's law needs to be in you, in order to save your soul. Man's law cannot do that. Man's laws though it be kept, will not be able to keep you out of Satan's prison, where islamic law is practiced on the lost, over and over again, untill judgment day. Satan will laugh at you, thinking man made laws, will keep the person out of that prison.
Click to expand...
Go back to your own thread, dog fucker!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
A truthteller said:
Matthew 11:12 12And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force. The Kingdom of heaven is in tyhe furries, l The Devil hates that. The Devil wants to infect the furry mind with Satan's hatred. Love they that the church taught people to hate. The church takes Christ's name in vain.
Click to expand...
To be fair, @CIA Nigger really could use a little Jesus in his life.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
Greywolf said:
I totally expect Barkade to use this as yet another excuse...


It was weird. Hotel fees were refunded in full or furfags could donate them to the con (hundreds of Her Maj's poonds). Con attendance fee they kept a percentage or the ff's could donate the lot. Options varied from getting 50-70% back to getting nothing back.

"Sponsors" lost more than regular attendees because the sponsor fee was lumped in with the attending ticket for the refunds. So that was a gold plated "fuck you all!" to people deluded enough to pay extra for ... whatever it is that gets spent on. It's not like they'll tell you. "Top secret business, private members club, only for staff". It's like a furfag Freemasons.

As I've said before, it takes years for anyone who's not 'in the fucking group' to get from joining the con to actually getting a thankyou let alone a badge. But if you can suck dick you'll get pulled on straight away and given full staff privs, early reg at other cons, the works. You won't even have to do anything.

This is why the staff list is secret.. because there are so many "head of dept X -> is fucking -> head of dept Y" relationships it was looking skeevy (because it is). 200 staff too - maybe 60-70 actually do anything useful.

The only good thing is they beat JFTW ... that's the one that said the hotel wouldn't refund them until someone actually called the hotel ... and found out the con had already been refunded.
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ i thought our cons in the US were bad but I guess those Brits need all the money they can get with that Brexit shit lol.

Is the one in Scotland the same shit too? I haven't heard anything about that one
 
looks like something happened at megaplex con outside of it being a hotbox breeding ground for covid.

screenshot-twitter.com-2021.08.11-09_15_18.png
archive.md

‎✪ TESS ‎✪ on Twitter: "Is it really too much to ask a con to not let…

archived 11 Aug 2021 16:14:58 UTC
archive.md archive.md

1628698591006.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Aunt Carol, No Life Prince, Reshiram Battle.mp3 and 10 others
Lion said:
looks like something happened at megaplex con outside of it being a hotbox breeding ground for covid.

View attachment 2434647
archive.md

‎✪ TESS ‎✪ on Twitter: "Is it really too much to ask a con to not let…

archived 11 Aug 2021 16:14:58 UTC
archive.md archive.md

View attachment 2434650
Click to expand...
Sexual assault is, unfortunately, not uncommon at conventions. The problem here lies in the response of the convention to the sexual assault that occurred during their event, and lady furs, who already feel ostracized and alienated among furries because “omg boobs are icky!!!,” are seizing this opportunity for a furry “Me Too” movement that’s been handed to them on a silver platter.

Conventions are often caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to requests like Tess made. Yes, as private events, they can choose who they accept registrations from. They can even ban people for no reason at all. But when they start to curate their membership like that, they have to take responsibility for conducting the research when folks won’t volunteer the information. And they can become liable for misinformation that gets leaked to the public.

It’s complicated, but no less complicated than a vaccine requirement.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Aunt Carol, Tennis-Ball-Tony, Cat Phuckers and 4 others
Sintharia said:
Sexual assault is, unfortunately, not uncommon at conventions. The problem here lies in the response of the convention to the sexual assault that occurred during their event, and lady furs, who already feel ostracized and alienated among furries because “omg boobs are icky!!!,” are seizing this opportunity for a furry “Me Too” movement that’s been handed to them on a silver platter.

Conventions are often caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to requests like Tess made. Yes, as private events, they can choose who they accept registrations from. They can even ban people for no reason at all. But when they start to curate their membership like that, they have to take responsibility for conducting the research when folks won’t volunteer the information. And they can become liable for misinformation that gets leaked to the public.

It’s complicated, but no less complicated than a vaccine requirement.
Click to expand...
It really shouldn't be controversial to refuse/revoke registration of registered sex offenders or people convicted of violent crimes when you're running a so-called "family friendly" con. That goes beyond hearsay and #metoo, someone being put in a list or having a rep sheet like that is more serious than "omg BlueWoof pinched my ass!".
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Aunt Carol, Digital Thunder, Reshiram Battle.mp3 and 9 others
considering how long it took for most mainstream cons to finally ban growly, i'm not surprised megaplex didn't do anything. to be fair expecting furry cons to do anything that's outside of banning wrong speak or bad thought is a lot.

i don't know why they don't go to actual hotel security instead of con security larpers.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Aunt Carol, s0mbra, Digital Thunder and 1 other person
Lion said:
looks like something happened at megaplex con outside of it being a hotbox breeding ground for covid.

View attachment 2434647
archive.md

‎✪ TESS ‎✪ on Twitter: "Is it really too much to ask a con to not let…

archived 11 Aug 2021 16:14:58 UTC
archive.md archive.md

View attachment 2434650
Click to expand...
I like how furries seem to think someone reviews and runs background checks on every single person who registers for their con, and that you could just give security a "list" of sex offenders to "keep an eye on".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Aunt Carol, round robin, S.C.U.D. and 8 others
JFKdestroyer said:
I like how furries seem to think someone reviews and runs background checks on every single person who registers for their con, and that you could just give security a "list" of sex offenders to "keep an eye on".
Click to expand...
I'd imagine that it can't be that hard to run a name through a database and see if your potential attendee is a diddler.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Reshiram Battle.mp3 and Cat Phuckers
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Aunt Carol, Shaka Brah and Cat Phuckers
first con since covid and it’s already going about as well as you’d expect. sexual harassment, and disease spreading at a furry convention? sounds like the usual.

megaplex’s response seems like the bare minimum, though. how brave of them to ban sex offenders from their convention. you’d think that would have already been in the rules. 🤔
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Oughtism, Reshiram Battle.mp3 and Cowboy Cat
Lion said:
looks like something happened at megaplex con outside of it being a hotbox breeding ground for covid.

View attachment 2434647
archive.md

‎✪ TESS ‎✪ on Twitter: "Is it really too much to ask a con to not let…

archived 11 Aug 2021 16:14:58 UTC
archive.md archive.md

View attachment 2434650
Click to expand...
I mean, when it comes to shit that actually happens at the con, they really CAN'T do anything without putting the con at liability of getting sued. That's why they tell you to call the police.

Oh wait, ACAB, I forgot. Get fucked faggots.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: good pussy, s0mbra, round robin and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back