What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Gf_yHO1WsAAf9YX.webp
 
not really a conspiracy, but hollywood frequently shows criminal activity in bad faith, or more so do not properly explain said laws et al. Which is to say Darwin’s idiots take it hook, line, and sinker.

It would go on, various levels of to not be boring, or not be too accurate. The instructions for dynamite in Fight Club are purposely inaccurate. When it comes to anything legal in film and TV, never take it at face value. "If you're an undercover cop, you have to tell me" for example.

I have to assume the MPAA and whatever versions in other countries would have something in their guidelines to over this kind of material. I assume they're pretty liberal with it, because plenty of stuff in film / TV is accurate. We all know to disolve a body in acid in a plastic tub instead of an iron bath after Break Bad and what kind of business to buy to money launder. I assume in the industry they know where to strike a balance. Plenty in Breaking Bad is also nonsense.

I suspect inaccuracies come down to not researching, being wrong and trying to be entertaining. If a character needs to pick a lock, just have it take 2 seconds instead of wasting 5 minutes. Make up technology and techniques to advance the plot and to be cool.

People do copy things from films though. Some people tried to pull off a Point Break style bank heist and failed after one left his wallet at the scene of the crime.
 
Nominative determinism is entirely real and a valid way to judge a person at a glance. Not 100% accurate but generally accurate.

The real reason the depopulation cult is going for it is because topsoil and ecology has eroded to the point the rich fear the industrial society will die out due to mass crop failure if there isn't a culling. There is no laptop managerial executive caste if there is no industrial society.

The Titanic was sunk intentionally because a large part of the people on board were influental actors against the federal reserve. It was sunk by an ((iceberg)).
 
We all know to disolve a body in acid in a plastic tub instead of an iron bath after Break Bad
Don't use an acid. Use a base like a strong potassium hydroxide solution. It will dissolve all tissue, it's just going to require a lot more volume and time than you think.

It does go along with what you were saying with TV/Movies showing inaccurate methods.

It was kind of insane in breaking bad that they used Hydrofluoric acid which no high-school (or college really) chemistry lab should ever have. HF is one of the worst chemicals to be exposed to. It not just burns you with the acid and kill all the immediate cells, but will strip all the calcium from your blood and bones which will can cause cardiac arrest. If treated, it will cause serious organ and nervous issues.

And for any murders trying to dispose of a body, ignore everything I said and use HF, that stinging feeling in the lungs is guilt and you should ignore it.
 
Another thing I should mention: troons have a propensity to associate with demonic iconography. Something like changing their name to "Lilith" is stupidly obvious, but you'll occasionally see or hear things that are far more subtle. It's something you that you'll notice a lot more often once it's been pointed out.
Very sorry for the late reply, but I did some reading on late Romanov Russia last year, and I read about how fascination with the occult was rampant in that part of the world back then. The books I read noted one man who was later involved in Rasputin's murder, Felix Yusupov, who was noted to both have an interest in the occult and was also a known crossdresser and homosexual. I talked to a relative who had done some studies in women's history about this a few days ago, and she told me a lot of executed witches historically were accused of being lesbians.

There is definitely a correlation between homosexuality and the occult. One must also consider the occult and human sacrifices and murder. Abomination breeds abomination.
 
Check out this hour-plus-long presentation on bionanotech by Ian Akyildiz. It’s being presented as a therapeutic intervention for tele-health purposes, but think about what this could be used for. Use a little imagination and think about what this could do if weaponized, because this is absolutely, unavoidably dual-use. They’re trying to put people’s bodies on a remote monitoring and control grid.

 
There is a growing, increasingly coordinated effort to craft and propagate a narrative that white Europeans are not the native population of Europe, but are in fact usurpers who replaced the "original" black and/or muslim population of the continent.

It started out as a crackpot fringe theory, lifted from the nation of islam stories about yakub creating white people in a cave and misunderstandings over the spread of the indo-european languages, or bizarre claims that "violent and warlike" caucasus steppe nomads replaced an extant "peaceful matriarchal society" in central europe. Over the years it has been laundered and transformed through different groups, spending a lot of time as a subject of mockery as various online accounts made ludicrous claims about beethoven, shakespeare, various kings, and other important European figures, but at some point it made its way into the fringe of academia. It incubated there for a while before it began to enter mainstream discussion and media, with the initial push being "it doesn't matter if the actors potraying these white people are black", "there were POC present all throughout european history but they were whitewashed", and similar claims that are usually accompanied by "and you're racist if you disagree". Now the first serious claims of "europeans were always black" are starting to emerge into mainstream discourse. Reconstructions of early European natives emphasise blackness even though we have no idea what they would have looked like. Major historical figures are claimed as black (and often muslim) without any caveats. This sort of behaviour is mostly ignored or mocked still, but the mockery is fainter, while the ideas are being pushed by mainstream sources rather than fringe lunatics or crazed academics.

In this way, it's following the cycle of prior fringe-to-mainstream impositions (SJWism, troonery, islam-means-peace-actually, other political movements, UK gun control, etc and so on) with approximately the same timeline of about 30-40 years, or roughly two generations. In particular, where we're at now is about where troonery was in 2010-2012, right before it suddenly burst out as an unassailable belief system with total institutional support. On that timeline, I feel like we're going to see overt claims that European natives are interlopers by around 2030-2035. They will be made by people who professed ignorance of the entire idea just a few years earlier, or even opposed it. These beliefs may even gain official state sanction, rather than the merely unofficial support that currently exists, and be enforced with increasing severity over time.
 
There is a growing, increasingly coordinated effort to craft and propagate a narrative that white Europeans are not the native population of Europe, but are in fact usurpers who replaced the "original" black and/or muslim population of the continent.
Look at how many white Americans can be made to feel guilty about displacing the native populations by being told that natives were simple, peace-loving folk instead of the clever warriors that so many journals from Back In The Day as well as the natives' own lore spoke of.
(Nevermind the hidden facts that only 16 US states had black slaves and that was made illegal on January 1, 1863, gotta work that white guilt)

Make whites feel bad for even existing and they'll be more likely to give up their place to a non-white.
Fill areas with non whites, step 3 profit?

I am wary that the AI may more easily replace the browns. Not sure how or why, but I'm going to be watching for it to happen.
 
There is a growing, increasingly coordinated effort to craft and propagate a narrative that white Europeans are not the native population of Europe, but are in fact usurpers who replaced the "original" black and/or muslim population of the continent.

It's one of those progressive beliefs that upholds racist beliefs but repackaged. It's based on an assumption black people are less primitive than white people but through the lens of, "we're all the same."

Human migration was gradual, not immediate, allowing skin pigmentation to adapt to local climates along migration routes. The notion that all humans were initially black and then changed color post-migration doesn't align with this slow, adaptive movement. Instead, skin color likely evolved in tandem with migration patterns, matching the environmental conditions encountered over time. Even with historical slow movement, regional pigmentation differences persisted, suggesting continuous adaptation rather than a single, global change in skin color after initial dispersal.

Then there's the egregious misrepresentation of what is known. Evidence of a couple of people from Algeria in Roman Britain and presenting it as evidence of an abundance of Sub-Saharan Africans. Then act all, "why do you care, you racist?" When people point the reality out.

Then you further look at the evidence and Ivory Bangle Lady. The only (I think) female African they have evidence for in Roman Britain and she's just got one North African grandparent.

I'm waiting for the day the pendulum swings back and there's backlash that all this blackwashing of history is racist. Historical supremecism. Claims it calls African history and culture shit. Which is what it's doing. It's demoralising a sense of national identity in the West, but it's also virtue signalling to Africans that we're being to humble to gift them out history over their own.

The other pernicious aspect of it is if everything goes super progressive and you have black kids growing up in Britain thinking it was always multi-cultural etc. It's depicted that way in media. History books tell of the diverse past. What will that person feel when they get to an age and realise that it was all a lie and it's not their history or culture? How will that go down?
 
Last edited:
Now the first serious claims of "europeans were always black" are starting to emerge into mainstream discourse. Reconstructions of early European natives emphasise blackness even though we have no idea what they would have looked like.
Ie "Cheddar Man."

1735781093988.png

As wikipedia helpfully "well akshually"s:

In 2018, the publication of the genetics study by Brace et al. and subsequent facial reconstruction of a dark-skinned and blue-eyed Cheddar Man resulted in widespread media coverage.[13][22] This coverage again described Cheddar Man as the "first Brit" (despite older remains of modern humans being known from Britain). Public discourse surrounding the reconstruction of Cheddar Man heavily revolved around the themes of immigration, national identity, race, and Brexit. Some saw Cheddar Man's predicted dark skin colour as a helpful riposte to anti-immigration arguments, while others condemned it as fake news and left-wing politically correct propaganda.[22] A dark skin colour was "strongly suggested" through exhaustive DNA studies. The current scientific consensus holds that populations living in Europe became lighter-skinned over time because pale skin absorbs more sunlight, which is required to produce enough vitamin D. There are a handful of genetic variations linked to lighter skin; it was determined in the study that Cheddar Man had "ancestral" versions of all these genes, strongly suggesting he would have had "dark to black" skin tone, but combined with blue eyes.[22][13]

I noticed they started an early version of this way back in the 90s, trying to claim that the "true and honest" natives of Scotland and Ireland were "short and dusky" and that any "tall and fair" phenotype was from evil Viking invaders.
 
There is a growing, increasingly coordinated effort to craft and propagate a narrative that white Europeans are not the native population of Europe, but are in fact usurpers who replaced the "original" black and/or muslim population of the continent.
Everytime I hear that kind of rhetoric for the US, or even (twice now, surprisingly enough) Europe, I always wonder what these people think conquest is.

Are they really so far up their Noble Savage asses, they forget basic human behavior, like assuming that african/jungle savages don't literally hunt, capture, cook and kill other tribes, or even basic history, like Islam being created in 610 (approx) but the roman empire, which is documented to have interacted with christians, fell in about 475.

Hunting, killing, and taking over other tribes is something we got from the monkeys.
Why the fuck should I feel bad for a civilization that got fucking wiped by overwhelming tactics and technology?
Older Native Americans were lightly civilized, somewhat respectable (given their living conditions) tribes, nowadays most of the ones still hanging on to the native pipe dream are just lazy, rapist retards profiting off of socialism that exists just because "uwu your ancestors' way of life got disturbed we're so sorry ;-; pls accept the white mans gift we will literally spread our cheeks and fight for you" while they kidnap, fuck, and kill their own in reserves, then pretend it didn't happen.
Those that are integrated properly into US society are just Americans, and those are respectable.
 
I believe everything in this video. Not to throw shade at Ukraine but it's absurd. Thankfully Russia haven't seemed to be capable or competent enough to end up using this against them but it is a peak NATO moment. I still think about this sometimes. The anthrax, all the bioweapon shit left out there. It's concerning but not worth losing sleep over... until something happens. We are a silly people on earth, the amount of dangerous shit there is at play every day without much thought about it. We can very easily turn into a proto-deus ex scenario. Oddly enough this is one of the last solid high-ish effort video redpill edits I've seen which was 2022. The internet has become unbearably polluted, to the point where not even 4chan will recover. It feels like it's by design; on purpose. I hope Kiwifarms never goes anywhere or gets sabotaged.
 
Last edited:
Psychiatry is 100% fake and is a pseudoscience just like chiropractory but it just has much better marketing and is much more useful to people to control society half of the psychological treatments used to be cutting out people's gallbladder or soaking them in freezing cold water.
The vast majority of psychological illnesses are caused by the breakdown of the moral fabric of society no **** people living in poverty are going to be depressed news at 11.

You know there might be lasting psychological damage from constantly being under artillery fire oh wow people can associate things with fear man what an observation you now have the ability to imprison people with no due recoice until you can say they can be let out of prison with being charged with absolutely no crime.


The feds only ironically allow people to stay up without harassment of censorship who bad jacket more effective forms of right wing politics such as racialism and people who want every FBI agent put in federal palm in the *** prison with Jamal and jamarcus.


Johnson Ben Shapiro and the rest of the grifter right such as Taco Carlson.

The vast majority of people overestimate how competent the FBI is especially these days after they hired a bunch of black women you think you're dealing with the FBI of the 1980s and 1960s of J Edgar Hoover you're not you're dealing with a more incompetent low IQ bunch of monkeys.

I'll give you an example a friend of mine was visited by FBI agents 'cause he runs a pretty popular white wing news website it was a fat Mexican woman an ugly black hoe.

He answered the door Saul was the FBI asked them if they had a war and if he was under arrest they said no when they slammed the door in their face.

American government surveillance is actually really inefficient reason most would be domestic terrorist gets caught because they constantly talk about it online or on the Internet if you just keep it to yourself the vast majority of the government won't be able to figure out what you're going to do.

Moves vaccine critics actually do deserve to be mocked relentlessly cause half of the criticisms is not the fact that vaccines have all of these special carve outs and protections in the law it's literally nonsensical things like vaccines cause autism.

No one should feel obligated to ever pay debt 'cause no one actually has that money 95% of the US economy is literally just smoking mirrors and every single country's economy is a massive pyramid scheme but if one country calls the pyramid scheme they all collapse.

Half of the dissident anything big personalities are being funded by some creepy billionaire who is most likely a pedophile take your pick.

The only reason we don't just carpet bomb nations into the Stone Age is not because the media actually has control over what the military does is for the stocks of Lockheed Martin and Boeing because it's much cheaper to build dumb bombs it is slight missiles and there's more profit and smart weapons.


Russian propagandists Chinese propagandists and American propagandists are all really obvious once you understand the patterns not really conspiracy the more just an observation
 
Last edited:
Very sorry for the late reply, but I did some reading on late Romanov Russia last year, and I read about how fascination with the occult was rampant in that part of the world back then. The books I read noted one man who was later involved in Rasputin's murder, Felix Yusupov, who was noted to both have an interest in the occult and was also a known crossdresser and homosexual. I talked to a relative who had done some studies in women's history about this a few days ago, and she told me a lot of executed witches historically were accused of being lesbians.

There is definitely a correlation between homosexuality and the occult. One must also consider the occult and human sacrifices and murder. Abomination breeds abomination.
No worries, and I agree wholeheartedly.
I am a religious man, but even without that conceit, I would like to point out this post:
Nominative determinism is entirely real and a valid way to judge a person at a glance. Not 100% accurate but generally accurate.
Not only do I agree with nominative determinism, but I also believe in Symbolic Interactionism and it's role in the homosexual-demonic connection. I'm going to use Christianity as the baseline, but understand that this extends to several Rule of Law scenarios.

The content we consume and the people we hang around with affect our minds and mentalities. It's not necessarily that violence or sexuality themselves are perverse, no, but our own perspectives become warped by the zeitgeist. To elaborate a little, something like Terminator 2 is an inherently violent film, but I wouldn't call it "damaging" per se, since the theme is overall hopeful. Something like Forrest Gump, which I have a vendetta against, is far more damaging since it's theme is nihilistic. This is partly a matter of personal perspective, how we interpret these films on an intrapersonal level. Indeed, if you enjoy a film like Forrest Gump, that's fine as long as you understand and reject the poisonous message. Nevertheless, when you consider both films in the context of our culture, Terminator 2 is a film about taking fate into your own hands and the necessity of morality, while Forrest Gump is about submitting to destiny and excusing lapses in morality based on that fact. Our current society dictates certain actions as "traditionally good," and others as "traditionally bad," while disregarding both's correlation with true morality. This moral obfuscation breaks Chesterton's fence into pieces. Even more so, it ignores the direct correlation with "traditionally bad," and just "bad."

"Traditionally bad" things, particularly those in Christianity, have a logical "bad" outcome. Don't steal, because then others can steal from you and property has no value. Don't lie, because it eventually comes out or haunts you forever. Don't cheat on your spouse, because it rots your relationship from the inside out and burdens your children in the long run. And, of course, don't blaspheme, because that lessens each law described in the Bible. Even if you are not Christian, the base morals here are sound and can extend to other foundational legislation.

Now, my theory as to why homosexuals are drawn to demonic imagery aside from being possessed by a retarded spirit is that homosexuality is a "good" perversion now, that goes against the "traditionally good." Therefore, the "traditionally good" becomes an enemy, and the "traditionally bad" becomes a friend. Demonic imagery is seen as baroque, so that's the symbology used. Of course, you could say it's solely mockery, but when it extends to names, tattoos, etc. it becomes a problem. Homosexuality becomes further entrenched within the demonic, and elements of that demonic behavior leak out into their personal lives. You rarely see a homosexual who is "just" a homosexual. They debauch themselves further in an attempt to battle the "traditionally good."

To try and summarize, our culture seeks to denigrate traditionally good morals and to subvert them with a new moral framework, while ignoring why those good traditional morals existed in the first place. Homosexuals are the zeitgeist's greatest soldiers due to their "innocent" debauchery. By embracing the demonic, they embrace many sins alongside it. It's partly mockery, yes, but I firmly believe it's more about eroding what goodness remains in the world through socially acceptable means.

TL;DR Abomination breeds abomination.
 
Last edited:
Psychiatry is 100% fake and is a pseudoscience just like chiropractory but it just has much better marketing and is much more useful to people to control society half of the psychological treatments used to be cutting out people's gallbladder or soaking them in freezing cold water.
The vast majority of psychological illnesses are caused by the breakdown of the moral fabric of society no **** people living in poverty are going to be depressed news at 11.
Sounds like something a Scientologist would say...

Also stop self censoring, this isn't YouTube.
 
Back