Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
JONATHAN YANIV #waxmyballs trending on Twitter 20181221_waxmyballs.jpg 20181221_waxmyballs.jpg Woman who says she was a victim of JONATHAN YANIV age 12-14 speaks out:
20181221_jonathanvictim.jpg


Cimorelli fan who wrote the Tweet thread last month knows her:
https://mobile.twitter.com/llysettexoxo/status/1070862588857044992
http://archive.is/yVNXr
 
Last edited:
Any other examples of pedo smile? In the interests of science? I'm curious now.

That expression he's making there seems related to autogynesmile, but it is not quite the same. Autogynesmiles radiate smug narcissistic self-absorption. Johnny boy's expression is smug too, but looks more like he's boiling over with suppressed filth and he's desperately trying to hold it all in. He always kind of looks like he's in the middle of swallowing a burp.

edit: x-post, thank you NoFeline! And that dude too looks like he's in the middle of swallowing a burp.
 
Has anyone yet talked about how fucking creepy it is that he's always wearing literal spycam glasses? Even, presumably, when he's in public bathrooms or hanging out with little girls?

It seems to me like the glasses may be key to the whole thing. Maybe "JY" wants in to some sites with images of girls at his preferred ages, and his constant questions about whether you can see the whole V in the locker room are because he's trying to record them in order to have original content to get deeper levels of access to pedo content. There's no way this dude doesn't have gigabytes of creepshots, footage of bathrooms, and CP.
 
Any other examples of pedo smile? In the interests of science? I'm curious now.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/science...-likely-physical-deformities-left-handed.html Of course it's the daily mail, buttt..would you look at that. They both have fucked up ears. Cute.

A lot of people cite a lopsided smile, or discolored or otherwise very strange looking mouths, knowing the above I'd say it's one of the very common physical defects among pedos (who we already know are more likely to have other more obvious oral deformities). The creepy pedo smile freaks us out because it triggers the uncanny valley in our caveman brains and we want to excommunicate the deformed monkey before it ruins the gene pool.
 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/science...-likely-physical-deformities-left-handed.html Of course it's the daily mail, buttt..would you look at that. They both have fucked up ears. Cute.

A lot of people cite a lopsided smile, or discolored or otherwise very strange looking mouths, knowing the above I'd say it's one of the very common physical defects among pedos (who we already know are more likely to have other more obvious oral deformities). The creepy pedo smile freaks us out because it triggers the uncanny valley in our caveman brains and we want to excommunicate the deformed monkey before it ruins the gene pool.

That article is a fucking wild ride.
Pedos more likely to be left handed?
Sinister bastards.
 
He must have been reported to the cops so many times.

They know about him. There are extensive records of him engaging in illegal behaviour. Why aren't they doing anything? I keep thinking of the West Yorkshire Police and Jimmy Savile.

But Jimmy Savile had sociopathic charm and ability to manipulate people, and lots of high placed friends, and he organised networking parties and patronised police charities. Savile was someone you didn't want to get on the wrong side of because he could bring you down, and your boss as well. By contrast what's happening with Yaniv doesn't make any sense. He should be an easy target for the cops. I can think of some explanations, but I don't like them.


I thought of r/incels the whole time I was reading that list. It sounds exactly like how they tend to describe themselves (apart from the low IQ but that's just lack of self-awareness.) That article makes me feel bad for ugly dudes who aren't pedos though.
 
There are extensive records of him engaging in illegal behaviour. Why aren't they doing anything?

Being creepy to children online doesn't result in convictions until images of the child are exchanged or things move offline. I can't recall any Canadian examples of anyone ever being charged just for text-based grooming, and the girls he sent nudes to didn't return the favour. DMCAing every mention of your name like a butthurt child is dubious but isn't strictly illegal enough to attract RCMP attention. Canada has an opiate crisis and concurrent property crime boom, the cops need some serious allegations before they're budgeted any time to deal with it.

If there's a smoking gun for this guy it'll involve kids he's related to, just the same as with every other pedophile. He's got the interest to offend but not the opportunity as far as we know. Strangers are not going to leave their daughters alone with this guy. Family might make that mistake.
 
He must have been reported to the cops so many times.
I saw a twitter cap of one of the teenagers he harassed saying she'd reported him to the cops. This was years ago, however. (Maybe 2012?)

She seemed to think she had something serious on him, maybe she was one of his dick pic victims? Obviously nothing of consequence came of it, but we can assume at least one of his child victims filed a report with the authorities.
 
It’s weird that Jonathan spent so much time and effort on taking down fan accounts and whatnot for that Cimorelli group but he uploaded something that wasn’t his as well.

He’s a walking hypocrisy.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YX5Kvqr7Gus

A quick look at his liked videos shows a bunch of Cimorelli stuff. If this is not a huge red flag for anyone...

Oh, and there is also a liked video of a lockpicking kit. Let that sink in.

ETA: @AnOminous didn't Jimmy Saville have ties to the UK police?
 
Last edited:
Here is the most complete version of the yogile album about Jonathan Yaniv. It has 58 images, some of which I definitely haven't seen before.
Being creepy to children online doesn't result in convictions until images of the child are exchanged or things move offline. I can't recall any Canadian examples of anyone ever being charged just for text-based grooming, and the girls he sent nudes to didn't return the favour. DMCAing every mention of your name like a butthurt child is dubious but isn't strictly illegal enough to attract RCMP attention. Canada has an opiate crisis and concurrent property crime boom, the cops need some serious allegations before they're budgeted any time to deal with it.
He has definitely tried to arrange meetings with underage girls. Also, isn't sending porn and nudes to kids a crime as well?

meet.jpg
 
Back