Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
View all 11 filings

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) PDF
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) PDF
View all 50 filings
FamicomGorby said:
Null has pledged to pursue Greee to the ends of the Earth to get him to pay his court costs for the entire case. There is no winng for Greer even if he quit now.
Click to expand...
There is certainly less losing and for all of Nulls talk that he would never settle, I think he would if Greer coughed up 40000 as a show of good will.

And that would probably be cheaper for Greer in the long run
 
Schizo Carmen Sandiego said:
I wonder if the obviously chat gpt written filings made Judge Barlow decide to jump in. This all could have been handled by Judge Bennett right?
Click to expand...
No, the district court judge has to handle an objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation.

(3) Resolving Objections. The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
Click to expand...
 
lolwatagain said:
No, the district court judge has to handle an objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation.
Click to expand...
This is why the usual magistrate recommendation practice is utterly useless when one of the parties is a vexatious litigant, because instead of saving time by having a magistrate handle routine matters, you just have to litigate every single fucking issue twice.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
Barlow's acting as if he's explaining this to a literal child
Click to expand...
To be fair, RG is behaving worse than a child right now with his case-related decorum. And, a child probably would understand these instructions better and make more of an effort to heed them.

BoomerPrime said:
Are we finally witnessing cracks in the tard-shield that can't be easily repaired? I really, really hope so. Looking forward to Bennett's assessment of Hardin's costs now and really hoping it's the full amount or close to it - the trauma lumps will be visible from the ISS.
Click to expand...
As much as I want to say yes, past history with the case downgrades me to cautious optimism. Still, it seems RG's one-track mind and circular reasoning might be wearing thin on the court. It's a shame the court has so far lacked the fortitutde to be more assertve with RG's passive and cavalier attitude about advancing the case.
 
Kiwi Lime Pie said:
RG's passive and cavalier attitude about advancing the case.
Click to expand...
Nobody involved is a pretty woman so Russell has no drive. It really is that simple.

I mostly lurk rather than contribute (poorly) to the thread anymore but I'm glad to see this development. I can only hope a pissy response is on the horizon and the sanctions are several thousand instead of less than 1 after agreements were made.
 
ECF 378
Screenshot_20251104_011929_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20251104_012245_Firefox.jpg
Russ filed a 31 page (only 5 of them have any arguments) document disagreeing with the District Judge and asking him to reconsider
 

Attachments

1762212710816.png
Oh come ON. We already know he didn't read the SPO, we already know he was told REPEATEDLY that the SPO didn't mean what he thought it meant. He really thinks the judge is this stupid.
 
People thought that it would be copywrite that got the judicial branch to strike down AI, but actually it will end up being prose dipshits being able to throw dozen to hundred page slopfilings at them at the drop of a hat that forces their hand.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
Russ filed a 31 page (only 5 of them have any arguments) document disagreeing with the District Judge and asking him to reconsider
Click to expand...
You're so close Russ! In your next filing you need to assert your dominance and call the judge a nigger - now don't hold back. If you call him that then he'll know you're serious and listen fully to your demands.

On top of that everyone here at the k-farms would respect you for it.

(I hear it's something the ladies like too)
 
S.C.U.D. said:
View attachment 8118537
Oh come ON. We already know he didn't read the SPO, we already know he was told REPEATEDLY that the SPO didn't mean what he thought it meant. He really thinks the judge is this stupid.
Click to expand...
ECF 263, which I assume is the March 28th filing his AI slave is referring to:

1762212989515.png
1762213002519.png
1762213030515.png
1762213051772.png
1762213156602.png

I would personally find it quite difficult to review and rely on both versions of the standard SPO if I did not have access to one of them. Greer quotes both SPOs in this document, so he had somehow gained access to them by this date, but he makes it pretty clear that he didn't have access to at least one version of the SPO during the events that actually got him sanctioned.

I'm not sure what's worse; he didn't proofread this, licked the stamp and sent it or he did proofread it and completely missed how bad this line of defense is.
 
S.C.U.D. said:
View attachment 8118537
Oh come ON. We already know he didn't read the SPO, we already know he was told REPEATEDLY that the SPO didn't mean what he thought it meant. He really thinks the judge is this stupid.
Click to expand...
And by the time March rolled around, maybe he had read the SPO. But all his filings and discovery fuckery between the hearing and then he assuredly did not.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
ECF 378

Russ filed a 31 page (only 5 of them have any arguments) document disagreeing with the District Judge and asking him to reconsider
Click to expand...
The judges in this case have certainly earned the incoming jump-scare of seeing keffals in a filing.

Love those greatest hits, Russ. Plightsperg about muh Rule 60 again it'll definitely work this time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom