Disaster A ‘plague’ comes before the fall: lessons from Roman history


By Colin Elliott | May 15, 2024

The Pax Romana—the 200-year “golden age” of the Roman Empire—was a marvel of diversity, connectivity, and unchallenged hegemony. By the middle of the second century AD, imperial Rome ruled territory across three different continents. Roughly one-quarter of the Earth’s population, some 60 million people, lived under Rome’s vast aegis, and the emperors of the age—most notably Marcus Aurelius—enjoyed the consent of those they governed. The Empire’s elites—witnessing the disciplined legions, widespread religiosity, cultural efflorescence, and dominant economy—likely expected their world order to endure forever.

In the year 166 AD, however, seemingly eternal Rome was caught completely off-guard as a deadly novel disease swept across the Eurasian landmass. It ransacked Rome’s cities for at least a decade and preceded centuries of decline. This major biological event—now known as the Antonine plague—appears to have been the world’s first pandemic.

Historians hotly debate its death toll—with estimates ranging from 2 percent to 35 percent mortality—and its broader social and economic effects. The disease itself remains undiagnosed. The great Greek physician Galen described its main symptoms as fever, throat ulcers, and a pustular rash. Some have suspected it was measles or smallpox, but modern analysis provides reasons to doubt these as the possible culprits. Human remains from the Antonine plague period, meanwhile, have thus far failed to yield genetic evidence sufficient to identify the pathogen.

Although the plague did not on its own cut short Rome’s dominance, it struck an empire that was confronting multiple challenges beneath a veneer of prosperity and growth—factors that modern-day infectious disease experts might recognize as creating the ideal conditions for pandemics. Much remains unknown about the Antonine plague; in some ways, modern scholars are just as in the dark about this first pandemic as its contemporary victims. But interdisciplinary researchers, trying to understand how the plague could have helped push such a powerful empire to the breaking point, have recently been unravelling some of its mysteries.

Probing the plague. Historians, archaeologists, and scientists have been sharing data and expertise, working together to develop histories of past pandemics—including the Antonine plague—that are surprisingly comprehensive and nuanced. Paleogenetic and paleoclimatological evidence reveal the crucial role of environmental and demographic factors in the pandemic. Insights from modern economics and sociology have improved historians’ understanding of how the institutions of the Roman Empire were affected by disease mortality. Even before the pandemic arrived, the pre-existing ecological, economic, and demographic context of mid-second century Eurasia prepared the way for the disease that would accelerate the end of Rome’s era of efflorescence.

Research assessing the severity of modern anthropogenic climate change, for example, has compiled a vast array of climatological data dating back to the Roman period, and well before. Such research offers historians an increasingly detailed and comprehensive view of the ecosystems of ancient Eurasia and Africa. The ancient Mediterranean was (and still is) polka-dotted with microclimates; meanwhile, ice cores from Greenland, ancient tree rings from northern Europe, and sediment cores from Egypt and Italy suggest that some regions in and around Roman territory endured cooler temperatures and droughts about a decade ahead of the Antonine plague pandemic. These climatological shifts were hardly severe, nor did they affect the entire Mediterranean Basin. Many of the affected regions, however, happened to play outsized roles in supplying Roman cities with grain.

The annual Nile flood in Egypt, for instance, reliably nourished well-irrigated grainfields with nutrient-rich water from the Ethiopian highlands. The resulting harvests, often abundant, were stored and then shipped in massive vessels across the Mediterranean to Rome for distribution to the city’s masses. But from the 150s onward, a series of droughts near the Nile headwaters in equatorial east Africa disrupted the flood, reducing the productivity of Rome’s main breadbasket. Meanwhile, at the same time, increased storm activity in the western Mediterranean—as confirmed by sediment cores extracted from the coast of southern France—made shipping already scarce grain far riskier than in previous centuries. As a result, denizens of Rome and several other major cities, and possibly also some of Rome’s soldiers, endured greater food insecurity and malnutrition—weakening their bodies ahead of the pandemic’s arrival in the 160s.

An interconnected, vulnerable ancient world. Historians still don’t know exactly where and when the pandemic entered Roman territory. But, again, historical circumstances conspired in favor of the novel disease.

An outbreak today can jump continents as quickly as an airplane can fly. Travel and transportation can facilitate the spread of infectious diseases. It may not be coincidental, therefore, that by the time of the Antonine plague, the Eurasian landmass was better-connected than ever before. In 166 AD, for the first time in recorded history, the imperial Han court in Luoyang, China, received visitors from the Roman Empire. Merchants from India, sub-Saharan Africa, Arabia, and Egypt rode the trade winds to ports all around the Indian Ocean. Roman soldiers, seeking to police and tax such abundant trade, ventured well outside Roman borders—as Latin inscriptions in the Farasan Islands of southern Arabia attest. In short, there were plenty of opportunities for novel diseases to cross political and geographic barriers into new populations, transforming what might have otherwise been a regional epidemic into a pandemic that spread across three different continents.

In the Roman Empire, an impressive transportation infrastructure—once a source of economic and military power—became a sudden liability once the pandemic breached its borders. Roman roads and ships weren’t themselves responsible, but larger movements and migrations transported the disease from city to city.

Because of the shifts in local climates, and resulting food insecurity, desperate and hungry rural peasants had already flooded into cities in Asia Minor (present day Turkey) and Italy. Beyond Roman borders, nomadic peoples on the Eurasian Steppe in search of food pushed against the Germanic tribes along the Danube River, sending hordes of migrants and invaders into Roman frontier provinces. Contemporary sources from the Han Empire reference a series of epidemics in several Chinese cities, as well as the army. Concerns over ever-present sickness were partly responsible for the famed Yellow Turban Rebellion—a peasant rebellion that unleashed decades of civil war and instability in much of eastern China.

At the exact same time, tens of thousands of Roman soldiers were uprooted from their military bases and sent thousands of miles—first to fight a war on the Empire’s eastern frontier in Persia (Iran), then back into Europe to resist the surging tide of Germanic migrants. At multiple points along these journeys, soldiers could have collected the Antonine plague pathogen.

The plague and the capital. Rome’s large legions might have sustained disease transmission for weeks, if not months, as armies passed back-and-forth through the same densely populated cities of Asia Minor and Italy that were taking on underfed refugees from the budding crisis.

None of these cities, however, were as packed as Rome—a cosmopolis of over one million people. In October of 166 AD, just as the pandemic reached Italy, the city held a massive triumphal parade for the legions, fresh off their victory in Persia. Perhaps 100,000 or more citizens crammed into the city center to celebrate, creating what may have been the world’s first super-spreader event.

Shortly following the triumph, the streets of Rome must have resembled a war zone. Bodies were so strewn about the city that Marcus Aurelius and his co-emperor imposed strict regulations on burials and tombs. They funded corpse removal. They sought out the gods for aid. At some point, perhaps after the first wave abated, the emperors commissioned statues to memorialize elite victims, while the masses were commemorated in remembrance events.

The ancient Romans had limited means to treat the Antonine plague, although they developed many remedies of unknown or suspect effectiveness. Elites, including the emperor Marcus Aurelius, used a concoction called “theriac”—an aged blend of exotic spices and expensive substances, mixed with a dose of opium. Others tried various smell therapies—including smelling laurel leaves. Galen claimed that fresh urine applied directly to the skin could help—the younger the urinator, the better.

The Antonine plague would continue to rage in the cities and military camps of the Roman Empire for at least another decade. A second wave of an undiagnosed epidemic disease hit Rome in 190 AD; if this too was part of the Antonine plague, then the pandemic lasted at least a quarter-century. However long it endured, the plague was an unprecedented test the resilience of Roman systems; Galen named it “the everlasting pestilence.”

Marcus may have rallied Rome during the first wave. But when the plague struck northern Italy a few years later, he abandoned his friends and soldiers to a dark winter of sickness. Officials responded to drought and high grain prices with price controls, most likely disincentivizing production and making shortages even worse. In response to plague and war deaths in the legions, Marcus recruited criminals and slaves into the military. This proved fateful when, a few years later, many of them deserted and, now well-equipped and trained, turned on the cities of the Empire, pillaging and murdering in a crime wave that stretched from Asia Minor to western Europe.

While it might seem like the pandemic single-handedly caused the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, it was clearly more complicated than that. The western Roman Empire would muddle along for over 200 years, but its heyday ended with the Antonine plague. The plague exposed and exacerbated pre-existing fragilities. Many Roman achievements may have been grand, but the Empire was a product of its pre-industrial context, in which weather, famine, and other factors could be destabilizing. The agricultural economy was subject to the vagaries of its ecosystem and the limitations of fledgling markets. Roman cities, for all the attention paid to aqueducts and baths, were contaminated by poor sanitation and grappled with persistent malnutrition. They may have been temporarily well-connected enough to enjoy the commodities of distant regions, but these same populations were simultaneously “immunologically naive” to pathogens from outside their immediate area. While it is no coincidence that the pandemic and the end of the Pax Romana occurred at the same time, exploring the connections between them underscores the interconnectedness and even interdependence of past human societies and their environmental contexts.

Present societies now easily mitigate much of what ailed Rome during the Antonine plague. The wonders of modern medicine—treatments, vaccines, and proven sanitation measures—render once-deadly scourges innocuous or even eradicated. A globalized society is one which collaborates and coordinates—orienting markets, scientific research, and communication channels towards responding to threats and, even better, predicting and preventing them before they occur. And yet, like the Roman Empire, the strengths of the modern world order have inbuilt weaknesses. Travel and transportation are so cheap and easy that pandemic diseases seem virtually impossible to contain.

The collaborative process that permeates most democratic societies nevertheless requires seemingly slow and cumbersome debate and consensus building. Yet all told, the modern world’s capacity to understand and adapt to our natural context—clumsy as it is at times—so far continues to outpace the rapidly evolving diseases that surround us. A vital part of our strategy must be to learn from the pandemics of the past.



Curated by Google News:
curated.png
 
It wasn’t the worlds first pandemic of course, maybe just the first we had good records of.
I absolutely love these ancient plagues, they’re fascinating. It’s also extremely difficult to decipher what they actually were. I know people think it was smallpox but that doesn’t fit. This is a bit of a side hobby of mine (one I will admit has soured a tad since Covid) and it doesn’t actually fit either measles or smallpox perfectly.
It probably came from china (as almost all plagues do for some reason…)
Galen’s description is a very good one, and he’s very clear that the rash developed on day 9, and was sometimes dry and sometimes pustular, creating a blackish dry exanthem and then dropped off but he never mentions any pockmarks or scarring which are such definitive marks of smallpox. He says clearly that the skin underneath is fine again. Nor does the molecular clock work support smallpox being the culprit.
It’s possible it was measles, but that doesn’t fit rally either. The thing that does point to measles is the fever manifestation - he talks about patients being ok to touch but they themselves have an unbearable feeling of internal heat. When Fiji had its first measles outbreak people were reported to be throwing themselves in the water to try to cool themselves.
But then other things do t support measles at all One thing he does say is that the diarrhoea was black which suggests haemorrhaging in the intestine or stomach. That does not happen with measles. It can happen with smallpox.
It’s so interesting becasue you can never know for sure but it could possibly have been a haemorrhaging form of smallpox. Or something completely different.
 
The freakiest part has to be, that, we still have no idea what this plague even was, and whether it could show up again...

All and all, this article very much reminds me of the 535 AD event. Historical calamities are always interesting to read about.

Always found the number weird and decided to look it up on YouTube a while back. Random earth cooling
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GunCar Gary
It’s so interesting becasue you can never know for sure but it could possibly have been a haemorrhaging form of smallpox. Or something completely different.
I wonder if some other pox would have been the cause, like monkeypox.

While disease doesn't help, the biggest cause of Empire degradation is brain and culture drain. The Barbarians at the gates aren't necessarily military invaders but subjects of other cultures with no tie to the empire that slowly outgrow the original. Allowing unchecked immigration just means you get exploited by people looking for money with no ties nor care to the things that built that value in the first place.
 
I can't believe Xehanort attempted to instigate a second Roman plague fall!
Seriously jokes aside this article is a mix of interesting trivia/history and also horrible horrible standard journo shit. Kinda fascinating but also...

There's shit like this in there.
And yet, like the Roman Empire, the strengths of the modern world order have inbuilt weaknesses. Travel and transportation are so cheap and easy that pandemic diseases seem virtually impossible to contain.
So this is why travel prices are artificially so fucking high now? or is the over $2000 for the cheapest plane tickets to anywhere last I checked on prices the "too cheap" price? Fuck the person behind this claim either way. "Free travel is what caused it guyse!" Nah bitch every first world government treating the pandemic as if it wasn't happening and you were racist for pointing out it was probably gonna go global while it was still an epidemic located pretty much solely in one region of china was what caused it to evolve into a pandemic. Zika almost got the same status but with less fanfare a few short years before the coof did. That's STILL global, by the way! Hope you enjoy your malaise, potential pinhead babies, and eyes/brain being potentially eaten by the virus later in life!
The collaborative process that permeates most democratic societies nevertheless requires seemingly slow and cumbersome debate and consensus building. Yet all told, the modern world’s capacity to understand and adapt to our natural context—clumsy as it is at times—so far continues to outpace the rapidly evolving diseases that surround us. A vital part of our strategy must be to learn from the pandemics of the past.
This makes me actually fucking mad. The reason a global pandemic hasn't happened till corona hit was exactly because we already learned from pandemics of the past and the collaborative process helped shit get locked down faster. SEE: Ebola outbreak and how it went "global" for short ass while only to get quarantined ASAP. They CAN pull that shit off and do it swiftly, which is why Corona outbreak was so fucking infuriating to anyone paying attention to the last several cases of serious disease outbreaks. "learn" I'm guessing in this means adding more fees and totalitarian shit to whip the non government and non corpo heads/media/celeb public into subservient isolated slavery. Zika should not have gone global, they could have delayed the sports game event till after the outbreak was dealt with. The rona simultaneously, probably would have been less severely spread if they didn't treat it like it wasn't happening when it was very much happening and even fucking chinese medical professionals were like "please be careful it might go global" only to be censored and written off as right wing conspiracy/hoaxes by the US media till they conveniently had an excuse to fear monger about it long after it went global.
 
Keep in mind the Western Roman Empire didn't collapse until 300 years after the Antonine Plague, and during the 4th century after Diocletian and Constantine was as strong as it had ever been. There were certainly major social and cultural changes that resulted which mark the transition from classical to late antiquity but this wasn't what led to the fall of Rome.

So in the sense of it marking the end of an era, yes, but not the fall of Rome itself. Philosophically you can argue whether something that has changed so much from its original form is still the same thing, but the Romans believed their Empire was a continuation of the same going back to Romulus.

Apparently it was caused by a big ass volcano somewhere in modern day Indonesia.
It also coincides with the start of the Gothic War, which utterly devastated Italy and arguably turned the post-Roman Early Middle Ages from a general continuation of Roman government and culture into social collapse. Rome's aqueducts were cut and it went from a population of 100,000, still one of the largest cities on Earth, to barely 30,000.
 
Keep in mind the Western Roman Empire didn't collapse until 300 years after the Antonine Plague, and during the 4th century after Diocletian and Constantine was as strong as it had ever been. There were certainly major social and cultural changes that resulted which mark the transition from classical to late antiquity but this wasn't what led to the fall of Rome.
Yeah I figured some shit was off with the article btu I didn't check the history/dates on stuff. I've lost a ton of knowledge on history shit sadly but I was all over ancient world history shit back when I was a kid. Not just for the test studying thing but specifically because I found it cool and intriguing. Probably wouldn't have checked out yugioh as a kid if it wasn't for the egyptian/ancient history elements. That's probably also partly why I fell off of yugioh after they removed it and made the world solely revolve around the card game they were playing.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Agamemnon Busmalis
Yeah I figured some shit was off with the article btu I didn't check the history/dates on stuff. I've lost a ton of knowledge on history shit sadly but I was all over ancient world history shit back when I was a kid. Not just for the test studying thing but specifically because I found it cool and intriguing. Probably wouldn't have checked out yugioh as a kid if it wasn't for the egyptian/ancient history elements. That's probably also partly why I fell off of yugioh after they removed it and made the world solely revolve around the card game they were playing.
It's a good article, that's just a clarifying point. Rome did change as a result of this and you can debate how much of a continuation it really was from the pre-plague Empire. It's just difficult to remember how long the Empire lasted since people mostly think of its greatest era in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD.

Kind of like how a lot of people think the Empire conquered most of Rome's territory when it was done by the Republic. I got into Rome through Caesar II and Age of Empires, loved the games and wanted to learn more about the people involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: demicolon
I often will compare modern politics to the Romans (the migrant crisis and rabid anti-Trump polarization are reminiscent of both the Late Empire as well as end of the Republic), but I don't think that applies here.

The plague didn't cause the Romans to have no constitutional orderly succession, nor did it force the alleged wisest philosopher-Emperor to break almost 100 Years of precedence and put his monster son in as successor instead of adopting and training a qualified adult military/political figure.

Despite that, Septimus Severus was good, and though his immediate family successors were not, Severus Alexander wasn't too bad. And then when things fell apart during the 3rd Century crisis, the Romans still put shit back together and went on centuries longer.

There were long lengths of relative peace and prosperity between 166 and 476, and in the core cities of Italy, North Africa. Hispania, and Gaul under the Vandals and Goths, the average person on the street probably saw intact cities and stable administration into the 6th century.

You can make a case that the Justinian plague was a huge blow, as it came at a time when the Empire was being very ambitious in trying to deal with the Persians and reconquer the West. Certainly it was the depradations of the ridiculously long Roman-Gothic war that did in civilization on the Italian peninsula, and perhaps had the plague not hit, Belisarius and Narses might have mopped things up as quick as was done in North Africa.

Trying to tie the Roman plagues to their nation's end and give a parallel to now is dumb, and reading the conclusion, the author seems to be saying:

Plagues are bad.

The Roman Empire fell because of a plague.

The modern world is better, but we need to Trust the Science, Vaccines are Always Good, Globalism will save us from civilization destroying effects of plagues, and that pesky unrestricted free cheap travel is actshuallly bad.

In other words, a paean to soy eating, pod living, no freedom of movement globohomoism disguised as a Serious Comparison To The Roman Empire. This faggot's ancestor Soyious Bugmanicus was probably writing screeds in Latin about why more Goths are needed to fill jobs, we abandoned Britannia--and that's a Good Thing, and how we need to spend more time debating the Nature of Christ/beating up pagans and less time fixing the economy and keeping out the Huns.
 
Mass migration and being distracted by power struggles killed the Roman Empire more than plague did.
And technological stagnation. The Romans weren't really great innovators, they had some key inventions but were generally much better at the logistics of using and implementing ideas vs. developing new ones. E.g. aqueducts and paved roads had been known since probably the Minoans, but the Romans perfected the technologies and implemented them on a mass scale.

The enormous slave system kept a damper on economic innovation and militarily I think they were hampered by overconfidence towards their enemies. The Germanic tribes kept importing Roman weapons and knowledge and by the 4th century were on par with Rome militarily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: demicolon
Galen’s description is a very good one, and he’s very clear that the rash developed on day 9, and was sometimes dry and sometimes pustular, creating a blackish dry exanthem and then dropped off but he never mentions any pockmarks or scarring which are such definitive marks of smallpox. He says clearly that the skin underneath is fine again. Nor does the molecular clock work support smallpox being the culprit.
It’s possible it was measles, but that doesn’t fit rally either. The thing that does point to measles is the fever manifestation - he talks about patients being ok to touch but they themselves have an unbearable feeling of internal heat. When Fiji had its first measles outbreak people were reported to be throwing themselves in the water to try to cool themselves.
But then other things do t support measles at all One thing he does say is that the diarrhoea was black which suggests haemorrhaging in the intestine or stomach. That does not happen with measles. It can happen with smallpox.
It’s so interesting becasue you can never know for sure but it could possibly have been a haemorrhaging form of smallpox. Or something completely different.
I recall some BBC documentary about some really really really old (even by European standards) skeletons with syphilitic lesions on the bones despite dating to pre-Columbus times. (Possibly even some Roman patrician remains?) In it, they discussed that there are (were?) two forms of syphilis: the brain-and-bone-rotting STD, and a comparatively mild rash. STD syphilis developed in response to people figuring out that separate beds are really cool, while the other version had been prevalent in poorer strata of society/more primitive cultures where communal sleeping was in vogue.

Is it possible this was just some form of measles or smallpox that got out-competed by the variants known to the modern world due to changes in social behaviors and the like?
 
could possibly have been a haemorrhaging form of smallpox. Or something completely different.
The fun thing with smallpox is, it's one virus, but can have drastically different effects depending on who it has infected. Often, around 10% (usually far less though, 10% is in a very large outbreak) of those infected will get the hemorrhagic form showing up, which is always 100% fatal, there is no recovering from that.
Given how pathogens tend to evolve over time to be able to kill slower and give better time for the infection to spread, perhaps the earlier form of smallpox was more often like that, as it still hadn't reached the point yet where it could incubate longer and spread more before killing its hosts. And the people who develop that kind in the more 'recent' outbreaks (more recent than thousands of years ago) were either just very unlucky or were missing some kind of immune response that could be present from survivor lineage. It's also way more likely to present in pregnant women too, with no real discovery as to why.
 
Rome, schmome.

I just want my public gladiator games.

Is that too much to ask?
Slavery still exists, and there's probably some extreme blood sports (akin to gladiatorial combat) going on somewhere.

This stuff will happen openly if civilization's current trajectory is completely derailed by the fall of a certain empire.
 
The coof would have been no different from the 1958 Asian flu (annoying, but nbd) except that a certain communist government decided that since had an epidemic on its hands, it was going to make sure the rest of the world got it too. Should have smacked those chinks in their buck teeth the instant it was revealed they shut down domestic flights leaving Wuhan province but allowed international flights to keep taking off
 
Galen claimed that fresh urine applied directly to the skin could help—the younger the urinator, the better.
And lo, watersports were born. Dignity died shortly thereafter.
It probably came from china
Not many know that Rome extensively traded with India for spices. Rats with infected fleas could sneak on a ship going back to Egypt, sneak out there and spread God knows what.
While disease doesn't help, the biggest cause of Empire degradation is brain and culture drain.
Biggest cause was no clear rules of succesion and the army itself, the empire being too big to manage and the insane by modern standards consolidation of wealth. Emperor was a revolving door of people too busy underminding their political rivals to fight outside threats and the army consisted of people having no ties or loyalities other than their general so you had usurpers declaring themselves emperor all the time, the empire itself was so big it had to be split in two and managed by 4 emperors at once, and half of all the money in the whole empire was emperor's PERSONAL INCOME, the remainder was divided between 0.0001% of the population, rest had fuck all.
Of course the biggest cause was China finishing the Great Wall, which pushed Huns west to find something new to loot and raze to the ground.
Slavery still exists
The way we treat animals is slavery in all but name. And slavery was also a big reason for Rome's downfall, it was so bad slaves could own slaves which also owned slaves. One eastern emperor had a primitive steamboat, they had the know-how to kickstart an industrial revolution but who needs engines when you can whip slaves to do the same thing?

Justinian plague is the one you can point finger at as what collapsed the eastern empire, since Justinian was on a roll reconquering the western empire but the plague killed so many people he had no manpower to defend the gains.
 
Back