- Joined
- Nov 10, 2015
Lol Kreamer. Maybe his ancestor was a cheesemaker?
Last edited:
Cologix Canada Inc. v. Path Network Inc and Path's other legal issues - Canadian data center company is suing Path Network, famous for being ran by a pedophile, not paying their bills, scamming their investors, and deplatforming the Kiwi Farms
- Thread starter Useful_Mistake
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
No, Judge Child! That's not the order! Enjoy an amended order! - The Plaintiff
Sooo, what's their reasoning for no childing the Judge? Well, Path insider apparently emailed them inside deets on Path.
Path also sent a message to their Discord Kittens, because if you commit a crime the best strategy is to make as many people aware as possible (I guess)
Much of the hardware at issue was seized by " PhoenixNAP and other datacenters"
Also:
Request:
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Turns out there was a motion for that, but it didn't appear anywhere until now. Not spending $10 on it because its already granted
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
The order is not yet available for purchase
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Path counterclaimed for breach of contract, "specific performance", and declaratory judgement
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
That's a weird counterclaim. As far as I can tell, the only breach they are alleging is that Data Sales didn't give them a buyout quote for 2 months, and then got pissy over past-due payments. If that breached a specific clause, like "DS will respond to all queries within 5 business days", Path would have quoted it; instead they just have a generic claim that this means DS didn't act "in good faith".
More relevant to Path haters, this doesn't sound like a healthy business:
You're supposed to raise equity capital to expand, not to dig yourself out of an ongoing debt. How bad is their business that the services provided by the lease don't pay for the lease itself?
After 4 months of searching around, Path couldn't get an investor bailout of a mere $500k.
Also, I don't know if there's legal significance to it, but Path admitting it made multiple payments and was trying to raise money indicates that they did know they were behind for tons of money. Otherwise they would have challenged the amounts and filed a lawsuit themselves. You don't make 8 "interim payments" then run to raise capital for charges you do not believe are real.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
All contracts carry what is called the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing." Path's argument either borders on or actually is frivolous, since nothing they describe comes close to the high bar for establishing such a violation.
While a violation of an explicit clause in the contract generally also violates the implied covenant, in such a case you usually see a reference to the explicit provision, so a claim of a breach of the implied covenant absent a specific provision has to get over a high bar to qualify.
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
I think they're trying to say DS gave them conflicting numbers and arbitrary deadlines, in an attempt to force Path into breach. But I notice they never mention their own regular payments to DS, or DS's regular invoices, etc. Even if you take everything Path claims in the most favorable light for them, the best you arrive at is DS had a slow response resulting in delayed ability to buy out the leases, and even then Path seems financially unable to exercise that option anyway.
Like you said, there's a high bar to prove "bad faith", but here Path doesn't even demonstrate DS's slowness was done intentionally.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
Path allegedly owes nearly $300k in taxes
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
TL;DR Data Sales says Path wasn't entitled to any buyout because they were behind on payments. If they can show that with Accounts Receivables receipts and the relevant contract clause, that wipes out basically everything in Path's counterclaim. In fact I'd say filing that counterclaim should be sanctionable as a filing in bad faith, if the buyout was so obviously not an option for Path that it couldn't become the basis for a claim of breach against DS.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
SUFFAH PATH!
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I hope this vile nigger company that has fucked with this site gets to reap what it's sown. Fuck this nigger pedo-ridden vile corporation that should not even exist. Fuck you Zoom in particular you diddling piece of shit.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Greer ass litigation
No, but seriously, did Path look at the bullshit Greer is pulling with the TRO and go, "Wow! He's a genius! We should copy that!"
No, but seriously, did Path look at the bullshit Greer is pulling with the TRO and go, "Wow! He's a genius! We should copy that!"
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2024
Now this is a proper shitshow.