- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
I love how you state this ignorance so confidently. No, Koreans did not domesticate dogs for food. They might have started eating them well after mankind as whole domesticated them, and even started breeding them for that, but dogs as an identifiable offshoot of wolves were not invented by fucking Koreans.Koreans domesticated dogs for food.
Moreover, humans did not evolve alongside dogs.
"Sometime during their evolution, after they and the wolves parted ways, dogs began a coevolutionary journey with humans. The two species share a remarkable degree of social tolerance and flexibility. As we've evolved together, we co-opted one another's social attachment systems to create a powerful interspecies bonding mechanism — or, more simply, to become best friends."
How Dogs and Humans Grew Together | Accumulating Glitches
Why do we have such a special bond with dogs? The answer may be in their evocative "puppy-dog" eyes.
www.nature.com
Further reading, unless you wish to remain ignorant:
archive
and
"Dogs are more than man's best friend: They may be partners in humans' evolutionary journey, according to a new study.
The study shows that dogs split from gray wolves about 32,000 years ago, and that since then, domestic dogs' brains and digestive organs have evolved in ways very similar to the brains and organs of humans.
The findings suggest a more ancient origin for dog domestication than previously suggested. They also hint that a common environment drove both dog and human evolution for thousands of years."
archive
It very much is. No matter how firm the footing of your principles, moral grandstanding is always embarrassing.
And you are doing an awful lot of it.
And what are you doing right now, post-merge hypocrite? Zero ability for self-reflection and critical thinking.
Last edited: