@NakiNoRyu
I have no idea where you hear or read this but I'd love to see it. Could use a laugh these days
I can't name you exactly where I heard it first, but wasn't that what all the fuss about delta was about? The huge panic about it being possibly resistant against the vaccines? Now, of course, if it is a variant that originated in unvaccinated communities you could blame those, but right now blame doesn't really change the fact that it's there. And if the vaccines don't help against covid finding hosts to mutate in, why take them? The way it is now I see getting the jab as a purely personal choice, not one that'd benefit the people around me that much. At least not much more than masks and distance do already.
>Why is covid different
The world may never know.
If any of that is true I'd actually be willing to reconsider my position.
I dont know what to tell you man. Virology has been around a long time, im sure there's a simple textbook that could be had. Even highschool textbooks have this infomation.
If it's that simple I'm sure you could explain it instead of talking down to strangers? Also, I'm sorry, but after the Hogan Experience I kinda have a hard time taking anything seriously that refers to "the science" like it's an uniform entity that shan't be questioned. Besides, it didn't even answer why covid apparently develops to be more deadly :<
@Techpriest
@Parasaurolophus we’ve answered a lot of your concerns with a lot of other people way earlier in this thread. Virology and epidemiology are complicated, dense topics. It’s easy to not understand or get wrong info from people about them, especially in regards to how vaccination in a population works, the effectiveness of the vaccine, and other such topics. I highly recommend you look into what the CDC has on its website (CDC.gov) regarding vaccination for plenty of things, not just Covid. There’s tons of legitimate, peer reviewed and published research on vaccination, which admittedly can and is usually dry as hell to read through, but there’s popular history on the Smallpox vaccine, and how we slowly killed a virus that’s caused about 1/10 deaths or so in human history.
Thank you for your advice and concern. You're right that those are no easy topics and especially now, with how politicized everything around covid is, you probably should take everything you hear with a grain of salt. Maybe it is better to get your information from unbiased textbooks that were published before December of 2019. Honestly, I wouldn't even trust the CDC right now, at least not on its own... Oh! I guess I just found what makes me a conspiracy theorist to other people^^
What I do know about smallpox, though, is that it was a human disease, right? That we were that successful in eradicating it was partially thanks to it not having a chance to escape to wildlife, mutate there, and then come back to us. Covid, on the other hand, is different in that regard, and it's questionable if we could repeat the same with this disease.
If we should, even. Maybe I'm pessimistic, but I don't think covid is ever going away and instead of continuously fighting it, maybe it's better to find ways to live with it instead. Vaccinate those who need it, keep the economy going and keep developing new vaccines for new variants. At least as long as covid isn't getting deadlier than it is now.
Edit since I genuinely didn't see your post before submitting:
@Standardized Profile
Your understanding is incorrect, probably due to sensationalist headlines from the mass media regarding the Delta variant. COVID vaccines reduce the number of people infected and the total amount of viral replication in the host, reducing the opportunities for mutation and transmission. A recent paper from
Norway determined vaccination is about 65% effective against infection by Delta. In the
UK, they're saying it's 75-88% effective against a symptomatic Delta case. No infection, or only a very minor or asymptomatic infection, means the virus isn't reproducing very much. That means fewer opportunities for mutation and/or transmission.
The media publicized a finding that some people who were vaccinated at some point could have as many virions as an unvaccinated person, but that doesn't tell us how long they were infected or how many virions were produced during that period. The maximum point on a curve doesn't tell us what the area under the curve is. And when you consider the whole population, instead of individual breakout cases, you have to factor in the vaccine effectiveness described above.
Yes, that is exactly what I was referring to! Probably a bit dumb to assume when all the news outlets report the same there must be some truth to it, at least nowadays. Thank you for your patience to explain the situation in such a polite manner.
So vaccines aren't perfect but they do retard mutations by killing off enough of the virus that in a majority of cases it doesn't spread or mutate. Alright, that is actually a good point. Still, 12-35% possibility of it doing so in bodies that are supposed to be equipped against it still appears a little bit scary to me, to be honest. I'm not that educated in biology, but my understanding is that the percentage that does survive probably is better suited to get by in vaccinated people?
"Usually" occurs over an evolutionary timescale. In shorter periods, viruses can become more deadly. For example, SARS-CoV-2 was harmless to humans until 2019, when it mutated and started killing us. In 2021, the Delta variant emerged which may be worse. And a virus only has to keep the host alive long enough to transmit itself to other people, which SARS-CoV-2 does wonderfully.
Of course. Thanks again for explaining it. Though, the way you word it it still sound pretty open if it is actually worse? Guess that means we have to wait and see?