Business Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Original Article | Archive

aa7dc3a4fdfa7ffddad9672abda73d0f34370258.webp

LOS ANGELES, June 11 (Reuters) - Walt Disney and Comcast's Universal filed a copyright lawsuit against Midjourney on Wednesday, calling its popular AI-powered image generator a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" for its use of the studios' best-known characters.
The suit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios, making and distributing without permission "innumerable" copies of characters such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Elsa from "Frozen," and the Minions from "Despicable Me".

Spokespeople for Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's executive vice president and chief legal officer, said in a statement: "We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity, but piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing."

NBCUniversal Executive Vice President and General Counsel Kim Harris said the company was suing to "protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content."

The studios claim the San Francisco company rebuffed their request to stop infringing their copyrighted works or, at a minimum, take technological measures to halt the creation of these AI-generated characters. Instead, the studios argue, Midjourney continued to release new versions of its AI image service that boast higher quality infringing images.

Midjourney recreates animated images from a typed request, or prompt.

In the suit filed by seven corporate entities at the studios that own or control copyrights for the various Disney and Universal Pictures film units, the studios offered examples of Midjourney animations that include Disney characters, such as Yoda wielding a lightsaber, Bart Simpson riding a skateboard, Marvel's Iron Man soaring above the clouds and Pixar's Buzz Lightyear taking flight.

The image generator also recreated such Universal characters as "How to Train Your Dragon's" dragon, Toothless, the green ogre "Shrek," and Po from "Kung Fu Panda."

"By helping itself to plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters -- without investing a penny in their creation -- Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the suit alleges.

"Midjourney's infringement is calculated and willful," it said.

'BIG SCRAPE OF THE INTERNET'​

Disney and Universal asked the court for a preliminary injunction, to prevent Midjourney from copying their works, or offering its image- or video-generation service without protections against infringement. The studios also seek unspecified damages.

The suit alleges Midjourney used the studios' works to train its image service and generate reproductions of their copyrighted characters. The company, founded in 2021 by David Holz, monetizes the service through paid subscriptions and generated $300 million in revenue last year alone, the studios said.

This is not the first time Midjourney has been accused of misusing artists' work to train their AI systems.

A year ago, a California federal judge found that 10 artists behind a copyright infringement suit against Midjourney, Stability AI and other companies had plausibly argued these AI companies had copied and stored their work on company servers, and could be liable for using it without permission. That ruling allowed the lawsuit over the unauthorized use of images to proceed. It is in the process of litigation.

The cases are part of a wave of lawsuits brought by copyright owners including authors, news outlets and record labels against tech companies over their use of copyrighted materials for AI training without permission.

In a 2022 interview with Forbes, Midjourney CEO Holz said he built the company's database by performing "a big scrape of the Internet."

Asked whether he sought consent of the artists whose work was covered by copyright, he responded, "there isn't really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they're coming from."
 
Considering that (((dis knee))) is the corporate velcro for taking from other people I don't know how to take this litigiousness. It's not like if they got their few sheckles they are going to pay their park employees an uplifting humane wage or anything.
 
Considering how Disney has destroyed copyright law in the US, I'm interested to see how far their money and political sway will go this time.
 
The Verge: Warner Bros. Discovery sues Midjourney for generating ‘countless’ copies of its characters (archive)

batman-midjourneyai.webp
Midjourney allegedly generated these images of Batman and the Joker.

Midjourney ‘brazenly dispenses’ images of copyrighted characters, like Superman, Batman, Bugs Bunny, and more, the lawsuit alleges.

By Emma Roth
Sep 4, 2025, 9:49 PM UTC

Warner Bros. Discovery is suing Midjourney over claims the AI startup “brazenly dispenses its intellectual property as if it were its own,” as reported earlier by The Hollywood Reporter. In the lawsuit, Warner Bros. Discovery alleges that Midjourney generated “countless” infringing images and videos of its copyrighted characters, including Superman, Bugs Bunny, Scooby-Doo, and more.

Warner Bros. Discovery accuses Midjourney of reproducing, displaying, and distributing “unauthorized derivatives” of its intellectual property through its AI image and video generation tools. Throughout the lawsuit, Warner Bros. Discovery shares several examples of how Midjourney’s AI tools seem to have generated images of copyrighted characters, like Wonder Woman, Tweety, the Power Puff Girls, and even Rick and Morty in response to prompts asking to see the characters in certain situations.

scooby-doo-comparison.webp

Additionally, Warner Bros. Discover claims that Midjourney will generate infringing images even if prompts don’t mention a specific character. For instance, Midjourney allegedly generated downloadable images of Superman, Batman, and Flash after receiving the prompt, “classic comic book superhero battle.” Midjourney is facing a similar copyright lawsuit from Disney and Universal, which called the company’s AI image generator a “virtual vending machine” that generates “endless authorized copies” of their work.

theflash-generation.webp
Midjourney allegedly generated these images in response to a prompt that asks for a “classic comic book superhero battle.”

Warner Bros. Discovery claims Midjourney is aware of the “breathtaking scope of its piracy and copyright infringement” but refuses to protect copyright holders.

“It is hard to imagine copyright infringement that is any more willful than what Midjourney is doing here,” the lawsuit states. “Midjourney is purposefully exploiting Warner Bros. Discovery’s valuable intellectual property to attract subscribers to Midjourney, and it is profiting by providing subscribers with endless copies and derivatives of Warner Bros. Discovery’s Copyrighted Works.”

Screenshot-2025-09-04-at-4.51.13 PM.webp

Warner Bros. Discovery is suing Midjourney for damages related to the alleged copyright infringement, and is asking the court to block Midjourney from copying, displaying, or distributing its intellectual property, as well as to stop the company from offering AI tools without copyright protection measures. Midjourney didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
“Midjourney is purposefully exploiting Warner Bros. Discovery’s valuable intellectual property to attract subscribers to Midjourney, and it is profiting by providing subscribers with endless copies and derivatives of Warner Bros. Discovery’s Copyrighted Works.”
Did they actually use copyright infringing character in their marketing?
 
Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's executive vice president and chief legal officer, said in a statement: "We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity, but piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing."
"We're going to replace our own artists as soon as possible with this plagiarism machine, but we don't want you reducing our corporate value by doing the same to us."
 
Fuck off. You can't CR, trademark or patent an art style. You arguably can't CR a fucking character out of context. Or you shouldn't be able to.

Too late faggots, this is never going back into the bottle. I have a feeling big media is about to try to civil lawfare it away.
 
You absolutely can copyright a character, its name, and "distinctive likeness".
Sure, but is AI generated images a copyright violation or is more along the lines of fan art? Also is the fault with the model or the user who requested the copyrighted character? Not to mention if did remove the character from the model, what's stopping someone from describing that character and getting a lookalike?
Another capitalist turns into a cummunist as soon as xir porn is threatened.
Copyright law is for faggots, a person generating random images of a character isn't taking money from the IP holder. Disney has fucked with copyright laws for over a century and I oh so wish they get told to fuck off by judge.
 
more along the lines of fan art?
Fan art is usually considered a derivative work of the original copyrighted character.
Only the copyright holder has the legal right to authorize derivative works.
Fair use only protects transformative uses, which are parody, commentary, criticism, and satire
 
Midjourney allegedly generated downloadable images of Superman, Batman, and Flash after receiving the prompt, “classic comic book superhero battle.” Midjourney is facing a similar copyright lawsuit from Disney and Universal, which called the company’s AI image generator a “virtual vending machine” that generates “endless authorized copies” of their work.

Company goes out of their way to make their content the defacto default association of a word, to the point of attempted copyright and suing over the term superhero. Suddenly upset that their content is used in associated with said term.

Same bullshit when Disney saturated the market with their Disney character slop on every fucking piece of merchandise for kids then sue rural daycares for having the audacity to paint a shitty image of their character on their property
 
Back
Top Bottom