Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So after reading this, basically what I learned is that every free speech issue that causes an uproar is basically just that they can't get their coomer material anymore. It's not actual speech, just coomers be so pornbrained they legitimately think their lives are in danger if they can't buy their porn games on steam.

Honestly, degenerates have hijacked this whole freeze peach thing so severely, I'd have a hard time giving a shit even if they were correct and banning internet porn, or even just specific kinds of internet porn, is a slippery slope to wholesale internet censorship of other things.

I might be dooming and all, but if people are going to abuse this "freedom" to destroy themselves and others by spreading shit that's a proven mental/spiritual health hazard, and normalizing unforgivable crimes against children, do we even deserve to be free?
 
The difference is that Sinatra would make it sound like a chorus of angels was asking me. This exact sentiment, that absurdity with no punchline is funny, is why there are next to no funny anime memes
Me posting that bosnia song sure is making all the pseudointellectuals come out just to express how much they didn't find it funny.
Are you guys the type to announce you're unsubscribing from a youtube channel too? Jeez.
 
Honestly, degenerates have hijacked this whole freeze peach thing so severely, I'd have a hard time giving a shit even if they were correct and banning internet porn, or even just specific kinds of internet porn, is a slippery slope to wholesale internet censorship of other things.

I might be dooming and all, but if people are going to abuse this "freedom" to destroy themselves and others by spreading shit that's a proven mental/spiritual health hazard, and normalizing unforgivable crimes against children, do we even deserve to be free?
Free speech is free speech, it has nothing to do with pornography. Pornographic images are intended to cause arousal, which IIRC the government has ruled as different than being something of worthy of discussion. Of course, bring it up if I'm wrong, but tl;dr free speech is intended to promote discourse, porn is intended for someone to masturbate to
 
A certain lolcow is making the claim that because some sick fucks also hate lolicon, that must mean that anyone who hates lolicon is also a pedophile and associated with these sick fucks, called reset the clock. I don't know if this has been posted here before, but I thought I should tip you guys off to be aware.
https://x.com/PeppermintSw/status/1959634628819468684 (A)
That list is just pedophiles saying lolicon is pedophilia. I'll take the word of a pedophile when they say lolicon is pedophilia. After all, I'm not the one attracted to kids, they are, so they know what turns them on and I don't think it's an earth shattering idea that pedophiles are aroused by lolicon.

Why do pedos keep using this list as if it's an argument in their favour?
 
View attachment 7569807Hello, I don't use the farms too often. But I have a partial dox on some german vtumor loli artist (xer server is also filled with cunnyniggers and has no age verification). We managed to get the village where she lives (she might live around nearby settlements tho), her car model and color, some important details about her house, and some other info based on photos and stuff she posted on her Discord.

We were pretty close to a dox but the problem it's that streetview in Germany is very shitty, so we couldn't get the house where she lives. Also I heard Germany has strict privacy laws so that doesn't help too much either.

Can I post the thread here? And if so is there any guide for the format of a post here? It seems that the doxxxes here follow a particular format.
I‘m super late to this idk you’ve found her now but Apple has good street view coverage in Germany, way way better than Google. Apple also has less blurred houses because nowadays people don’t care as much about their house’s privacy than they did 10+ years ago.
 
So after reading this, basically what I learned is that every free speech issue that causes an uproar is basically just that they can't get their coomer material anymore. It's not actual speech, just coomers be so pornbrained they legitimately think their lives are in danger if they can't buy their porn games on steam.
The funny thing is a lot of them would be fine with censoring other people. They’re massive hypocrites and morally inconsistent.
That list is just pedophiles saying lolicon is pedophilia. I'll take the word of a pedophile when they say lolicon is pedophilia. After all, I'm not the one attracted to kids, they are, so they know what turns them on and I don't think it's an earth shattering idea that pedophiles are aroused by lolicon.

Why do pedos keep using this list as if it's an argument in their favour?
They think it’s an own, even though there aren’t really that many examples as opposed to the examples of lolifags being pedophiles.
 
Free speech is free speech, it has nothing to do with pornography. Pornographic images are intended to cause arousal, which IIRC the government has ruled as different than being something of worthy of discussion. Of course, bring it up if I'm wrong, but tl;dr free speech is intended to promote discourse, porn is intended for someone to masturbate to
There might not be a single person alive today who agrees with the founding fathers on the matter of free speech, with the biggest reason being that blasphemy was not considered to be protected free speech until very recently, see this article by Harvard Law Review and this federal court case that ruled Oklahoma City's 1940 prohibition on blasphemy to be constitutional.
The Ordinance said:
Section 3. It shall be unlawful and an offense for any person, firm or corporation, within said City, to wantonly utter, publish, circulate, or distribute any words or language casting contumelious reproach or profane ridicule on God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, the Holy Scripture, or the Christian or any other religion calculated, or where the natural consequence is, to cause a breach of the peace or an assault.
 
A lolicon orbiter of Nachisu Miku/Kenneth Christian Paul Schulz, the male kike larping as a female neo-nazi VTuber has been unmasked fully phonebooked.
Kurayami / KurayamiGGEZ / kurayamiggez / GrimDeity_GG / Grim Deity / Kurayamitherpgmaster / kurayamiryu / Kurayami Ryu / Christopher Long
[/]Kurayami is one of Kenneth's last remaining catboy. He is a 35-year-old autistic lolicon and is a major degenerate. He has a major fixation at doing challenge runs such as "no damage" for RPG video games such as Kingdom Hearts and Dark Souls.

Chris has a Twitter account (A), this is where the most damming dirt I have on him. He is genuinely a pedophile degenerate. I cropped out some of the screenshots, but keep in mind the archives show the full picture, there is some Islamic content in them, so beware.
The address is correct. It appears on his voter registration:
View attachment 7829077
 
Last edited:
Which means that a lot of our current problems can easily be solved if our government weren't too squeamish to enforce existing laws, I assume.
The government is literally the definition of bureaucracy. Someone like peppermint can go free but I go 7 above the speed limit all of a sudden I'm the bad guy.
 
do we even deserve to be free?
There are different ways one can define "free". There is being free to do anything you wish - watch porn, inject heroin, etc.. And there's being free from the grasp of evil. These two are in direct contradiction. One is restricted in his actions if he chooses the path of Christ (i. e. the path of truth), and is therefore not free by the first definition. A person choosing to not follow Christ is unrestricted (this hypothetical does not include the government or any form of mortal law, subjects are isolated) in his actions, but the lustful and hedonistic actions that he will take will position him withing the grasp of evil, and he therefore is not free by the second definition.
When a person seethes about porn or any other form of degeneracy being censored, like with the recent VISA Steam and itch.io issue, they necessarily align themselves with evil.
Internet censorship does not trample on your rights because you do not have rights. You don't have a right to use the Internet, you don't have a right to visit any given website, you don't have a right to "free speech", you don't have a right to anything. Everything modern people consider to be "rights" are merely privileges bestowed unto them by either the government or some entity, e.g. your ISP giving you access to the internet.
What exists are "justified actions" - actions which are morally correct to do, said morality being set by the Word of God. These can be considered "rights", in the sense thay they are morally **right** actions, but I won't be calling them that to avoid confusion.

To answer your question: No, not by the first definition of "free".
 
if people are going to abuse this "freedom" to destroy themselves and others by spreading shit that's a proven mental/spiritual health hazard, and normalizing unforgivable crimes against children, do we even deserve to be free?
People were destroying themselves and spreading mental/spiritual hazards thousands of years before the internet, long before things like human rights were a concept and when authoritarian leadership was the norm. But people were still thinking similar things even back then "why do humans have free will?". There are a thousand different explanations for it, some even believing that we have no free will at all and that everything is predetermined, not gonna pretend I know the answer to that. However, some experience solace by having faith that this is all meant to be a test, that human nature is meant to be flawed and unfixable so that only those who truly try to be good get to pass the test of life. Maybe having faith in that could bring some peace to you. Or at the very least, it is much healthier than looking for a Stalin-esque figure to control and manage every tiny detail of peoples life, having a flawed human play pretend to be god that thinks they can somehow fix or transform human nature and make everybody live peacefully together in village communes.
 
I feel betrayed discovering how many people from the gamergate era including people like aydin paladin were pro Lolicon

Here Is my expirience with gamergate, i became a member of the kotakuinaction/gamergate subreddit because I'm tired of leftist shit, i still am but then i discovered something that Creeped me out, how many of them were pro Lolicon gooners,every Time you bring the topic of Loli to that sub you get downvoted to death.

I started to suspect that some of these people were degenerates hiding behind freedom of expression, and they openly support porn and hentai

I Hate Anita , Zoe and wu but i have realized over the years that maybe some of these people are not so innocent and are giving Fuel to the narrative that antisjws sometimes are just as degenerates as their leftoid counterparts
 
Last edited:
I feel betrayed discovering how many people from the gamergate era including people like aydin paladin were pro Lolicon

Here Is my expirience with gamergate, i became a member of the kotakuinaction/gamergate subreddit because I'm tired of leftist shit, i still am but then i discovered something that Creeped me out, how many of them were pro Lolicon gooners,every Time you bring the topic of Loli to that sub you get downvoted to death.

I started to suspect that some of these people were degenerates hiding behind freedom of expression, and they openly support porn and hentai

I Hate Anita , Zoe and wu but i have realized over the years that maybe some of these people are not so innocent and are giving Fuel to the narrative that antisjws sometimes are just as degenerates as their leftoid counterparts

It's like just to spite the lib feminists, they turned themselves into the same vile misogynistic degenerates the lib feminists claimed they were.

The 2010s were truly a cultural dumpster fire, and not just because of the wokists.
 
Since Blue Archive gets mentioned in the thread quite a bit, I finally googled some images from it:
IMG_2059.webp
What the fuck is this DeviantArt looking shit? The characters look disproportionate as hell. The color pallet for each character is as uninteresting as it gets. The faces have no symmetry, made worse by none of the characters having noses.

Don't even get me started on the same face syndrome ass. If you told me that this was an AI generated image, I would believe you because the art style is as fucking generic as it gets.

The art is dogshit.

Remember that one artist, Amuria? You know, the one who abused the fuck out of dodge and burn tool back in the day?

IMG_2018.webp
At least her art had a distinct color pallet and look to it. It had SOVL TO IT.

Tl;Dr: the pedophiles who draw art for Blue Archive can't fucking draw for shit, and Lolicons eat it up because they're too low IQ to see it being as bad as it is.
IMG_2062.webp
 
Last edited:
I’m going to do a deep dive on Madam Savvy one day because I randomly looked up her username through Google and it was tied to an old cam whore site. The woman really comes off like a “pick me” and recently got into the anti-censorship/loli defending grift to get money.

She has always came off as fake. Her latest free speech crusade against Visa and Mastercard just feels so shallow since she isn't bothering pointing out the fact that Trump's pick to head the Office of Budget and Management, Russell Vought, has stated on camera that not only he wants to ban porn nationally, but also wants to get rid of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to accomplish it.


PreserveTube
 
IMG_2063.webp
Found this poster of Blue Archive. Which once again, proves that Lolicons are easily impressed.

Characters look a little bit more proportionate here, but that's likely due to assets from Clip Studio Paint being used. Don't believe me?

Clip Studio Paint Brush 1
Clip Studio Paint Brush 2
Poseable 3D Bike Model
The sky

I can't find the exact photo that was like photobashed for the background. I'll assume in good faith that the artist at least took the photo himself since it doesn't seem to appear on CPS.

I got nothing against individual artists using CPS assets for their own projects; they have zero financial backing from some studio. Freelancers often do use some photobashing where possible, as do concept artists to save time. Many webtoon artists out there also use CPS assets, to the point where poorly rendered 3D models have become a meme.

I'm pointing all of this out because it’s hilarious to me the lengths salaried artists in Japan will go to just not draw.

Now that you all know these tricks, you too can make your own animes. ^_^
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom