Crime Justice Department charges Southern Poverty Law Center with fraud over investigations into extremist groups

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link | Archive
Washington — A federal grand jury in Alabama indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on 11 counts of wire and bank fraud-related charges on Tuesday, the Justice Department announced, accusing the organization of paying members of extremist groups as part of its efforts to investigate them.

"The SPLC is a nonprofit entity that purports to fight white supremacy and racial hatred by reporting on extremist groups and conducting research to inform law enforcement groups with the goal of dismantling these groups," Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said at a news conference announcing the charges. "The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred."

An indictment was not immediately available on the federal court database.

Blanche said the group was charged with six counts of wire fraud, four counts of bank fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

The SPLC is a nonprofit that tracks white supremacist and other hate groups across the U.S., and has been a frequent target of President Trump's allies. It is best known for its work investigating the Ku Klux Klan.

The charges came hours after the center's interim president and CEO Bryan Fair said in a video that the organization was being investigated by the Justice Department in connection with a now-defunct program that used paid confidential informants to infiltrate far-right groups.

"The focus appears to be on the SPLC's prior use of paid confidential informants to gather credible intelligence on extremely violent groups," Fair said. "We will not be intimidated into silence or contrition, and we will not abandon our mission."

The SPLC has had a rocky relationship with the Trump administration for reasons other than the conduct alleged by the Justice Department on Tuesday.

In October, FBI Director Kash Patel ended all ties between the bureau and the center, accusing the group of being a "partisan smear machine." Allies of the Trump administration have accused the organization of being "anti-Christian" and unfairly targeting Republican-aligned groups like Turning Point USA, the Family Research Council and Moms for Liberty. They have also criticized the SPLC for singling out members of the Trump administration in its online reports.

The group was the subject of a Republican-led congressional hearing in December, where a senior TPUSA executive accused the group of "weaponiz[ing] the 'hate' label against ideological opponents."

In a draft report from a task force on "anti-Christian bias" that CBS News has seen, Patel accused the SPLC and the Anti-Defamation League of providing the bureau with "false information." He said analysts used that information to generate an internal intelligence memo that raised concerns about a possible link between racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists and radical Catholic ideology.

President Trump's allies have pointed to that memo as evidence that the FBI under President Joe Biden was weaponized against Christians. The Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group is planning to release a report analyzing how the memo came to be, according to sources familiar with the matter.

An internal FBI review later concluded that there was no malicious intent in the memo's creation. But its drafters failed to adhere to proper standards and lacked enough evidence to support a relationship between the two groups, according to a summary of the internal findings that was released to Congress in April 2024.

In his video about the federal probe Tuesday, Fair accused the Justice Department of targeting the nonprofit, and vowed to defend it from any criminal prosecution.

"Today, the federal government has been weaponized to dismantle the rights of our nation's most vulnerable people and any organization like ours that stands in the breach. We stood in the vanguard then, and we stand in the vanguard today. We will not be intimidated into silence or contrition, and we will not abandon our mission," he said.

"We will vigorously defend ourselves, our staff, and our work; we will continue to fight hate; and we will continue to seek a safer and more just world."
 
Let's see how long we wait before the ADL face the same music.
I’d love to see that fucker Greenblatt in the slammer.

On a related note, I wonder who the Charlottesville informant is. Richard Spencer maybe?
IMG_4401.jpeg
 
Ah, the SPLC. A group that should've been RICO'd into the ground long ago. Is Mark Potok still shilling for them? He was a faggot who flagged every pro-2A group as 'white milita terrorist' types.
 
This is perhaps the funniest part of the indictment document:
1.png

If true, the SPLC paid a long-time informant to steal documents from a neo-Nazi organization (which he was a fundraiser of), had him put them back after copying the stolen materials and then paid another informant to take the blame for the theft.
 
Last edited:
Usually when something like the FBI pays informants, it's to get convictions. With this, it's to post articles on their fucking website? Most of these groups are obscure enough that they should have been practically irrelevant by now but of course when you've got a retarded charity laundering hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to fund them of course they'll stick around and it's obvious that they wanted this to be the case.

1776813221228.png

It can't be that fucking hard to figure out who this one is, and throwing money or anything at him was going to amount to what? Clearly he was still doing klan related shit. And the indictment claims there's even more of this crap? Anyone with a partially functioning brain who was throwing money at the SPLC should be furious since I doubt they would have wanted their money to be laundered into payments for any of these people, especially some at $100,000/year.

This also goes to show that there was indeed a set of hands behind the scenes funding some of this shit like people always assumed was the case but could never definitively prove.
 
Back
Top Bottom