@Wool tries to defend his toddlercon collection

Bunny Tracks said:
It is now, dude, considering you're the one that brought it up in the first place.

You posted CP (not just any CP-TODDLER CP. It might be drawn toddler CP, but it's still toddler CP nonetheless) to test a site's "free speech" claims which is already really fucking retarded and then when you get asked where you got the CP from, you immediately reeing about how it's "nOt On ToPiC, gUyZ!!!", and try crying to the mods to help save your retarded, pedophillic ass.

Like it, or not, shithead, you're the topic now considering you're the one that started all this shit, and the more you try to deflect, evade, and backseat-moderate the more suspicious you look.
Click to expand...
"Homosexual man attempt on discovering new source of "CP" for their collection, foiled"
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: BallsDeepInAi, stcstnr, MemoriesOfMemphis and 37 others
Taylor Swift's Ghostwrite said:
Picking the place of defense being the MLP cum jar which wasn't even in the circle of discussion is interesting to me. Do you feel personally targeted by those being made fun of @Wool ?

Also don't try deflecting your sick toddler porn on other people. It won't work here.
Click to expand...
I am not replying where to get toddlercon porn.
 
  • Deviant
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: stcstnr, Autistic Joe, ICraveDeath and 22 others
Wool said:
Do you understand the legality of drawn porn
Click to expand...
See if you disavowed this and kept with the story of how this was about testing the limits on the site, you might have an angle.

If a person jerks it to a drawing of a dog being fucked by a human, its a fair conclusion they are into fucking dogs. If you jerk it and enjoy pics of drawn kids in sexual situations then its a fair conclusion you're into kids.

"Its not illegal to enjoy drawn porn of children" isn't the win you think it is.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: BallsDeepInAi, Kermit Jizz, stcstnr and 37 others
Wool said:
Do you understand the legality of drawn porn
Click to expand...
Do you?
1629863135766.png
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: BallsDeepInAi, 𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔, Gun Safety and 30 others
Taylor Swift's Ghostwrite said:
See if you disavowed this and kept with the story of how this was about testing the limits on the site, you might have an angle.

If a person jerks it to a drawing of a dog being fucked by a human, its a fair conclusion they are into fucking dogs. If you jerk it and enjoy pics of drawn kids in sexual situations then its a fair conclusion you're into kids.

"Its not illegal to enjoy drawn porn of children" isn't the win you think it is.
Click to expand...
Where did I say I am jerking off to it.
Quote it.

You are seeing dogwhistles like schizos do faces.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Autistic Joe, ICraveDeath, Autismo Pinochet and 14 others
Wool said:
Where did I say I am jerking off to it.
Quote it.

You are seeing dogwhistles like schizos. do faces.
Click to expand...
You didn't say you jerk off to it but you brought up the cum jar when nobody else had. I'm not an expert but when someone spontaneously brings up cum in this context it feels a little weird.

It was a weirdly specific example that had nothing to do with the topic.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Autistic Joe, ICraveDeath, Cheerlead-in-Chief and 15 others
Bunny Tracks said:
Do you?
View attachment 2477948
Click to expand...
Let's ignore the fact that the ruling of legal pornography varies from Country then state then county then city, where you can easily assume most don't even give a fuck since most countries do not have a stance on fictional porn AND that is actually inforced with regularity.
Do you realize that even using that image, I could just not be committing a crime if minds and I were in California and you work under the logic that you think you know where I live and that it's illegal there and/or that it's illegal to share those files to Minds host.

Taylor Swift's Ghostwrite said:
It was a weirdly specific example that had nothing to do with the topic.
Click to expand...
It's a perfect example of degeneracy and people pointing anything suggestive that sticks out, instead of the main topic, like I tried to do.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: stcstnr, Autistic Joe, ICraveDeath and 13 others
Wool said:
If that's the case then I am just going to wait and see if other jannies take the wheel or not and talk about minds and my reasons in depth.
However I cannot do that if another mod comes in and lays the banhammer on me for going about this more than it's appropriate.
Click to expand...
Die you fucking Barneyfag.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: BallsDeepInAi, Iceland Heavy, ICraveDeath and 17 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back