- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
most likely some deal to tell her to shut up & give her info(discord & email & text) for a paused case & not going into discovery.
TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.
- Thread starter Sheryl Nome
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 2:25-cv-05564
-
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California
-
- Filed
- Jun 18, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Both
-
- Last Filing
- Apr 30, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 37)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | Apr 30, 2026 | NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Response in Opposition to Motion 36, Request for Judicial Notice, 37 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/01/2026) | |
| 37 | Apr 30, 2026 | REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Declaration)(Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/01/2026) | |
| 36 | Apr 30, 2026 | OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/01/2026) | |
| 35 | Apr 16, 2026 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint filed by Defendant Alexandra Marwa Saber. Motion set for hearing on 6/5/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Benjamin Kassis, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 04/17/2026) | |
| 34 | Apr 1, 2026 | NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Stipulation for Hearing,, Stipulation to Amend/Correct, 33 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 04/02/2026) |
Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 2:25-cv-05565
-
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California
-
- Filed
- Jun 18, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Plaintiff
-
- Last Filing
- Aug 4, 2025
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Morgan Kamal Majed, Ted Entertainment Inc., Does
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 14)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Aug 4, 2025 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTEND ING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 13 by Judge John F. Walter. Frogan's deadline to respond to TEI's complaint extended to October 3, 2025. (iv) (Entered: 08/06/2025) | |
| 13 | Aug 4, 2025 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 3, 2025 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 08/05/2025) | |
| 12 | Jul 17, 2025 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc., upon Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed served on 7/14/2025, answer due 8/4/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe - Member of Household in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 07/18/2025) | |
| 11 | Jun 19, 2025 | STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) (Entered: 06/20/2025) | |
| 10 | Jun 19, 2025 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed. (sh) (Entered: 06/20/2025) |
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri
-
- Docket No.
- 4:25-cv-00459
-
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Missouri
-
- Filed
- Jun 18, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:101 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Both
-
- Last Filing
- Dec 7, 2025
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does 1-10, Ted Entertainment, Inc., Kacey Caviness
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | Dec 7, 2025 | ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) | |
| 26 | Dec 1, 2025 | STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) | |
| 25 | Oct 7, 2025 | DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025) | |
| 24 | Oct 5, 2025 | PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025) | |
| 23 | Oct 1, 2025 | Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025) |
In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 3:25-mc-80296
-
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California
-
- Filed
- Sep 21, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 890 Other Statutory Actions
-
- Cause
- Civil Miscellaneous Case
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- Apr 28, 2026
Parties (2)
- Parties
- Ted Entertainment, Inc., Doe Defendants
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 39)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | Apr 28, 2026 | ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) | |
| 44 | Apr 23, 2026 | NOTICE by Doe Defendants and Respondent Ted Entertainment, Inc., of Relevant Related Proceedings (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026) | |
| 43 | Apr 22, 2026 | TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 4/20/2026 before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for Recorded Proceeding - San Francisco. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2026) (Entered: 04/23/2026) | |
| 42 | Apr 22, 2026 | Transcript of Proceedings held on 04/20/26, before Judge Sallie Kim. Court Reporter/Transcriber Echo Reporting, Inc., telephone number echoreporting@yahoo.com. Tape Number: 9:40 - 10:07. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 41 Transcript Order ) Redaction Request due 5/14/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/26/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/22/2026. (Related documents(s) 41 ) (Jauregui, Tara) (Filed on 4/23/2026) (Entered: 04/23/2026) | |
| 41 | Apr 21, 2026 | TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 04/20/2026 before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim by Doe Defendants, for Recorded Proceeding - San Francisco. (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 4/22/2026) (Entered: 04/22/2026) |
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2024
Imagine Ethan Klein becoming a landlord to Kaceytron, lmao.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Forced mediation is a scam.
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2015
Most states have a homestead exemption. But everything inside the house that isnt taped down is up for grabs.
How so?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Because if you have to force it at least one party is not being reasonable and is NOT going to go along with it. So both sides end up spending tens of thousands of dollars on some completely worthless mediation that is never going to result in shit, and they also have to pay the mediator for wasting everyone's time.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2022
it seems to work in australia. i learned that from an abc law show called "Fisk".
is Kaceytron the only one of the 3 with ties to the snark reddit?
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2021
No, I believe Denims refer nced them in her video.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2024
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
Kaceytron is using the same lawyer Denims is, and for him to appear pro hac vice they need another lawyer to basically stand in as the responsible party who can practice in Missouri.
Nothing new, this was known for multiple months since the filings were made and we even looked at her lawyers and their case history a bit.
Nothing new, this was known for multiple months since the filings were made and we even looked at her lawyers and their case history a bit.
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2024
It's still crazy she hired two lawfirms instead trying to negotiate a settlement. Lus speculated Kacey might not be as broke as she tries to portray herself based on this fact.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
When will we find out what happened with mediation?
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
It really depends on how much they actually cost.
LUS is a retard and FORMER patent or IP (forgot which, too lazy to look it up) lawyer from Australia, his opinions on legal US topics are about as relevant as a wet fart in my opinion.
He really glomped onto the Karl topic trying to become relevant as some Aussie lawtube persona, but his history is a failed trading card game company speculating on the TCG market, plus is autistic "I now have a girlfriend" talking in the past make him highly suspect as a source.
[EDIT] I would say my opinion on legal US topics is about worth as much as his, which means very little. I have no education in the field, I am not a US citizen, all my "expertise" is Dunning-Kruger Google skills. But I am not making Youtube videos about it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2021
She's probably rich for Missouri, but poor for California.
I wonder if it's more over her putting so many emotional pleas out over social media.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
She is poor and her family is poor. They are the definition of white trash.
Semi-retarded unemployed leeches living off the Streamer money the drug addict daughter brings in.
Remember, Kacey started her career as a tits-out LOL streamer.
And her family has been spending the money simps give her for showing half her tits on stream while failing at LOL, getting high and crashing out.
Just look at the house on google maps. If she had money, she would not be living in that ramshackle wooden hut and drive a beater.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2025
Hiring local counsel plus specialized pro hac counsel is a signal of more money. While Missouri is a third-rate state, it does have St Louis and Kansas City -- which surprisingly do have some reasonably good legal talent (Shook Hardy and Polsinelli come to mind immediately). So it was a choice to go with the California team plus local counsel. I guess the three defendants may have some kind of joint defense arrangement -- ignoring what could be problematic conflicts issues -- and be pooling money.
It's all so dumb. You know damn well these judges don't want to actually expend effort on ruling on motions here -- they expect a settlement, and might put everyone through the ringer trying to force a settlement through mediation. The judge I clerked for had an, in my opinion, naive expectation that "if i just don't rule on the papers, and push them towards more mediation, this will all just go away because it is so obvious" -- and he did that for a case involving a trucker for an out-of-state oil and gas company clearly at-fault killing a bystander, where the amounts at-issue were significantly higher than anything at issue here.
Until the three amigos get a clear adverse ruling I think they'll continue huffing copium about it all.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
Of course hiring extra lawyers means extra money, but I would assume Kacey is to dumb to hire her own counsel and relied on Denims to get the same lawyers, who then organized for local counsel.
Frogan got her own more boutique LA firm, she is not in the same boat with the other two.
Overall she has been the one who handled the situation the best.
She STFU, deleted all content to avoid causing further harm, and got a lawyer without a conflict.
Denims and Kacey likely have their shared defense arrangement, but I would be surprised if they had pooled their money.
The 40k$ should last Kacey through mediation, but she knows already that she does not like what the Mediator will suggest, and her lawyers already told her what a fair settlement would be. She seems to think she has a chance in court, because she is too stupid to understand what the final sum will be she will be found liable for.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
toooo soon
might need the burger suit with my invese karma
Kaceytron and Ethan Klein have reached a settlement
2 for 3 for jew - reddit & Denims left
.....
might need the burger suit with my invese karma
Kaceytron and Ethan Klein have reached a settlement
2 for 3 for jew - reddit & Denims left
.....
Reactions:
x 271 x 67 x 91 x 57 x 14 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 1
x 271 x 67 x 91 x 57 x 14 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 1
Reactions: x 65 x 13 x 2 x 2 x 2
x 65 x 13 x 2 x 2 x 2
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
I am surprised that someone got through to her to explain how much this will cost her if it goes to trial.
And Ethan must have been VERY VERY merciful