Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I think it does mean genocide since you need people to particapet and yes volunteer for it
True, but I really do think asshats like the Malcolm X fetishist in the OG tweet really do believe that there are militarized, jack booted, state sanctioned, turbo murderers dragging blacks out of their homes at night like it's the Purge ( no that doesn't mean the police :story:). I swear they get off on these fear fantasies. Like look at Tariq Nasheed's Buck Breaking bullshit, there is no historical evidence or relevance, but there was a whole lot of in depth white on black buttfucking.
 
Imagine female dwarves having a huge revolution where they started dressing like women, with it being treated openly like the dwarven women coming out as transsexual because of Dwarvish gender norms. (Multiple books involving the city watch, starting with Feet of Clay I believe.)

Imagine the villain of one of the books literally being a female dwarf noble who had a slow mental breakdown because she couldn't bring herself to embrace the new gender expressions while all kinds of other dwarven women were. (That would be The Fifth Elephant.)

Imagine a novel where the big twist at the end is literally every single named character was BIG AIR QUOTES "trans," including the villains and their enablers. (Monstrous Regiment, although it's more of a Mulan situation.)

Not saying Pterry would include random troonery in his books, and no, all of those examples you mention make perfect sense as to being the kind of insane bullshit the wokies would want him to cover in the way they'd want him to cover. After all, Terry Pratchett never won a Hugo, the official woke-left literary badge of honor, because he was too busy writing good books instead of writing tranny coomer propaganda to bludgeon people over the head with.

Not like amazing hugo award winning novellas like "If you were a dinosaur, my love," which was all about having two random brown faggots talk about how awesome it would be if one of them was a dinosaur so they could kill disgusting straight white men, or the multiple "queers love X" where X is whatever fandom the author was trying to infiltrate that year.

Which is why any discussion about Pterry and Transsexuals is absurd. They ignored the fact that Pterry was covering this for decades, because he was doing it with finesse and actual nuance, and they don't want that. They want coomer AGP/HSTS propaganda that says YAS SLAY KWEEN THAT 350 POUND MAN IS CLEARLY A STUNNIN AND BRAVE WAMYXN and anything less than that, anything written with any more talent than that, is beyond them.
I completely disagree with you. When i was reading those books i didn't feel they are about trans. Dwarfs thought gender/sex is irrelevant and it was only humans assumeing they are all male. For dwarfs... They were dwarfs. Its gold that mattered not sex. So female showing up their gender was imo seen as a"slut" more than trans. At least that was my vibe when i read them. Never in my life i assumed this struggle was anything but in favour of fighting FOR feminity, not against it.

All the female characters were shown as proud and strong and feminine in their own way.

Maybe my interpretation of this is wrong and im missing the point, but personally i don't see anyway transess has any place in diskworld. Prachett did wrote about many issues, feminism, racism, xenophobia jesus even fat acceptance but never have i felt that he wrote about guys chopping their dicks off and spinning in dresses.
 
Last edited:
True, but I really do think asshats like the Malcolm X fetishist in the OG tweet really do believe that there are militarized, jack booted, state sanctioned, turbo murderers dragging blacks out of their homes at night like it's the Purge ( no that doesn't mean the police :story:). I swear they get off on these fear fantasies. Like look at Tariq Nasheed's Buck Breaking bullshit, there is no historical evidence or relevance, but there was a whole lot of in depth white on black buttfucking.
probable black panther fantasies too
 
1628700710307.png

1628700749168.png

1628700762170.png

1628700783373.png

If all men disappeared for a day.
 
True, but I really do think asshats like the Malcolm X fetishist in the OG tweet really do believe that there are militarized, jack booted, state sanctioned, turbo murderers dragging blacks out of their homes at night like it's the Purge

Oh, if only. I often say I'd want these delusional freaks to be sentenced to live in the horribly racist world of their mental illness, which is true. Sometimes I wish I could live there too, though, because then I could be the one putting the jackboot into their smug face.
 
If all men disappeared for a day.

Oh if they had their wish, they'd really notice it. But not for the bad stuff that's gone, the good stuff that goes on that they take for granted. The lack of goods and food being shipped via all forms of transportation. The trash that didn't get picked up, the plumbing that didn't get fixed, the rodent and bug infestations that went unchecked, the sewage pipes that stayed backed up, the HVAC units that stayed broken, the construction that stopped, the car accidents that remained blocking traffic.

Now that I think about it, men should take a day off, no make that a week off, eh better make that a month to really drive the point home for them to stop taking shit for granted and kick them off their high horses.

And even if men did decide to go on a worldwide strike, most guys still wouldn't do it. Because a lot have this thing called responsibility instilled into them. "If I don't do it, who will?" is what a lot of guys think and what drives them to do some of the dirtiest, shittiest jobs in the world that keep it turning, while these harpies live in the lap of luxury.
 
Last edited:
Oh, if only. I often say I'd want these delusional freaks to be sentenced to live in the horribly racist world of their mental illness, which is true. Sometimes I wish I could live there too, though, because then I could be the one putting the jackboot into their smug face.
In a perfect world we'd be stuffing Shaun King into a locker right now.
 
Now that I think about it, men should take a day off, no make that a week off, eh better make that a month to really drive the point home for them to stop taking shit for granted and kick them off their high horses.

If all the men got temporarily raptured for a month the majority of women in the 1st world would straight up die. Mostly from the largest population centers burning to the ground, mass starvation when the shelves are bare, and no functioning infrastructure. Maybe some nuclear strikes and fallout when some diversity hire colonel launches missiles because there's no Midol left in the base dispensary.

Besides the massive cleanup effort, men would probably be greeted by a much more appreciative and humbled population of female survivors.
 
I completely disagree with you. When i was reading those books i didn't feel they are about trans. Dwarfs thought gender/sex is irrelevant and it was only humans assumeing they are all male. For dwarfs... They were dwarfs. Its gold that mattered not sex. So female showing up their gender was imo seen as a"slut" more than trans. At least that was my vibe when i read them. Never in my life i assumed this struggle was anything but in favour of fighting FOR feminity, not against it.

All the female characters were shown as proud and strong and feminine in their own way.

Maybe my interpretation of this is wrong and im missing the point, but personally i don't see anyway transess has any place in diskworld. Prachett did wrote about many issues, feminism, racism, xenophobia jesus even fat acceptance but never have i felt that he wrote about guys chopping their dicks off and spinning in dresses.

I'm not familiar with Terry Pratchett, but I'd give a very high chance of him supporting trans stuff and continuing to support it in the Current Year, simply by virtue of him being a fantasy author.

Most of whom would at least claim to support trans people. And they probably all believe that they do. They're almost all progressives. And to them, supporting trans just means supporting people to be their true and authentic selves. If they have any nagging doubts about the sinister side of transness, like the coercion of children, then they either keep these things to themselves, or they think these things are so rare that they're not even worth talking about.

(Being in a progressive echo chamber will do that to you, when every "authoritative" source of information paints trans in such a positive light, and any opposition to trans ideology comes from "far-right" people they wouldn't want to talk to anyway.)

Remember that noted transphobe J. K. Rowling also supports trans people. She even said in the essay that got her cancelled that trans women are in some ways more oppressed than women. If anything, her cancellation was for not going far enough, for drawing a line in sand and saying she would only support them up to a point.

And while Pratchett may not have written about guys chopping their dicks off, he also wouldn't have needed to. You can just write about someone wanting to be a different gender, and half the people who desire trans representation will see it in this character (the other half will insist that the character isn't trans enough, and needs to be transed up further). And since it's fantasy, you can always use some kind of magical plot device to change someone's sex (which is pretty much how trans people view HRT).

Our Witches Are Different.png


A quick scan of TVTropes would imply (correct me if I'm wrong) he believed the differences between genders are largely social. People who think this are very easily conned into thinking their beliefs equate to gender being entirely social. Of course, it's possible the example mentioned about Eskarina's magic is merely symbolic of a woman breaking the proverbial glass ceiling, But even if he'd lived to 2021, I doubt Pratchett would be such a sperg that he'd go out his way to say you can't interpret it also as a metaphor for being trans.
 
Oh come on, everything about Batman and the Bat-family is fucking gay. It's why making Tim Drake bi is a mistake, because bisexuals don't read Batman titles, because they're a complete sausage-fest and the only femmes in there look like drag-queens.
Hell some of Batman's rouges gallery were the gayest things ever conceived. Rainbow Raider for example.
 
I'm not familiar with Terry Pratchett, but I'd give a very high chance of him supporting trans stuff and continuing to support it in the Current Year, simply by virtue of him being a fantasy author.

Most of whom would at least claim to support trans people. And they probably all believe that they do. They're almost all progressives. And to them, supporting trans just means supporting people to be their true and authentic selves. If they have any nagging doubts about the sinister side of transness, like the coercion of children, then they either keep these things to themselves, or they think these things are so rare that they're not even worth talking about.

(Being in a progressive echo chamber will do that to you, when every "authoritative" source of information paints trans in such a positive light, and any opposition to trans ideology comes from "far-right" people they wouldn't want to talk to anyway.)

Remember that noted transphobe J. K. Rowling also supports trans people. She even said in the essay that got her cancelled that trans women are in some ways more oppressed than women. If anything, her cancellation was for not going far enough, for drawing a line in sand and saying she would only support them up to a point.

And while Pratchett may not have written about guys chopping their dicks off, he also wouldn't have needed to. You can just write about someone wanting to be a different gender, and half the people who desire trans representation will see it in this character (the other half will insist that the character isn't trans enough, and needs to be transed up further). And since it's fantasy, you can always use some kind of magical plot device to change someone's sex (which is pretty much how trans people view HRT).

View attachment 2435090

A quick scan of TVTropes would imply (correct me if I'm wrong) he believed the differences between genders are largely social. People who think this are very easily conned into thinking their beliefs equate to gender being entirely social. Of course, it's possible the example mentioned about Eskarina's magic is merely symbolic of a woman breaking the proverbial glass ceiling, But even if he'd lived to 2021, I doubt Pratchett would be such a sperg that he'd go out his way to say you can't interpret it also as a metaphor for being trans.
Im sorry maybe i just don't see this. I don't want to be keep this sperging up but no, she was not trans. She was allowed to be finally a women/girl in a charge of the magic. It was called EQUAL RITES for a reason. Why the fuck you want so hard them to be a trans? She was a girl denied of her skills... She was not a man?
 
A quick scan of TVTropes would imply (correct me if I'm wrong) he believed the differences between genders are largely social. People who think this are very easily conned into thinking their beliefs equate to gender being entirely social. Of course, it's possible the example mentioned about Eskarina's magic is merely symbolic of a woman breaking the proverbial glass ceiling, But even if he'd lived to 2021, I doubt Pratchett would be such a sperg that he'd go out his way to say you can't interpret it also as a metaphor for being trans.
The main difference between Pratchett and 90% of what is being cranked out at the moment is he was not quite so overt with his real world comparisons. While there are obvious one equivalents there are much less clear ones.

Dwarf women for example are encourage to keep their feminine identity concealed, only exposed between a dwarven partner and it very clearly calls out dwarf identity attitudes as akin to religion. So a religion where women are encouraged towards attire that completely conceals their feminine qualities, only revealed between them and their chosen partner. What real world religion could possibly have anything you could compare to it? He never overtly made that comparison because there are many other things it can be compared to too but it's one of the ones you could make. As you say, he would be unlikely to deny the trans metaphor because that is a possible interpretation as with Equal Rites.

However as was posted earlier in the thread he is not overly simple with what makes a character one of the villains. For example he does not make those who chose to embrace that part of dwarvern culture as evil either. His villains are those who strip the opportunity to be able to choose.

For a more directly SJW equivalent there's "The Campaign For Equal Heights" a bunch of busybody humans who campaign for the rights of the more diminutive citizens such as dwarves. While I might need to double check to make sure I neither hallucinated these nor am remembering them incorrectly their demands over the course of the books have included;
Only dwarves be allowed to investigate dwarf crimes
1.5 x the number of dwarves should be in the city watch than humans to make up the height disparity
That dwarves should not be allowed to move to the city and send money home because that perpetuated a sterotype, irrespective of the dwarves themselves being fine with it

They also branch out to fight for the rights of gnomes in other books which goes worse. "The [Campaign for Equal Heights] was always ready to fight for the rights of the differently tall, and was not put off by the fact that most pixies and gnomes weren’t the least interest in dressing up in little pointy hats with bells on when there were other far more interesting things to do. All that tinkly-wee stuff was for the old folks back home in the forest - when a tiny man hit Ankh-Morpork he preferred to get drunk, kick some serious ankle and search for tiny women. In fact the CEH now had to spend so much time explaining to people that they hadn’t got enough rights that they barely had any time left to fight for them."

It was always made clear this group was to be pointed to and laughed at and those they claimed to fight for often disliked them more than anyone else. They were the SJWs of the Discworld and the books laughed at them.

Also Pratchett was, while critical of corrupt police forces, fairly pro-police given the major focus on the Watch across a lot of the books. And very contemptuous of people interfering with the police with zero practical experience but a desire to interfere on the grounds of "we know what the people we have no interaction with want from a police force we have no understanding of."
 
Last edited:
"I'm not liberal. I'm just bitter."

That stayed with me. Eventually we would later have a falling out and lose contact. I wasn't too surprised to find out she would later get a B.A. in African-American Studies and became a very rabid lesbian feminist black nationalist. Perhaps our falling out was a blessing in disguise.
I brought up the clip before and it makes the best comparison those types are like Louis CK's daughter, see he had a comedy bit about how fucked up little girls are psychologically compared to boys. One of his daughters broke a toy she had I believe it was a doll and she was offered a replacement but she didn't want it rather she wanted to see one of her sisters dolls broken just so said sister would know how it felt even though she had nothing to do with the situation.
 
Back