Blake Howard Hobbs / Laura Hobbs / CommieDickGurl / laurizza / LAURAZILLA100s / EndGCTP / CaliPizzaGirli520 / CrazeDawg - It's ma'am the sequel, incel-to-troon pipeline exhibit A, threatens TERFs and blames them for him being sexually assaulted

I think the thing is we are dealing with more advanced technologies that are potentially very self sustaining and a massively uneven distribution of wealth. If we took some control of automation, ai, tech giants and the gluttony of their executives we wouldn't need to necessaeily have a command economy and the goal for me as an anarchosyndicalist is eventually communist structures will have run their course and can be phased out mostly.

I might be able to give you a better answer later.
I just don't get how new factories or farms or any kind of production that requires a large upfront investment of resources would work. I hate late stage capitalism as much as anyone, and I'm not trying to smugly reddit up the place and ree at your politics, I just want somebody to explain that part of ancom to me like an idiot child because it's the only proposed system of economics where I can't actually understand how it's supposed to work, and you're the first ancom I've ever met on the internet who hasn't immediately blocked me for being an unsafe murder nazi.
 
I just don't get how new factories or farms or any kind of production that requires a large upfront investment of resources would work. I hate late stage capitalism as much as anyone, and I'm not trying to smugly reddit up the place and ree at your politics, I just want somebody to explain that part of ancom to me like an idiot child because it's the only proposed system of economics where I can't actually understand how it's supposed to work, and you're the first ancom I've ever met on the internet who hasn't immediately blocked me for being an unsafe murder nazi.
Under an anarchist society achieved through communism people would more collectively over time run smaller farms and factories and would be given the assistance they need to effectively watch over the initial investments which over time would become more collectively owned instead of just growing endlessly. You would have as a result people generating extra income and being able to participate not only in more sustainable labor but they would increasingly own these factories and farms that are gobbled up by huge corporations who have all their decisions made by executives and lobbyists who typically get way too much of the pie and fuck everything up.

I was reading something about how farms in particular benefit from having farmers on the ground. In Anarcho Communism you would have more small farms and small factories instead of big glutinous ones and the decision making is moved down. This includes control over decision making of automation and access to machines and to the education which a lot of people are sorely lacking. This should be done democratically but we need to get people really united at redistributing wealth from the very top because they are just going to keep letting things get worse.

Eventually, base level workers are able to own more of their production means and have more say according to how much they are willing to participate.
 
Grrrr Blake angry! Blake doesn't the world reminded he's a woman hating shit bag when he's been enjoying pet troon status. He thought it was so secure! Grrrr.

Maybe go accuse a celebrity of raping troons because he thinks you don't pass and get it all out, sweetheart. You'll feel better.

Super glad you rallied from your sads, tho.
 
Under an anarchist society achieved through communism people would more collectively over time run smaller farms and factories and would be given the assistance they need to effectively watch over the initial investments which over time would become more collectively owned instead of just growing endlessly. You would have as a result people generating extra income and being able to participate not only in more sustainable labor but they would increasingly own these factories and farms that are gobbled up by huge corporations who have all their decisions made by executives and lobbyists who typically get way too much of the pie and fuck everything up.

I was reading something about how farms in particular benefit from having farmers on the ground. In Anarcho Communism you would have more small farms and small factories instead of big glutinous ones and the decision making is moved down. This includes control over decision making of automation and access to machines and to the education which a lot of people are sorely lacking. This should be done democratically but we need to get people really united at redistributing wealth from the very top because they are just going to keep letting things get worse.

Eventually, base level workers are able to own more of their production means and have more say according to how much they are willing to participate.
That much I get, and I think it'd work perfectly fine for farms and small mines and manufactories where you can add to the productive capacity bit by bit, but like, if I'm part of a syndicate working a tuna boat and our tuna boat sinks, what do we do at that point?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Angry Canadian
Under an anarchist society achieved through communism people would more collectively over time run smaller farms and factories and would be given the assistance they need to effectively watch over the initial investments which over time would become more collectively owned instead of just growing endlessly. You would have as a result people generating extra income and being able to participate not only in more sustainable labor but they would increasingly own these factories and farms that are gobbled up by huge corporations who have all their decisions made by executives and lobbyists who typically get way too much of the pie and fuck everything up.

I was reading something about how farms in particular benefit from having farmers on the ground. In Anarcho Communism you would have more small farms and small factories instead of big glutinous ones and the decision making is moved down. This includes control over decision making of automation and access to machines and to the education which a lot of people are sorely lacking. This should be done democratically but we need to get people really united at redistributing wealth from the very top because they are just going to keep letting things get worse.

Eventually, base level workers are able to own more of their production means and have more say according to how much they are willing to participate.
what’s the scale that you imagine this happening on?

is this only feasible once we have trans world order universal government or do you think it’s possible to adapt to syndicalism within already existing states?

I can’t imagine a system with such little opportunity for growth being able to legitimately compete with other states.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Angry Canadian
That much I get, and I think it'd work perfectly fine for farms and small mines and manufactories where you can add to the productive capacity bit by bit, but like, if I'm part of a syndicate working a tuna boat and our tuna boat sinks, what do we do at that point?
Industries would be able to make decisions with one another through regional and national federation and would have a very democratic congress in the interest of seeking cooperation rather than competition. So basically your collab would then decide with your supplier and create solutions for this particular problem in a cooperative manner.. I can not speculate what the solution to that would be though because that would be putting myself on a kind of platform. The decisions would have to be made between the fisher men/women and the suppliers as well as anyone else effected in this interaction depending how/if it effects them.
what’s the scale that you imagine this happening on?
I would eventually want it on a global scale but I expect it would take a long time and it would require people volunteering into this system to make it work in a way that people are equals rather than in a hierarchal way.
is this only feasible once we have trans world order universal government or do you think it’s possible to adapt to syndicalism within already existing states?
Anarchists don't want to so much create new forms of government so to form some authoritarian order would go against the very tenants. It would take cooperation but this would need to be started at the grassroots level. I will argue that we might have to begin by using some of the infrastructure already available and my desire for it to be global kind of oversimplified things.
I can’t imagine a system with such little opportunity for growth being able to legitimately compete with other states.
That's really the hardest part to figure out but I'm just one person. Overcoming this setback would take the collective ideas of a lot of people who I don't necessarily know better than anyone what it is.
 
Industries would be able to make decisions with one another through regional and national federation and would have a very democratic congress in the interest of seeking cooperation rather than competition. So basically your collab would then decide with your supplier and create solutions for this particular problem in a cooperative manner.. I can not speculate what the solution to that would be though because that would be putting myself on a kind of platform. The decisions would have to be made between the fisher men/women and the suppliers as well as anyone else effected in this interaction depending how/if it effects them.
So essentially we'd all be paying duties to some kind of union with a capital fund? That makes a lot more sense than how I pictured it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nertz
I would eventually want it on a global scale but I expect it would take a long time and it would require people volunteering into this system to make it work in a way that people are equals rather than in a hierarchal way.
we should just introduce a kiwi farms sticker system but into reality

also we need the equivalent of a profile page to vandalize in case someone acts out of line
Anarchists don't want to so much create new forms of government so to form some authoritarian order would go against the very tenants. It would take cooperation but this would need to be started at the grassroots level. I will argue that we might have to begin by using some of the infrastructure already available and my desire for it to be global kind of oversimplified things.
I was fucking around at the “trans world order” part, I imagine anarchists wouldn’t really like a new world order trans or otherwise

thanks for the reply though :)
 
>Me returning to this thread after someone liked my reply.
what a fucking mess.jpeg
 
Industries would be able to make decisions with one another through regional and national federation and would have a very democratic congress in the interest of seeking cooperation rather than competition. So basically your collab would then decide with your supplier and create solutions for this particular problem in a cooperative manner.. I can not speculate what the solution to that would be though because that would be putting myself on a kind of platform. The decisions would have to be made between the fisher men/women and the suppliers as well as anyone else effected in this interaction depending how/if it effects them.

I would eventually want it on a global scale but I expect it would take a long time and it would require people volunteering into this system to make it work in a way that people are equals rather than in a hierarchal way.

Anarchists don't want to so much create new forms of government so to form some authoritarian order would go against the very tenants. It would take cooperation but this would need to be started at the grassroots level. I will argue that we might have to begin by using some of the infrastructure already available and my desire for it to be global kind of oversimplified things.

That's really the hardest part to figure out but I'm just one person. Overcoming this setback would take the collective ideas of a lot of people who I don't necessarily know better than anyone what it is.
The problem with your proposition is very simple ; this kind of utopian fantasy relies on 2 main things, (if you don't want authoritarianism and harsh, violent dictatorships.)

1. Good will.
2. Cohesion.

Good will isn't forced, it's earned. Good will is usually earned through social cohesion. Social cohesion is achieved by some kind of meting out of social mores and norms. Social mores and norms are usually cultivated to benefit the longevity and prosperity of society.

Anarchy is by virtue opposed to this. The above is not authoritarian per se, but it relies upon social order and structure.

When you don't have goodwill in this circumstance, people like you, sorry to say, are the first to be taken out. You're, by virtue of your anti-social lifestyle, in this circumstance, not conducive to productivity.

This is why communism can only survive in the vacuum of dictatorships, violence and authoritarianism.

Say, for the social good, for the good of the "herd" you would need to give up being a troon. Goodwill cannot be cultivated when you're going to Chick-Fil-A with your dick out. For the social good, you'd probably be heavily medicated until you behave in a socially conducive manner.

These are all realities. You're American, so I don't expect you to really feel the gravitas of that from experience, because I don't think Americans - no matter how much you "hate" your country, truly understand just how free you really are. No American is truly oppressed - atm, anyway, but that's subject to change.

You're already living in a proto Anarchist society - you're as close to Anarchy as any life form can ever truly be.
Yes, you have governments and rules, but as far as humans go, your freedom is barely impeded.
The fact you're allowed to swan around looking like a painted whore, with you dick bulging, driving around in cars where your "girlfriend" has an axe... I mean... no one is stopping you.

No one is stopping you from existing in a community that is communal. No one is stopping you from doing what you please.

No one is censoring your voice online or in the public square. You aren't cut off from government support, the media is on your side, you aren't prevented from leaving your country or home, you aren't prevented from working (yet) - you have everything at your disposal.
Like I said - the American Constitution is as close to an Anarchist's paradise as is humanely possible.

Even in Anarchist "societies" (See : CHAZ/CHOP) you end up with hierarchies. You end up with hierarchies in communism. Communism is always implemented in an extremely oppressive way, because it's the only way it can be enforced to survive.

This is what I find so amazing about Ancom/Communist Americans. You really have no idea what you have. Anything you "want" further would rely on bloodshed and dictatorship to obtain and maintain.
 
Can I give you some random constructive criticism here @CammieDoxGirl ?

I see what look you’re trying to go for with your makeup and I can appreciate that, but the dark heavy makeup with all that black on your fair skin ends up looking really harsh and not flattering.

Makeup is about enhancing features, and for you it’s both about softening your features and enhancing them.

Your face is naturally very angular which reads male. All of the straight lines you’re doing with brows and blush enhances that in a way I don’t think you want.

Super dark straight brow with white under the brow bone is just going to enhance your brow ridge for example, plus yeah it does give some Frankenfurter feels.

Soften all that makeup up girl, pick lighter colors that flatter your natural coloring and don’t make it look like you’re wearing an obvious mask. You’re trying to simulate roundness in your face and features- curves, not straight lines.

(and a dark or bold lip with heavy/dark eye makeup with strong blush usually doesn’t look good on anyone past 30, not just you, but I would stop doing that)
 
Ga
Can I give you some random constructive criticism here @CammieDoxGirl ?

I see what look you’re trying to go for with your makeup and I can appreciate that, but the dark heavy makeup with all that black on your fair skin ends up looking really harsh and not flattering.

Makeup is about enhancing features, and for you it’s both about softening your features and enhancing them.

Your face is naturally very angular which reads male. All of the straight lines you’re doing with brows and blush enhances that in a way I don’t think you want.

Super dark straight brow with white under the brow bone is just going to enhance your brow ridge for example, plus yeah it does give some Frankenfurter feels.

Soften all that makeup up girl, pick lighter colors that flatter your natural coloring and don’t make it look like you’re wearing an obvious mask. You’re trying to simulate roundness in your face and features- curves, not straight lines.

(and a dark or bold lip with heavy/dark eye makeup with strong blush usually doesn’t look good on anyone past 30, not just you, but I would stop doing that.
Yeah with the makeup she does rn she looks more drag than fem. No makeup-makeup look would probably suite her or what you just described.

Edit: Seeth @Angry Canadian
 
Last edited:
@Angry Canadian is an angry lesbian who I hope continues to cope and seethe because without their spergery I wouldn’t have found this thread.
I get more angry incel vibes from him than angry TERF. He may sound like a TERF at times but that's because he steals other people's talking points.
 
View attachment 2479776
Let's wait for this current mushroom girl scandal to subside before we make an informed judgement on hobbs

Shut your filthy mouth post merger and read the whole thread because I already made that mistake, judge for yourself.

And reaction memes aren’t really considered high effort or looked highly on here because generally they don’t contribute anything.

Maybe stay with fungus girl until you lurk more outside that.
 
Shut your filthy mouth post merger and read the whole thread because I already made that mistake, judge for yourself.

And reaction memes aren’t really considered high effort or looked highly on here because generally they don’t contribute anything.

Maybe stay with fungus girl until you lurk more outside that.
OP needs to be updated to include this.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: CammieDoxGirl
Back