BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
LORD IMPERATOR said:
And I've met more than my fair share of right-wingers who either despise religion or don't care. Aaron Clarey is one such example; he keeps making potshots against Christianity even though his main enemy are the SJWs. Sargon of Akkad, Carl Benjamin, is another; he was a hard atheist MGTOW libertarian who wasn't a big fan of either religion or SJWs. They only tone it down now and then because the right-wing traditionalist Christians are a stable ally against the SJWs. They need allies against your Lindsay Ellises, your Anita Sarkeesians, and the right-wing Christians are as good enough as any to start.
Click to expand...
As a part of this camp I dont have a problem with religion in general, I have a problem with Abrahamic religions and their quest for supremacy, christianity included. I still get people in my bumfuck nowhere pajeetland trying to preach christianity to non christian people in an attempt to conquer them ideologically, even using methods like guilting them by offering free stuff. I find it extremely cheap and quite sinister even that Christianity as a religion/religious institution cannot tolerate non involvement or the existence of other religions and I know the argument youre gonna give is that "Its the word of god" or "word of christ" or "we're objectively good" but that doesnt give the credence for religious colonialism. And yes im going to call it colonialism cause the missionaries cannot accept or tolerate neutrality and had to insert themselves into every corner of the earth. As much as people hate neocons and the like for trying to export cultures around the world, trying to make the world into one totalitarian culture, Christianity is attempting to do the same and the argument that its objectively good doesnt track as everybody who does this colonial cultural export shit thinks their shit is objectively good as well including Islam which requires the world to be converted to Islam. Its a good thing for Abrahamic religions to stay contained within the western world and leave us the fuck alone cause we have our own pacifist religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, Jainism among others which arent built on a supremecist totalitarian framework and for the most part do not preach shit like slave morality.
 
Shintoism is nice specific religion it can refer to many things Buddhism is a philosophy not a religion.
You also forgot Daoism and Confucianism but those are also both philosophies more than religions I guess you could say there's several philosophical religions but I would not consider them religions

Nietinism is not a religion Nietzsche was a philosopher people need to stop confusing thetwo things



Widow burning
The Cult of the thuggi

Smearing yourself with cow s*** Hinduism should have been treated like every other 9th century Pagan nonsense that Europeans come across crushed under a thousand marching boots.
If you practice human sacrifice you are a degenerate Savage and you should be treated as such cultural relativism is mentally retarded
 
Sargon's wife's son said:
Shintoism is nice specific religion it can refer to many things Buddhism is a philosophy not a religion.
You also forgot Daoism and Confucianism but those are also both philosophies more than religions I guess you could say there's several philosophical religions but I would not consider them religions

Nietinism is not a religion Nietzsche was a philosopher people need to stop confusing thetwo things



Widow burning
The Cult of the thuggi

Smearing yourself with cow s*** Hinduism should have been treated like every other 9th century Pagan nonsense that Europeans come across crushed under a thousand marching boots.
If you practice human sacrifice you are a degenerate Savage and you should be treated as such cultural relativism is mentally retarded
Click to expand...
Nice to know you havent met a Buddhist or Jain, it is a very western view to treat Buddhism as a philosophy cause they see it the way they see yoga, "its just a lifestyle bro". Buddhism is an actual religion with its own religious figures apart from the Buddha, the list of 7 million sins, the various incarnations of the Buddha, religious events which happened and will happen etc etc. You could argue that it is a subsect of Hinduism cause Buddha is the 9th Avatar of Vishnu among the prophesized 10 and Buddhism shares a lot of aspects of Hinduism but Buddhism deviates so much from Hinduism that it is barely comparable.

Shintoism may be non specific but its still practiced in Japan for something which is considered "extinct Pagan shit". Its still a religion with its own list of forest, nature and animal spirits with associated mythology, you can call it stupid but I can also call Christianity stupid.

Daoism and Confucianism are closer to philosophy, I agree with that although Daoism is something downstream from Buddhism again considering the influence of Buddhism on China.
Nietinism is hippie bullshit similar to Dudeism which is a religious cult centered around the Dude from Big Lebowski. Similar to the Korean Moonie cult as well.

When it comes to Hinduism, westerners like to point out the extremist and stupid aspects to prove that its an inferior or stupid religion. Widow burning is bad I will admit but
A it wasnt an official part of the religion itself rather a practice which was a result of the times
B it was the responsibility of the people who practiced it to realize that it was bad and we had advocates against that who were Hindus themselves. We were almost done with it by the end of the 19th century and all the credit britbongs take for "taming the degenerates" is just a superiority complex. If you still want to argue about how Britbongs tamed the Hindu degenerates, I want to ask, why the fuck wasnt the slave trade and colonialism resolved within a single year by the superior huwhite christian man?
The Thuggee cult is a cult, its like saying Jehovahs Witnesses are the representatives of Christianity.
Shit smearing, piss drinking and the like is done by people who are beyond logic and reason and use religion as a justification for their stupidity. They do it primarily because they think not doing that shit will incur bad juju, not necessarily it being blasphemy but to just satisfy their sanity and bring good luck. Again a good comparison would be the Christian priests who dont fuck or eat chocolate cause theyre manifestations of the devil or fuck 16 year old nubile virgin daughter wives for "their seed to bring forth the lord" or some shit like that. Im pretty sure just cause Christianity says dont give in to temptation it doesnt mean chocolate is fucking Satan.

There is stupidity in all religions, even sometimes human rights violations but that doesnt give credence to the superiority complex brigade to exert their own religion as the arbiter of all good in the world, which is what I see Christianity as partially, a militaristic expansionist religious hierarchy preaching a specific moral code. Yet I dont condemn Christianity in its entirety, it teaches a good moral code which you can get from other religions, I just condemn the stupid parts which you should for Hinduism and other religions as well.
 
@Georgio Cocklord
Every religion seeks supremacy. It's not just the Abrahamic ones. Buddhists and Hindus hated one another, especially since Buddha is a heretic in the eyes of Hinduism, the Daoists under the Yellow Turbans tried to overthrow the Confucian Chinese Emperor during the tail end of the Han Dynasty, it's just that they stopped fighting each other because the Abrahamic Faiths would've crushed them long ago if they kept up their old vendettas. Shit, they could barely handle Islam, let alone Christianity, which was far more advanced and far more effective at converting people. Heck, in WW2, the Japanese Buddhists tried to do the same thing for the Japanese Emperor, spreading his empire and worshiping him as a god while killing/enslaving racial inferiors. Which of course, blew up in their face literally when the Yanks nuked them twice.

Hell, Confucianism had no problem with having the Emperor of China preach about how great he is to the world, how he is the son of heaven, and how other nations should pay him tribute. How's that any different from Catholicism converting different countries and getting them to pay tithes to the Pope? Nothing at all, they both even have monarchs with a Mandate from Heaven, except in Catholicism, it's a lot less murky and a lot less open to interpretation, because you need to get voted in by the Cardinals, whereas in Confucian China, a few natural disasters and some bad luck in politics, and you'll soon have assholes saying that your regime as Emperor is no longer valid because heaven turned against you.

Nowadays, what the kids call Buddhist is just BS philosophy being packaged as Buddhism. Old-world Buddhism in places like Myanmar and pre-WW2 Japan is different from the kind of yoga instructor crap they peddle as Buddhism.

The Hindus should've buried their retrograde practices like cow worship and widow burning the way Catholicism buried a lot of its more radical shit after Vatican II. This is why Catholicism is still growing in the Third World, because it can culturally adapt. Hinduism, outside of attracting some bored, curious white people, will never catch on outside of the Indians. Same thing with the Evangelicals and the Muslims. Some Muslims are radical as fuck, others can blend in with Christians in the West like the Tatars.

Still, the non-Christian right has to keep its mouth shut 99 percent of the time, because if they don't, they'll lose the only influential allies they still have against the SJWs, that being traditional Christians. Breadtube has yet to catch on to this, and so they still see all right-wingers as dumb bible-beating hillbillies, and they whine about how Christianity is patriarchal or some shit.
 
AeroGavin Rossdale said:
Knowing Better, who I last saw 'cutting through the bullshit around gun control' by appealing to his experience in the military and immediately misidentifying the borrowed M240 he was posing with as a Vietnam era M60, has important question. Were books written before 1800?
View attachment 5468482
Click to expand...
The earliest book is a clay tablet with about 20 recipes on it from 1500 BC.
The reason we don't have copies of books from the Romans and Greeks a large amount of them is because the material it was written down on degrades.
Funny enough clay tablets are actually much more durable than paper or Parchment.
Not to mention the degrading of the ink due to exposure to the elements.

Actually the funny thing is a lot of people used to think most Germans will quite primitive thanks to most of the Romans just writing all the political opponents and people they conquered as sub human

And it's for the concept that books were extremely expensive a book in the Roman Empire probably costs as much as a college textbook so kind of expensive but a lot of people could afford that and printing blocks date back to 800 ac in China .

As for books becoming extremely cheap it was the introduction of paper as well as the invention of the printing press that drove down the price of book.

Knowing better also thinks Japan is never apologize for the war crimes that's a blatant lie Japan has apologized several times and has paid money to the Comfort girls not sure about the Rape of Nanking victims but there'll be no point because the Communist Chinese party were just pocket the money anyways.

It's just that the Japanese are not going to let that Define the rest of the countries destiny
Germany should just get over itself and stop apologizing to Jews about the Holocaust or just kill all the Jews
one or the other
 
Is this the beginning of anti-breadtube backlash going mainstream?


I was going to clip some highlights, but after watching it through, I found it best enjoyed in its entirety, as its an unbelievably based calling out of breadtube's hypocrisy. The only criticism I have to add is that Philosophytube wasn't brought into discussion nearly enough for his blatant (attempted) prestige-seeking in legacy media, alongside his near-six-figure salary.
 
@LORD IMPERATOR Buddha wasnt really a heretic in the eyes of Hinduism, he was just a social heretic cause he was a royal who refused society and the social hierarchy, therefore perceived as an enemy of the caste system and in extension society as a whole. Not really a heretic in the eyes of Hinduism the religion but a heretic to Hinduism the social system. Its like how you have the billion dollar christcucks who work in megachurches and shit who are technically christian heretics.

Christianity is not effective at converting people, like I said the church and missionaries offered riches, resources, matrimony and a lot more to the poor and impoverished. They still do in fact in every remote corner of Pajeetland. They will offer anything you require including sex in some cases but you should become a member of the church. They will plaster religious signs everywhere, do public seminars, do religious rituals in public and if you hate Muslims trying to Islamize Europe you should hate this too. They will even incorporate iconography of other religions like they do here with Hindu iconography to get you on their side (Not really a surprising tactic since the New testament is propagandizing trash written by the Romans to convert pagans). I find it incredibly gross, cheap and borderline parasitic which I feel describes Christianity as a whole to be honest. They treat people as land to be colonized by them and their ideology, not multifaceted individuals with complexities, not even pacifist outsiders of the religion, just fucking minds to be plugged in to the church. If that is what you call effective, using cheap battle tactics to force people into your institution, then it probably is.

Thats the thing I described as the problem with Abrahamic religions, they have supremacy built into the religions and its institution. Christianity colonizes through subversion of foreign cultures, Islam colonizes through sheer force and Judaism colonizes through corruption but all three want control of the entire world, all three want every single person on earth under the control of the institution. Not all religions are supremist, especially buddhism considering how isolationist actual buddhists are and how they fuck off to the mountains or remote parts of Asia. Same with Hinduism, its a largely self contained religion whose people have not invaded another land or tried to spread their religion for almost all of history (Except for the Sangam Era and their conquest of Malaysia and Indonesia which arguably didnt make religious conquest). Again I know Buddhism has been repackaged and sold to westerners as a philosophy but I know the religion, maybe not intimately but a lot of the lore and practices and it is definitely a religion. Youve got me with Confucianism though, I didnt know that, that is pretty bad. But I dont agree with the religious supremacy part, Asian religions have extremist elements which are supremecist but supremacy is not part of the framework unlike Abrahamic religions which require worldwide domination. Its part of the reason Asian people especially Pajeets dont want secular states because we are not supremecists, the religion is the most important part of the culture and we lived in religious homogeniety till the 20th century prosperous or not, we just want to be left alone and isolated to our pacifist selves and secularism is a problem because of colonialist western religions which seek domination.
The Best of Me said:
Is this the beginning of anti-breadtube backlash going mainstream?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=VRldlCUTfhg
I was going to clip some highlights, but after watching it through, I found it best enjoyed in its entirety, as its an unbelievably based calling out of breadtube's hypocrisy. The only criticism I have to add is that Philosophytube wasn't brought into discussion nearly enough for his blatant (attempted) prestige-seeking in legacy media, alongside his near-six-figure salary.
Click to expand...
Kidology is alt right*, Breadtubes mentally ill fanbase is here to stay and its a very cyclical audience captured relationship for the most part. I was just thinking about this in the shower, somebody should make a stochastic terrorist type video ranting madly about the hypocrisy of breadtubers in detail. If you barely scratch the surface, pull up graphtreon and see top earners, most of the top earners are breadtubers with an average income of 40k a month off patreon alone. Theyre all millionaires who are shacked up in million dollar compounds and private housing, theyre the fucking elite and its incredibly stunning that people follow them unthinkingly. They dont even give charity ffs, all their supposed charity money is gotten from stream donations and not a single fucking cent is their own cash (Yes every single breadtuber does this. At this point Im assuming they dont even leave their houses cause theyre scared they have to give money to the homeless on the streets). Thats just really scummy and theyve managed to just swipe it under the rug so effectively. People like to go after Hasan cause hes the most publicly rich but Chapo gets 200k a month, Bomberguy Contra and Jenny Nicholson get around 50k a month at minimum from patreon alone, Im sure PhilosophyTube is up there as well with the Fed deal, Vaush gets couple 10ks every month plus his hollywood shit so on and so forth. Nobody is even aware of any of this cause these people like to hide it by portraying themselves as poor while Hasan is a retarded sandnigger running around cali with his girly shit so people notice it. Its genuinely amazing, history repeats itself as the entitled rich upper middle class seeks to become the rich elite by advocating for the poor as the people are incentivized to fight amongst themselves. Hitler was right.

*According to the commies
 
Georgio Cocklord said:
Its a good thing for Abrahamic religions to stay contained within the western world and leave us the fuck alone cause we have our own pacifist religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, Jainism among others which arent built on a supremecist totalitarian framework
Click to expand...
Are you aware that India has had its own indigenous Christian population for almost as long as Christianity has existed? It's a religion that has as long a history in Asia as it does in Europe. Even as far east as China it had a presence long before any kind of European colonialism. I find your focus on Christianity interesting when Islam has a much more substantial history of trying to suppress and dominate the other religions of the Indian subcontinent, including the ideology of "Ghazwa-e-Hind" that has no equivalent in Christianity.
 
Beautiful Border said:
I find your focus on Christianity interesting when Islam has a much more substantial history of trying to suppress and dominate the other religions of the Indian subcontinent, including the ideology of "Ghazwa-e-Hind" that has no equivalent in Christianity.
Click to expand...
Current day quest for supremacy beginning with the Brits. Yes Mughals and islamites are technically the colonizers and I am aware of Syrian Christians as well, which is what those people are but A Hinduism still predates both by couple hundred years B Syrian Christians are not predominantly missionaries, the newly arrived Catholics and protestants were and C just cause a certain section of the populace are pacifist doesn't mean the religious framework doesn't advocate for totalitarianism. In fact the region where Syrian Christians settled is now majority Christian with active efforts at radical expansion of territory even if most of them are pacifist. It's just that their active efforts are very lackluster because their job is almost done, they're the majority demographic while other parts of the country have more active active efforts.
 
AeroGavin Rossdale said:
Knowing Better, who I last saw 'cutting through the bullshit around gun control' by appealing to his experience in the military and immediately misidentifying the borrowed M240 he was posing with as a Vietnam era M60, has important question. Were books written before 1800?
View attachment 5468482
Click to expand...
Okay, uh, The Bible, for one. Then the Talmund, Book of Enoch, Koran. Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and just about nearly every civilization-defining work in western society? Like bro I'm barely literate and I can come up with more than two.
 
Georgio Cocklord said:
Current day quest for supremacy beginning with the Brits. Yes Mughals and islamites are technically the colonizers and I am aware of Syrian Christians as well, which is what those people are but A Hinduism still predates both by couple hundred years B Syrian Christians are not predominantly missionaries, the newly arrived Catholics and protestants were and C just cause a certain section of the populace are pacifist doesn't mean the religious framework doesn't advocate for totalitarianism. In fact the region where Syrian Christians settled is now majority Christian with active efforts at radical expansion of territory even if most of them are pacifist. It's just that their active efforts are very lackluster because their job is almost done, they're the majority demographic while other parts of the country have more active active efforts.
Click to expand...
The British Raj actually disproves your point though, because for the most part the British Empire was happy to let its subjects practice whatever religion they want. British rule in India wasn't motivated by some religious fervor to convert the natives. In places in India where there's a lot of missionary work happening (like in Nagaland) it's mainly the work of American Baptists, and it's something that only started very recently.

When you get Christians that are trying to aggressively expand the religion these days they're usually newer sects, not the ones that have existed for thousands of years like Catholicism and Orthodoxy that truly represent Christian civilization. A lot of these sects (like the Mormons and Jehovah's Witness) aren't even real Christians but heretical cults that deviate too far from the Nicene Creed to still be Christians.
 
Beautiful Border said:
The British Raj actually disproves your point though, because for the most part the British Empire was happy to let its subjects practice whatever religion they want. British rule in India wasn't motivated by some religious fervor to convert the natives. In places in India where there's a lot of missionary work happening (like in Nagaland) it's mainly the work of American Baptists, and it's something that only started very recently.

When you get Christians that are trying to aggressively expand the religion these days they're usually newer sects, not the ones that have existed for thousands of years like Catholicism and Orthodoxy that truly represent Christian civilization. A lot of these sects (like the Mormons and Jehovah's Witness) aren't even real Christians but heretical cults that deviate too far from the Nicene Creed to still be Christians.
Click to expand...
The fuck does any of that gotta do with shitty youtube clout-chasers?
 
Therealhomor said:
The fuck does any of that gotta do with shitty youtube clout-chasers?
Click to expand...
Conversations can occasionally drift off into other tangents. If It completely took over the thread then you'd have a point.
But if that's what you want, then here's more from a lovely lady I posted about earlier:
You only have to listen to that voice to tell they are a TRUE and HONEST woman
 
@Georgio Cocklord
Buddha wasnt really a heretic in the eyes of Hinduism, he was just a social heretic cause he was a royal who refused society and the social hierarchy, therefore perceived as an enemy of the caste system and in extension society as a whole. Not really a heretic in the eyes of Hinduism the religion but a heretic to Hinduism the social system. Its like how you have the billion dollar christcucks who work in megachurches and shit who are technically christian heretics.
Click to expand...
Social heretics are heretics in the eyes of society; it's no different than a Lutheran in a Catholic party. The Caste System is everything in Hinduism. If you try to take it away, they will get mad. Down to the point when Christian missionaries arrived in India, they realized they had to preach Christianity differently to the different castes. And yes, those megachurch cucks would've gotten burned at the stake if we did things like we did 500 years ago. They're anabaptist heretics, even the Lutherans and Anglicans would join the Catholics in burying them.

Christianity is not effective at converting people, like I said the church and missionaries offered riches, resources, matrimony and a lot more to the poor and impoverished. They still do in fact in every remote corner of Pajeetland. They will offer anything you require including sex in some cases but you should become a member of the church. They will plaster religious signs everywhere, do public seminars, do religious rituals in public and if you hate Muslims trying to Islamize Europe you should hate this too. They will even incorporate iconography of other religions like they do here with Hindu iconography to get you on their side (Not really a surprising tactic since the New testament is propagandizing trash written by the Romans to convert pagans). I find it incredibly gross, cheap and borderline parasitic which I feel describes Christianity as a whole to be honest. They treat people as land to be colonized by them and their ideology, not multifaceted individuals with complexities, not even pacifist outsiders of the religion, just fucking minds to be plugged in to the church. If that is what you call effective, using cheap battle tactics to force people into your institution, then it probably is.
Click to expand...
LOL no they do not. The Church offers alms to the poor, medical assistance, food, but riches, they often don't. After all, the life of a Christian is supposed to be sharing your riches with others, so it's usually the other way around; some rich, Fortune-500 schmuck joins the Church and they start offering alms to the poor to buy their place in heaven.

LOL the Romans were the pagans and tried to burn the New Testament. You really have no idea who wrote the New Testament or who resisted it at first. Jesus Christ's Jews wrote it and tried to convert the Romans; they had mixed success for 300 years, with the Romans trying to eradicate all copies of it, until one of the Christians managed to become Emperor thanks to his mum marrying a previous Emperor, then they actually sat down and decided which books belong in the Bible.

As for the Muslims taking Europe, well, they don't convert natives, they just bring their own people over. So no, that isn't similar at all. They're not converting white, secular/Christian people to the Islamic faith, they're just beating up white people while trying to screw their women, whereas Christians in India want Indian Christians to take over, not racially replace them with white Christians.

Also, everyone does the whole colonizing thing. Hinduism would've done it if they had a globe-spanning Empire; the Confucian Chinese Emperor tried to get neighboring lands to pay tribute to him, attacking them if they do not, which was what led to their invasion of Vietnam in the ancient days. The Buddhists in Japan tried to conquer Asia for their divine emperor in WW2. That's even more violent than the Christians spreading the Gospel through force or missionary work.

And it's such a threat to Hinduism because Hinduism has nothing to offer in return outside of a broken system where they worship cows, drink pee, and kill widows. Christ is someone who will hold you responsible for your sins and for the state of your soul, but He won't force you to worship animals or kill your widows. Hinduism at most is a national faith, giving pride to a people of a certain nationalistic identity, and if the Indian people were to disappear tomorrow, the religion itself would die. Meanwhile, if all of Europe were to disappear tomorrow, Christianity would still be around, because Christ's appeal warms the hearts of millions of brown people all over the globe.

Thats the thing I described as the problem with Abrahamic religions, they have supremacy built into the religions and its institution. Christianity colonizes through subversion of foreign cultures, Islam colonizes through sheer force and Judaism colonizes through corruption but all three want control of the entire world, all three want every single person on earth under the control of the institution. Not all religions are supremist, especially buddhism considering how isolationist actual buddhists are and how they fuck off to the mountains or remote parts of Asia. Same with Hinduism, its a largely self contained religion whose people have not invaded another land or tried to spread their religion for almost all of history (Except for the Sangam Era and their conquest of Malaysia and Indonesia which arguably didnt make religious conquest). Again I know Buddhism has been repackaged and sold to westerners as a philosophy but I know the religion, maybe not intimately but a lot of the lore and practices and it is definitely a religion. Youve got me with Confucianism though, I didnt know that, that is pretty bad. But I dont agree with the religious supremacy part, Asian religions have extremist elements which are supremecist but supremacy is not part of the framework unlike Abrahamic religions which require worldwide domination. Its part of the reason Asian people especially Pajeets dont want secular states because we are not supremecists, the religion is the most important part of the culture and we lived in religious homogeniety till the 20th century prosperous or not, we just want to be left alone and isolated to our pacifist selves and secularism is a problem because of colonialist western religions which seek domination.
Click to expand...
Oh please. Not only is religious supremacy a thing before Christianity, especially since the Greeks tried to spread their pagan faith to the Jews and stamp out worship of Abraham's God, but Christianity actually preserves cultures and passes it on. Catholicism just as an example has tons of cultures, from Mexicans, to Filipinos, to Irish and Italians, and the Church itself preserves the Roman culture that once tried to destroy it. Literally, the only reason people still know Latin today is because Catholicism decided to use it as its lingua franca. It's how some asshole from Poland could understand another asshole from France during the Middle Ages. And yet it was a culture that once tried to destroy the Church. Then you have the Orthodox Church which really ingratiated itself into the cultures of Eastern European countries, and the Protestant American churches which preserved America's colonial past and culture.

Supremacy was always part of the framework. The Daoist Yellow Turbans and their war with the Confucian Han Dynasty killed far more people than all the crusades or jihads combined. India and Pakistan hate each other so much that they're pointing nukes at each other, which is far more hatred than anything the British Northern Ireland had with the rest of the Irish. The only reason you don't see Indians conquering for their faith is because they can't conquer shit outside of their country; even the Japanese Buddhists tried to conquer Asia for their god-emperor and were only stopped when they got nuked twice.

And then of course, there's the violence between castes in India where people of different castes hate each other's guts and continue to fight with each other. Even to the present year. So caste supremacy is something ingrained in Indian culture, to the point where people are still killing each other for it.

It's kind of funny that you'd call the New Testament ''trash'' when your own religion kills people for utterly bullshit reasons. At least Cortez slaughtered the Aztecs for sacrificing humans to heathen gods. He did all of mankind a massive favor that day. The New Testament did more for mankind outside of just getting them to understand God's personal tastes; it jumpstarted the quest for equality among all men, because it posited that all men can receive Christ and become temples to the Holy Spirit. And if all men could have the Most High God in all of them, then of course, some people will come to the conclusion that they must all be equal in some way. Meanwhile, your faith still has lower-caste folks getting killed for caste reasons; like how lower-caste kids get killed for daring to touch a pot of water meant for upper-caste folks, or daring to play in grounds meant for upper-caste folks.

I'll take Christianity's religious supremacy over caste supremacy any day of the week. At least you can join Christianity no matter what caste or social structure you're born from; Hindu castes are something you're born into and cannot control, and you can still get killed for being the wrong caste. Christianity is the religion where some random fucking bouncer can become the Pope. Hinduism is the religion where even to this day, people kill each other over caste differences, and lower caste people are still fair game for upper-caste people to abuse.

Therealhomor said:
Okay, uh, The Bible, for one. Then the Talmund, Book of Enoch, Koran. Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and just about nearly every civilization-defining work in western society? Like bro I'm barely literate and I can come up with more than two.
Click to expand...
You have to realize that you're dealing with low-IQ idiots who wouldn't know literature if it bit them in the ass. Breadtubers are known for chasing clout, not being smart.

AeroGavin Rossdale said:
If you want to get super autistic and define 'book' as a piece of genre fiction prose printed in bound form, the answer is still fucking yes, obviously.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure pagan Rome already had books long before they fell.

Breadtube is full of people who haven't realized the obvious. And it's fucking hilarious because of it.

Beautiful Border said:
But if that's what you want, then here's more from a lovely lady I posted about earlier:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=CqRBJn0yHnshttps://youtube.com/watch?v=nig6OFcL2QcYou only have to listen to that voice to tell they are a TRUE and HONEST woman
Click to expand...
Gendered video games died because whenever game designers would make a game for women, the feminists would scream like banshees about how they're reinforcing sexist patterns of gender-discrimination and enforcing traditional gender norms, which they see as a bad thing. So game designers just opted to make women in video games to be more like men, since that would get the feminists to shut the fuck up.

Breadtube is oblivious to the fact that the Left itself is the cause of much of their problems. Especially in the current day, where the rise of the Alt-Right and Trump, people who are considered to be living demons by Breadtube, is entirely the fault of the SJWs during the Obama years pushing things too far, which caused a counter-culture to emerge among people who previously voted with them against George W. Bush.
 
Last edited:
LORD IMPERATOR said:
Speaking of which, some evangelical pastors are finding it harder to preach the Gospel of Christ to people in the Right, since every time they open their mouths about ''help the poor'', ''love thy enemy'', and ''pray for those who persecute you'', they get their answer from the crowd. ''Where did you find this hippie garbage?'' Modern-day right-wing politics has done more than its fair share of damage against the Faith of some people. Just as your average SJW sees religion as a pile of shit because they substituted their faith with politics, so too do some right-wingers substitute faith with politics and completely forget the lessons of the Gospel.
Click to expand...

The rest of what you said here is very thought provoking, and I agree for the most part.

I think what turns many right wingers off from the things you describe is the fact that the mainstream left takes those things and twists them into evil things.

When the left talks about caring for the poor, what they really mean is demonizing successful people and the forceful redistribution of wealth, the abolition of private property.

When the left talks about opposing racism, they mean supporting reverse racism, or racism against what they perceive to be the ethnicities in power. Or they mean pathological altruism. Either they excuse bad behavior from out-groups, or they prioritize taking care of outsiders before putting their own house in order first (there's a damned good reason why airliners tell you that when the cabin is depressurized, put your own damn mask on before you try to help others out)

When they talk about tolerance and love, they talk about leniency towards unrepentant criminals at the expense of their victims. Or they mean tolerance of the most depraved sex acts and most self-destructive lifestyles known to man, and you're a bigot if you say anything bad about them. Apathy when your brother is literally killing himself via his own stupidity.

The people you describe aren't that smart, but they can smell the hypocrisy from the left from a mile away. Unfortunately, the only thing they can think to do is to go full-contrarian and throw the baby out with the bathwater, rather than recognize those things for what they are:

Good, righteous things, that the left has twisted into something evil. The more overplayed they are, the more likely they are to be rejected.

It's depressing.
 
Last edited:
@Aero the Alcoholic Bat
Good, righteous things, that the left has twisted into something evil.
Click to expand...
That's the problem. A growing number of right-wingers are dumb enough to just reject the teachings of Christ altogether instead of just realizing that the Left is trying to use something good for something bad. Which, in turn, will lead to the Right having more infighting between people who want to keep Christianity and people who want to go full edgelord alt-right atheist.

Breadtube atheists won't be able to take advantage of that, though. These people hate Christ for right-wing reasons, not left-leaning ones. If the Breadtubers try to talk to them about sexism and racism they'll complain that Christianity wasn't sexist or racist enough.
 
So there's this breadtube fag named James Rehwald that's been making shitty videos on twitter and tiktok that are basically your average breadtube tier videos.

Why I mention this guy though is that he got attention from the Right because Sam Hyde mocked him for one of his videos, and James ended up getting doxxed by these dudes as a result. So i'm sure things will be fun for him for the next few weeks. Also apparently because this dude works for Nike he will never call out Nike for any bullshit.
 
Rudolf's Friend said:
So there's this breadtube fag named James Rehwald that's been making shitty videos on twitter and tiktok that are basically your average breadtube tier videos.
faggotry.mp4
Why I mention this guy though is that he got attention from the Right because Sam Hyde mocked him for one of his videos, and James ended up getting doxxed by these dudes as a result. So i'm sure things will be fun for him for the next few weeks. Also apparently because this dude works for Nike he will never call out Nike for any bullshit.
fag gets trolled.mp4
Click to expand...
I've seen this guy go semi viral on twitter 3 times over the past few years. Very cringe shit that the Tumblr refugees love I guess
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom