Russell Greer / @theofficialinstaofrussellgreer grammar spergs

artilleryfroth said:
Thank you. There is no point in going through the rest of the document and pointing out all of the hideous errors. There are members here who will defend every one of them, for several obvious reasons. I’ll leave it now, but note that if I were the client, I wouldn’t pay for this filing.
Click to expand...
Go read a Dog Bite filing and calm down.
 
artilleryfroth said:
Thank you. There is no point in going through the rest of the document and pointing out all of the hideous errors. There are members here who will defend every one of them, for several obvious reasons. I’ll leave it now, but note that if I were the client, I wouldn’t pay for this filing.
Click to expand...
You pay lawyer for law. I don't know why you consider that grammar makes an legal argument more legally sound, but that is not the case. Everyone makes grammatical errors, judges included. There is a big difference between grammatical error by, lets say an author, and a lawyer, and if you can't see that, I'm sorry, but the issue is with you. There is also a difference between law and grammar. A grammatical mistake does not mean a legal one, no matter how much you want to equate the two
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre
Useful_Mistake said:
You pay lawyer for law. I don't know why you consider that grammar makes an legal argument more legally sound, but that is not the case. Everyone makes grammatical errors, judges included. There is a big difference between grammatical error by, lets say an author, and a lawyer, and if you can't see that, I'm sorry, but the issue is with you.
Click to expand...

Says you who says “lets say” when it should be “let’s say”. You would be kicked out of court for that if you were a lawyer.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Disagree
Reactions: wristwatchswisswatch, DarkAlien, cromit and 6 others
artilleryfroth said:
Says you who says “lets say” when it should be “let’s say”. You would be kicked out of court for that if you were a lawyer.
Click to expand...
Can you stop shitting up the thread with your pedantic nitpicking?
You veer off track more than Russ.

Anyway props to Skordas for pointing out Russ once again does not state a claim. It's a great callback to the last time they faced off.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: StinkySnack, Useful_Mistake and Andrew Neiman
artilleryfroth said:
Says you who says “lets say” when it should be “let’s say”. You would be kicked out of court for that if you were a lawyer.
Click to expand...
Instead of addressing my point, you moved to grammar. I am only lead to believe that this means that you cannot, in good faith, address my points.

That being said, it is curious that you refuse to clarify what country you allegedly practice in. It can't be in Europe, nor US. I don't believe Canada is much different either.

Anyway, like I mentioned before, your arguments at best are in bad faith. A grammatical mistake does not mean a legal one, no matter how much you want to equate the two. I don't know why you are so allergic to reality of law practice. but grammatical mistakes happen, by both judges and lawyers.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: StinkySnack and Andrew Neiman
artilleryfroth said:
Says you who says “lets say” when it should be “let’s say”. You would be kicked out of court for that if you were a lawyer.
Click to expand...
Depends on how you're using it. English isn't my first language and even I know the difference between the two. One is third person and the other is a contraction.
Useful_Mistake said:
Instead of addressing my point, you moved to grammar.
Click to expand...
He's not even good with grammar, I don't know why he's even trying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back