Business Apple Wants People to Control Devices With Their Thoughts - "The company is taking early steps to enable people to control their iPhones with neural signals captured by a new generation of brain implants."


iPhone-maker works with startup Synchron on new brain computer interfaces to help disabled people use its devices​


Apple is embracing the world of brain computer interfaces, unveiling a new technology that one day could revolutionize how humans interact with their devices.

The company is taking early steps to enable people to control their iPhones with neural signals captured by a new generation of brain implants. It could make Apple devices more accessible to tens of thousands of people who can’t use their hands because of severe spinal cord injuries or diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS.

Apple is looking forward to a day, still some years away, when implants developed by Elon Musk’s Neuralink and its rivals receive approval from the Food and Drug Administration. Such implants, known as brain computer interfaces, have already been safely placed in a handful of patients.

Historically, humans interacted with their computers mechanically, using keyboards and mice. Smartphones introduced touch, a behavioral input, but still an observable physical movement. The new capability means Apple devices won’t need to see the user make specific movements, the devices can detect user intentions from decoded brain signals.

Apple has worked on the new standard with Synchron, which makes a stent-like device that is implanted in a vein atop the brain’s motor cortex. The device called the Stentrode has electrodes that read brain signals. It translates the signals into selecting icons on a screen. Apple took a similar step in 2014 when it launched a technology standard for hearing aids to communicate with iPhones via Bluetooth, a standard most hearing aids have since adopted.

Mark Jackson, an early tester of the Stentrode implant, was able to peer over the ledge of a mountain in the Swiss Alps and feel his legs shake. Jackson can’t stand up, and he wasn’t in Switzerland. He was wearing an Apple virtual-reality headset, which was connected to his implant.

Jackson can’t travel from his home outside Pittsburgh because he has ALS. Still, he is learning how to control his iPhone, iPad and Vision Pro headset thanks to a connection between his Stentrode implant and Apple’s various operating systems.

The Synchron device effectively translates brain waves, allowing a user to navigate around a screen and select an icon. It works with a feature inside Apple’s operating system called switch control, which literally switches control to a new input device like a joystick, or in this case a brain implant.

Jackson cautioned that Synchron’s technology is still early in its development. He can’t use it to mimic moving a cursor with a mouse or a touch screen with fingers, so navigation is much slower than normal interaction with a computer or smartphone.

Today, brain computer-interface companies have to trick computers into thinking the signals coming from their implants are coming from a mouse, said Synchron Chief Executive Tom Oxley. More is possible with a standard built specifically for these implants, he said. Apple will release the new standard later this year for other developers.

The first user of Neuralink’s implant has shown that he can move a cursor with his thoughts faster than some people can with a mouse. Its device, called the N1, captures much more brain data than Synchron’s because it has more than 1,000 electrodes picking up neural activity compared with the Stentrode’s 16. Also, the N1’s electrodes are implanted inside the brain rather than placed on top of it. The neural data picked up by its implant is converted into mouse clicks or keyboard strokes.

Musk has extolled the potential of such implants for all people, saying they could amplify the brain’s capabilities and enable humans to compete on equal footing with superintelligent AI systems.

Synchron has implanted its Stentrode device in 10 people since 2019.

Morgan Stanley has estimated that around 150,000 people in the U.S. who suffer from critical upper-limb impairments could be early candidates for brain computer-interface devices. It anticipates that the first commercial approval for such a device will come in 2030. Oxley said he believes Synchron will receive approval before then.
 
Wake the fuck up Samurai it's time to bomb Arasaka Tower.
1000002330.webp
 
I really have a difficult time condemning this kind of thing from the standpoint that some people are trapped in their bodies. If something like this helps them see or hear or have a new arm or be able to interact with the world instead of being stuck in a chair it seems cruel to say, "Well...no...no...you suffer."

On the other hand the list of bad outcomes...
 
On one hand, I'm fine with severely disabled people getting the means to interact with the world. On the other hand...

Alita Last Order 0015-004.webpAlita Last Order0015-005.webpAlita Last Order 0015-006.webp

You can bet your ass they'll abuse this tech to control thoughts or at the very least, beam unskippable ads into your brain. So if the ad of the day is a faggot doing meatspin so you can buy your bug bars, you're stuck viewing it until the time ends.
 
Today, brain computer-interface companies have to trick computers into thinking the signals coming from their implants are coming from a mouse, said Synchron Chief Executive Tom Oxley.
I can't work out what combination of retardation led to these words appearing in that order, but I hate it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MLK Ultra
Controlling a device with your thoughts is a massive step backwards surely?

I generally don't think about using my device (unless i'm doing something outside of the regular), like I am not consciously thinking about each individual keystroke while typing this i'm think of how to structure what i'm trying to communicate
 
Can't wait to be that cantankerous old bastard with no implants, maybe even no internet at that point fucking things up by simply refusing to eat ze bugs and live in the pod.
Until they remove everything that doesn't need those implants and replace them with things that do, forcing you to get them anyway to survive. Then they'll call that 'progress' and tell themselves ' See, everyone wants to be implanted with our brain chips!'
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Vesperus
I won’t be surprised if in 20 years Apple introduces a new product called the iSlave where they had this brain shit implemented into them and they do everything they are ordered to do by their owner.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jarl Varg
Let me correct the title: Apple wants to connect their devices to our minds so they can control our thoughts.

"No, no, no, you're not having the appropriate happy thoughts to be allowed to watch this movie...!"
Oh, it'll be far more insidious than that. They won't have to farm around to 'force' the right responses or interactions. They're gonna be hovering up your literal brain activity, and A/B testing their shit across the population to get their intended messaging refined to the point that you'll gladly think what they want because they know what the specific parts of the brain they're lighting up are. It won't even be conditioning, they're going right to the source of what already exists and just leveraging it.

And none of us can avoid it, because as long as some portion of retards embrace this, which they absolutely will, they'll have a large enough sample size to know how to influence those who stay disconnected anyway. You can't observe the world without processing the world, and that's all they'd need.
 
Until they remove everything that doesn't need those implants and replace them with things that do, forcing you to get them anyway to survive. Then they'll call that 'progress' and tell themselves ' See, everyone wants to be implanted with our brain chips!'
If I starve, I starve without selling my soul.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WhiteNiggasGardens
I really have a difficult time condemning this kind of thing from the standpoint that some people are trapped in their bodies. If something like this helps them see or hear or have a new arm or be able to interact with the world instead of being stuck in a chair it seems cruel to say, "Well...no...no...you suffer."

On the other hand the list of bad outcomes...
Hello, only other person who read the article.

This is literally just a computer mouse you control with your brain, which we've had for decades. Trying to connect this to some mind control project is boomer tier tech illiteracy.
 
Back