Charlie Kirk specifically, while Hasan was visibly disturbed by the assassination at the moment it happened, after just a couple of weeks he was slyly flaunting the Bella Ciao song (from one of the bullet inscriptions). Just in the past week, he casually floated the idea that Israel assassinated Kirk, this following Hasan's new stated gameplan after the WHCD assassination attempt of Trump that he will purposefully pass conspiracy theories to his audience, even when he personally doesn't believe them, because he assesses the chaos the theories cause to be to his political advantage
You do realize the immense difference between having schizo theories about his murder, like Hasan did, and actually being in favor and gloating about his death? Stop the debatebro false equivalence its not even remotely the same
Hasan explains "social murder" to defend the assassin Luigi Mangione. Hasan's regular cries of "out of context" are just his way of pointing to his mask when he lands into trouble with critics seeing him for what he really is, and those who fall for his mask are either in on his subversive radicalism or cowardly sucking up to him because they believe a political coalition with him (and his vast, young audience) is necessary to beat Republicans.
You didn't show any example of him calling for political violence. Afaik, he said that Luigi Mangione was the logical conclusion of the current Healthcare system. Do you have a quote or source for him actually cheering for it? Again, your other example is just him saying that he doesnt have an issue with someone starving stealing from a Walmart. How is that being in favor of polticial violence? I remember seeing the clip and he even says that he's not one of those who thinks that low level theft is justified just to own the rich. s
Everything you bring up is not even in the same league as being pro CSAM, pro pedophilia, hanging out with a trannie pedo (foodshops), calling openly for murder, doxxing, etc.
Your argument basically hangs on "Hasan might not be as open about it, but that's what makes him so much worse as he is more subversive" which is just a way of saying that you made it up. Like he never said anything about pro csam, or that indicates that he was happy Charlie was assassinated, or that called for political violence in any concrete way (saying that bad Healthcare leads to radicalization isn't in any meaningful way). But you think that he probably thinks all of that in his head. It's just completely unfalsifiable.
And even if everything you said is completely true, and interpreted as uncharitably as possible. It's still not even 5% as bad as what destiny openly says, much less what he doesn't.
Same goes for Asmongold. He might be a complete retard, and he might be super wacky for libtards, but even if we take everything he says at face value, he is still like 2% as bad as destiny
