/r/TNOmod and the Reddit HOI4 modding community - When a subreddit for a video game mod turns to utter insanity

This document suffers the cardinal sin of being a unorganized mess that mixes actually bad shit alongside the authors retardation and denseness. Pretty sure the author is also a ESL so it's difficult to read.

Firstly we have this, the author censors every image to a ridiculous degree, meaning the reader can't actually judge the content of any of the images without having prior knowledge of what the image is. All interpretation of the evidence has to come purely from the author. If you believe the content of this document is so bad that if you don't censor it, it is liable to be to being taken down, then the censorship is understandable. I however believe the author takes this censorship to such a extreme that it only hurts their case, as it allows someone to agree the content isn't as bad as the author implies via their censoring. (The author actually does this in the document.)

So first we have this screenshot, which is 100% lolicon shit, there is no possible argument otherwise. For some reason, however, the author has to add the "(seia is 17)" note to confirm why it's bad? If you take issue with this image, but the issue you take is that the character is "canonically 17" and not anything else, I question your logic heavily. Also, completely obscuring the character, including their face, is questionable.

The document immediately devolves into questionable bullshit with the next part, where the author relies on a AI summary provided by google as evidence of why this is bad. The character is Susie from Deltarune, who has no actual age, just being referred to as "teenage." The author, however, will rely heavily on this AI summary as proof of the character's age, and makes it a major point when they bring her up later.

Susie is immediately followed by this, which is yet again, 100% lolicon. The author doesn't call it that though, instead using the term "anorexic young look character".
Later in the doc, however, the author makes a stink about "Hitori Gotoh", namely this cosplay.

Which again, the author makes a point to bring up the age. This is a adult woman cosplaying a popular character from a anime, I find this vastly less damning than the image above it, but the author seems to take more issue with the cosplay.


This section is rather confusing, because for some reason the author included a completely uninteresting image amongst 3 examples that are actually decent for the authors point. Ignoring the potentially incorrect statement that the character is a minor by the authors age-based metric. (Konata is 18 by the end of the Lucky Star series, so she wouldn't be a minor by age. She is still a loli, but again, the author's age autism bites him in the ass.)
Also, later on the author shares this.

The author specifically notes that the character on the left is a minor, but doesn't restate that the character on the right is also a minor, according to their prior mention of them. ESL issue for sure, but still a strange comment to make. The image would stand alone well enough without a caption.


Speaking of Lucky Star, the author uses this image, saying it's "A minor character" depicted as a mother, except it isn't. The author cares so much about the ages of characters, but can't even do a simple search to see if he's right. (The character, Kanata, is the Mother of Konata from Lucky Star. She's supposed to be mid 20's here.)


There is also this, the author claims this person has a blue archive pfp, and then states blue archive is a famous for having pedophiles. One issue, their pfp isn't from Blue Archive, it's from Girl's und Panzer.
Now, you will notice the censoring here, and understandably assume it's obscuring a panty shot or something similar, right?

Wrong, It's a shadow. This is, in my opinion, a really blatant attempt to make the image look vastly worse than it is in reality.

On page 32 of the document, the author leaves this comment under a picture.



This should have been the crux of the entire document, the entire focus of this big google doc, instead it's on page 32 of a 41 page mess that reads like the author throwing everything they could find that was even slightly questionable together, discrediting actual bad content by putting it alongside speculation of fictional characters ages and general ESL retardation. The doc does feature plenty of actual evidence, including examples of Lolicon and Shotacon content.