Why would I take ivermectin when there is a perfectly good and free vaccine available? Do you think rich Indians are taking ivermectin? No, don't be daft. They have gotten vaccinated. Next, you'll be advocating for homepathic cow poo or some other rubbish.
Uh huh, and chemo makes people so sick they require constant medical attention. As for the India pills, how much do you want to bet the blood concentration from taking it is ineffective, but the zinc promotes healing damaged tissue while the doxycycline prevents pneumonia complications from secondary infections.
Says the guy who literally just made shit up in this paragraph lol. Your numbers are made up and the racial gap is narrowing regardless.
Yes so perfectly good it does
Oh wow, so 10% more blacks are jabbed now, are they still right-wing?
Why did you ignore the other link? Because it completely ruins the point you tried to make?
Proportions matter less than numbers. 10% of the black population in the US is far less people than 10% of the white population.
It prevents you from getting bad symptoms and dying though (unless you are so fragile and immunocompromised from another condition that you would have been killed by a seasonal cold anyway). So you can legally spread a deadly disease to others without suffering yourself. Who would turn down that kind of power?
It sure does. I know you have debilitating autism to the point where you get a tugboat for it and thus your diseased brain cannot understand things that aren't 0% or 100%, but they are still effective even though they aren't 100% effective. Why do you anti-vax retards keep parroting this incorrect talking point? Is it because, like your cult leader, you want to repeat a lie over and over again until it becomes true?
It does this, too, but again, not 100% effective.
Maybe. The jury is still out on that.
Citation needed on 80% being immune to covid. You can still catch covid, even severely, if you've already had it, you retard.
Because In Vitro and in silico means jack shit in regards to actual results in a human body. You probably don't even know what in silico means. It's a computer model. You're using a simulation of proteins and chemicals interacting as evidence for a whole biological system
Great, so why are you branch covidians still whining about unvaccinated people as if we are somehow harming you?
mb.com.ph
Yes, don't take the jab and booster shots and rely on your immune system for a virus with a 99.8% survival change for anyone under the age of 70.
Again, I know your autistic peabrain cannot understand things that aren't 0% or 100%, but things can be 70% effective, or 80% effective, or 90% effective, or 95% effective, which means there will be cases where it didn't work. I highly recommend you talk with your case worker about getting educated on how percentages work, because you're coming off like a retard here.
See above. Again, I know things that aren't 0% or 100% just completely baffle your diseased brain. I highly, highly recommend talking to your case worker about these things. It'll help you in life, too.The CDC Director went on CNN and told Wolf Blitzer that the jabs cant prevent transmission.
Fully vaccinated people can still transmit COVID-19 virus: US CDC director
The Nation's Leading Newspaper
As for citation, i should just link you a kiwifarms post because thats all you need to debooooonk, but here, because i can't be bothered to find the actual cdc press release.
Again, I know you have autism and cannot understand things that aren't 0% or 100%, which is why you should talk to your case worker.
It's also about preventing transmission. The fewer people who get it, the fewer variants will pop up and the less hospitals get overwhelmed. I know that doing something selfless is completely foreign to your selfish, narcissistic ass, but try it sometime.
Fair. But you realize that your reasoning is pretty weak and unconvincing, right? I'm not trying to convince you to take the vaccine. I don't really give a shit. I am trying to convince you that you're not very smart. You should look into that.
So if it is easy for you to dismiss those studies, including the 30+ others, why do you stan for a jab that has no study to prove its effectiveness with the earliest study being finished in 23/24?
