💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Member when people cheeered in when Obama killed Osama? No one bitch and moan about impeachment, but because it's Trompas......
It's even more retarded because Maduro was happily dumping Venezuelan prisons and pointing them to the US.

But they TOTALLY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG!
 
Just had a look at the latest Weekly Seethe and jumped in just in time for Dev to make jokes about assassinating Trump, remember Dev now argues that jokes should be taken seriously (so long as the jokes come from people he hates):
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just had a look at the latest Weekly Seethe and jumped in just in time for Dev to make jokes about assassinating Trump, remember Dev now argues that jokes should be taken seriously (so long as the jokes come from people he hates):
Looks like Dev realized that talking about shooting the president might be a bad idea. He's already yanked it down. Anyone archive the VOD?
 
Amazingly, Dev just got rid of the defense that he was just making a joke by now seriously arguing in favor of it.

02.png


 
Looks like Dev realized that talking about shooting the president might be a bad idea. He's already yanked it down. Anyone archive the VOD?
I would have but itl got drag to an appointment that I didn't enjoy in the slightest, fuck.

Someone who watched could at least give a TLDR summary?

He also didn't archive it on his Odysee page, god dammit.
 
But snatching a literal venezuelan dictator who did the same and keeping him alive isn’t?
Standard procedure TDS: anything Trump does is automatically wrong, ergo any enemy of his is automatically right, perfect, wonderful and awesome, even if it's a fucking murderous dictator.

Also, if this guy's American, he's likely going to get a visit from the Secret Service boys for a quick chat. Rhetoric is one thing but this is a pretty clear threat.
 
Amazingly, Dev just got rid of the defense that he was just making a joke by now seriously arguing in favor of it.

View attachment 8377642


As much as the guy is a retard, he makes a fair point, if anyone for that matter subverts the constitution and illegitimately seizes power they ought to be removed by any means necessary, this is fundamental for the survival of a republic.

Term limits exist for a reason and benefit all sides of the political spectrum by preventing power from accumulating in the hands of the few.

Regardless of whether it is Trump or anyone else, the Republic and its Constitution come first above all else.
 
Term limits exist for a reason and benefit all sides of the political spectrum by preventing power from accumulating in the hands of the few.
They’re an invention of the 20th century and only happened because Republicans got upset the same Democrat kept winning.

People should be allowed for the person they want and not have that choice ruined for them because the other side can’t find someone who can beat them.

They’re undemocratic and for sore losers, hence the current Democrats crying about it. If Obama wanted to find a way to stand for a third term do you think the people calling Trump a dictator would be crying about it?
 
People should be allowed for the person they want and not have that choice ruined for them because the other side can’t find someone who can beat them.

They’re undemocratic and for sore losers, hence the current Democrats crying about it. If Obama wanted to find a way to stand for a third term do you think the people calling Trump a dictator would be crying about it?
Amending the Constitution is part of the democratic process, and more difficult than passing laws. The 22nd was proposed, passed with the necessary votes in the House/Senate, and ratified by 36+ states. Term limits are inherently democratic because our wise representatives wanted them.

Inb4 the move to Mass Debates.
 
A sixth fucking politicalsperg post there.
ShortFatOtaku is straight up advocating for Trump to get killed now.
Mate he's clearly saying IF Trump uses unconstitutional means to get a third term, using violence against him is justified.

He's not advocating for Trump to get killed. Trump isn't getting a third term and he's not running for a third term, we're only in year two of his second one. That's such a far and ridiculous stretch it's borderline retarded, it's not even bad faith, it's an outright lie.

I'll dumb it down even further.
If anyone is found to be child molesters in Epstein's files, regardless of their political status, their political affiliation or career status, or even if they're the sitting president, or a previous one, they should be punished by the law. And I think child molesters should be shot.
That's not me straight up advocating for the execution of Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates and so on. There's a qualifier.
 
They’re undemocratic and for sore losers, hence the current Democrats crying about it. If Obama wanted to find a way to stand for a third term do you think the people calling Trump a dictator would be crying about it?
I cede the point that term limits do limit the choice that individuals are given as to whom is to be leader of the Republic, however, I argue that the prevention of abuse, and accumulation, of power which it affords benefits a healthy democracy far more than it costs.

Terms limit serve to quite effectively eradicate cults of personality — which often lead to the subversion of the state — prevent the stagnation of the status quo, and force the public to engage with a wider range of candidates.

Moreover, to claim that term limits are an invention of the 20th century is altogether untrue. Term limits and restrictions date back to the Roman Republic and were an uncodified political convention in the United States since its invention.
 
Back
Top Bottom