BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://archive.vn/VIQpC
View attachment 1387821
No shit, you're almost indistinguishable from someone who doesn't identify as trans
On the plus side, it's almost completely unlikely you'll both get murdered AND posthumously misgendered by both the police and the media.

The more likely case for posthumous misgendering is by your parents and other relatives when you die from something mundane like a regular person.
 
Sometimes, when I'm really bored, I'll search up "lefttube" on YouTube and I'll filter the search by newest. And I simply have to say, what the fuck is this supposed to be? I have no idea what's going on here. What's with the fanbase?




















I'm sorry
 
Sometimes, when I'm really bored, I'll search up "lefttube" on YouTube and I'll filter the search by newest. And I simply have to say, what the fuck is this supposed to be? I have no idea what's going on here. What's with the fanbase?


LeftTube as Vines.mp4

















I'm sorry
It's a "[blank] as vines" meme video, but it's not very good. With many of them I don't even see the correlation between the given vine and the specific breadtube e-celeb
 
Sometimes, when I'm really bored, I'll search up "lefttube" on YouTube and I'll filter the search by newest. And I simply have to say, what the fuck is this supposed to be? I have no idea what's going on here. What's with the fanbase?


LeftTube as Vines.mp4

















I'm sorry
I'll give credit where credit is due. This is just as unfunny and cringe-inducing as anything from Vine.
 
Or spending his entire life building autistic bunkers because Enver Hoxha, the closest thing to a lolcow who ever ran a country, thought it was a good idea to cover literally the entire fucking country in completely useless bunkers that did nothing and were never used.
A fair few are now used for shops, galleries and homes.
 
gamers=bad
unless you praise anything woke, even if the character is a female before they are a character; which is forced diversity.
From what I can tell,reactionary is similar to being socially conservative. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reactionary
So if you don't agree with the far-left on certain things then you're socially conservative/have socially conservative beliefs. Just like Syndey Watson is somehow a fascist according to Vaush even though she just simply disagrees with him on some trans shit and social issues.
 
Last edited:
gamers=bad
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HLg7diIYJ8Q unless you praise anything woke, even if the character is a female before they are a character; which is forced diversity.
From what I can tell,reactionary is similar to being socially conservative. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reactionary
So if you don't agree with the far-left on certain things then you're socially conservative/have socially conservative beliefs. Just like Syndey Watson is somehow a fascist according to Vaush even though she just simply disagrees with him on some trans shit and social issues.
Most people aren't even pissed about the ugly troon-looking woman or the lesbo shit, the people who are pissed off about that haven't even played the previous game, they're pissed off because the main character of the previous game who they grew emotionally attached to gets unceremoniously killed off in the first half of the game. A Korean streamer deleted the game off his hard drive and then cut the disc in half when he got to that scene, guess he's a goose-stepping reactionary nazi who hates lesbians now!
 
Xanderhal sperging out unscripted over a video about interracial relationships.

1:20 Black separatism is cringe because leftism. Ok bud. Also Muhammad Ali looks like Malcom X to you. Ok bud.
1:36 Who isn't libertarian in the room though? People can freely choose not to race-mix just as much, can they not?
4:30 So we don't critically analyse media messaging anymore now? Interesting. That being said, neither side has data so whatevs.
9:10 Your display of YouTube flaggotry notwithstanding, how is that ToS?
10:30 It fits the definition of a natural experiment bud. Google "natural experiment".
11:00 American norms have changed at this particular point in time. Whether or not there were interracial relationships in ancient Rome is irrelevant.
13:20 The SHR raw data is easy to find and can be grepped through. (see sources) I don't have the tables for interracial relationships in the USA right now unfortunately, but if I did I could reconstruct the data point.
15:20 You didn't get any of that did you?
16:10 Buddy, homicides don't get underreported because of toxic masculinity. Other kinds of abuse maybe, but when there's a body it gets counted.
17:00 Notwithstanding the jargon usage of "parsimoniously", if you look at table 2 in this paper, (see sources) I would say Embargo dude's recounting of it is pretty accurate. The model } where you assume spousal homicide rate is predicted by non-spousal homicide rate in the same demographic group doesn't fit the data, you have to conclude that men kill women more often and that some specific combination of demographics are more dangerous. And when you do that it fits better than the socioeconomic factors in Table 3.
19:00 Based on the data, it cant be completely imputed to those factors.
20:40 you corrected yourself later on, but for the record there is data and I mention it here at 17:00
25:00 "Wouldn't we want a black person to date a white person?" That's a tangent, but you say we as in the collective whose interests are reified in crime rates apparently, rather than thinking in terms of what an individual actor would decide to do for themselves. Even a "libertarian socialist" like yourself would recognize that a white woman, given this data, would be rationally self-interested in not dating a black man, at least to an extent, right?
28:00 I would argue that, if you're going to be married for, say 40 years, the rate of homicide per year may compound, so with 8.5 per 100 thousand compared to 1 per 100 thousand, you get 0.34% chances of being dead after 40 years compared to 0.04%. What says you?
29:20 see 13:20
31:40 Even at that, you don't know what the underlying causal links are because you cant have ceteris paribus in a natural experiment. It's perfectly reasonable to conclude that based on the evidence presented, getting in an interracial relationship might be undesirable.
43:40 reread the table buddy
47:00 No sarcasm there I think.
49:00 Muhammad Ali breaks ToS now? Again, how is that ToS?
50:50 it's not cherry-picked dude come the fuck on
51:30 Who said black people were more violent other than you?
51:50 you can arguably go directly from "mixed race couples are more likely to be violent" to "mixed race couples are bad" bud, you're not making sense.

So in summary, Alex cant into stats and inference, fails to demonstrate that race-mixing has no negative effects and also doesn't demonstrate that it has positive ones, calls for Mommy Susan to ban stuff he doesn't like, and tops it off with hypocrisy.

 
When your comrades act like subhumans and you have to revert to semantics to distract away.

He's recently repeated this hilariously out of touch statement in response to the George Floyd riots:
piq3anfvkk251.jpg

I think the people injured in the Berkeley riots & the staff of the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma would disagree. Also there's this recent take:
8sefdsk9xk251.jpg

Yeah, such a brave statement isn't it? It's not like people have LITERALLY BEEN SAYING IT FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s2BLwkk7WI
Have they won yet? Cos it seems to me that the Anti-SJWs are still going strong while BreadTube is the one in shambles with all the infighting & such.
gamers=bad
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HLg7diIYJ8Q unless you praise anything woke, even if the character is a female before they are a character; which is forced diversity.
From what I can tell,reactionary is similar to being socially conservative. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reactionary
So if you don't agree with the far-left on certain things then you're socially conservative/have socially conservative beliefs. Just like Syndey Watson is somehow a fascist according to Vaush even though she just simply disagrees with him on some trans shit and social issues.
Anyone else find the cartoon avatar of him smiling smugly while listening to his headphones annoying? He's been using it in the thumbnail of every video (apart from livestreams) ever since his name change from Pigpuncher to Xanderhal. And I don't know what it is about it, but it honestly makes me wanna punch him.🤜👊
 
He's recently repeated this hilariously out of touch statement in response to the George Floyd riots:
View attachment 1400129
I think the people injured in the Berkeley riots & the staff of the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma would disagree. Also there's this recent take:
View attachment 1400132
Yeah, such a brave statement isn't it? It's not like people have LITERALLY BEEN SAYING IT FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS!!!
Hes obviously baitposting dude
 
He's recently repeated this hilariously out of touch statement in response to the George Floyd riots:
View attachment 1400129
I think the people injured in the Berkeley riots & the staff of the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma would disagree. Also there's this recent take:
View attachment 1400132
Yeah, such a brave statement isn't it? It's not like people have LITERALLY BEEN SAYING IT FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS!!!
"antifa orginization"
Yep, bait.
 

This is a old video on Xanderhal/Pig puncher but I think it really highlights some of the short comings of Xanderhal's rhetoric and the way he does videos in a really funny way. And it's super telling that Xanderhal never responded to this, it has nearly 100,00 views, Xanderhal responds to videos about him with 200 views on 100 subscriber channels. So the fact he never adressed is really telling
 
He's recently repeated this hilariously out of touch statement in response to the George Floyd riots:
View attachment 1400129
I think the people injured in the Berkeley riots & the staff of the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma would disagree. Also there's this recent take:
View attachment 1400132
Yeah, such a brave statement isn't it? It's not like people have LITERALLY BEEN SAYING IT FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS!!!
you got baited. the whole idea he's playing off of in the first post is that antifa isn't an organization which one can be a member of, which is true. you have many organizations, groups of friends, different groups who come together for antifa-activity, but there is no main organization which decides who is and isn't a part of it, hence why a single organization named "antifa" cannot be held responsible for what one "antifabro" does.

Its a bit like referring to "the neo-nazis" as one organization. sure, they tout a lot of the same shit and wear the same non-haircut but they aren't all connected as one organization, hence you cannot blame the nazis in russia for what some wignat zoomer in north carolina does on a friday night.
 
Peter Coffin recently decided to debate Milo Yiannopolis. As one would expect that the big-brained members of r/BreadTube did not like this:
1593102658146.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/hfg0lb/peter_coffin_is_going_to_have_a_friendly_chat/ (Archive)

"This is why the Breadtube community is kind of a joke. For so many its about optics and not actually helping people. Because sitting around jacking yourself off talking about how good of a leftist you are is more important than actually trying to benefit people." Ture, true.

However, it's also a joke primarily because of the fact that their most vocal figures are lunatics with shitty backgrounds and the general "BreadTuber" is a clown with shitty ideas who tries to politize everything. They are no different from any other out of touch Marxist LARPer. They also have a tendency towards in-fighting towards and cancelling any who acts even remotely out of what the community likes which is often debating someone they don't like or simply saying something they disagree with.

However, another big-brained Redditor disagrees with the notion that BreadTube is a joke:
Redditfag said:
I agreed with everything said in this post that reached the top of the sub, other than the suggestion this is a reflection of a larger problem in the BreadTube community and not merely more a problem with Peter's own judgement.

I did recently make this post expressing concern specifically that Vaush, Destiny (though not a BreadTuber) and The Serfs might be causing more harm than good by engaging with fairly fringe fashies with no real influence in debates, but at the very least these were debates challenging the ideological opponents in question (though Destiny may have been negotiating to do some sort of gaming stream with a Nazi, and his recent choice to make an in-person appearance on the Killstream was and act relatively friendly with them frustrated me, so in his case that's a separate problem).

What Peter wants to do though is merely have a civil conversation with Milo about how the left is not "all about cancelling people". Of all the points to challenge the right on, I fail to see why this one of all things is the one Peter thinks is worth debating, but to do so with someone who's done the level of harm, is as tied with far-right beliefs (considered extreme even in the current US Overton Window) and has so little a current audience like Milo seems both pointless and dangerous to me. Pointless in that any right-wing audience Peter might 'convert' would be utterly insignificant numerically compared with other right-wing figures he could be talking to, and dangerous in that Peter's name value will only help bring more attention to Milo, who most of us were enjoying the fact now operated in complete obscurity, and those like me who were very aware of Milo when he was active know fame and attention is probably all Milo really wants.

That said, I haven't yet seen many BreadTubers come to Peter's side over this. AngieSpeaks has unfortunately, and Lance from The Serfs has given a very tepid, diplomatic approval, but no-one else that I've seen. I imagine most might prefer not to stir the plot, and I don't blame them. It also means though that I don't think the initial criticism in the r/BreadTube post I'm responding to against BreadTube as a community overall is fair.

I have no idea what this concern with 'optics' that is supposedly more prized among BreadTubers than helping others is meant to be, other than this specific hyper-focus on cancel culture Peter appears to have (which ironically seems terribly bougie to me).

Keep supporting the BreadTube community, but if anyone can get through to Peter (not an easy task considering the very rude responses I've seen him offering to anyone to bring up these obvious criticisms to him, but please try), that'd be great.
1593103114387.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/hfm23d/re_the_breadtube_community_is_not_a_joke_but/ (Archive)

TL;DR- "Debating people we don't like= bad", whines about other BreadTubres siding with Coffin, and doesn't actually say anything to counter the idea that BreadTube is a joke.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom