BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

I just have to ask as this particular thing triggers such severe levels of autism in my very being... Why on earth does anyone think it's good or right to suggest that having more people with more guns being more willing to kill as is proper for anyone intending to use such a weapon in self defence will in course result in less killing?

I mean I have at least some understanding of the situation and I would not suggest it not right and proper if anyone of you should own a weapon to keep it well God forbid the time should ever come one might find this need for it in defence of self or loved ones or perhaps even just strangers in the night. This would be one's own business I find no reason to intervene in in of itself and even if God help me I did feel any kind of need to do so I'd certainly need a significant level of divine intervention to even make a dent. Also if we're honest, guns in of themselves are quite fascinating, some might even say somewhat artful and quite entertaining in the right circumstances.

This is not the question. The question is why have you turned the concept of escalation upside down and decided to pretend this finds it's root in anything other than the very same fear and cowardice I have seen others accusing people of who don't seem to them to feel this same apparent willingness to take the life of another human being even in of course strictly theoretical self-defence, or as I've seen put around here 'in minecraft', again God forbid it might ever come to that. Why would you suggest this of others if not that very insecurity which if I'm not mistaken is the exact thing you claim that gun you already own gives you?

If I were particularly philosophical I might ask some exceptionally rhetorical questions such as is it really the gun that protects you? Do guns really kill people? But even as I type this I see the circular nonsense emerging in my mind and remember why I dislike philosophy in general.

But while we are here still with these clearly exceptional internet people and their plainly exceptional internet happenings let's examine the concept of escalation for a small moment if I might seek your indulgence as such. Let's imagine our very exceptional fellow here has in an alternative universe decided to level up his exceptionally exceptional views by deciding to own a gun perhaps in response to his now dead stalker predeath. What is the first thing a fellow of such truly exceptional being does perhaps even before he leaves the store with his new purchase... Do you see where this is going?

:thinking:
 
He's definitely not wrong. The Ralphamale rolls up on his eskimo bros looking to fight, while wearing a shirt that says "Not Today Satan". He would never hide in a situation like this.
View attachment 5551632
Say what you will about Ralph he would 100% have tried to fight the guy and gotten gunned down before cowering behind his woman
 
Tbh the whole thing with him yanking his phone out of his asshole at a time like that is just the most self centered shit, and him getting pissed he did it in "MY FUCKING HALLWAY”
No you don’t understand this is his personal 9/11. He got blood all over the hecken Funko pops and then those pig cops tracked mud over his carpet. How is he supposed to be cucked when the bull is cooked?
 
If they're pro gun control, they deserved worse.
Bread tubers and pro gun control whites rarely live around black neighborhoods for a reason.
When the likes of Kyle Rittenhouse delivered just that and bagged himself a pedo, a wife beater, and house burglar, they weeped and wailed and gnashed their teeth over it.
Kyle Rittenhouse is more of a patriot and hero than those homos at a black rifle coffee company. Unlike Kyle Rittenhouse killing a pedo. Killing innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn’t make you a hero, it doesn’t make you heroes deserving of worship. Makes you a tool for globalists.
1702084447216.jpeg
is it just me or does it legit disturb you these people have followings
Dumb people deserved to suffer from dumb leadership. Let dumb people starve to death. You do everyone a favor.
 
>Be Hunter
>Get cucked by Tyrone
>Get clowned online
>Try to cope online gigachading it
>doesn't work
>"well I might as well be the bull for once"
>cuck a soylent manlet
>manlet goes on a violent rampage
>shoots gf
>Have Hunter so scared he has to record begging the cops to hurry up
>Gets clowned again

:story:
 

Attachments

  • 29494949.jpg
    29494949.jpg
    724.7 KB · Views: 64
I just have to ask as this particular thing triggers such severe levels of autism in my very being... Why on earth does anyone think it's good or right to suggest that having more people with more guns being more willing to kill as is proper for anyone intending to use such a weapon in self defence will in course result in less killing?

I mean I have at least some understanding of the situation and I would not suggest it not right and proper if anyone of you should own a weapon to keep it well God forbid the time should ever come one might find this need for it in defence of self or loved ones or perhaps even just strangers in the night. This would be one's own business I find no reason to intervene in in of itself and even if God help me I did feel any kind of need to do so I'd certainly need a significant level of divine intervention to even make a dent. Also if we're honest, guns in of themselves are quite fascinating, some might even say somewhat artful and quite entertaining in the right circumstances.

This is not the question. The question is why have you turned the concept of escalation upside down and decided to pretend this finds it's root in anything other than the very same fear and cowardice I have seen others accusing people of who don't seem to them to feel this same apparent willingness to take the life of another human being even in of course strictly theoretical self-defence, or as I've seen put around here 'in minecraft', again God forbid it might ever come to that. Why would you suggest this of others if not that very insecurity which if I'm not mistaken is the exact thing you claim that gun you already own gives you?

If I were particularly philosophical I might ask some exceptionally rhetorical questions such as is it really the gun that protects you? Do guns really kill people? But even as I type this I see the circular nonsense emerging in my mind and remember why I dislike philosophy in general.

But while we are here still with these clearly exceptional internet people and their plainly exceptional internet happenings let's examine the concept of escalation for a small moment if I might seek your indulgence as such. Let's imagine our very exceptional fellow here has in an alternative universe decided to level up his exceptionally exceptional views by deciding to own a gun perhaps in response to his now dead stalker predeath. What is the first thing a fellow of such truly exceptional being does perhaps even before he leaves the store with his new purchase... Do you see where this is going?
The answer is the right to bear arms isn't supposed to defend you against your fellow countryman, but rather the tyranny of your government. The fact that things have gotten so bad is an unrelated "cultural" matter. If you dive deeper you'll find that lawful gun owners actually commit LESS gun violence than non-gun owners. If you own a gun legally, you're less likely to commit a gun-related violent crime than somebody who doesn't have one at all.

As for the lust for self defense in minecraft, that too is more a consequence of the current borderline civil war levels of hatred in the US.
 
So your girl/friend/person you’re trying to bang gets shot by a deranged ex boyfriend and instead of trying to help her or at least pretend to protect her in some way you get out the phone to livestream. Do you call the cops? Do you call the ambulance? Do you do anything to preserve your lives? Nope, you get out the phone and make content.

He’ll just use this to double down on gun control content, despite him using a shotgun which is never suggested to be banned in gun control proposals.
You just know he's elated to be able to say 'AS A VICTIM OF GUN VIOLENCE" in every gun control debate from now on.
 
If only Conrad had killed Hunter. That would have been really funny.
Hopefully something even more crazy will happen before the end of this year.

No, this is the funnier outcome. Forget that the 'other man' is a Breadtuber for a moment. Focus on Cuck McManlet. The faggot had no idea how to even prep for murder correctly (brings the weakest possible ammo type with him), injuries the woman he supposedly 'loves' (but not enough for a committed marriage, but some bullshit 'open relationship' - is it any wonder she left him?) and then an-heroes himself with birdshot at point blank, which I had never heard of before.
 
Last edited:
Did anyone else catch the fact that in the video he took, he appears to be leaning to the far side of the balcony away from the doorway (trying to hide?), while the girl is standing directly in front of the door to the patio/balcony, which appears to have a large window, with bird shot in her leg?? What a fucking pussy he is.
 
I really don't know anything about this guy other than the highlight.
I find it absolutely disgusting that this """"man"""" upon seeing his injured girlfriend. With potentially another shot ringing out at any other moment, decides to record/livestream.
There are a litany of other actions to do in this situation. Retreating to a secondary location, grabbing your own firearm (he is anti gun?) Followed by immediate medical attention.
But no, I have to record this for the vine sweetheart.
He goes on to blame her for not getting down so the faggot just takes his phone out lmao
I mean wow can this guy be any more soy?
Im not even gonna call him a faggot cause faggots have way more balls.
 
Back