Chinese Nationalists / Wumaodang (五毛党) / 50 Cent Party - CHINA NUMBAH WAN

Yes, unlike the Kuomintang, the CCP had no material or logistic support, especially not from any very large, very nearby Socialist republics that might have some extra equipment and experienced officers left over from a recently-won war. This image is a forgery.
And it's not like the KMT had bled itself dry against the IJA while Mao spent the war engaging in banditry.
 
LMAO, this is rich considering that China spends loads of money preparing to invade Taiwan but never actually following up to it and invading the island. Both the Nationalist and Communist Party fought together during WW2 meanwhile Taiwan was under Japanese occupation during that period so I don't understand what they're trying to convey here. The Wumaos are only proving that Taiwan is its own separate country with a history different to the Mainland.
 
Last edited:
And it's not like the KMT had bled itself dry against the IJA while Mao spent the war engaging in banditry.
The funniest thing about it was that the 1st phase of the civil war, is that the communists only ever took important land from mostly isolated regions (with the exception being Ruijin):
1623022802702.png

1623022448841.png

(Red is the warlords territory, blue is KMT)
On top of that KMT had wide spread corruption problem & it's alliance with the former warlords were not on the best terms by the time the 2nd phase of the civil war broke out.

If these CCP lickers really wanted to drive an "epic own" at the Taiwanese they could just quote Chiang himself:
"After the fall of Kaifeng our conditions worsened and became more serious. I now realized that the main reason our nation has collapsed, time after time throughout our history, was not because of superior power used by our external enemies, but because of disintegration and rot from within"
 
So why doesnt China just like, take Taiwan?
Would be the ultimate "do it faggot" to the trannies of the west.

Hell they got away with unleashing a bioweapon, real or imagined, without any real repurcussions.
 
LMAO, this is rich considering that China spends loads of money preparing to invade Taiwan but never actually following up to it and invading the island. Both the Nationalist and Communist Party fought together during WW2 meanwhile Taiwan was under Japanese occupation during that period so I don't understand what they're trying to convey here. The Wumaos are only proving that Taiwan is its own separate country with a history different to the Mainland.
If you read stuff written during the war for popular consumption in America there's also a lot about how "Formosa" is an impregnable fortress-island and how it would be the Japs' last hold out.

I'm not so sure that's changed a lot with modern Taiwan.
 
Too much to snip, but this is an ice cold take about historical reenactments.
 
Found this wumao tankie on instagram. What's interesting is this post, which is unusual from someone like him.

While commies have favored the Palestinian side of the Israel-Palestine conflict for decades, they usually don't have issues with the "chosen people", as can be seen by the comments. I guess he's never read (((Karl Marx's))) early life section.

Apart from that, it's your typical commie bullshit like "America raycis 2 pee oh cees", "China stronk" and "Look, Americans being hypocrites". Apparently, that justifies China to do the same.
 
The contents of this image aren't entirely wrong, though. If some warlord's army comes through your land, takes all your crops and rapes your wife daughters and possibly you, and then some other warlord's army comes through, kicks out the other guys, only takes half your crops and doesn't rape anyone, which one are you more likely to support? In the early days of communism, before people knew what it really was, the leaders were often successful in garnering support from the public by just being moderately less assholish than the royalists or warlords they were replacing.
 
A Day of No Significance on r/Sino: a Play in 4 Picture and 3 Acts
SOURCE
Holy fuck, the amount of copium that's being ingested is four times the lethal dose. The amount of cope and seethe I see in these wumaos is just enormous. These aren't the Imperial dynasties of old, or the Chinese Republic. It's literally a group of bandits who took over an entire country with the goal of implementing an ideology created in Germany.
 

The foreign legion of YouTubers defending China

With YouTube videos “debunking” allegations of human rights abuses and diatribes on Western “conspiracies” against China, an unlikely set of foreigners are loudly defending Beijing from its international critics.

They are teachers and business owners from Britain, Colombia and Singapore, a collage of YouTubers garnering fame for their video takedowns of what they say are unfair accusations against Beijing.

western china youtuber


Videos alternate between praise of China’s rapid development and rebuttals of negative foreign reports about the country.

Experts say they are being deployed as a weapon in the information war against China’s critics, with hundreds of videos reaching millions of viewers.

“I am trying to reach the people that have been brainwashed,” Fernando Munoz Bernal, a Colombian English teacher in southern China’s Dongguan and the owner of the “FerMuBe” channel, told AFP.

Bernal, who came to China in 2000 and has nearly 30,000 YouTube followers and 18,000 subscribers on the Chinese platform Bilibili, was among the vloggers who rebutted allegations of human rights abuses in Xinjiang this year.

In an April video, he accused foreign media of distorted reporting on Xinjiang and defended local businesses’ reluctance to speak to correspondents against “whatever lies and rumours journalists concoct”.

Western media seek to deflect from problems in their parts of the world by “creating enemies out of thin air” in China, he told AFP.

He is not alone.

“Does this look like oppression? Take a look at this buffet!” says Brit Jason Lightfoot, with 173,000 subscribers, in another video of the same genre as he visits a restaurant in Guizhou province.

The United States and other governments allege genocide is taking place in Xinjiang while rights groups say Chinese authorities have imposed mass detention and forced labour in the region.

Beijing denies the allegations and has gone on the offensive against governments, individuals, media groups as well as companies that have promised probes into their Xinjiang supply chains.

Paid stooges? Not us​

The vloggers deny being paid mouthpieces for the Chinese government, instead claiming to be on self-appointed missions to clear up misconceptions about a country they love.

Their backgrounds are often in fields unrelated to current affairs or politics, while their videos blend footage of everyday life with passionate commentaries defending China.

Bernal, who speaks some Chinese, said he was motivated by fear of a conflict between China and the West sparked by what he calls a “disinformation campaign” against Beijing.

“If there is a war, it’s my life at risk,” he told AFP.

YouTube is inaccessible inside China without special VPN software.

Yet like the other YouTubers, Bernal’s subtitled videos get a warm reception on Chinese social media platforms including Bilibili, while state media frequently republishes their content and features the vloggers online.

The same media often rips into unfavourable reporting by accredited foreign journalists.

“Where possible, the propaganda system is bound to integrate them into their own propaganda efforts,” Florian Schneider, politics researcher and director of the Leiden Asia Centre, told AFP.

Bernal said he and other YouTubers shared “opportunities to collaborate with state media” but insisted he was not a propagandist for China’s Communist Party.

His videos have featured tours sponsored by the government-run China Radio International, where he interviews other YouTubers about criticisms of China and explores rural development projects.

In one video, he slams the 2019 pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong as “terrorism” and suggests the United States was attempting to provoke a war with China by supporting the movement, while referencing 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Preaching to the converted​

Lee Barrett of the “Barrett” channel, which has over 300,000 YouTube subscribers, recently addressed the question of state media repurposing his content for PR.

“If you’re making some content that the government likes, or whatever, what’s the problem with them reposting it?” he said in a video.

Barret declined to be interviewed by AFP after initially agreeing to speak.

Many of the vloggers started their channels with apolitical lifestyle videos, but their content has in recent months dovetailed with official narratives.

Lightfoot’s early videos were focused on his travels around Asia as he sampled street food and sang at karaoke lounges.

But last year, he began posting frequently on Western “lies” about China, while making spoof videos of an exaggerated, fictional “BSB news” network modelled after the BBC.

Beijing routinely condemns BBC reporting for alleged bias, accusing it of fabricating human rights abuses.

Lightfoot did not respond to AFP’s request for an interview.

It is difficult to quantify the influence of the YouTubers outside China, with many of their commenters claiming to be grateful Chinese.

That raises a question about their target audience, says analyst Schneider, as the videos are “hardly going to convince anyone who is not already a believer”.

While researchers have said China uses fake accounts and “bots” to manipulate online traffic, AFP did not find proof that the YouTubers were part of this effort.
 
Back