Russell Greer vs. Viatron Corporation, A-26-937678-C

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I can smell that suit from here.

Seems like the judge is less impressed with Greee than he was with ViaTRON's counsel, and that's saying something.
 
The Ace Paralegal doesn't know how to demand a jury trial, according to the judge.

Cockblocked.
 
Greer responds:
  • not just a negotiation
  • Viatrion expects $20,000
  • Viatron didn't say that Russ must say
  • I simply asked for more
  • He accepted both $20,000 and $200,000
  • IIED and Defamation are for the jury
Judge: You filed your request for Jury incorrectly and is "likely unaffected"
Judge explains to Russ how to demand for a jury.

Russ response stops
 
What, that's all he says???
 
ViaTRON argues no contract was accepted, for either 20k or 200k as they made counteroffers which show no meetings of minds.
 
He didnt even contest anything besides dismissing the breach of contract. The rest of the suit is just going to be dismissed because he didnt contest it.
 
Null should demand a change of venue and get this judge lol

Edit* You'll cowards don't even smoke crack. This post has been highlighted and then un-highlighted like 3 times.
 
Last edited:
Viatrion:
  • not served with the opposition motion and the settlement motion
  • no facts show that contract was ever created
  • no "I accept your entire offer"
  • $20,000 was one term of the offer, to which Viatron counteroffered
  • She understands that the complaint is super low
  • No contract of any kind
  • No elements of breach of contract are met.
  • Wage claims do not apply
  • IIED does not apply, and so does defamation
 
This little girl is shit. They may not get their motion to dismiss granted. If this judge grants it, it'll be by the skin of little girl lawyer's teeth and only because Greer is marginally a worse arguer than she is.
 
Back
Top Bottom