Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • Happy Easter!

Will the Magistrate grant Greer's request to post bond?

  • Yes

    Votes: 96 24.6%

  • No

    Votes: 141 36.1%

  • The Magistrate will set a higher bond than Greer asked

    Votes: 98 25.1%

  • The Magistrate will deny the motion, and threaten jail time

    Votes: 56 14.3%
  • Total voters
    391
Next Highlight
Null said:
Can anyone find an archive of this page in 2020 BEFORE November 2020?

Archive.org blocks us and archive.is only has it from November
Click to expand...
It's in 2016, but here's one from the kiwifarms.net domain (wordfilter changing it from kiwifar <dot> ms).
https://kiwifarms.net/misc/contact

kiwifarms.is has two, unfortunately in 2022. I think there may have been other active domains in 2020 but I only remember the .ms one.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: N Space, Pepo, Billy Bong and 16 others
  • Like
Reactions: Moosebonker, koos koets, Neetorino and 8 others
1744667254835.webp

It's nice to recognize foreshadowing from 6 years in the past right before it becomes relevant in the current season.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: ICanLurkNoMore, Clovis, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 30 others
Useful_Mistake said:
View attachment 7220236
Click to expand...
Damn what a doozy of a docket entry from Hardin.

TLDR, Greer amending his complaint lets Hardin relitigate the venue and original basis of the complaint. So basically Greer fucked up all to add two randos to the case that he would never have been able to serve.

Finally might get the magistrate to say how the fuck this case is supposed to proceed if he denies this.
1744680701141.webp

1744680773372.webp

Hardin explains arguments involving time travel aren't allowed.
1744681302883.webp

Null using things from this thread

1744681524109.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: RefurbishedApparatus, Swedishcrepes02, Last Ride and 41 others
Useful_Mistake said:
View attachment 7220236
Click to expand...
IT BEGINS

1744680982290.webp
I figured that was why Hardin pointed out the reset in previous motions. Though I didn't recognize the "declined to raise" in the previous motion because it was successful, until the 10th messed everything up.

1744681095407.webp

He's completely right, but death march to trial, tard shield, etc. Plus the district judge that ignores the must and shall of the law when he's in the mood. I really hope the judge doesn't decide we're too far along to go back to the beginning.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Mexican Molotov Marauder, BrainProlapse, koos koets and 19 others
How many pictures of Hitler is Russel "Shitlips" Greer going to need to include in his response to this motion to counter this brutal legal onslaught from Matthew "D. Hardship" Hardin? Can the judges possibly tard guard Greer against this latest legal maneuver? Will Josh get sweet release from this dumpster fire legal nightmare?

Stay tuned and find out next week/month/year on Greer v. Moon.

Brought to you by autism.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Windex, Moosebonker, koos koets and 14 others
Allegations which require a belief in time travel are expressly barred by Fed. R. Civ. P.


12 (b)(6) because they are implausible. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 696, 129 S. Ct.


1937, 1959 (2009) (Souter, J., dissenting).
Click to expand...
Yeah the time travel quote goes in the thread hall of fame along with the Ouija board. But now I'm wondering why Souter was in favor of time travel arguments.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, koos koets, ConSluttant and 14 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back