Aug 9 2022 - Continuance on Grand Jury, defense filed motion for autism disorder deferred disposition

Status
Not open for further replies.

My Name is Mud

Where you goin', city boy?
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
BIG UPDATE:
CWC.png
No Indictment presented? For autism disorder deferral?
ETA: looks like the autism thing was a motion from the defense registered on August 5th.
But what the hell is the GJ result? Did they actually not indict him, or am I reading this wrong?
 
BIG UPDATE:
View attachment 3580466
No Indictment presented? For autism disorder deferral?
"deferred disposition"

§ 19.2-303.6. Deferred disposition in a criminal case; persons with autism or intellectual disabilities.​

A. In any criminal case, except a violation of § 18.2-31, an act of violence as defined in § 19.2-297.1, or any crime for which a deferred disposition is provided for by statute, upon a plea of guilty, or after a plea of not guilty, and the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, the court may, if the defendant has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist with (i) an autism spectrum disorder as defined in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association or (ii) an intellectual disability as defined in § 37.2-100 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder or disability, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, after giving due consideration to the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the views of the victim, defer further proceedings and place the accused on probation subject to terms and conditions set by the court. Upon violation of a term or condition, the court may enter an adjudication of guilt; or upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions, the court may discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against him without an adjudication of guilt. This section shall not limit the authority of any juvenile and domestic relations court granted to it in Title 16.1.
 
Please forgive me if this has already come up. Does the current situation mean that his apparent malfeasance by accessing Barb's bank account in violation of the "EPO"? isn't going to be addressed?
He has not been charged for it (or any other alleged crimes, not even rape, just incest), at least for now.
 
Ah gotcha, fair enough. So I'm guessing there is a big chance he might actually just walk with probation now?
It appears that way. I actually just read about this now, and I can't believe it. If the text of the law is anything to be believed, and the motion is allowed, he very well might walk with probation.

Whether or not this will embolden him remains to be seen.
 
It appears that way. I actually just read about this now, and I can't believe it. If the text of the law is anything to be believed, and the motion is allowed, he very well might walk with probation.

Whether or not this will embolden him remains to be seen.
Good God...


Also a tiny update on the Pleadings/Orders table:
custody.png
Nothing actually out of the ordinary, just continuance of his custody.
 
Good God...


Also a tiny update on the Pleadings/Orders table:
View attachment 3580510
Nothing actually out of the ordinary, just continuance of his custody.
Ok, I'm starting to see what probably happened:

When Heilberg made the motion for the autism defense (8/5), they must have put off presenting the case to the grand jury, instead opting to continue until the motion is accepted or not. If it was a flat out grand jury refusal, I doubt they would have continued. And Heilberg probably has the hospital paperwork to back it up.
 
So after all this he may well avoid the clink?

On the other hand however, surely this will mean that he will be legally required to live in some sort of supervised capacity?

If they concede that as a massive autist, he raped his mother out of a lack of social awareness and understanding of norms and the law, then surely that also means they accept that he is a risk to the public and himself?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back