📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
View attachment 8076213
Yeah wow it’s almost like looking people dead in the eyes and telling them that Lia Thomas is a true and honest woman and you’re a monster if you disagree was a bad idea, weird
View attachment 8076214
It’s crazy to me how many of these people don’t even have the decency to a) make their post history private or b) separate serious accounts from their goon accounts. So either they a) don’t understand how normal people perceive them or b) they want as many people as possible to see their nasty shit because…reasons.

Stumbled upon a few stories in Lesbiangang, very surprised troonbians haven’t sunk it yet. I’m sure they’re working tirelessly night and day to kill that sub, too. Anyway…
View attachment 8076215
View attachment 8076216
View attachment 8076217View attachment 8076218
View attachment 8076219
>"omg they had their dick out and had a beard!"
>still calling the freak a woman
Modern liberal women are literally niggercattle.
 
>"omg they had their dick out and had a beard!"
>still calling the freak a woman
Modern liberal women are literally niggercattle.
Unfortunately they still have to play by those stupid rules, or they’ll end up like thelezistance that got removed a few months ago, or the multitude of other subs that have been taken down over the years. Troons never sleep (4tran4 in particular has it out for them.)
 
Bro spent nearly $100k and counting just to look like an uncanny freak.

View attachment 8075110

Never let a tranny convince you that they’re anything other than extraordinarily privileged. Who the fuck has this much money lying around for elective surgeries and cosmetics?
When women get a nose job or something people rightly mock them for their vanity but nobody bats an eye for this shit.
 
Why are tumblr trannies even more deranged than trannies on other platforms?
I actually have a theory about this, if the fine scholars of derangement will permit it. Sorry if this seems incoherent; I'm a bit loopy from flu medicine.
I believe that trannies on Tumblr are uniquely batshit crazy and deplorable because before Musk's proper takeover on Twitter, Tumblr has been one of the few holdouts in which A) trannies generally rule the roost yet also B) there is still a sizable enough radical feminist community to lock horns with, and therefore to build elaborate victmization fantasies around. Radical feminists are the sworn nemesis of trannies in particular, so this part is relevant.

In spheres which trannies have complete and total domination, you still see the same amount of freak-ass perversion, but much of it branches out into other subjects and becomes more nebulous; take Reddit and Bluesky as examples where they may have "noncon" (read: rape) fetishes, they are usually more interested in being the victim of said rape rather than raping their political enemies. In spaces like Twitter, they are rapidly becoming outnumbered by a mix of amused/disgusted regular people and big mean nasty Nazi CHUDs who are often just normal guys taking the piss out of them; essentially, the ecosystem is almost too diverse on Twitter to properly mutate them into what we see on Tumblr.

(Also, they don't tend to fantasize about raping straight guys into submission because these particular types are all straight guys themselves and the straight guys they would be threatening would, in all likelihood, not go down quite so easily.)

Enter Tumblr, a place where there's still iron-clad echo chambers of tranny ass-kissing and there are plenty of women on there to bully, disgust, terrorize and brow-beat. But here in lies the twist: the trannies themselves are still forced to see, on a regular basis, that these women not only refuse to worship girlcock, but write autistically long essays and convert other women into being fellow haters of the troon clade and sometimes even have a riotous good time of it. Twitter has a decent radical feminist community, but it tends to be made up moreso of sensible older women who are more even-keeled and prone to blocking; Tumblr girls, however, are forged in the fire of trollish tendencies after years of abuse from overreaching troons, so they're much readier to mock them with transphobic aplomb. And these are men who, more than actually being attacked by homophobic men in real life, hate being laughed at by women online.

Essentially, my idea is that due to being so consistently exposed to women with backbones who hate them and also entrenched in echo chambers with fellow crazy troons, Tumblr trannies therefore evolve to be what I consider the final bosses of transgender misbehavior out of a combination of:
  • being on a website with a general reputation for attracting geeks, weirdos, artists, perverts, freaks and overall misfits, therefore luring in people who usually tend to feel victimized by the world at large already;
  • intense delusions of harassment, abuse and discrimination propelled furthered by amping each other up with borderline pornographic fantasies of mistreatment at the hands of women;
  • a style of platform that is generally anonymous, in which this anonymity breeds sexual depravity and promotes porn sickness and encourages sexual escalation as a form of camaraderie;
  • a culture that practically endorses grooming and conversion, thus making it remarkably easy to entrap new members especially if they are already antisocial gooner weirdos who think everybody hates them.
The reason the victimization part is very vital to all of this is because Tumblr is the #1 site to really propagate the concept that as long as you are oppressed, you can say any sort of heinous, wicked thing about your "oppressor" and have it be defended. It is automatically justified because it is "punching up." Essentially, you cannot abuse nor meaningfully hurt someone with more social capital than you have. We've all seen this at this point, but Tumblr helped solidify this as a legitimate worldview for many people.

So this is how the trannies of Tumblr view it: they are subjugated for being innocent little twans beans who simply want to pee -> TERFs are big, mean, scary, evil lesbians* with cis privilege who drive trannies to their own undoing due to constantly depriving them of much needed sexual attention and community (which is just another form of sexual attention) > therefore, elaborately violent fantasies of raping and torturing lesbians are morally justifiable due to social hierarchy indicating that lesbians are their subjugators.

*The lesbian part is necessary to recognize because these are straight men who want sexual access to all women,
and the more sternly a woman lays down her boundary, the more he wants to conquer her to ensure complete domination of her body and soul.

Other platforms have started letting go of this "oppressed cannot hurt the oppressor" mentality, but Tumblr holds onto it with both hands, hence what leads to this evolutionary disaster for trans ideology. Combine this with a borderline constant waterboarding of sexual deviancy across these blogs and the fact that a lot of these Tumblr troons have actually grown up on Tumblr and are as young as 17-18 years old when they write these posts? Yeah, it makes them a lot freakier than other kinds of troons. Honestly, if big name transphobes started plucking posts from Tumblr instead of other platforms to show people the depths of troon madness, sympathy would start reaching record lows even among the most dedicated buttslurpers.

Now I don't think this is a perfect theory, and we'll likely never know exactly what the fuck is in the water over on Tumblr that makes this happen, but it's my suspicion based on witnessing troons 'n' poons across numerous platforms. If anyone has good counterarguments or any meaningful ways to poke holes in my theory, I'd love to hear it because it is a sincerely fascinating social phenomenon that does not bode well for the fabric of society going forward.
That got a bit out of hand, my apologies. Enjoy some thread tax for your trouble.

Does anyone have some pointers on how to teach these li'l doodz on how to be proper li'l doodz? Naturally, one is best off seeking such sagely wisdom from fellow li'l doodz rather than daring to ask any flesh-and-blood men their take on the matter, which is probably for the best because this is the kind of question where you're just asking to be swirlied.
Link | Archive

Where to Learn the Little Guy Socialization Things?

I'm in my 30s and been on hrt almost 6 years now. I "pass" a good amount of the time but I feel like I am missing a peice of the puzzle for making guy friends as an adult. I have friends from childhood but they live thousands of miles from me.
If you transitioned as an adult and didn't have a ton of guy friends as a kid how did you learn social etiquette and stuff? I'm not into being all macho all the time but I dunno I just feel like I don't know the "bro code" or whatever.
A young poonling has given her baby brother a warped concept of what constitutes male and female and now has concerns that she might be altering his development as a result.
Link | Archive

People with young siblings and unsupportive parents, does this happen to you?

My little brother (6) has only been alive since ive been male presenting and passing (im 16) and since my dad always refers to me as she, it has sort of messed up his perception of gender. My brother sees me as one would an older brother, he associates me with boy things, looks up to me in boy ways, and all those good brotherly things. but he, because of my dad, uses female pronouns and now he doesn't really know how to refer to other people aswell. he sometimes calls our older brother a sister, uses she on other boys on accident, and overall I'm scared for his development. I want to know if other people have gone through something similar and how it turned out, or maybe how they try to deal with it.
A regular male ally tries to ask the troons 'n' poons of r/honesttransgender why they won't simply answer the basic question of "What is a woman?" without becoming mute, childish or combative; the conversations that follow in the comment section indicate why exactly they prefer to be masturbators over master debaters.
Link | Archive

“What is a woman?”… I don’t understand why more people don’t just answer that question? (NOT a sea lion post, my own attempt at a succinct and accurate trans inclusive answer included)

Important clarification before getting into my point;
-I’m very aware that most people asking the question are looking for a gotcha and aren’t interested in tackling the meat of the discussion that can open, rather they want a trans person to look intellectually dishonest/ stupid by their response. This is the context in why I ask why more people don’t just answer the question instead of handing them what they want on a silver platter
-I agree that people don’t owe an explanation for their existence and experience, I’m not including people who don’t want to engage with these folks full stop with the title, only those that do actively engage with them yet refuse to answer. Choosing not to respond to someone trying to bait for content for their social media channels is perfectly fair and valid, but my concern comes at those that loudly engage yet refuse to actually answer what is surely a pretty simple question
With that out of the way, I see the question asked a lot, and a considerable lack of good answers even when asked by a transgender person wanting good answers to give in debates. Some reply with a snarky non answer (“a woman is someone who covers their drink when you walk by”), some will shut the conversation down with “you’re just looking for a gotcha, you asking the question proves you’re arguing in bad faith so the conversation is over” (if you’ve ever had a religious relative tell you whatever reason you bring to the table is invalid because you don’t have god in your heart so are arguing in bad faith might recognise the problem), some employ circular reasoning of ‘a woman is someone who identifies as a woman’ (which comes off awfully close to “it’s meaningless nonsense and we’re making it all up”) and I very rarely see anyone actually trying to answer the question which isn’t a fantastic look when a community united by that which relates strongly to the true meaning of sex and gender identity are also the ones most reluctant to answer what that actually means.
Granted I’m cisgender so forgive me if this is a flawed attempt, but wouldn’t a simple enough response of a catch all definition of a woman be “someone who’s gender identity aligns closest to that of the typical experience of an adult human female”? Points of reasoning as follows:
-It’s not employing any circular definition that renders the word meaningless, and by extension not rendering anything based on that definition meaningless
-Avoids the trap of getting caught up in confusing wordplay while highlighting the difference between sex and gender
-It’s no more or less rigid than the go to definition of “an adult human female” that someone asking the question will employ; the usual go to criticisms will also dig back at their own definition too. The only argument they could make that wouldn’t necessarily be self defeating in this context would be ‘but you can’t test feelings in a lab with science’, which immediately falls flat in that by extension they’d be making the argument that all feelings don’t exist. At that point, how do you define the exact molecular ticking over point from sad to happy? Warm to cold? Happy with one’s skin complexion until the exact hash code of colour is reached that it scientifically and by definition warrants wearing orange face paint to feel better in a way that applies to every human, not just one particular unusual presidential exception?
-It opens the table for further discussion and room for elaboration in response to counter questions. For example; “how can you say your inner feelings fit black and white with a female instead of black and white with a male when there’s X Y and Z to consider?” “Great question, let me introduce you to the concept of the spectrum of gender and how that differs to sex” etc
-Related point, but doesn’t exclude or gatekeep people that wouldn’t fit on a strict binary scale, embraces the spectrum of gender identity
Am I barking up the wrong tree here, or would you agree that definition does the trick?
[–]AntifaStoleMyPenis
I made a post about this a few years ago [A] but the long and short of it is:
Basically there's no way to explain a trans woman's womanhood that doesn't render the whole concept of "nontransitioning nonbinary person" null and void... other than turning woman into a meaningless nonsense word of circular definition, as you've noticed.
Like it's not actually hard to argue that trans women are or becoming female,
it's just impossible without exposing the fact that Gender™ is a naked emperor that identifies as wearing clothes lol

[–]Meiguishui
Most of these stupid conversations would be avoided if we didn’t have self ID and changing sex was dependent on a diagnosis followed by hormones and surgery.

Most of these conversations would be avoided if we didn't feel the need to legally align society along the lines of sexuality and mating. But people are dumb and it pleases their amydalae so we do.​
Yeah, why this obsession with mating? It’s almost as if it’s necessary for the survival of the species. Weird.​
Nobody said it wasn't. Missing the point.​

[–]SpphosFriend
The reason we don’t answer is because the people asking It aren’t asking in good faith.

This.​
If you give any good answer they can't argue against, they just go "Noooo, it's an adult human female!"
They're not talking with you. They're talking at you. And as long as you're being talked at, no amount of engagement is going to produce good results.​

[–]Mya__
“What is a woman?”… I don’t understand why more people don’t just answer that question?
I answer it every single time just by using the dictionary... It's really simple.
woman
noun
  • an adult female human being:
  • an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth:
~~The Dictionary

And all I did was look it up in the dictionary. The Dictionary is the thing that people made to record and categorize what words mean and how they are used by people. When we have a question about a word the dictionary is a good place to start.
If you want a personal definition I like the more recent one: A Woman is an adult human female - and I like this one because it's simple and after I completed transition I became an adult human female (using current binary definitions)

If you want a medical definition:
Woman
nounA term used to describe someone who self-identifies as a woman or as feminine based on what is important to them as an individual—including gender roles, behavior, expression, identity, and/or physiology. ~~Stanford Medical Dictionary

[–]not-ok-69420
Consider this: What is a female? 🤔 The delineation is arguably just as blurry as "woman".

[–]ImposssiblePrincesss
Better to understand the question you're asking.
No one is here to write a dictionary. This is a political talking point, part of a set of such points arguing first that trans women are not really female "because of her biology" and that she is not really a woman because "women are female".
It's very childish, really.
Non-abrahamic (not Jewish, not Christian, not Muslim) societies have allowed people "born male" to renounce their sex and become eunuchs for tens of thousands of years. Those eunuchs, posing no risk of making women pregnant, were always allowed to live as women - adopting female names, wearing female clothing, and living by female rules - if they wished to do so.
Only in the west do people see someone made miserable by the rules of masculinity and tell them "live as a man anyway, we don't care".
American and British society, with its bloody past of colonialism and slavery, should consider finally learning some empathy and some compassion, instead of the being the orgy of cruelty it has now become.

The basics are this:
* Trans women, while not biologically identical to cisgender women, are almost always more similar to cisgender women than to cisgender men in any way that matters to the society around them.
* Trans men, similarly are more similar to cisgender men than to cisgender women.
This may not always be true if we don't consider medical transition and surgery and look only at self identification, but the reality is that most trans people who are given the opportunity to get hormones and surgery will do so.
There is a need to recognise that, in the situation where a trans person hasn't transitioned medically, some restrictions may be needed, temporarily, while also giving that person the opportunity to cross that line.
That being said, those restrictions (e.g. a trans woman having female hormone levels in order to play sport) shouldn't be designed to make life humiliating or unliveable for trans people.
India's model, where anyone can get a "T" or "X" marker on their passport by self-ID, wear the clothes of their preferred gender, and have full rights (one day, when society catches up) but you need medical transition to go to "M" or "F" opposite from birth, might be a compromise in those countries that can't bear to have full self ID.
Of course, the coutnries that do have full self ID, like Australia, are doing just fine.

[–]madmushlove
Honestly, the answer you gave would just be laughed at and interrupted. People answer that question all the time just like that and they're turned into INTERNATIONAL HUMILIATION MEMES for it. No thank you

[–]3amcaliburrito
>“What is a woman?”… I don’t understand why more people don’t just answer that question?
probably because it's never asked in good faith. it's always just a shit-stirring effort in an attempt to own the libs

[–]mxtrekkie
Because the only definition they'll take is "an adult human female." Anything else, they'll call it woke, DEI, gender extremism, or whatever else is the flavor of the week. They will accept not a drop of nuance.

Something that bemuses me about the "adult human female" line is that it still does not categorically exclude trans women.

[–]hole-in-the-day
Woman is the social category associated with the female sex. To be part of a social category, you both need to recognise yourself as belonging to it, and other members of your community need to recognise you as belonging to it.
I understand the appeal of just wanting to use the first part and making it entirely a matter of self identity, because that includes every trans woman. But that's not how social categories work on a societal level. The way you're viewed by other people determines how you're treated, what spaces you're allowed in and the gendered assumptions people make about you.
When you meet someone, in a split second your brain genders them and this informs the way you interact with them. Most of this process is subconscious, and even people who are otherwise progressive won't quite treat a non-passing trans woman as a woman.
This is why until sex changes became a thing, barring the vanishingly few who could pass and go stealth, trans people were largely treated as being part of a third or fourth gender category,
and they still are in many parts of the world where transition medicine is less available. It wasn't until you could actually alter your phenotypic sex with hormones and surgeries that this changed, that trans men were able to live as men and trans women were able to live as women.
In an ideal world, all trans people would belong to their self identified gender category. But that's not the world we're living in, and most of the issues trans people face are rooted in this.
It's why we're misunderstood by most medical providers and given shitty treatment. It's why we're mistreated by the legal system and socially marginalized. If we want social progress and medical advancement, we have to first acknowledge where there is a lack of progress. We need a better slogan than "trans women are women."

[–]SnapDragon100
The social presentation of the female sex.
"A person who prefers female sex traits, and/or cannot tolerate male sex traits, and otherwise prefers to be treated & viewed as female" is a good answer that isn't too vague but also not too exclusive. Bit of a mouthful though

[–]Kuutamokissa
Someone who is automatically categorized and treated by both individuals and society as a whole as an adult human female, who interacts with individuals and society like an adult human female, and whose life experience accordingly is that of an adult human female.

[–]Zoeeeeeeh123
My definition of a woman would be this:
A person with physical (sex characteristics) and/or psychological (gender identity) and/or social traits (societal gender norms) that are most commonly associated with people of the female sex.

[–]bannakaffalatta2
Anyone with a female brain

Isn’t this usually said by TERFS/gen
Idk tbh, I just think it's true no matter who says it​

[–]Progressive_Alien
I go off Jovan Bradley’s definition which is:
A woman is an adult human whose inner sense of gender aligns with traits associated with their schema on the female sex.
A good follow up question to ask the trans exclusionist is:
Can you tell me what is the necessary condition to being a woman that excludes Transgender women but that wouldn't exclude other Cisgender women from that category?

[–]RaccoonTasty1595
A woman is someone with a female fender identity. Which is different from claiming to be a woman. Anyone could claim to be one, but gender identity is involuntary.
Same with men, same with enbies.
But generally this question is just a distraction. It shifts the focus from getting trans people the help/autonomy/safety that we need to arguing about semantics

[–]Own-Primary5315
Adult human female fits just fine unless you don’t think sex can be changed.

Wouldn’t that be excluding trans women who haven’t yet transitioned/ have reasons (financial, safety etc) for not transitioning medically?​
definitions by virtue are exclusive. How would you define the “typical experience” of a woman? Because if a woman said having a menstrual cycle, that would exclude elderly women and non fertile women, and women on contraceptives. I don’t think a definition has beat “adult human female” just yet.​
this is a non nonsensical response that gets used.. elderly women were once prime adult women. same with no fertile women; they have an exception to the rule that would otherwise definitely apply to them.
Well, I think my initial point still stands. Adult human female seems to be the best definition if you know humans can change their sex. Female humans/girls/women can be assigned male at birth
BUt can we ereally change our sex? This is another misnmer I think.
Secondary sexual Characteristics are not sex. But then that is transphobic or something.​
Maybe it would be better as “adult human female and people can change sex”
I say "An adult human female. Like me since age 29."
 
Hey gang, meet Sadie (@dewkissedherbas)
1761410945762.png

Sadie is on a quest to be blue.
1761411179125.png1761411128046.png
1761411284451.png
1761411521356.png
1761411342145.png1761411593709.png
1761411555685.png1761411574529.png
1761411643641.png1761411667766.png

But there's been a snag:
1761411452507.png
 

Attachments

  • 1761411107671.png
    1761411107671.png
    231.5 KB · Views: 1,027
I've seen this guy in my Twitter feed before. Honestly, I'm surprised I don't hear more about people trying to just tattoo their skin into a fantasy color.
 
I was looking for this X profile but typed the wrong thing and wound up finding her... OF account?
1761417509798.png
Proceed with caution
This account also has twice the followers than the blue one
 
After the groomers infesting public schools and camps have been at them, children might not know whether they are boys or girls. Yet archeologists centuries in the future will be able to find out by examining their bones, because biological facts are impervious to neoliberal ideology — although freedom of speech is not, as Emanuel Brünisholz of Switzerland found out the hard way (archive):
1761427743710.png1761428010581.png

Brünisholz is reportedly (archive) about to start a 10-day prison stint due to his voicing skepticism about claims that skeletons are transgender.

https://xcancel.com/EmanuelBrn22173/status/1968970562174103894

1761427830058.png1761427885072.png

Shitlibs probably believe skeletons can be polysexual too — a scary thought right before Halloween.

In 2022, he responded to a Facebook post by Swiss National Council member Andreas Glarner on the controversy. …

The wind-instrument repairman thought that such claims were unfounded and posted a comment that said, “If you dig up LGBTQI people after 200 years, you’ll only find men and women based on their skeletons. Everything else is a mental illness promoted through the curriculum.”

For this factual observation, Brünisholz was charged with “hate speech” and “public belittling” offending legally favored sexual deviants.

He was convicted and fined 500 Swiss Francs.

Brünisholz commendably refused to pay on principle, so he will serve time as a political prisoner in a supposedly free country.
 
Are there any filings or whatever that substantiate the claim it was because he said skeletons are sexed? Based on the crime and what he said, it seems more likely that the second sentence was the issue.
If you dig up LGBTQI people after 200 years, you’ll only find men and women based on their skeletons. Everything else is a mental illness promoted through the curriculum.
 
Is it weird that I think this is kinda cool-looking? I’d rather them go for something absolutely insane than pretend to be a real woman.
IMG_6760.jpeg
I was looking for this X profile but typed the wrong thing and wound up finding her... OF account?
View attachment 8077889
Proceed with caution
This account also has twice the followers than the blue one
Definitely proceed with caution, lotsa dick. More non-dick examples:
IMG_6757.jpeg
IMG_6759.jpeg
I hope he’s saving his money if he really goes through with the tattoo thing. Can’t imagine it’ll be easy to find a job after that.
IMG_6756.jpeg
I was wondering what happened to Lee Francis!
 
Is it weird that I think this is kinda cool-looking? I’d rather them go for something absolutely insane than pretend to be a real woman.
View attachment 8078424

Definitely proceed with caution, lotsa dick. More non-dick examples:
View attachment 8078430
View attachment 8078431
I hope he’s saving his money if he really goes through with the tattoo thing. Can’t imagine it’ll be easy to find a job after that.
View attachment 8078442
I was wondering what happened to Lee Francis!
Man, I don't think I could take all that paint being on me. Like it would end up every where
 
Man, I don't think I could take all that paint being on me. Like it would end up every where
It would also come off when you washed your hands. The rare occasions I wear makeup it takes all my concentration to not rub my face and make smears, because the feel of the makeup on my skin bothers me. I have the same problem with wearing sunscreen, I just feel weird and gross when I'm not even touching my arms or whatever.

Of course the tattoo artists told him it was doable. They stand to make a lot of money from doing every inch of him! They don't really care what happens after it's done and healed.
 
All that effort just to still have big ass man hands
The pop accessory thing is hilarious. However, it isn't just his hands. My man is 5' 11" based on the door. That would put him in roughly the 99.9th percentile for female height. Not breaking the 6" barrier brings down another one, rip. Seriously though, all these dudes don't think anyone notices they should playing in the WNBA?

The first troon I ever saw in person was at a parade. We were on a slight rise and 100ish yards away I noticed someone in a dress fucking towering over people. The guy was easily 6' 3-4" and I'm guessing more like 6' 6". Several years later I was at the hardware store in the same town and a very tall guy wearing earrings and a pink puffy winter jacket walked in. I always assumed it was the same dude and he was very obviously a man with a women's accessories.
 

That is so fucking insane. I can tell you, having seen and studied skeletons of male and female individuals, both medically and forensically, you can absolutely, without a doubt, tell them apart. Just give me the pelvis alone, and I could tell you which is which. This is fucking madness. We are now putting people stating biological facts in jail. This is the fucking dark ages all over again. Can there be any doubt this is the degenerate timeline rather than the main timeline?
 
Back
Top Bottom