Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Status
Not open for further replies.
832313bf0b9fbcb4cf4581413e78f398.jpg

LOL that happened to me too.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SolidusChris
Retweet.


Dobson's being oppressed, you gaizes.
Pffft. You can't oppress straight white cis males. SJW rule #1
You got that wrong, he's oppressed on behalf of the people who simply couldn't get shit done about their social standing without white cis men taking the helm in their activism.
New art, aka Dobson cannot draw faces.

View attachment 49482
Right forearm is broken.
Also, good lord, that chat is a fucking cringefest.
I kind of want to see Dobson draw a vagina. The Lovecraftian horror his lack of anatomy knowledge will spawn shall be a thing of legend.
If his CattyN images are anything to go by, he also really blows at drawing nipples. He always drew them in a really ugly way.
For all the braincells it would cause to commit sudoku, I would like to see him draw some naked chicks... mainly cause there, he can't just hide his bad understanding of anatomy and this inability to have people and objects interact.
 
Dobson continuing the trend of deciding something is bad without actually watching said thing.


The internet has almost unanimously praised it as a great series opener and a fine episode.

So Dobby is wrong again

Plus the master's current incarnation is female and well received. Dobson could get an equality boner if he wasn't so prejudiced against Steven Moffat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The internet has almost unanimously praised it as a great series opener and a fine episode.

So Dobby is wrong again

Plus the master's current incarnation is female and well received. Dobson could get an equality boner if he wasn't so prejudiced against Steven Moffat.
OT: The episode was above average. It felt a bit too rushed, at times too silly for the overall atmosphere. And I cheered as...

...Clara was exterminated... I just don't like her character, at all. Also Davros is apparently Voldemort now.

Anyway Dobson can guess as much as he wants, at least he's not claiming anything. Btw. I watched a few MGSV Videos on YT. I see why some people have a problem with Quiet, but I still don't get the extend of the outrage. The entire thing struck me as extremely silly... And since we are talking about Kojima here, that shouldn't be a surprise.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Captain_Asshole
The internet has almost unanimously praised it as a great series opener and a fine episode.

So Dobby is wrong again

Plus the master's current incarnation is female and well received. Dobson could get an equality boner if he wasn't so prejudiced against Steven Moffat.
I guess Dobs, being the phony SJW that he is, assumed that the episode was "problematic", when it was brought up by someone. See, it's so rare for SJWs to acutally praise something, that by going "I guess it sucked" is 'playing it safe'. First instinct is to be offended and then later decide why.
Too bad Dobs sucks so hard at being a mindless femidrone that he can't foretell what the crowd's reaction to certain stuff will be, so he's never going to be at the front rows of whatever it is SJWs think they do, he's always going to be stuck somewhere in the far rear, shaking his fist and going "DAMN STRAIGHT!" whenever Wu or Anita proclaim something to be "problematic". Not only does it take him some time to jump into bandwaggons, but he's also lingering on so much longer than anyone else of his precious SJW crowd since he always has to rely on someone else telling him what to be offended about next.
 
Even tiny little things serve as a great window into how someone thinks.

When confronted with 'did you see (x)?' someone looking to make a reasonable argument, or a proper analysis of media or whatever would effective always say "No I have not. Do you mind giving me the details so I can look into this further" or "No I have not, perhaps I should if you think there's something of interest in it."

And when confronted with that same question, a pretentious cockhead who's fishing for oppression points like Dobson or Wu will immediately answer "NO I HAVE NOT BUT I'LL ASSUME IT'S PROBLEMATIC ANYWAY AND NEVER LOOK INTO THIS FURTHER. OPPRESSION! OPPRESSION! #KILLALLMEN #DONATETOMYPATREON #LISTENANDBELIEVE"

I'm guessing it's going to be, as Genzed put it, "mock outrage" over
killing off a character who was female?
 
Even tiny little things serve as a great window into how someone thinks.

When confronted with 'did you see (x)?' someone looking to make a reasonable argument, or a proper analysis of media or whatever would effective always say "No I have not. Do you mind giving me the details so I can look into this further" or "No I have not, perhaps I should if you think there's something of interest in it."

And when confronted with that same question, a pretentious cockhead who's fishing for oppression points like Dobson or Wu will immediately answer "NO I HAVE NOT BUT I'LL ASSUME IT'S PROBLEMATIC ANYWAY AND NEVER LOOK INTO THIS FURTHER. OPPRESSION! OPPRESSION! #KILLALLMEN #DONATETOMYPATREON #LISTENANDBELIEVE"

I'm guessing it's going to be, as Genzed put it, "mock outrage" over
killing off a character who was female?
Nah, she isn't dead. The way they shot her indicate that she will come back next episode. Besides, Moffat is too much in love with her.
 
Nah, she isn't dead. The way they shot her indicate that she will come back next episode. Besides, Moffat is too much in love with her.

As if that's going to stop the mock outrage brigade. These are the people who get offended over something with no context at all and then refuse to look at context.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Too Many Crooks
I put too much effort into troll art.

View attachment 49661
Dob - A blue bear who won't shut up

The lack of glasses is highly problematic. It sexualizes and infantilizes him too much. I mean, his face is completely naked in a way that is usually associated with youth and anti-intellectualism.

In other words, I find your drawing too pretty to look at, you monster.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back