US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Nobody, because without a tiebreaker not even the RINOs will sign on to anybody.
Can that happen? Can you have a pres with no vice?
One of the people actually pulling the strings.
Pelosi stepped back from the spotlight as Biden took over, because she plays as a puppeteer (in addition to other players)
Bill Gates?
 
View attachment 2542838
“There's lots of evidence that gas prices should be going down but they haven't, we’re taking a close look at that.”
1631822813696.png
 
Big Tech: Yah, well... the problem with them is simple. They have almost no power at all. I know, I know. "but mah censorship". What they have in -spades-. in just mountainous shit tons is -leverage-. The ability to turn any firecracker into a stick of dynamite. Their former alliance with the Establishment made the two of them absolute juggernauts since the mass power of the Establishment could be turned into an atom bomb. With the unceremonious breakup, they are both able to savage the other but unable to get any kills in. Their strategy is thus to make strategical strikes, using their media blackouts to prevent damage to themselves while amplifying key issues to cripple their opponent.
So what even is the end goal of Big Tech in this scenario? I understand the progs simply want power so they can push Marxism & the establishment want to keep their power because they're either not good enough for any other job or they just like the money that comes with it, but I don't understand what Big Tech wants out of politics or why they so badly hated Trump? I know revising Section 230 was a threat to them (and the rest of us) but that only came about because Twitter kept fucking with Trump's tweets in the first place. What motive then do they have to collaborate with the other two parties against Donald Trump or Republicans as a whole? What did they seek to accomplish & what do they want power for?

Jill: Not entirely sure here, I -think- she is gearing up to get revenge though. Her goal is already lost, Biden is going buswards eventually. In what way is yet to be seen, but his legacy is already in the gutter and by extension hers. There is no recovery, but there is revenge. She controls the President, anything she tells him he does. That's a lot of power, and while there is no capital to spend, she doesn't need to spend it if alls he wants to do is exactly the opposite of what the Cabal members want. The problem for her, is doing it in ways the cabal can't stop.
Are you saying Jill might've masterminded the Afghan pullout?

Speaking of which, how do the Military and Pentagon fit into this? They too maneuvered & lied to Trump in seditious manners to avoid leaving the Middle East, and from what I understand, it was the Pentagon that leaked the phone call between Biden & Ghani telling the Afghan president to save face to make the withdrawal look better than it really was. Mark Milley gave a pinky promise to China that he would alert the CCP if any attack initiated to spite Trump. What do they seek to gain & how do they interplay with this cabal? Are they even considered to be part of it?

Furthermore, do they all just hate Trump or are they genuinely paranoid of him? Do they really think he's a fascist mastermind set to start WW3 or is that just a big spoonful of bullshit they feed to the proles? Do the progressives believe in what they say or is that also subterfuge?

Lastly but not least, what caused the breakup of the cabal of the first place? Was it Jill & the Afghan pull or did it happen earlier than that?
 
So what even is the end goal of Big Tech in this scenario? I understand the progs simply want power so they can push Marxism & the establishment want to keep their power because they're either not good enough for any other job or they just like the money that comes with it, but I don't understand what Big Tech wants out of politics or why they so badly hated Trump? I know revising Section 230 was a threat to them (and the rest of us) but that only came about because Twitter kept fucking with Trump's tweets in the first place. What motive then do they have to collaborate with the other two parties against Donald Trump or Republicans as a whole? What did they seek to accomplish & what do they want power for?


Are you saying Jill might've masterminded the Afghan pullout?

Speaking of which, how do the Military and Pentagon fit into this? They too maneuvered & lied to Trump in seditious manners to avoid leaving the Middle East, and from what I understand, it was the Pentagon that leaked the phone call between Biden & Ghani telling the Afghan president to save face to make the withdrawal look better than it really was. Mark Milley gave a pinky promise to China that he would alert the CCP if any attack initiated to spite Trump. What do they seek to gain & how do they interplay with this cabal? Are they even considered to be part of it?

Furthermore, do they all just hate Trump or are they genuinely paranoid of him? Do they really think he's a fascist mastermind set to start WW3 or is that just a big spoonful of bullshit they feed to the proles? Do the progressives believe in what they say or is that also subterfuge?

Lastly but not least, what caused the breakup of the cabal of the first place? Was it Jill & the Afghan pull or did it happen earlier than that?
On Big Tech. Put simply, power. The Democrats promised them the world, they bit hook line and sinker, and enough of their own employees are true believers that the non-believing CEOs decided to go the whole hog into it. This kicked off the 230 things, which they were promised would never occur, and this caused them to go all in. They doubled down again and again until they had no choice but to participate in the civil war.

On Jill. Good god no, all this kicked off good and proper during Afghanistan and right after, Afghanistan was the turning point, the ignition to this bomb.

On intel agencies: Obama era cronyism lead to them being rather for the uniparty, but they remained a separate entity from it. After they got thrown under the bus for Afghanistan, they have been steadily leaking shit to damage everyone with no signs of loyalty to anyone. Frankly, I have no fucking clue where their loyalties lie if anywhere. I'd dare guess they are loyal to absolutely no one, and are just in it as a faction to hurt everyone in petty spite. Might actually be good for Trump if true, ironically, since the man is known to reward loyalty and unlike the uniparty didn't stab them in the back.

As to Milley... until that revelation, I would have said he was using a fear of Trump as an excuse. After... it -only- makes sense if he truly bought into that fear, which raises the question if they all did. I am still mulling that one over, reconsidering past evidence. May get back to you on that.


A fag like Romney or Murkowski will break for whoever is nominated, but with Romney he'd probably nominate himself so he can pretend he got as far as Trump. The GOP should be smart and at least demand it be a senator from a red state where the governor can appoint the replacement to shore up the senate.

Think more dastardly. The RINOs will deliberately go lockstep to obstruct a VP. A VP has a deciding tiebreaker, without the tiebreaker the Democrats -have- to offer the RINOs stuff to pass anything. They become kingmakers.
 
I look at the nuclear ships deal between the US, Australia, and the UK and shake my head at people who actually believe that Beijing Biden, who on the same day this was announced, his administration stated they see nothing wrong with traitor Milley's actions in colluding with China...the same Biden who handed $85 billion of military equipment to the Taliban who sent most to China for reverse engineering (not to mention the Lithium and other materials under Afghanistan)...these people believe the plan is to go head to head with China with nuclear ships?

My theory, and again it's just a theory, is this is the part in the playbook where a pretext for China to either bomb or invade these three countries, particularly the US, is established and holy fuck Trump it might have been a good idea to secure that election with a year of notice there would be mail in ballots rather than what you did which is nothing.
 
How does expect resistance or uprising in some shape against the ruling elite and yet call those who resist as glowies?

The glowies can't arrest people for protesting and as far as January 6th goes, basically a shitshow that got out of control. And there were two major protests in DC before that day as well. Seems like it was intentional not to deploy the national guard that day or more police as Bowser made security a joke. I would advise people if something is too good to be true, refuse it like for example some asshole offering cheap guns to pull a John Wilkes Booth at that protest should be beaten and turned over to the authorities.


Trump should get off the Zionist cult worship and get on Gab.

Most acts of political resistance that produces the biggest bodycount or major dead politician, tend to be lone wolf situations. IE someone acting completely alone or with at most, one or two other people in the case of McVeigh.

That is what the DNC fears most, though they won't ever admit it. And the only thing that keeps it from ever happening happening assassination-wise these days, is the fact that politically, at least, ever since Bush II there has been a weaponization of the VP slot so that people don't try and kill the President because not only will you martyr the President, you also install someone worse who will do all sorts of beyond the pale shit as part of that martyring against all enemies of the party.
 
I look at the nuclear ships deal between the US, Australia, and the UK and shake my head at people who actually believe that Beijing Biden, who on the same day this was announced, his administration stated they see nothing wrong with traitor Milley's actions in colluding with China...the same Biden who handed $85 billion of military equipment to the Taliban who sent most to China for reverse engineering (not to mention the Lithium and other materials under Afghanistan)...these people believe the plan is to go head to head with China with nuclear ships?

My theory, and again it's just a theory, is this is the part in the playbook where a pretext for China to either bomb or invade these three countries, particularly the US, is established and holy fuck Trump it might have been a good idea to secure that election with a year of notice there would be mail in ballots rather than what you did which is nothing.
China will never, -ever- declare war on the U.S. so you may want to rethink that.
 
My theory, and again it's just a theory, is this is the part in the playbook where a pretext for China to either bomb or invade these three countries, particularly the US
The Uk is on the other side of the world, and even if they land and capture london. its full of nigger that will go apeshit when the gibs stop coming..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back