4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC and LOLCOW, LLC, d/b/a KIWI FARMS, Plaintiffs, v. THE UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, a/k/a OFCOM

4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC v. UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS 1:25-cv-02880 — District Court, District of Columbia

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-02880
  • Court
    District Court, District of Columbia
  • Filed
    Aug 26, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Jan 15, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
LOLCOW, LLC, UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, 4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
13 Jan 15, 2026 REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 01/16/2026) PDF
— Jan 1, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines
— Jan 1, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 1/19/2026. (tj)
— Dec 31, 2025 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
— Dec 31, 2025 MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 19, 2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/1/2026. (lcrc2)
View all 30 filings
I haven't watched the BBC documentary, but just at face value, it doesn't make much sense that people would waste time, let alone risk their jobs, deceptively editing a person to make them say something if there was already an unambiguous unaltered recording of them saying the very same thing, right?
 
woduqu said:
I haven't watched the BBC documentary, but just at face value, it doesn't make much sense that people would waste time, let alone risk their jobs, deceptively editing a person to make them say something if there was already an unambiguous unaltered recording of them saying the very same thing, right?
Click to expand...
As long as it's somebody the media doesn't like, they could do literally everything claimed and the media would still edit it deceptively just to try and make him seem even more evil. Always assume a journalist is an arrogant malcontent with a god complex.
 
woduqu said:
I haven't watched the BBC documentary, but just at face value, it doesn't make much sense that people would waste time, let alone risk their jobs, deceptively editing a person to make them say something if there was already an unambiguous unaltered recording of them saying the very same thing, right?
Click to expand...
They know their audience pretty much only gets their news from the BBC or other liberal news. They know that if their documentary helped tip the scales and prevented Trump from becoming president that he wouldn't have the ability to challenge them on this.

Obviously they were wrong, and now they're reaping what they sowed.
 
Not a big fan of Lunduke personally
ECF 5: NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Kelsey Kry on behalf of UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)

ECF 6: MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, 3 Errata by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)

gov.uscourts.dcd.284218.6.0-pg1.webpgov.uscourts.dcd.284218.6.0.webp
 

Attachments

“In this District, requests for extensions of short durations are routine,” and “most requestsof this nature . . . [are] unopposed.” Jordan v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 308 F. Supp. 3d 24, 37 (D.D.C.2018), aff ’d, No. 18-5128, 2018 WL 5819393 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 19, 2018). This modest requestshould have fallen into that category.
Click to expand...

Is this a slight against us or the court?
 
"Ofcom is a UK public regulatory authority and has substantial grounds for seeking dismissal of this lawsuit based on sovereign immunity."

Yes.
Sovereign Immunity.
Ya know. That thing that makes it so OFCOM cannot fine or punish US citizens or corporations doing business in the US....BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY!!!
 
jxxyy said:
Not a big fan of Lunduke personally
ECF 5: NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Kelsey Kry on behalf of UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)

ECF 6: MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, 3 Errata by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)

View attachment 8185553View attachment 8185555
Click to expand...
PUSSIES! Just respond instead of asking for two weeks! Stop running you cowards!
I guess this finally puts to bed the question if they got served or not.
 
Botchy Galoop said:
"Ofcom is a UK public regulatory authority and has substantial grounds for seeking dismissal of this lawsuit based on sovereign immunity."

Yes.
Sovereign Immunity.
Ya know. That thing that makes it so OFCOM cannot fine or punish US citizens or corporations doing business in the US....BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY!!!
Click to expand...
do private companies usually have sovereign immunity?
 
Null said:
do private companies usually have sovereign immunity?
Click to expand...
This bullshit operation is a private company when it wants to be and a government agency when it wants sovereign immunity.

Nuke the United Cuckdom. We have already had this war once and they lost.
 
Private Tag Reporter said:
Personally, I say we re-litigate this the 1776 way, but that's just me. KIWIFARMS VS. THE UNITED KINGDOM (A WAR).
Click to expand...
Hilariously OFCOM's actions if they are in fact a UK Government Agency and subject to Sovereign Immunity could well be taken as a Violation of the Treaty of Paris of 1783. Round up the Fifes and Drums! We March at Dawn!
 
LiquidChrisRespecter said:
They got the extension.
Click to expand...
1763545850637.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom