@Android Raptor Hate Thread

Period at twelve, frontal cortex development complete at 25, split the difference
I wish it was that simple, people will argue about this endlessly as if consent at 16 is somehow pure evil and 18 is for some reason based und rotpilled, sent by Lord Jesus Himself.
All these numbers are somewhat arbitrary based on the what you mentioned but also the realistic knowledge that young adolescents will likely fuck like rabbits and that's part of the adolescent experience for healthy young people and adults should compassionately make sure that these no-longer-kids are educated and learn about sexuality in a proper way.
i.e. no faggotry and tranny shit, just understand your body and enjoy sex responsibly with somebody close to your age
Many Americans here are just prudes. It's expected from religious people like SSJ, and that's fine, but the more liberal/progressive Americans also tend to be ridiculously prudish.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: eatler
I wish it was that simple, people will argue about this endlessly as if consent at 16 is somehow pure evil and 18 is for some reason based und rotpilled, sent by Lord Jesus Himself.
All these numbers are somewhat arbitrary based on the what you mentioned but also the realistic knowledge that young adolescents will likely fuck like rabbits and that's part of the adolescent experience for healthy young people and adults should compassionately make sure that these no-longer-kids are educated and learn about sexuality in a proper way.
i.e. no faggotry and tranny shit, just understand your body and enjoy sex responsibly with somebody close to your age
Many Americans here are just prudes. It's expected from religious people like SSJ, and that's fine, but the more liberal/progressive Americans also tend to be ridiculously prudish.
I think we just needed a number to set the line at, and of course people develop at different rates, but we didn’t want to spend the money to impanel a court of justices of determination of the age of fuckability and have our kids run around naked in front of them.

It’s imperfect but so is everything.
 
Fail to see how
Period at twelve, frontal cortex development complete at 25, split the difference
Basically because 18 works and there's no real problem with it, that's the real reason.

I wish it was that simple, people will argue about this endlessly as if consent at 16 is somehow pure evil and 18 is for some reason based und rotpilled, sent by Lord Jesus Himself.
16 isn't "pure evil" but it is a tender age, and they're still supposed to be learning and growing, it's a period of life they should be left to unmolested.

i.e. no faggotry and tranny shit, just understand your body and enjoy sex responsibly with somebody close to your age
That's a very liberal belief. They should be encouraged to view sex through a conservative lense, not that hippy free-love way which has lead to our current state of society.

Many Americans here are just prudes. It's expected from religious people like SSJ, and that's fine, but the more liberal/progressive Americans also tend to be ridiculously prudish.
I'd believe this way even if I wasn't religious, it's just ideal. And I don't know what planet you live on where libtards are at all prudish.
 
16 isn't "pure evil" but it is a tender age, and they're still supposed to be learning and growing, it's a period of life they should be left to unmolested.
Who is molesting them?
It's forbidden for adults more than 5 years their senior to fuck them, that's rape. At least where I live.
People misunderstand the laws in the EU.
Also consent must still exist.
That's a very liberal belief. They should be encouraged to view sex through a conservative lense, not that hippy free-love way which has lead to our current state of society.
I am not a conservative, and always, constantly, argued against conservatism, it's one of the ideologies I mock the most often.
I am a reactionary.
I see sex as needed for reproduction. I see prudishness as foolish. Gimme free love, as long as the state can have children at replacement levels.
Demographics are destiny.
It’s imperfect but so is everything.
Yeah it's OK.
I'm just neutral on it. I just don't get why people seethe at how we do things in the EU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eatler
Yeah it's OK.
I'm just neutral on it. I just don't get why people seethe at how we do things in the EU.
Not me. I don’t care how other countries run themselves or we should’ve nuked Africa a long time ago.

I just want the place I’m raising my kids to have consistency and to try to comport with the rule of law concept
 
Who is molesting them?
unmolested
adjective
not pestered or molested; left in peace.
"they allowed him to pass unmolested"

I am not a conservative, and always, constantly, argued against conservatism, it's one of the ideologies I mock the most often.
I am a reactionary.
I see sex as needed for reproduction. I see prudishness as foolish. Gimme free love, as long as the state can have children at replacement levels.
Demographics are destiny.
Reproduction divorced from proper sexual ethics is not good. And in a world with no questions asked abortion on-demand, young people encouraged to engage in fornication will seek it out. If demographics are destiny you're better off encouraging responsibility and family building than immoral sexual activity.

I don’t care how other countries run themselves or we should’ve nuked Africa a long time ago.
Yeah, I pretty much agree.
 
whats your ethnic heritage?
Italians cosplaying as Germans 214E4D87-346F-4C21-8ADE-B2E87CB69E18.jpeg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Black Man Underwear
Probably a mix of Irish and English in AR
Italians cosplaying as GermansView attachment 5760759

I should've expected a no response from a lesbian feminist. There is no ethnic heritage. Only white, the scourge of the Earth that must be eliminated. Then the blacks and browns will live in rape and cannibalism harmony. As they did before the white man arrived.
 
Back