Plummeting Birthrates Watch Thread - The horrifying implications of living in a Children of Men situation.

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Third worlders are only here due to leftist support. They can’t fight. I’ll repeat this.
Agreed, the third worlders in the West are obese, cowardly, and reliant on NGOs to keep themselves fed, let alone capable of any action.

The redditors supporting them, on the other hand, have been hyped up into a Ukraine-style psychopathy towards normal American Whites. I don't think they can win, but I do think you would need to inflict Azov level casualties on them to convince them that they aren't going to easily triumph over the "300 lb bubba drumpfies" that they think they'll be fighting. Liveleak footage of scores of lisping antifags getting put down by FPV drones and improvised incendiary mortars.

This isn't universal, of course. The higher ups are less delusional, and once the rightie taboo on violence is decisively broken, they'll flee the country or try to de-escalate.


Just seeing how many murderers one population produces highlights a discrepancy in the willingness to do violence.
Disagree with this. The core determinant in crime is how likely you are to think you'll get away with it. The system presently makes it clear that it will do everything in its power to let a nignog who killed ten infants on film out of jail while likewise breaking every rule to frame a White man who did nothing wrong.

Once civil conflict has broken out, to the point where police response is questionable, that goes away. The first guy to grease someone unpopular and get away with it will become a legend in the classical sense, driving ordinary people to acts they thought themselves incapable of.
 
It's not about having enough money to have children, its that unless you're making a household income of over 150k, having a child will require you to step down a class. As DINKs were you taking two abroad vacations a year, eating out twice a week, having two cars, and a renovated 4 bedroom? With kids it's one vacation camping, ramen dinner nights, one car, and a three bedroom that needs a new roof. Even though that's not necessarily a bad thing, people are revolted at jumping down a class. Like any time I hear a commie talk about a rich person giving up a boat I'm thinking people are literally AVERSE to lowering their comforts/wealth in any way. Why would a middle class couple be different? It really feels like millenials/zoomers are the first group in American history where having kids means having so much less you drop a full class.

There is a lot of fear mongering about age and childbearing that I'm suspicious is just a part of the greater anti-natalist agenda.
Thanks for pointing this out, cuz I am kind of convinced. I know two dozen 35-45 year old mothers/45+ fathers and none have special needs kids. The only one I can think of online is freaking CWC and he would have been autistic due to the rearing of that freak Babs had he popped out her 24 year old puss. Advanced age increases birth defects, but it's an insignificant amount. like .1% going to .2%. Just have the fucking children. But good luck conceiving because aging absolutely obliterates fertility.
 
Thanks for pointing this out, cuz I am kind of convinced. I know two dozen 35-45 year old mothers/45+ fathers and none have special needs kids
I maintain that the skyrocketing autism rates - including the ones that don't count as speds - come from geriatric pregnancies rather than from any of the usual boomer bugbears like vaccines and video games. Biology is complex and full of soft gradients rather than sharp edges. The child a woman has at age 40 is going to be subtly less healthy than the child she'd have had at 20 in any number of little ways, and every one of those changes is multiplicative in terms of life outcomes.

The post you're replying to doesn't hold water, either. Telling women that "it's never too late" just causes them to push their 20's ever further back. It doesn't actually result in more kids.
 
skyrocketing autism rates
You get gibmedats for claiming you have autism, access to academic performance enhancing drugs (Adderall) , and social asspats (tumblr and the woke stack fight over who is least neurotypical and white). Autism is a badly defined spectrum disorder with symptoms ranging from the invisible to severe retardation. In instances where it is obvious, it is overwhelmingly genetically heritable. Real autism is one of those disorders that could be nearly eliminated in a single generation with zygote screening for well known genes linked to it.
 
I don't think they can win, but I do think you would need to inflict Azov level casualties on them to convince them that they aren't going to easily triumph over the "300 lb bubba drumpfies" that they think they'll be fighting. Liveleak footage of scores of lisping antifags getting put down by FPV drones and improvised incendiary mortars.

You say this like it wouldn't be hilarious.

Apropriate to compare antifa to Azov. Neonazis that the real nazis would have gassed.
 
So what, exactly, is a "brown?" Are the arabs, mongols, central asian turks all white? Audit seems to have a similarly slippery definition of "never winning a war." He'd probably also argue that Italy wasn't defeated in Ethiopia, because they came back forty years later.
Modern Arabs only castrated male black slaves.
Agreed, the third worlders in the West are obese, cowardly, and reliant on NGOs to keep themselves fed, let alone capable of any action.

The redditors supporting them, on the other hand, have been hyped up into a Ukraine-style psychopathy towards normal American Whites. I don't think they can win, but I do think you would need to inflict Azov level casualties on them to convince them that they aren't going to easily triumph over the "300 lb bubba drumpfies" that they think they'll be fighting. Liveleak footage of scores of lisping antifags getting put down by FPV drones and improvised incendiary mortars.

This isn't universal, of course. The higher ups are less delusional, and once the rightie taboo on violence is decisively broken, they'll flee the country or try to de-escalate.



Disagree with this. The core determinant in crime is how likely you are to think you'll get away with it. The system presently makes it clear that it will do everything in its power to let a nignog who killed ten infants on film out of jail while likewise breaking every rule to frame a White man who did nothing wrong.

Once civil conflict has broken out, to the point where police response is questionable, that goes away. The first guy to grease someone unpopular and get away with it will become a legend in the classical sense, driving ordinary people to acts they thought themselves incapable of.
Ironic, Redditor shitlib are closer to the fatty retard Whites they accuse the right of being.
 
Telling women that "it's never too late" just causes them to push their 20's ever further back. It doesn't actually result in more kids.
Not telling women it's never too late, obviously the ideal time to have children is between late teens early 30s. As stated in my post, the decline in fertility is the biggest issue. (I even have a friend in her mid thirties who is putting off a family to finish her phD and I told her she's a retard) Just saying don't stop trying just because you're late thirties to forties and worried about birth defects.

In life sometimes you won't meet the right one until you're like 38, even if you weren't girl bossing. Don't give up on a family. Just accept it might not happen, but you can at least try.
 
RDT_20260505_1822393530210788980390378.png
Non-EU borns are 25% in Finland. Terrifying.
 
Agreed, the third worlders in the West are obese, cowardly, and reliant on NGOs to keep themselves fed, let alone capable of any action.

The redditors supporting them, on the other hand, have been hyped up into a Ukraine-style psychopathy towards normal American Whites. I don't think they can win, but I do think you would need to inflict Azov level casualties on them to convince them that they aren't going to easily triumph over the "300 lb bubba drumpfies" that they think they'll be fighting. Liveleak footage of scores of lisping antifags getting put down by FPV drones and improvised incendiary mortars.

This isn't universal, of course. The higher ups are less delusional, and once the rightie taboo on violence is decisively broken, they'll flee the country or try to de-escalate.



Disagree with this. The core determinant in crime is how likely you are to think you'll get away with it. The system presently makes it clear that it will do everything in its power to let a nignog who killed ten infants on film out of jail while likewise breaking every rule to frame a White man who did nothing wrong.

Once civil conflict has broken out, to the point where police response is questionable, that goes away. The first guy to grease someone unpopular and get away with it will become a legend in the classical sense, driving ordinary people to acts they thought themselves incapable of.
The redditors don't seem to get that every cleetus likes to deer hunt which basically means every 300 pound bubba is a highly experienced sniper.
 
View attachment 8961106
Non-EU borns are 25% in Finland. Terrifying.
Keep in mind that non-EU includes other European countries like Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Britain, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Moldova, Serbia, Bosnia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Albania, North Macedonia, and Georgia (to the extent you consider them European). Finland in particular has a sizeable Russian, Albanian, and Ukrainian populations. Still bad, though.

On a related note, here are the White-majority countries which have seen preliminary increases in TFR for 2026 since 2025:

Britain: 1.39->1.41
> England: 1.40->1.42
Finland: 1.31->1.37
Netherlands: 1.41->1.44
Greece: 1.22->1.26
Estonia: 1.15->1.16
Poland: 1.09->1.11
Lithuania: 1.04->1.11
Croatia: 1.48->1.53
Serbia: 1.61->1.65

Everyone else has either declined or not reported any data yet for 2026.

Finland is the most significant here, imo. If they keep up this trend throughout 2026, that would mean they increased from 1.25 in 2024 to 1.37 in 2026, a 0.12 increase in just two years.
 
Between January 2026 and March 2026 in the US, there were:

2,416 births to Pakistani women
12,626 births to Indian women
2,128 births to Afghan women
3,980 births to Dominican women
5,570 births to Venezuelan women
3,706 births to Colombian women
6,070 births to Salvadorian women
2,200 births to Ecuadorian women
37,591 births to Mexican women
11,297 births to Guatemalan women
5,282 births to Haitian women
8,265 births to Honduran women
2,293 births to Nicaraguan women

However, it's worth noting that every single one of these numbers is a decline from 2025 with the exception of Pakistani births (+8.00%) and Indian births (+0.97%).
 
Also, India has announced that the results of the NFHS-6 survey, conducted in 2023-24, will be released soon. While the TFR overall and by state is also reported by the annual SES surveys, the NFHS is the only survey to report the TFR by religion.

Any bets? Keep in mind that India fell to about 1.90 in 2021-2023 era. Personally, I'm expecting around a 1.80, range 1.70-1.90. Muslim TFR will likely be in the 1.90-2.10 range, Hindu TFR in the 1.70-1.90 range, and other minorities (Christians, Sikhs, Jains, etc.) even lower (1.40-1.60).
 
Birth demographics of France, 2024:

1778016509481.png


Honestly surprised the White/European population is still that large among infants. I know the 74.31% born in France doesn't account for naturalized immigrants, but if we assume the women giving birth in 2024 were 20-30 years old, then we can work backwards based on birth statistics in the 1990s-2000s.

In this general range, about 10-13% of births were estimated to belong to immigrant mothers (including other Europeans, but let's assume a worst-case scenario here that the overwhelming majority of these immigrant births were non-European). That would mean 74.31 - 13.00 = 61.31 + 4.16 = 65.47% of births in France in 2024 were White/European (about two-thirds). However, accounting for the fact that at least some of that 10-13% were European, and that at least some of the "Americas" category was White/European from Canada, US, Argentina (85-95% White), Uruguay (80-90% White), Brazil (about 50% White), etc., then the actual percentage of White/European births in France in 2024 was probably still close to 70%, which would make them better off than England and Wales (only about 61% White/European in 2024).

In general, if we wanted to consider European countries with the largest number of non-White/European births, then Britain and Sweden would likely take the shit prize (both in the 60-65% range). Even other extremely cucked countries like Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands have notable percentages of Eastern European births that skew the non-EU numbers (closer to the 70-75% range).
 
the skyrocketing autism rates - including the ones that don't count as speds - come from geriatric pregnancies
Geriatric pregnancies accounted for less than 5% of the autism diagnoses increase according to a California study. The relative risk increase of up to 51% in geriatric pregnancy is still only a 0.7 to 1.1% absolute risk increase (1.5-1.7 to 2.2-2.6) and that only accounts for age 40+, not the actual AMA of 35+, which would lower the risk.
The child a woman has at age 40 is going to be subtly less healthy than the child she'd have had at 20 in any number of little ways,
This is completely depedent on individual risk factors. A healthy 40 year old is still most likely to just have a healthy child if she can still successfully conceive. This is not "you can wait" propaganda. The ability to conceieve and carry full term in the first place is the most important factor, and other risk factors/maternal family history/maternal health is the primary indicator of the child's outcome. This "subtly less healthy" is nonsense. Starting younger is ideal of course, but let's not propagandize women into thinking they can only have sick or disabled children if they're starting late, if they can still conceive. It's simply not true. It's just fear mongering. We do not have to lie to women that they can all still conceive at 40+ and neither do we have to scare them into self-sterility. We can simply present truth without bias. See it's not that hard.
 
Between January 2026 and March 2026 in the US, there were:

2,416 births to Pakistani women
12,626 births to Indian women
2,128 births to Afghan women
3,980 births to Dominican women
5,570 births to Venezuelan women
3,706 births to Colombian women
6,070 births to Salvadorian women
2,200 births to Ecuadorian women
37,591 births to Mexican women
11,297 births to Guatemalan women
5,282 births to Haitian women
8,265 births to Honduran women
2,293 births to Nicaraguan women

However, it's worth noting that every single one of these numbers is a decline from 2025 with the exception of Pakistani births (+8.00%) and Indian births (+0.97%).
What are the statistics for somalian women?
 
We’re back but that Asian number should be nowhere near 6% of the population. It includes (probably majority at this point) Indians, Bangladeshi, and Pakistanis, followed by Chinese and SE Asian. All these groups suck and look like ancient hominid reconstructions (except Chinese - but they suck and are sneaky). We need to yoink the H1-B and any similar visas pronto. Almost all the parents are foreign. In fact we need a second Chinese Exclusion Act, and an Indian one just for fun.
 
Back
Top Bottom