Boy Accidentally Orders 70,000 Lollipops on Amazon. Panic Ensues. - Holly LaFavers said she was eventually refunded $4,200 for her 8-year-old son’s order of Dum-Dums candy.

07xp-dumdums-fbck-superJumbo-v3.webp
The delivery of Dum-Dums lollipops was left outside of the LaFaverses’ home on Monday in Lexington, Ky Holly LaFavers, via Associated Press

By Christine Hauser
May 8, 2025

On Sunday morning, as Holly LaFavers was preparing to go to church, a delivery worker dropped off a 25-pound box of lollipops in front of her apartment building in Lexington, Ky.

And another. And then another. Soon, 22 boxes of 50,600 lollipops were stacked five boxes high in two walls of Dum-Dums. That was when Ms. LaFavers heard what no parent wants to hear: Her child had unwittingly placed a massive online order.

“Mom, my suckers are here!” said her son, Liam, who had gone outside to ride his scooter.

“I panicked,” Ms. LaFavers, 46, said. “I was hysterical.”

Ms. LaFavers said in an interview that Liam, 8, became familiar with Amazon and other shopping sites during the pandemic, when she regularly ordered supplies. Since then, she has occasionally let him browse the site if he keeps the items in the cart.

But over the weekend, Liam had a lollipop lapse. He told his mother he wanted to organize a carnival for his friends, and mistakenly, he said, he placed an order for almost 70,000 pieces of the candy instead of reserving it.

And so the double ramparts of suckers rose on their doorstep, where the excesses of e-commerce crossed paths with their tight-knit community.

Ms. LaFavers said that she discovered something was amiss after a shopping trip early on Sunday, when she checked her bank balance online. “It was in the red,” she said.

The offending item was a $4,200 charge from Amazon for 30 boxes of Dum-Dums. Frantic and upset, she called Amazon, which advised her to reject the shipments. Ms. LaFavers was able to turn away eight of the boxes, totaling 18,400 lollipops, but the 22 boxes containing 50,600 lollipops had already landed.

“My Alexa didn’t even ding to tell me they had been delivered,” she said.

Ms. LaFavers said that she was then told by Amazon that it could not take the candy back for a refund because it was food. So she tried to send back to the virtual shopping world what it had unloaded on her in the first place.

“Hi Everyone! Liam ordered 30 cases of Dum-Dums and Amazon will not let me return them. Sale: $130 box. Still sealed,” she wrote on Facebook on May 4.

The post attracted the attention of local news stations and national media outlets, highlighting the financial treachery of online activity.

Parents commiserated on her Facebook page and shared solutions, like detaching payment methods from online accounts, setting up alerts for large purchases or simply keeping children off phones. One child spent $980 on virtual Roblox game currency. A 3-year old playing on a phone during an airport delay spent $300 on movies. A woman’s granddaughter spent $1,000 on Google Play.

“As a mom that has experienced unwanted orders, I feel your pain,” a woman wrote.

Companies offer steps on how to prevent and dispute unauthorized purchases in online shopping and games.

Roblox advises parents to use password-protected purchasing, and to call its customer service center before initiating a dispute with a payment provider, which would stall the refund process. Epic, the makers of Fortnite, has safeguards that include an “intent-to-buy” step, and purchase cancellations.

On Apple devices and accounts, family-verification settings include controls called Ask to Buy for a child’s device, or “don’t allow” for in-app purchases.

Google Play’s purchase-verification process also has additional safeguards on family accounts that reverify the user is authorized to make a purchase on apps meant for children ages 12 and under.

Amazon eventually told Ms. LaFavers that it would give her a refund. In an email, the company said that it “worked directly” with her “to turn a sticky situation into something sweet.”

On Wednesday, after the refund came through, Ms. LaFavers decided to give away the Dum-Dums instead of selling them. One neighbor offered to distribute some on Halloween. A local chiropractor asked for two boxes, and a bank in Somerset, Ky., said they would take five boxes.

“I am giving them to the individuals that offered to buy them from me, or I am donating them to a charity or a school or church,” Ms. LaFavers said. “People that I have relationships with were willing to buy those to help me out.”

Spangler Candy Co., the company that has made Dum-Dums since 1924, invited Ms. LaFavers and Liam to visit its factory in Ohio. “We also love that so many people jumped in to offer to purchase the extra cases,” said Kirk Vashaw, its chief executive, in an email.

Liam’s online browsing privileges are on pause. But Ms. LaFavers said he, too, had tried to find a way to recoup her money, telling his mother: “It’s OK, mom, we can sell my Pokémon cards.”


Liam LaFavers and his mother donated a box of Dum-Dums to Immanuel Baptist Church in Lexington, Ky. Bradley Stevenson/Immanuel Baptist Church

Source (Archive)
 
They literally used to tell you to not put your information online, don't allow your children to be unsupervised online, and never put your credit card information online. I have 0 sympathy for these retards despite the fact I also hate Amazon and the like as well.
 
Given how large Amazon is and what scale they operate it’s impossible to have humans trying to contact the customer to see if it’s a valid order, I’d imagine.
I hope she changed her order confirmation needs to be multiple steps.

Here’s a nifty trick for ya:
If you order on Amazon and DHL brings you packets, and you want to return it: it can be that it’s not possible. DHL does not take any dangerous goods even perfume and distributes it.
So little things like a skin peeler for your girlfriend will not be able to send back because of the internal battery.
Get your money back but keep the thing, how nice. A rounding error for Amazon.
 
Boys and lollipops?


Seriously, his parents need to do that thing called 'securing their financial information online'.

At least it wasn't cigarettes, there's always that...
 
Spangler Candy Co., the company that has made Dum-Dums since 1924, invited Ms. LaFavers and Liam to visit its factory in Ohio.
They should do it. Factory tours are really interesting.
So little things like a skin peeler for your girlfriend will not be able to send back because of the internal battery.
I'm not sure I'd openly admit to skinning my girlfriends, but you do you. Hopefully the FBI hasn't hacked the Farms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin and cactus
This isn't on the kid its on the idiot parents who let him fuck around on the internet with their credit card and order shit without their oversight. Could have been alot worse. Reminds me of the incident in the STO community years ago when some kid was given access to get some cstore points for some ship he wanted in the cash shop for his birthday. Average cost of a ship at that time was 2000 points which was about $20. Turns out the kid had multiple accounts to get around the need to buy character slots for new characters and instead of just buying the points for the ship he bought I think it was 6 lifetime memberships (those are $1000 US each and there isn't much you actually get worth paying for except maybe the liberated borg species) and all of the currently available ship expansion packs for each account, which were several hundred dollars each. and the ship he wanted? Well he wasn't being entirely clear with his parents about the particulars of how one actually got said ship. Turns out he wasn't buying cstore points to buy a regular ship in the cash shop, he had a 'miscommunication' and in reality he was buying lockbox keys to unlock lockboxes to try to win a T6 ship choice pack. Well the odds on those boxes is something like 1:600 if you're lucky. He did eventually get the ship but the final cost of this fuckup was something like $11,000 US

Needles to say the parents in question were not happy and as far as i'm aware never got their money back because of the fact they had authorized the use of the credit card, they just didn't pay attention to what he used it for. The best part though is while arguing with support about demanding a refund they admitted the kid in question was under 13 - which per the tos prohibits him from playing or having an account, so what did support do? Ban all of his accounts. So not only did he not get to use any of the shit he bought but they ended up having to still pay for it

Somehow I get the feeling that kid is still grounded to this day

Moral of the story is when this shit happens its the parents fault. Its bad enough most parents don't supervise their young kids when they're on the internet, its outright idiotic that they refuse to do so after handing them a credit card. The mom is lucky the kid didn't spend an insane amount of money on some thots OF or camshow. Imagine the shitshow that would have started
 
If only there was a video in the article that shows what she looks like…
Niggerly behaviour transcends race. This is nigger behaviour. Therefore, she's a nigger.

Her kid obviously has special needs. Perhaps if she invested more time parenting it and les time using tech as a baby sitter and sub for human interaction he might not be a spud.

Having a child you've no intention of raising properly is peak nigger.
 
Given how large Amazon is and what scale they operate it’s impossible to have humans trying to contact the customer to see if it’s a valid order, I’d imagine.
I hope she changed her order confirmation needs to be multiple steps.

Here’s a nifty trick for ya:
If you order on Amazon and DHL brings you packets, and you want to return it: it can be that it’s not possible. DHL does not take any dangerous goods even perfume and distributes it.
So little things like a skin peeler for your girlfriend will not be able to send back because of the internal battery.
Get your money back but keep the thing, how nice. A rounding error for Amazon.
Hi. As a frequent Amazon user, please don't listen to this retard and try to game the system.

I've had some rare cases where I needed to return an item and Amazon had no issue with it, even when I offered to take only a partial refund.

Good customer service is rare nowadays and if you go into a transaction with the primary intent of trying to get it for free, your as bad a the n*ggers y'all constantly deride around here.

Want to scam a company? Try Walmart or any high-end retailer.
 
Back