@Android Raptor Hate Thread

Android raptor said:
She has a different body type. She's naturally very thin and flat chested. Having naturally big tits means you aren't gonna be rail thin.
Click to expand...
Only partially true. If you check her Strava profile, she's probably running like 70-100 km each week, and I assume that beyond that she'll also do recovery and strength working out (or she'll get injured from so much running). This is a huge calory burning that she's doing, like 400-1000 cals/run. I think she's about 30 and married, lucky dude (fingers crossed).
Not only she runs, but she runs really well. Her marathon times are only marginally worse than mine, and I know that when I scored my personal best I nearly died at the end and won't likely bother doing that effort again. For a woman, she's like 1/1.000.000 or something, not really a top athlete, just a dedicated competitive runner.
Also, that's just what I subjectively like, but most of my friends would most definitely not appreciate that sort of thinness. So it's more of a niche taste in women I think, as most men prefer a bit on the heavier side with some fatty cushion.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, Sparkling Yuzu, Doctor Neo Cortex and 1 other person
PistachiosOnMyDesk said:
Under ordinary circumstances that would be the right move, but due to her simp crew - at least one of which is a mod here - she's capable of disrupting & derailing threads with her political sperging, and then, when someone takes issue with it and responds, she calls in her pet mod(s) to get them threadbanned. It creates a chilling effect, basically - I watched that happen to someone else and voluntarily stepped out of the thread because I could see the writing on the wall. She's also a pathological liar, as seen here:
Click to expand...
I didn't call any mods, nor do I have any simping for me afaik. The farms just doesn't take kindly to noncery. Cope and seethe.
AgendaPoster said:
Only partially true. If you check her Strava profile, she's probably running like 70-100 km each week, and I assume that beyond that she'll also do recovery and strength working out (or she'll get injured from so much running). This is a huge calory burning that she's doing, like 400-1000 cals/run. I think she's about 30 and married, lucky dude (fingers crossed).
Not only she's runs, but she runs really well. Her marathon times are only marginally worse than mine, and I know that when I scored my personal best I nearly died at the end and won't likely bother doing that effort again. For a women, she's like 1/1.000.000 or something, not a top athlete, just a dedicated competitive runner.
Also, that's just what I subjectively like, but most of my friends would most definitely not appreciate that sort of thinness. So it's more of a niche taste in women I think, as most men prefer a bit on the heavier side with some fatty cushion.
Click to expand...
I prefer curves myself as well. Nothing against thin/athletic women, but I enjoy breasts and powerful thighs.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: PistachiosOnMyDesk, Shidoen, Sparkling Yuzu and 3 others
Shidoen said:
Bro you’re not Patrick Bateman and Android is a lot more mentally stable than him.
Click to expand...
Maybe, to our knowledge she only wants to hack up people with axes, she (hopefully) doesn't actually use babies as firewood.

Sparkling Yuzu said:
Not for modern suction abortions
Click to expand...
That's a pro-abortion myth, there's lots of women who testify to the contrary, but of course the liberal media and medical community won't let you know that. You know, the same medical community that says a man can become a woman and that the jab prevents infection.

Android raptor said:
It's especially wild to use the incredibly creepy way Britney Spears was treated as a minor to defend noncery.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? Britney Spears was an adult in '99, which is when her album dropped, I remember because my sisters were into her music then.

IMG_20240111_145751.jpg
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: PistachiosOnMyDesk, Cumeatsioner Gordon, Sparkling Yuzu and 2 others
PistachiosOnMyDesk said:
Under ordinary circumstances that would be the right move, but due to her simp crew - at least one of which is a mod here - she's capable of disrupting & derailing threads with her political sperging, and then, when someone takes issue with it and responds, she calls in her pet mod(s) to get them threadbanned.
Click to expand...
What fucklng forum have you been posting on?
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NewnameRealEmail, Neo-Nazi Rich Evans, I'm Really Feeling It and 10 others
SSj_Ness said:
That's a pro-abortion myth
Click to expand...
No, it's better technology lessening the risks of the procedure.
SSj_Ness said:
there's lots of women who testify to the contrary
Click to expand...
Anecdotal evidence weaponized by pro-life activists.
SSj_Ness said:
of course the liberal media and medical community won't let you know that
Click to expand...
Conspiracy brained.
SSj_Ness said:
You know, the same medical community that says a man can become a woman
Click to expand...
Anyone who disagrees with me is a tranny!
SSj_Ness said:
and that the jab prevents infection.
Click to expand...
I like how you're both an expert on gynecology and immunology now.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: PistachiosOnMyDesk, Billy Bob Dick and Android raptor
generic sauce said:
No it started here, and you still kept on going on even after I got the hammer.
Click to expand...
Both of you are wrong and severely autistic.
First for you, stop trying to deconstruct the age of consent. Yes you are technically correct that at 17.9 yrs and 18.1 it's same shit. But we have laws and the laws necessitate that we draw the boundary somewhere, even when it's somewhat arbitrary. Keep in mind that you have used this deconstruction in the same way that shitlibs use it to deconstruct racial categories, "how do you know who is white". Not good.
As for Raptor, we've had this discussion before, and it's nearly impossible to conduct, cause she will accuse everyone of pedophilia and grooming rather randomly.
- US is not the only one country on the planet; countries in the EU often have 16 or even lower as the age of consent
- it's obvious that adolescents can consent at 16 (and younger) simply by taking notice of the crazy amounts of sex going on at that age.
So the problem here is adults trying to mess with adolescents, or worse. If you're a dad and you have a 15 yrs old daughter, you don't want her to fuck 25 old males, even if she wants to. But to argue that she cannot say yes to her 17 yrs old boyfriend is patently ridiculous. There's a reason sex ed is targeted so much at these ages, 13-14-15.
So we need rules and laws based on a pragmatic attempt to keep adults from corrupting adolescents and children, which is rather easy due to power and wealth imbalance. Parents have an interest to protect their offspring too. At the same time, people should stop arguing that 18 is some sacred age where you are suddenly able to consent, as if the Amerimuttlands are the only country on the planet and everyone else is wrong and degenerate. We all know the truth is kinda the opposite.
We should keep these laws simply based on a need for societal order and protection of the youth. Not because they are scientific and exact in nature.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Drael, Justa Grata Honoria, BSC and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back