Do you have any videos of you dancing or singing in competitions? What style of music and dance is your specialty?
I have never joined a singing competition. I was trained for 3-4 years by a jazz singer, and 2 years by an opera singer. Of all of my singing recordings here are the ones I'm most proud of:
Donna Vorrei Morir - S. Lorenzo -
https://cometo.bandcamp.com/track/donna-vorrei-morir
You Raise Me Up - Josh Groban -
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_D4KyCsPmJU
Julias Hair - Roger Quilter -
https://youtu.be/-C_ZT7w9hJY
Hey Ho, The Wind and The Rain - Roger Quilter -
https://cometo.bandcamp.com/track/the-wind-and-the-rain
Strike the Viol - Henry Purcell -
https://cometo.bandcamp.com/track/strike-the-viol
I admit openly I think I'm an awful dancer. Winning any competition is a blessing and, any furry will tell you this, it doesn't matter who wins. What matters is the audience, and nothing matters more then the audience. The competitions I've won are videos 7, 10, 11, 17, 19, 28, 29 from the playlist. The order is chronological, so the very first video is literally the first dance I've ever made.
www.youtube.com
The style of music I enjoy doing the most is original COMEDY music. I have tons of crude ones. The style of music which I'm strongest in, is the music I'm trained in: Opera, and jazz. Ironically I don't enjoy those genres at all.
The style of dance that is my specialty is robot, animation, and theatre. I also consider myself a popper.
Googled it, no mention of 10%.
Looks like I underestimated it!
According to Alfred Kinsey 17% of farm boys had sex with animals.
Maybe I lack initiative, but this didn’t seem like the kind of thing where you could just go out on the street and ask for a show of hands. Instead I camped out in the medical library looking…
www.straightdope.com
A study from the Journal of Sexual Medicine which took place in Brazil found this percentage to be as high as 34%, most of which were from rural backgrounds.
You might think that bestiality has died out, or that it only happens on farms, or that it's illegal everywhere. You would be very, very, very wrong.
www.health24.com
I'm honestly embarrassed of my porn addiction and you should be too. It's not something to be proud of, guy.
And that's because around 1900 years ago a writer printed that shame for ones naked body was first created after tasting an apple from the tree of knowledge. You've learned from millennia of ignorant propaganda that you should always be, not only ashamed of your naked body, but ashamed of sexuality and sexual fantasies. As positive as the lessons of the Bible are, they are NOT all positive.
And your reply is absolutely an example of that. Who taught you to be ashamed of pornography? It was probably whomever read that 1,900 book. Even though masturbation is a normal and healthy treatment for epididymal hypertension, assholes like Dr. Will Keith Kellogg released propaganda stating circumcision was a treatment for the EVIL which was masturbation.
So yes, of course you're embarrassed. You're probably embarrassed of your own body. Thank you Tree of Knowledge for literally creating a millennia of unnecessary shame for anything connected to sex. It's some successful propaganda from the 1st century.
And you're an sperg who keeps fanning the flames, like the lolcow you are. Maybe change your fursona to something more fitting.
This forum threw the first punch. I just respond. And you think victims of bullying should just take the punches? This is obviously the psychology of a broken abused individual. As I've said previously, I've had conversations with two members of KiwiFarms and they both were former victims of bullying. This is huge. This is confirmation that the victims of abuse learn to be abusers themselves and an absolutely incredible thing.
Your offers to submit will be declined. Unlike you, I'm not ashamed of my identity enough to stick my thoughts and opinions to it. You are. Don't send me an invite and most importantly: Don't give me advice.
Maybe change my fursona? Maybe don't be so ashamed of who YOU are that you need anonymity to speak your mind. It says a lot that you're on a forum that supports the doxing of babies, easily giving pedophiles a roadmap to their exact location and at no point you aren't moral enough to understand the publicly bullying of a father trying to protect his kids not only is immoral, but it's something you might one day learn to regret.
Again, each and every one of you KiwiFarm members have PROVEN that you are too cowardly to go to your local moral leader, your father, your mother, your pastor, your local police officer, your grandparents and asked them if it's moral to post the private address of two babies online while lying about and harassing their parents! How cowardly is that?
Really, if you see nothing immoral about that then it's clear that you never learned morality.
Either way you taking glee in outing pedos with the little they showed but getting overly defensive with the amount of evidence we have... About the same. Actually definitely more. They just show strings of text. KFers have documented context of all your shit to
That is bullshit. I've said this a million times: If I watch an artist, it's because I'm searching specifically for more TGTF related things, since that artist has done that in the past. If they happen to have some type of sick pedophile shit, I ignore it or delete it from the new submissions list.
It's like, I love the song "Pitch" by Barenaked Ladies. But after buying their other albums, it was clear some of the songs were as awful to listen to as sick InkBunny art was to look at. But, just because Barenaked ladies has some awful music, just because an artist who made TGTF in the past makes some shamefully sick on InkBunny art, does this mean that I never buy another Barenaked ladies album?
You're saying, very clearly, if I find a piece of art that I think is AWESOME and another piece of art that I think is REALLY AWESOME that I should immediately unwatch that artist after they make something I think is disgraceful and disgusting.
This is no different from saying "Pitch and One Week were one hit wonder songs and Barenaked Ladies mostly do forgettable crap. You shouldn't buy their album, the songs are terrible. If you do buy their album it proves you are a fan of all of their music! It proves you are a Barenaked Ladies fan!"
Because called a pedophile and being called a Barenaked Ladies fan have the equal amount of shame. But the comparison is just. Just because an artist makes TERRIBLE art doesn't mean I'll unwatch them. If I unwatch them I might miss out on an untagged TGTF related piece. And that'd be more terrible. I'm just explaining the truth. What you're arguing is that I should stop listening to Barenaked Ladies because their newer music isn't palatable.
There is no evidence. There is just the assumption that every single furry in the fandom only watches artists with art they 100% approve of. This is a completely false and ridiculous assumption. But its a false assumption that literally all of you have. Why do you have this assumption exactly? An artist earns my watch if they create an art connected to TGTF. Somehow this fact is so hard to believe, that no one believes it.
And I certainly don't care if you don't believe it. I'm just here to speak the truth. If you find holes in my logic then feel free to poke holes in it.
I will admit, when I was in high school and my parents asked me "Did you do your homework?" or "Did you study?" I would absolutely, positively lie. I lied so hard. And I am ok with that. I can do my homework during recess. But after I finished school, I had a conversation with a gentleman who was an actor in a musical I was a piano player for.
Before we went to Boston Market in San Jose in 2010, he told me that he admired our friendship because I was one of the few people around who gave him the truth. And from then on out, I was cemented in the fact that really: If someone needs to lie to try and force you to like them, how can they ever pretend that they are worthy of the attention of anyone? They are worthy of scorn and public humiliation.
I'm proud of the fact that I don't need to lie to people to try and put up a false image. In fact I'd say the top reason people block me on social media is because I'm TOO truthful. People will get triggered when I say something TOO raw, TOO true, and it hurts their feelings. And those blocks are good.
Furries who look at a website and get emotional over it, really shouldn't have anything to do me. If you can't control your own emotions when looking on the internet, that is ultimately your personal flaw and you shouldn't blame people who trigger you. You need to blame yourself. You need to own up to the fact that you can't control your own emotions. People shouldn't depend upon the internet for their emotional gratification. That's ridiculous.
Also Id say its important for parents to limit bad touch parents contact time. But of course every single issue in the world is never your fault. There is always someone to blame. Do you never even question yourself over that?
I have never tried to bring my children near anyone with any criminal record or who had any pedophilic or zoophilic history. That's outrageous lie. And that's why I'm here. You're here to lie. I'm here to tell the truth. I'll keep playing Whac-A-Mole just as long as you're willing to play it with me.
And to all of the people private messaging me saying "Stop feeling the trolls!", I don't care. Literally someone on this thread claimed that my wife called the police to report a sexual assault. That is absolutely, positively the #1 reason I should be responding to begin with. How can someone be motivated to spread such a lie like that?
And even more shocking, that the OP even said that SEVERAL people heard this particular lie? How is this NOT something I should address instantly, in public. This is an unbelievable allegation!
I have to tell everyone who says "Don't feed the trolls! Stop bumping your thread!" the same thing: If someone lies about me. I respond with the truth. And some of these lies are pretty shocking. Pretty incredible stuff. This is not something I should ignore.
Almost every single response I've been getting has said, in essence "You should ignore trolls". Of course I won't ignore a SEXUAL ASSAULT allegation. Even more shocking the O.P. said clearly that this false rumor has been repeated by several people. That is absolutely, positively the LAST thing I should be ignoring.
When someone lies, I set the record straight. Stop telling me not to because you'll be wasting your time. I have had family members who had been sexually assaulted so it REALLY hits close to home that the OP would say such a disgraceful, evil lie about me. That's beyond all measure one of the most disgusting, disgraceful things I've heard in my life and how DARE the OP insinuate for a second that I've been nothing less then an ideal father and an ideal husband.
My pride will not let these lies stand.
But of course every single issue in the world is never your fault. There is always someone to blame. Do you never even question yourself over that? Or if you truly do believe you are the victim so much why don't you change?
I am absolutely to blame for causing negative emotions in others. As you can see, this whole thread is full of insecure triggered trolls and I do understand I'm fully to blame. When I give my thoughts, opinions, facts and otherwise it undoubtedly is responsible for creating a negative emotional reaction and I am to solely to blame. I admit that.
But in order to change that, as you are implying, I'd need to use the reaction to my words as a means to determine their morality. And that's where the problem lies:
If I determine my own personal morality by the consequences of my actions, and consequences are purely determined by luck (since how my actions trigger any individual varies), then that would mean that in order for me to change I'd need to determine my own personal morality by luck. That's exactly what you're suggesting.
The logic is: If I create no trigger then I'm good. If I create a trigger then I'm bad. Often social justice warriors believe this is a measurement of morality and I fully respect that. But when triggers are purely determined by luck, then why should luck EVER be a part of the measure of morality? I have so chosen to use intent to measure morality and this choice would be easily supported by any religious, legal, or moral leader in the nation.
So, no I don't consider myself a victim. I consider myself a moralist. And I consider the OP a hedonist since the intent was to both give the other farmers entertainment through embarrassment and to give myself shame for not being aware of how to participate in the facebook furry community without my account being deleted for having a false name, and not being aware of how to remove white pages from the internet.
Even though I am at fault for triggering the members of this forum, I am going to continue to do so.
Clearly we aren't going to so if there is a problem youll have to change yourself
Actually no. I like the way I am. And you, just like the other members of this forum, support baby doxing while being too cowardly to ask your parents or neighbors about the morality of doxing babies while publicly mocking their parents for trying to protect their childrens safety. If you somehow transition from today to your last breath without seeing the the basic immorality that you've participated in then that will be a truly sad thing.
It's clear that BECAUSE no one is taking my challenge that all of you are secretly ashamed of attaching your name to your inexcuseable evil behavior, which endangers the lives of two babies who really have no defense over an army of internet bullies who have nothing better to do then endanger their lives.
And you tell me to change myself? How you or the OP can sleep at night is a subject matter that would make for an entertaining documentary.
Dude... why would you tell people all this on a public forum? You're going to court to testify for custody of your kids & this is the last thing you need to be doing.
Simple: Because my ex-wife has chosen to contact well over 1,000 furries about the divorce, so many so that one of her false rumors ended up on the largest furry gossip forum in the world unfortunately I must respond to these bad faith actions with responses made in good faith. If I don't respond, I could open myself up for vigilante attacks. A furry has already expressed his interest to kill me. This is exactly what I was talking about in my first PM to the OP.
All this tells me though is that absolutely NEITHER of you should have custody of the kids. You're both out of your god damn gords & my utter sorrow for these children only deepens.
And your saying this because I look at pornography on the internet, I make jokes on twitter and I kissed a plastic toy during the Vancoufur 2018 fursuit dance competition? Really rich stuff there. Wonder why you're not a family court judge yourself?
Here is the way the real world works: You need hospital reports, pediatrician reports, police reports, CPS reports, and all of the above to prove the fitness of any parent. A family Court judge doesn't care about your tweets or your sense of humor.
you've both put them in situations for them to be traumatized for the rest of their lives.
Hugging a person in an animal costume causes trauma? Well they seem awfully happy about it. Sounds like you've never marched in the AnthroCon fursuit parade. They have tons of kids getting "traumatized" with hugs, high-fives and squeaking sounds. Seriously.
Or worse. Much worse. Have the Kero leaks demonstrated nothing to either of you? Or your own friends getting arrested and outted?
There is no possible way to anticipate who in your social circle will commit a crime in the future. That's not in your control. What is in your control is that you never take your eyes off those kids and that if you avoid anyone with any criminal history.
Believe me, I have no desire to ever my children alone with any furries, or any of my high school friends for that matter. Only a family member, a Care.com professional or a Government licensed day care professional is good enough for them.
Power leveling here but the reason I'm so damn sensitive on these issues is because I was a victim of CSA.
And you should be sensitive about those issues. I understand. I repeat: I would never leave furries alone with my kids under any circumstance, just like I would never leave them alone with any of my college friends, high school friends, coworkers or otherwise.
Especially if you're both insistent on continuously putting them in danger?
I've never put my children in danger. I've already said a hundred times that the internet cherry picked one twitter comment out of 10,000 and took advantage of the fact that it was a poorly worded joke. That doesn't change the fact I'm the best father in the furry fandom. Fox Dad got nothin' on me. And neither do you!
I don't know why I'm even bothering with this long post but you NEED to realize that this isn't about you anymore. It's about them. Is staying in the fandom more important than your own sons? Is that really how you value them? If so, I feel so fucking sorry for them.
I talked about this topic on a podcast recently: The adult and family friend sides of the family need to be segregated and that's ok if you believe there is no such thing as a family friend furry. That's YOUR dogma. I think someone taking their kids to a furry con is better then taking them to a shooting range, God-forbid. But hey, you-do-you. I'll do me.
And stop pretending you can teach me something. You don't know a thing about me, and all I know is you're doing your darnest effort to make sure MY KIDS are future CSA victims by literally giving internet pedophiles a ROADMAP TO THEIR HOUSE. That's all you're doing. You're not proving any point other then you, as a CSA victim, are ENABLING others to cause my children to be future CSA victims.
They deserve better from both of you but you're both too stupid and selfish to give that to them.
Our definitions of stupid differ greatly, and I've said this before and it bares repeating: A stupid person is someone who does something that is counterproductive to their own intensions.
You, a CSA victim posted a roadmap to every single pedophile on the internet where they can get some FRESHMEAT to satisfy their lust for children. Let me repeat 5 times this so you can understand the point:
You are a CSA victim enabling pedophiles to make my only two children future CSA victims.
You are a CSA victim enabling pedophiles to make my only two children future CSA victims.
You are a CSA victim enabling pedophiles to make my only two children future CSA victims.
You are a CSA victim enabling pedophiles to make my only two children future CSA victims.
You are a CSA victim enabling pedophiles to make my only two children future CSA victims.
Hopefully by repeating it, you might learn something new. Because all you've taught me is there are sometimes people on the internet who hate themselves so much they have to dox toddlers to feel good about themselves.
You are a disgrace. And I pity anyone stupid enough to take any advice that comes out of YOUR mouth. Have fun feeling guilty after your roadmap causes a sicko to find my kids.
All you have to do is make a new screen name. I'd have to live the rest of my life knowing that some people on the internet truly have a purely evil intent and they're willing to help each other carry out those intentions. And it's the duty of good parents like me to make sure my kids ...
do not turn out like you.
So you've come here to denounce the big-bad stalker bullies, while simultaneously implying that the other three-hundred or so furries targeted on Animal Control alone have some merit in having threads here?
I genuinely have no reason to read any of these threads. I just respond to slander and try to not enable pedophiles, like the OP has.
I knew furries were narcissists but you really take the cake. Do you even hear yourself?
I do. I'm the only one that doesn't have to resort to name calling to make a point. I don't consider myself to be an important furry in any respect, but clearly when measuring civility I think I have you all beat by a long shot.
Imagine finding out your dad is sexually aroused at the idea of turning into a feral female cat and ageplay. That's gonna need some therapy.
I am not aroused by ageplay. I already said before I didn't understand the meaning of the term in 2012, the last time I updated my F-list.
Now what you're saying also, is that fetishes and sexuality NEEDS to be private, correct? That a TGTF fantasy is only something that can never be posted online.
This comes back to the stupid 1,900 year old fiction book where people became ashamed of their body after eating an apple from the tree of knowledge. It's 2020, RetroCrab, stop being ashamed of your own body. People really needed the Bible back then because they were making lots of bad life decisions. People needed something to believe in. They needed to start making better life decisions and the Bible was a fantastic method of teaching morality.
BUT, ones shame over their naked body or their sexuality is one of the most nasty propaganda pieces from the Bible. Almost as disgusting as the concept of a woman being made from the rib of a man. It's terrible what lessons it gives.
By saying I should keep my sexual fantasies in my head you ARE endorsing the exact same shame that the story of Adam and Eve promoted. Am I wrong?
You should offer KhordKitty a deal: if he leaves the fandom behind completely right now and gets his life together, then in five years offer to remove his real name from the thread title to spare his kids the crushing shame of Googling their father. We all know he's too self absorbed to take the offer, but it'd be a nice gesture to show we really do care about his kid's futures.
Actually the effort made to create an I.B. account to seek out watch lists, researching the criminal pasts of old twitter follows, and misinterpreting outdated Twitter jokes is an effort that the O.P. chose. I have no control over any of that research thus I have no concern over it.
What's important to learn is the intent. The OP clearly created it for hedonist purposes: To help the farmers feel good about themselves by joking about false conclusions to cherry picked data. And to try and make me feel embarrassed because you think I regret any private information I put on the internet. My life is an open book. I think being caught in a lie would be 100 times worse then being caught saying something personal.
But the fact that the OP was willing to threatened the well-being and safety of two babies who have no defense against a group of DOXing adults, as a worthy sacrifice for the pleasure of the users is an extremely important moral lesson that everybody in the world can learn something from.
When you sacrifice a childs safety for your own entertainment, you have proven yourself to be a public example of what it means to be a genuine degenerate. If my kids ever learn anything, it's to understand that safety is of a higher priority then pleasure.
And most importantly that they should look at pedophile enablers, like OP and CSA victim "Catch Your Breath", and see exactly what it means to not only do evil but to try and justify or intellectualize evil. It's an important lesson of morality. It's extremely important and unfortunately so many farmers here probably don't have the openmindness to even comprehend such a basic truth.
So no. You don't give a shit about my kids futures. You're teasing a father for trying to protect his childrens safety by endorsing their doxing. You don't give two shits about my children. You are literally forwarding a "Molest-Here" map to every single degenerate on the internet.
None of you appear to be intellectually able to comprehend that basic fact. And it's an incredible leap of logic to think any of you have any right to lecture me about parenting, morality, or anything for that matter. You've all failed to prove you own basic humanity and I'm sure none of you would want your neighbors to know what type of sick twisted evil you are doing on the internet at this very moment.
The sick twisted evil that "Catch Your Breath" is doing by enabling pedophiles to find their victims easier. You're a degenerate giving a moralist advice. Save your breath.
I see this as more than fair since most people with threads don't get this kind of offer. I'm willing to consider it though solely based on the well-being of the kids.
I don't give a shit if I'm doxed. I'm just trying to protect my kids. How is this so hard to believe: A father protecting their babies.
I meant only to take his dox out. The thread itself on KhordKitty should stay up forever. I wouldn't even lock it. Let it be an eternal reminder that if he goes back to his old ways, we're here watching.
WHAT OLD WAYS? What the hell are you talking about?
I will, ALWAYS make bad jokes on twitter. I will ALWAYS watch artists who make shitty art because SOMETIMES they make awesome art. And I'll attach my real name with my furry identity because I don't give a shit about hiding anything. My life is an open book. Not a goddamn thing is changing.
KhordKitty, man up, be a respectable father to your kids instead of an internet sexual degenerate. Do the right thing, and we will too. Deal?
Looking at TGTF pornography doesn't make me a degenerate. Giving a pedophiles a roadmap to where to find their fresh meat IS what a degenerate does. How many times do I have to make this point before you actually comprehend that you're not hurting me. You're hurting these helpless innocent children, and your own entertainment. For shame.
metro.co.uk
