US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
> our definition of hate speech is better than theirs.
> it's all 4D chess. Trust the plan.

No one believes these things anymore.
Okay well the original complaint came from the fucking Blaze and Glenn Beck is a moralfagging faggot who fags on about muh principals while telling people to ‘pray for the shooter’s family’ the day after the shooting. He only supports Trump because his media company was turning into a laughing stock in the Never Trump days.
 
the most surprising charge to me is it's second degree murder not first.
Screenshot 2025-09-16 113817.webp
the guy 3D printed a gun for the attack, wrote delay," "deny" and "depose" on the bullets and had a notebook describing his intent to murder people what the fuck do you have to do to get first degree?
 
Last edited:
I have to say though, her latest fumble might accidentally make the Left support free speech. Every time Trump's crew says they're for something, the Left ends up screaming against it. For example, the Left is now against limiting seed oils and banning food dyes now that JFK Jr has decided to be against it. It would be hilarious if we start seeing the Left suddenly champion "hate speech" because of what Pam Bondi said.

That's not what we're going to see. Instead, the radlibs will simply argue that Bondi's definition of the term "hate speech" is incorrect, and only bigoted speech targeting "marginalized minorities and POC" counts as hate speech. They will maintain course and simply declare her words invalid.

There's no positive spin, here. She fucked up and gave them a free optics win by making the right look like hypocrites.

She could have said "advocating for terrorism" instead of "hate speech", and everyone on the right would have cheered her words, but ultimately she's just a dumb Karen at heart with no real conviction behind her right wing posturing. The biggest thing hamstringing Trump right now, aside from extremely compromised lower court judges, is members of his own cabinet. At least they're not outright opposing him, like in his first term, but the sheer incompetence and bad optics is a serious problem, and I don't see it getting better until he kicks a few asses to the curb.
 
the most surprising charge to me is it's second degree not first.
View attachment 7923815
the guy 3D printed a gun for the attack, wrote delay," "deny" and "depose" and had a notebook describing his intent to murder people what the fuck do you have to do to get first degree?
Yeah. I mean, I'm fine with dropping the Terror charges. But this is absolutely First Degree by all available metrics available to the general public. Dude planned it in advance with intent to kill.
 
I believe this was just the state terrorism charges on Luigi dropped, not to cause any double jeopardy issues because the fed charges are still there.
 
Back
Top Bottom