US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I have never wanted to see a president get JFK'd more than I do Biden. The man is the worst president I've ever seen in my life, and I lived through Clinton, both of the Bush presidencies, Obama, and Trump and not one of them did I ever wish to see dead. But Biden? I'd fucking love if some brass-balled sumbitch fed that feckless shitstain a .50 MG round.
As much as I agree that Biden sucks, I DO NOT want him assassinated. The damn optics would be through the roof as MAGA, Trump supporters, and Conservatives would all be blamed for it. Then the 2nd amendment would be questioned again. The DNC would make people sympathize with Biden because the general public wouldnt want to be seen with a "party who assassinates people." It would honestly be a win for Dems if Biden were to be killed.

As @GuntPunt said let time be his killer. I prefer the suffering he's having to endure as his body fails him and he begins falling apart.
 
As much as I agree that Biden sucks, I DO NOT want him assassinated. The damn optics would be through the roof as MAGA, Trump supporters, and Conservatives would all be blamed for it. Then the 2nd amendment would be questioned again. The DNC would make people sympathize with Biden because the general public wouldnt want to be seen with a "party who assassinates people." It would honestly be a win for Dems if Biden were to be killed.

As @GuntPunt said let time be his killer. I prefer the suffering he's having to endure as his body fails him and he begins falling apart.
Time, dementia, the coof...

Also never rule out suicide. While I don't think Biden actually cares for the dead, these sort of things tend to haunt you.
 
As much as I agree that Biden sucks, I DO NOT what him assassinated. The damn optics would be through the roof as MAGA, Trump supporters, and Conservatives would all be blamed for it. Then the 2nd amendment would be questioned again. The DNC would make people sympathize with Biden because the general public wouldnt want to be seen with a "party who assassinates people." It would honestly be a win for Dems if Biden were to be killed.

As @GuntPunt said let time be his killer. I prefer the suffering he's having to endure as his body fails him and he begins falling apart.
Good point. Either way, his administration has made me rethink some of my views.
I used to believe the idea of Hell was absolutely unjust. What sort of monstrous God would send people to Hell forever for finite crimes? Then it occured to me, it's not the actions that get you sent to hell, it's your character.

I don't know if there is a God, or a Heaven, but one thing I'm damn sure of is that if there is a Hell that piece of shit Biden is fucking going there when he dies. And he's going to deserve every moment of hellfire.
 
Emily Miller has been going off in the last hour or so.
View attachment 2493189

Any actual evidence for this?
Some journalists still exist and stake their crediblity through what they publish and their sources they keep connected with. Don't know too much about Emily but a variety of stations is usually a good sign. this also goeswith Lara Logan who I think is the most accurate journalist in regards to the middle east.

1630295736058.png

 
Some journalists still exist and stake their crediblity through what they publish and their sources they keep connected with. Don't know too much about Emily but a variety of stations is usually a good sign. this also goeswith Lara Logan who I think is the most accurate journalist in regards to the middle east.

View attachment 2493311
Well, even if she's not trying to be dishonest, she's still getting her info from another source. That source very well could be dishonest.
 
Mitt Romney really wants to be 2012 again.

"Gosh this looks horrible for Biden, and I'm ostensibly on the other side, but the Uniparty says we can't have any more supple child sex slave anuses, cocaine, and adrenochrome unless Trump loses in 2024. I know, I'll blame BOTH!" - Le Fake Mormon Fuckwit
 
Well, even if she's not trying to be dishonest, she's still getting her info from another source. That source very well could be dishonest.
you are correct but the only thing we fact check her source as is 'retired Spec Op'..which we know there are retired spec ops on the ground and we know the whitehouse/state department have been cock blocking them because they'd rather people die /be held hostage than have someone else 'do it for them'. They feel like they can spin a hostage situation into 'look how great Biden is' than 'a bunch of retired Vets came in and saved the day because Biden failed'.

I guess I'm just spit balling but I wager money I'm 100% right.
 
This is about 10 billion times worse than Saigon and Iran Hostages combined, holy fuck. Atleast those were in seperate presidencies.

Shit, I am weighing who was worse in foreign policy: LBJ, Dubya, or Biden. LBJ and Bush 2 are essentially just wasteful long war starters. Dubya at least made the appearance of caring about the effort and America.

So who is worse: LBJ, the guy who escalated Vietnam on a lie to make profit on the war or Biden, the man who threw away 20 years and trillions on a photo op, and drone-striked children while calling them terrorist masterminds to look like he was doing something?

One is an obvious choice, but the other is so reprehensible and ongoing that I can't decide, especially since Biden isn't done with Somolia, Iran or Syria yet.
 
you are correct but the only thing we fact check her source as is 'retired Spec Op'..which we know there are retired spec ops on the ground and we know the whitehouse/state department have been cock blocking them because they'd rather people die /be held hostage than have someone else 'do it for them'. They feel like they can spin a hostage situation into 'look how great Biden is' than 'a bunch of retired Vets came in and saved the day because Biden failed'.

I guess I'm just spit balling but I wager money I'm 100% right.
To that, I'd point out that "retired Spec OPs" in this context very likely means a glow nigger.
 
Ah, the good ol' Obama Era control of a theater.

Imagine get caught in an ambush, under fire, but you CAN'T RETURN FIRE until someone from the Pentagon checks with the lawyers and then makes sure he can't get in trouble for it, then MAYBE you'll be able to shoot back.

Micromanagement on a shocking level.
 
This is about 10 billion times worse than Saigon and Iran Hostages combined, holy fuck. Atleast those were in seperate presidencies.

Shit, I am weighing who was worse in foreign policy: LBJ, Dubya, or Biden. LBJ and Bush 2 are essentially just wasteful long war starters. Dubya at least made the appearance of caring about the effort and America.

So who is worse: LBJ, the guy who escalated Vietnam on a lie to make profit on the war or Biden, the man who threw away 20 years and trillions on a photo op, and drone-striked children while calling them terrorist masterminds to look like he was doing something?

One is an obvious choice, but the other is so reprehensible and ongoing that I can't decide, especially since Biden isn't done with Somolia, Iran or Syria yet.
Joe seems to be doing a speedrun of every major foreign policy fuckup of the last half of the 20th century.
 
This is about 10 billion times worse than Saigon and Iran Hostages combined, holy fuck. Atleast those were in seperate presidencies.

Shit, I am weighing who was worse in foreign policy: LBJ, Dubya, or Biden. LBJ and Bush 2 are essentially just wasteful long war starters. Dubya at least made the appearance of caring about the effort and America.

So who is worse: LBJ, the guy who escalated Vietnam on a lie to make profit on the war or Biden, the man who threw away 20 years and trillions on a photo op, and drone-striked children while calling them terrorist masterminds to look like he was doing something?

One is an obvious choice, but the other is so reprehensible and ongoing that I can't decide, especially since Biden isn't done with Somolia, Iran or Syria yet.
Biden doesn't get a pass on starting long wars either, he was on the Senate Foreign Relations committee for decades and supported and voted for both Iraq and Afghanistan, as much as his shills are trying to make him out to be an embattled dove doing the Right Thing and getting us out. The only foreign intervention in the last few decades he didn't support was the Gulf War, which was naturally the most successful one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back