💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing Redditor who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger cuck visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron in third person on REDDIT. Wife's bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

  • 📧 If you are an employee of a T1 ISP, US datacenter, or related company please get in touch at josh@kiwifarms.net. I have some questions.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votes: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votes: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votes: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votes: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votes: 146 36.1%

  • Total voters
    404
  • Poll closed .
trouble breathing

Not enough trouble since he's still sadly doing it
Nick is once again preparing to throw his lawyers under the bus. He hates having legal representation
So fire them and represent yourself, or hire some retard like Barnes who'll shit out whatever gobbledegook you want

They didn't put in that the judge who signed the warrant was biased against him.
Holy shit he's literally reached the Acerthron tier of arguing that it's the biased judges that are the problem

It's just that watching them do examination and cross-examination makes him want to kill himself.
Actually I take back what I said earlier, don't fire them, keep going.

denies having communicated anything from court
He lied as easily as he breathed thought about Aaron's cock.

The fact pattern in Nick's cases are so bad, and he expects nothing short of miracles. Because he's a fucking idiot, and doesn't understand how any of this works.
Nick very much reminds me of the nigger clients described in Confessions of a Public Defender:
If you tell a black man that the evidence is very harmful to his case, he will blame you. “You ain’t wokin’ fo’ me.” “It like you wokin’ with da State.” Every public defender hears this. The more you try to explain the evidence to a black man, the angrier he gets. It is my firm belief many blacks are unable to discuss the evidence against them rationally because they cannot view things from the perspective of others. They simply cannot understand how the facts in the case will appear to a jury.
 
He actually has a "creative writing" degree. This is a degree for people too retarded even to get a journalism degree. I'm barely in a position to be critical, having also gotten one of those "I need some kind of degree to get into lol skool" degrees, but he even sucks at his specific degree.

I mean, I suppose constantly lying is a form of creative writing, but he's really bad at it and keeps doing it anyway.

One thing I never get about lolcows is why they're uniformly pathological liars and somehow, despite doing nothing but lie all day, they're absolute shit at it and tell retarded lies that wouldn't fool a downie child. This isn't even shit like Columbo would have to read you and trick you to figure out. It's just like wtf nigga what are you even trying to pull off? Not a single person who hears this shit is going to believe it!

Nick is like a caricature of those things where liars have visible tics when they're lying, like the touching their nose, looking upward or off camera, shifty eyes, looking at you obviously wondering whether you're believing their lies, etc. His entire facial vocabulary is a case study on liar's tells.
Yeah, do not disparage actual lit degrees from actually demanding schools!

And even on the scale of creative writing degrees, Nick is bottom-of-the-barrel. I am also certain that even in his bottom-tier Minnesota college cohort, he was the least talented and engaged student.
 
Yeah, do not disparage actual lit degrees from actually demanding schools!

And even on the scale of creative writing degrees, Nick is bottom-of-the-barrel. I am also certain that even in his bottom-tier Minnesota college cohort, he was the least talented and engaged student.

He confessed as much, but he crowed that he got the same degree as everyone else while having fun in uni. When he talked about law school, he said he was never chasing contended internships or high-power law firm positions because, 'I had a family and needed to get to work!'

I believe the implication was that the same degree (at least in law) offers similar opportunities for most people--patently false.
 
Holy shit he's literally reached the Acerthron tier of arguing that it's the biased judges that are the problem
A real practicing lawyer would know this is completely irrelevant. Signing a search warrant is not a substantive part of the proceeding.

He would have to show not only bias but that the bias caused her to grant a warrant in the absence of probable cause. The fact is there is not a judge on the planet who would not have granted a warrant given the overwhelmingly obvious probable cause.

Even in that case, it would neither be necessary nor sufficient to prove bias. The simple absence of probable cause leading to an improvidently granted warrant would be the substantive issue. It would only really be relevant in the context of an ethics proceeding of some sort, and Nick hasn't brought one, because he's completely full of shit.

It would possibly have been appropriate to have recused herself once the case hit substantive issues, some time after the arraignment/preliminary hearing phase. It's a moot issue since he used his statutory "free" DQ to get rid of her anyway.
And even on the scale of creative writing degrees, Nick is bottom-of-the-barrel. I am also certain that even in his bottom-tier Minnesota college cohort, he was the least talented and engaged student.
He has claimed to be Order of the Coif (which incidentally I am from a better school) which is top 10% of the class in most cases, but there are miles of difference between top 10% at a fifth tier toilet and, say, Harvard or even a middle of the road top 50.

Of course, he's a lying liar who lies, but at least at the outset of his career he was routinely able to get the basics right.
 
The fact is there is not a judge on the planet who would not have granted a warrant given the overwhelmingly obvious probable cause.
I know that the reports from people at the church etc. are far more important for establishing probable cause but it's funnier to pretend that the "Anime sucks.... cope and sneed" segment was the entirety of the evidence for probable cause and they got the search warrant signed first thing that morning.
 
1781383558585.png
[ L / A ]
Hahahaha! Damn that must've pissed him off.
nitter.net_RekietaLaw_status_2065888681995436348.png
[ L / A ]
Nick threatening to sue Ralph. Do it pussy.
 
Last edited:
Hahahaha! Damn that must've pissed him off.

The problem with Nick bringing a defamation case against Ralph based on an accusation that Nick had sex with Scarlett is that Nick does not have a good reputation or a reputation for fidelity within his marriage. I mean a poly swinger going to court claiming that he was damaged by an accusation that he was not faithful to his wife during his marriage just isn't going to work.

It would be a situation just made for an anti-SLAPP motion.
 
Last edited:
He has claimed to be Order of the Coif (which incidentally I am from a better school) which is top 10% of the class in most cases, but there are miles of difference between top 10% at a fifth tier toilet and, say, Harvard or even a middle of the road top 50.

Of course, he's a lying liar who lies, but at least at the outset of his career he was routinely able to get the basics right.

He may have claimed it, but I am pressing exceptionally hard to doubt. Doesn't mention it in his linkedin, either. And his degree has no laude references, either, no PBK or other honor societies, nothing.

Side note: lol, the only reference I found in 3 seconds of googling was a post from you on the same thing from 2019 (also funnily in response to someone using a similar bottom /barrel reference I did):

He claimed at one point to have been Order of the Coif, which would be top 10% of the class. That said, Mitchell Hamline is definitely a fourth tier toilet.

That said when you have an actual career nobody really gives a shit where you went to school. There are incompetent morons who matriculated from Harvard Law School, and Stephen J. Wentzell, the judge on Nick's case, graduated from William Mitchell (a predecessor of Mitchell Hamline).

That's not to say I doubt he claimed it - I would not be surprised in the least. I just don't believe it, plus even if true, that's the least he should have done at his school, which is oriented toward people with very very different means and backgrounds than Nick Rekieta had coming out of high school/ through college.

As gor getting the basics right, well, BARBRI is a useful distiller of information, and he did pass the bar. But do you think he even knows what hornbook law refers to?
 
The problem with Nick bringing a defamation case against Ralph based on an accusation that Nick had sex with Scarlett is that Nick does not have a good reputation or a reputation for fidelity within his marriage. I mean a poly swinger going to court claiming that he was damaged by an accusation that he was not faithful to his wife during his marriage just isn't going to work.

It would be a situation just made for an anti-SLAPP motion.
If the people who claim to be local sources are even half right Nick maybe be close to deformation proof in his local community after his arrest. The fact that everyone actually relevant to his e-reputation (except for Aye-Aye-Ron and Father-Gymathy) he has ever threatened would be federally diverse from him and not vulnerable to Minnesota corruption in a plaintiffs suit may explain why he has kept a lid on his legal-cuck-rage.

I'm not sure Nick understands civil procedure like that, thought.
 
Back
Top Bottom