@Android raptor Neutral Thread

[Android raptor]

So which is it, should it be banned or not? if you think it shouldn't be banned why not?

I think both are abhorrent, but banning either violates the first amendment and opens the door up for censorship of shit with actual artistic merit. The Turner Diaries has been legally challenged in the US and the challenges shot down every time.

I also think we need to worry about banning child marriage first, since that's still legal in most states. Lolicon is disgusting but banning it wouldn't do a damn thing to help actual abused kids the way banning child marriage would.

 

[Bargain Bin Laden]

I also think we need to worry about banning child marriage first, since that's still legal in most states. Lolicon is disgusting but banning it wouldn't do a damn thing to help actual abused kids the way banning child marriage would.

Why can’t we ban both?

 

[Android raptor]

Why can’t we ban both?

First ammendment. That's why the legal challenges to the The Turner Diaries have always been shot down in the US.

Child marriage should be banned and has no constitutional protections, but good luck getting the GOP on board that since they're the ones fighting to keep it legal. I think everyone that can join the fight to ban child marriage should though. I know many bills in many states have been proposed to ban it (or even just set a minimum age in states with none like Wyoming), but Republicans have successfully killed them in most states. Look up the situation in your state and where your legislatures stand and vote accordingly.

Alternatively, move to Canada, where lolicon and the Turner Diaries are both banned.

 

[Bargain Bin Laden]

First ammendment. That's why the legal challenges to the The Turner Diaries have always been shot down in the US.

Alternatively, move to Canada, where both are banned.

I was talking about lolicon and child marriage. In regards to the Turner Diaries, there’s more of an argument there because it’s text. The first amendment protects words not images.

 

[Android raptor]

I was talking about lolicon and child marriage. In regards to the Turner Diaries, there’s more of an argument there because it’s text. The first amendment protects words not images.

Given the link between the Turner Diaries and actual terrorism, including OKC, I think text or not its still pretty comparibly deplorable to lolicon. Especially since that's supposedly where McVeigh got his fertilizer bomb recipe.

 

[ExsanguinateHorizon]

This already dragged people in from the hate thread didn't it

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

This already dragged people in from the hate thread didn't it

no shit, can we PLEASE KEEP THE FUCKING HATE POSTS IN THE FUCKING HATE THREAD

THANK YOU VERY MUCH

... Jesus wept

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

There is no need for what aboutism with that question.

Don't take away her only tactic.

I think both are abhorrent, but banning either violates the first amendment and opens the door up for censorship of shit with actual artistic merit.

False, because artistic merit is protected, read obscenity laws. Only things without it are at risk.

Child marriage should be banned and has no constitutional protections, but good luck getting the GOP on board that since they're the ones fighting to keep it legal.

Misleading, they're fighting to keep it legal for minors can marry each other (which I don't necessarily support either, but it's a far cry from the image you're trying to paint of a bunch of elderly predators marrying babies).

I know many bills in many states have been proposed to ban it (or even just set a minimum age in states with none like Wyoming), but Republicans have successfully killed them in most states.

Because of the aforementioned reason. If they could come to a compromise on that issue then it'd be resolved, but neither side seems interested in working together on anything anymore, especially Democrats.

Alternatively, move to Canada, where lolicon and the Turner Diaries are both banned.

And so is protesting by conservatives, and not trooning your kid, and reading the Bible publicly.

Given the link between the Turner Diaries and actual terrorism

Even if said "link" existed, which is dubious, it wouldn't change that it's just fiction; you'd have to therefore ban all realistic crime fiction to be consistent. There's nothing special about thst particular work which incites violence.

 

[Android raptor]

Misleading, they're fighting to keep it legal for minors can marry each other (which I don't necessarily support either, but it's a far cry from the image you're trying to paint of a bunch of elderly predators marrying babies).

A vast majority of child marriages are an underage girl being wed to an adult man

False, because artistic merit is protected, read obscenity laws. Only things without it are at risk.

Except it hasn't been during shit like the Comic and Hays code era.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

A vast majority of child marriages are an underage girl being wed to an adult man

If so then all the more reason Democrats and Republicans should work together to end that.

Except it hasn't been during shit like the Comic and Hays code era.

I'm too lazy to check, but I think that was even before the current obscenity laws were put in place, which I think was the mid 70's.

 

[RollerGator]

Given the link between the Turner Diaries and actual terrorism, including OKC, I think text or not its still pretty comparibly deplorable to lolicon. Especially since that's supposedly where McVeigh got his fertilizer bomb recipe.

Hey you gremlin faced retard. Attempt to defend your position on lolicon without bringing up thr turner diaries. You can't do anything without deflection. You've mentioned the turner diaries in a hundred posts now. Try and make your pro loli argument without doing it. You can't.

 

[Android raptor]

Hey you gremlin faced retard. Attempt to defend your position on lolicon without bringing up thr turner diaries. You can't do anything without deflection. You've mentioned the turner diaries in a hundred posts now. Try and make your pro loli argument without doing it. You can't.

First amendment and censorship of obscene fictional materials opens the door to censorship of shit with legit artistic merit, especially since that's exactly what happend in the past like with the Comic and Hays codes.

It's not really pro-loli since I think loli is disgusting, but anti-censorship and opening the door for shit that's been a problem historically (and continues to be a problem since fundies are still trying to ban books that get their panties in a wad because they have gay people or talk about racism or w/e).

Unfortunately you don't seem to understand complex, nuanced issues and the history behind them and just leap to extremes.

 

[RollerGator]

First amendment.

The first amendment doesn't protect cp cartoons. Just like it doesn't protect bomb threats or libel and slander. But it's nice to see you have no argument other than "muh turner diaries!". You are a pedo.

 

[Android raptor]

The first amendment doesn't protect cp cartoons.

Then put it before the Supreme Court (also stop watering down terms meant to describe abuse of real children, its bad enough terms like gaslighting and grooming basically mean nothing now).

 

[generic sauce]

Then put it before the Supreme Court (also stop watering down terms meant to describe abuse of real children, its bad enough terms like gaslighting and grooming basically mean nothing now).

Blame your legbeard fujo tumblrina friends for that one.

 

[RollerGator]

Then put it before the Supreme Court (also stop watering down terms meant to describe abuse of real children, its bad enough terms like gaslighting and grooming basically mean nothing now).

You're saying that because you sympathize with troons that groom kids. Every time there's a thread about one you jump in with "Oh yeah, what about catholic priests hmmm!?" All you know is whataboutism and deflection. Your personality is as foul as your appearance. The only cosplay you should be doing is meg griffin.

 

[Android raptor]

Blame your legbeard fujo tumblrina friends for that one.

They're not the ones who abused the term grooming

 

[generic sauce]

They're not the ones who abused the term grooming

whatever you say bud

 

[The Cunting Death]

Bowie Dyke and Elliot Ness need to get a room.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

You're saying that because you sympathize with troons that groom kids. Every time there's a thread about one you jump in with "Oh yeah, what about catholic priests hmmm!?" All you know is whataboutism and deflection. Your personality is as foul as your appearance. The only cosplay you should be doing is meg griffin.
View attachment 5646369

You're a stupid faggot and your opinions are stupid faggot opinions.