Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
View all 11 filings

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) PDF
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) PDF
View all 50 filings
LOWERCASE LETTERS said:
What's even the difference between a reversal and overturning?
Click to expand...
The 10th and Utah would be unconditionally bound by a reversal (the timing of which has long since passed), while an overturning would just vacate the precedential value of the 10th's decision as improperly decided. To put it in other words, had SCOTUS reversed 10th's decision, it would have all been over and Null would have had won (assuming a straightforward reversal). Were SCOTUS to overturn the 10th's decision now as improperly decided, it would not change anything bar create another argument Null could use for dismissal at the District level.
 
Bogliacci said:
Implying the email alert didnt get lost in his OVERFLOWING inbox
Click to expand...

Hey, it's really easy to overlook some dumb email from the courts when he has dozens of emails every day from SUPER HOT SINGLE BABES who are waiting to talk with Russ! There's even one from this local chick who just thinks he's a total stud and his music is just so inspirational, and she's TOTALLY going to get together with him when she gets back into town. The problem is she's stuck in Thailand right now because she was doing a photo shoot for this modeling agency, and someone stole her bag with her money and ticket for her return flight, and if Russ will just send her the money for a flight back home and some food and other things, she will totally make it "worth his while" when she gets back into town. All she needs is his bank routing number and social security...

You can't blame a guy for failing to see some dumb court email when he's got an opportunity like that! Hell, she might even decide to become his best earner at his brothel!
 
Useful_Mistake said:
To put it in other words, had SCOTUS reversed 10th's decision, it would have all been over and Null would have had won (assuming a straightforward reversal). Were SCOTUS to overturn the 10th's decision now as improperly decided, it would not change anything bar create another argument Null could use for dismissal at the District level.
Click to expand...

But there may be dumber options. An overturn might get noticed by the judge, who dismisses the suit on his own. In theory he'd still have to deal with all the open sanctions, but I don't believe Judge "shall is a suggestion" Barlow is going to be so scrupulous.

Even dumber, Greer himself might move for a dismissal and ask for everything else to be rendered moot. It's been said several times that he can no longer drop the suit without Josh's permission, and Josh wants fees. But if SCOTUS cuts the legs out from under the case, Greer has an excuse to get out without admitting he did anything in bad faith. After all, how could a poor little pro se retard know what SCOTUS would decide 5 years later?

We're in the "I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me" phase of kicking the retard. As funny as it would be if SCOTUS kills contributory infringement as a concept, I don't want it to somehow give Greer an easy out. It would also go against Josh's stated goals of fighting for so long.
 
Eep.
1758754721205.webp
 

Attachments

No way Greer wrote that. The formatting is consistent, things are properly capitalized, and no way would Greer ever just use Moon to refer to Josh.
 
Accept Only Substitutes said:
No way Greer wrote that. The formatting is consistent, things are properly capitalized, and no way would Greer ever just use Moon to refer to Josh.
Click to expand...
Well, there is an incorrect comma use ("Holding Mr. Moon accountable, does not risk cutting off innocent households from internet access; it targets an operator whose own conduct materially contributes to infringement."). But yes, 100% AI. Russell does not know semi-colons, but AI does.
 
parsnip said:
View attachment 7959393

Not only did he use AI, but chatgpt has personal experience reading his previous briefs and thinks this one isn't retarded enough to be Greer's writing 🤭
Click to expand...
For its insights into Greer's schemes, I will just this once forgive the clanker for giving itself a congratulatory reacharound like this. "Wow! This is great! A wonderful improvement! I'll bet a humble AI like yours truly is to blame!"
 
Just noticed a Greer-format snuck through.
2025-09-24_18-39.webp
But, as just as important, that's a totally nonsensical reference. There is no title 545 of the U.S. Code.
If he meant to cite the Grokster case it's 545 U.S. 919 (not "at 919" or "at 939"). And then you'd have a reference to the actual paragraph you were citing (at something).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom