US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
XYZpdq said:
I think that one claim of the dead fatty is some internet guy joke like Sam Hyde doing everything? was there a subsequent dead journo claim?
Click to expand...
Hmm. I may have fallen for a fake image, I cant seem to find confirmation, but then I wouldnt put it past them to cover this shit up, every CNN search I see on twitter is that idiot woman and the "peaceful "Taliban.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: FlappyBat, Exterminatus, Clockwork_PurBle and 2 others
Meat Target said:
Then, maybe what follows will not be the end of libtards, but the Dems will abandon their neoliberalism, have their Tea Party movement, which culmanates in a genuinely left-wing candidate?

After all, the GOP should never have survived Bush 43.
Click to expand...
You would think after 2016 after they lost to Trump but they instead double down with that identity politics bullshit.

I only see their tea party happening after Biden/Harris both leave.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Exterminatus, Gensou Hadou and 2 others
Michael Wade said:
Hmm. I may have fallen for a fake image, I cant seem to find confirmation, but then I wouldnt put it past them to cover this shit up, every CNN search I see on twitter is that idiot woman and the "peaceful "Taliban.
Click to expand...
tbf this is LITERALLY the fog of war so getting a few wires crossed is understandable
Gehenna said:
I covered that a while back. Basically, they had a series of strict criteria they -had- to follow or everything would fall apart from the word go. Harris was literally the only candidate to check them all.
Click to expand...
I still say Val Demings would have been a better pick than Kamala
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Yamma Damma and AnotherPleb
Gehenna said:
I actually can answer this. The answer is No.

The VP had to fit a few criteria, some less obvious than others.

1: They had to be female.
2: They had to be non-white, the darker the better.
3: They had to be in a weak starting position so that they have to rely on the puppetmasters to stay in power.
4: They had to have presidential ambitions despite the above.
5: They had to be ethically skewed to accept the Corpse President.
6: They had to be legally clean, depriving Republicans of any serious ammo.

Stacey Abrams violates 6 for sure, debatably 4. The problem is they needed a candidate who fit this EXACT criteria. And there was only one option.
Click to expand...
See above for me finding that post.
GuntPunt said:
They aren't replacing Biden with Kamala until the midterms are done, because if they pull it before, it'll make 2010 look like a joke in terms of Republican gains.

Biden is a absolutely unremarkable person, which is good because they can slide things under the rug because noone will give a shit.

Kamala is the least popular VP since the 70s. Literally only Spiro Agnew was less popular, because he was getting his ass impeached in the biggest scandal in modern American history at the time. She would also become the 2024 front runner by default, and would arguably lose the election much easier than if Biden was in, "fortification" nonwithstanding.

Why the fuck did they choose Kamala again?
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: GuntPunt
shitshow.PNG
wow4.PNG

archive.ph

Taliban commander who gave victory speech from presidential palace wa…

archived 17 Aug 2021 02:04:14 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Luck Skeleton, KoopsInk and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: Yamma Damma and FlappyBat
Cuckoman said:
Biden decided he wanted to give a speech and have a photo-op on 9/11/21 for his legacy
so "fuck you sandniggers, the deal is off, I got a photo-op to plan"

That is what happened. This all is due to Biden wanting a photo-op for his legacy.
Click to expand...
Wait a second…

Biden is always going back on his word. He constantly wrapped up in semantics so he’s always in the right. He’s really bad with money. He constantly shifts the blame to others to say that he did nothing wrong, and he is obsessed with his legacy.

Is Joe Biden the DSP of presidents?:stress:
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Luck Skeleton, Chad Holdenford and 14 others
You know, I either watched or listened to the news all day today. While I'm hardly a foreign policy expert, I'm pissed.

I don't know that we could've stopped this from happening if Biden had stuck to Trump's timeline. I think that Afghanistan is pretty much ungovernable and the Taliban is about the only organization brutal enough to pull it off (which is a sad reminder that the world isn't a warm and fuzzy place).

That being said, our actions over there have required the assistance of the locals and when I see those same people clinging to the sides of departing cargo jets (and then falling to their deaths) it strikes a chord with me. If my options were taking my chances desperately clinging to a C-17 or certain execution at the hands of the Taliban, I don't know which I'd choose.

I'd like to think that maybe our hasty retreat demoralized the Afghan military and America's welching on the terms of our withdrawal helped the Taliban recruit. Certainly, our leaving behind military equipment didn't work in the Afghan Army's favor. It's a what-if but I think there might be some merit to it. Then again, maybe they just don't care or are too afraid of the enemy to fight.

Regardless, we're going to inevitably leave people behind that we shouldn't have and they will suffer brutal reprisals as a result. That's a function of the disorganized mess and general incompetence of the people running this show and that can't really be denied. Maybe if the administration hadn't had their heads completely up their ass about the Taliban's capabilities, the army wouldn't have become demoralized at the Taliban's rapid advance. Maybe we would've had more time to get the people who helped us out.

Watching this president, whom I wouldn't trust with a potato (much less a potato gun), get up on stage three days after he said this wouldn't be another 'Fall of Saigon', blame everyone but himself and give us platitudes about how we need to apply international pressure against the Taliban to better the conditions for those we abandoned pisses me off. We all know that's not going to work.

I get that this is a long war and that it's long past time to go, it's also our responsibility to not leave the place in utter chaos and this administration's ineptitude has caused us to do just that.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Yamma Damma, argostug, KoopsInk and 13 others
Gehenna said:
The VP has power, more than most people suspect. For example, they are the tiebreaker in the senate.

A tiebreaker with a 50/50 senate.

Kamala can hold the entire senate hostage if she wants. And that's not even touching on the fact she is VP to a president who is about 5 steps from the rgave.

Correct, and that will be -fun- to watch given the absolute lack of political capital and the sheer -infighting- it would cause.
Click to expand...
Especially if Pelosi does lose the gavel and the Republicans gain a majority in the Senate. Imagine that VP seat sitting empty while McCarthy is next in line and old man Biden is over a year older and more demented. 2024 in this scenario would be Kiwi gold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Luck Skeleton and Clockwork_PurBle
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Luck Skeleton, naaaaiiiiillllll!!! and 6 others
Nypical Haterade Comment said:
Wait a second…

Biden is always going back on his word. He constantly wrapped up in semantics so he’s always in the right. He’s really bad with money. He constantly shifts the blame to others to say that he did nothing wrong, and he is obsessed with his legacy.

Is Joe Biden the DSP of presidents?:stress:
Click to expand...
Don't forget he literally only won because he faced off against someone more hated. Joe Biden really is the DSP of Presidents for how easy it was for him to get as far as he did.

America really is screwed if the last two presidents we have can be compared to lolcows.
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager, make_it_so and Glowing In The Streets
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back