BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

I've been seeing a lot of the VR Youtube confessionals lately, mostly ones that have to do with Military related misconduct. Youtube is pushing this one in particular though so I caved and decided to give it a chance. Everything about this guy is a minefield of red flags with just the tiniest sliver of a benefit of the doubt. He's a tranny with a weeb avatar claiming to have multiple personality disorder due to having a Neo-Nazi dad, so already that puts me at 80% doubt. Then he starts speaking in therapese by using words like "compartmentalize" to mean "forget." His dad also happens to be such a hardcore Neo-Nazi that it makes his skinhead buddies give him side eye. So his dad isn't just a no good heckin Neo-Nazi, he's the worst of the worst.

He just so happens to have the most min-maxed combination of Tumblrite bingo oppression points imaginable without being black and crippled, because being the mulatto wheelchair-bound tranny schizo son of a Southern hick Neo-Nazi would be pushing it too far, I guess.

So now I'm at 96% doubt and nearly ready to pull the trigger on calling him a full on liar, except he said something that rings true but isn't something a liar would just know, which is that Neo-Nazis are fond of shifting blame for their problems to whoever they can.

Thing is though, this story sounds incredibly familiar, like I heard it or read about it years ago, and this video was just published two months ago and I've never seen it, so not only am I 98% sure he's a liar, I'm also fairly certain he's a plagiarist too.

Update: 11 minutes in and he claims his sister decided to rape him in elementary school. Nope, sorry, I know what the Westermarck effect is, you overplayed your hand and you're 100% lying.
Family rape is a thing, however this is definitely bullshit just because of the Multiple Personality Disorder. Even if you manage to get some negligent therapist to give you that bullshit diagnosis, it still requires you to play along with the dumbest LARP ever in order to get it. Even if they are "really" trans, they're still a liar with two massive made-up personality traits, so I see no reason to believe a single thing they claim.
 
Have anyone know what city Hunter lives in or what police department came to save his dumbass? I want to see can get the bodycam from the Public Information Act. Since no one has done that.
Everything I could find relating to the shooting in terms of location states that it took place in Martinsburg, West Virginia. The Martinsburg Police Department did release a statement relating to the shooting and the details within seem to match with the events previously brought up in the thread.

martinsburg.png
 
So now I'm at 96% doubt and nearly ready to pull the trigger on calling him a full on liar, except he said something that rings true but isn't something a liar would just know, which is that Neo-Nazis are fond of shifting blame for their problems to whoever they can.
the idea that the far right supposedly blame others for their own failures is one of the most common things I hear about them, the book Hillbilly Elegy by J.D Vance is basically about this.

Do they do it ? I mean yes but I don't think neo nazis are especially bad about blaming others for their problems, the left does it just as much tbh, the thing is due to leftist dominance of culture the people the things they blame are more legitimatized.

Black activist do blame White people for all their problems, here is a leaked diversity memo from IBM

GBrVSxjbgAAq8Me.png
They straight up say "white erasure" is the cause of all of black people's problems
 
1703576978979.jpeg
1703577104993.jpeg
1703577154654.jpeg

1703577647107.jpeg
I know it's already been noticed there is a lot of overlap between cartoon review YouTube and Hollywood damage control channels, and the bread tube community. Ethan is online, apart from Breadtube being pissy that conservatives are finding success with independent film making and sometimes destroying late-night comedy ratings. Mind you, Ethan is online is someone who sees not shilling Big Pharma conservative. Bread tube and the LGBT community are big Pharma whores.
 
I love how these people totally do not support imperialism but it's totally okay to support imperialism and basically the equivalent of the white man's bone as long as you're saying about brown people and anytime you point this out to any of these people's fan base they literally have ab**** fit meltdown.
I was going to reply to this, but forgot to do so.

What they don't understand is that much of Muslim ''science'' was done by pagans and Christians given Arabic names. Muslims did very little science and philosophy on their own, and those Muslims who opened their mind to Greek science and philosophy came to see it as superior to Islam, which is why they stopped innovating science long before the Crusaders arrived, because these ''scientists'' were either lukewarm Muslims or nonbelievers, and they started persecuting nonbelievers after Harun Al-Rashid's death.

So when the Moslems invaded Visigothic Spain, they didn't find cavemen living there, there were people living in the same way they did under Ancient Rome, since tribes like the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, and Franks preserved the Roman government systems and even continued to use Roman officials, it's just that they seized control of it and collected the taxes. They were still practicing Greek science and living like Romans before Islam showed up and put an end to that in Spain. There's a reason why the local Spaniards never accepted them and waged war for them for hundreds of years until the Reconquista kicked them out. They were foreign invaders who were more barbaric than the actual barbarians who took down Rome's western empire.

So there is no justification for Islamic imperialism, and all that crap about them spreading science and math is hogwash when they more than likely STOLE it from the locals. If you look at Islam's actual positions on science, it isn't that welcoming, hence why Islam fell behind the Christian west in terms of science; the best they did was preserve Greek science, but so did the Byzantines, so they weren't alone. That's something a lot of breadtubers ignore; the fact that not only was Islam's theology not reconcilable with science, to the point where Muslims who practiced Greek science saw Aristotle as superior to Muhammad, but Islam was hardly the only power preserving the science left over from the Roman world, since an actual remnant of the Roman Empire did the exact same thing and even used that science on the battlefield with examples like Greek Fire.

Even when you look at Medieval Europe's military technology and farming techniques, they were superior to their Muslim counterparts. The latter only had a head start because they stole the Roman world's homework, and they didn't try to innovate it, but the Crusaders did, hence why the latter had weapons like crossbows, while their Byzantine frenemies had flamethrowers, and the Muslims were still using scale mail and composite bows which were inferior to Crusader armor and weapons. That's why during the early Crusades, the Crusaders creamed their Muslim foes, and the only way Islam won was due to charismatic warlords like Saladin or through extensive use of slave-soldiers who were expendable suicide shocktroops.

One question you should ask these people when they speak about how scientific and tolerant Islam is, if Islam is that good, why don't they become Muslims? Watch as you get nothing but silence as their brains slowly implode. They know they can't do it because actual Islam isn't that tolerant of ideas that question it, and they know it. They only praise Islam to bash Christianity. If they actually became Muslims, they'll soon figure out that the reality of Islam being compatible with their lofty ideals of what Islam is turned out to be completely false.

They can bitch and whine and say that early Islam was more tolerant, unlike modern Islam, but that was because the early Muslim rulers needed the help of the locals in overthrowing the Romans and the Persians, once they ceased being a threat, Islam started to dogmatize and persecute them. That's called Taqiyya; they deceive their way in to be friends with you, then turn against you once they have the numbers and no longer need to keep up a friendly face.

Also this guy lives in Argentina so that's funny he's going to have to face Salvador Miley's anarcho capitalist death squads
I can imagine some breadtubers in Argentina are probably fearing for their lives.
 
Last edited:
Everything I could find relating to the shooting in terms of location states that it took place in Martinsburg, West Virginia. The Martinsburg Police Department did release a statement relating to the shooting and the details within seem to match with the events previously brought up in the thread.

View attachment 5588353
Isn't that part of Virginia a dump? Hammerhand mocked Hunter's incident, but was surprised how Hunter lives or spends time in dumps despite the thousands of shekels he gets from his viewers.
 

A thing I've noticed is Breadtubers and leftists in general tend to make the worst, most uncharitable interpretations of everything. I'm beginning to think that doomers aren't just a rightoid phenomena but that prog leftists are some of the biggest doomers there are.
It’s gotta be really tiring to be this miserable all the time. And to have your only personality trait be “cynical”.
 

A thing I've noticed is Breadtubers and leftists in general tend to make the worst, most uncharitable interpretations of everything. I'm beginning to think that doomers aren't just a rightoid phenomena but that prog leftists are some of the biggest doomers there are.

The movie doesn't even glorify capitalism.

The antagonists are a bunch of corrupt businessmen, alleged competitors who actually collaborate and form a cartel to drive out competitors. They bribe the police chief to do their bidding, they do underhanded actions to screw over anyone who threatens their bottom line, and they even corrupt the church.

Everything bad about capitalism that commies could spout are present in the movie.

But no, because it depicts the protagonist as being a scrappy small-businessman, because even the police in the story aren't all that bad (and even turn on their own chief when his deeds are brought to light), and because Wonka at no point tries to tear down the capitalist system, is it evil.

It's just like those socialists who hated Charles Dickens, those socialists who thought that he was too soft: Charles Dickens never called on the poor, the working class, to tear the rich and powerful down. Rather, Dickens frequently made the point that the rich and powerful were morally obligated to lift others up.

Which, interestingly enough, is another one of Wonka's reasons for wanting to succeed at his business: he wants to free his friends from debt slavery to a pair of highly predatory innkeepers and laundromat owners.
 
Last edited:
I had the displeasure of watching a Maggie Mae Fish video and realized about a third of the way through she was incompetent / a la socialist.

The phrase that rang my alarm bells was her belief that housing should be a human right.

I cannot for the life of me fathom something so dumb. A mere introspection into the issue will reveal a multitude of issues.

Since housing is a right, how is it assigned?

Who gets the better assignments (Oceanview, balcony, larger size)?

What is the size of assigned housing for people?

Is private housing still available?


Honestly, nearly all the time I watch a commie video they use buzzwords to try to gloss over in significant problems their plans have.

Even with the Vaush Coconut Island analogy, the private property market is still better as I have more choice than the unsurmountable monopoly of the state.

If Vaush thinks that is a violation for person stranded on an island to be forced to suck cock for coconuts, then I let's share some stories about how Soviet mothers had to prostitute themselves for some regional housing czar.
 
I had the displeasure of watching a Maggie Mae Fish video and realized about a third of the way through she was incompetent / a la socialist.

The phrase that rang my alarm bells was her belief that housing should be a human right.
Socialist rhetoric sleight of hand doesn’t magically make more housing pop up. You can’t (re)distribute a scarce good among a larger mass of people, you will run out no matter how clever and fair the way to divide it is.

Total NIMBY cultural capture has made it widely unthinkable to simply build more homes to meet demand, whether you’re a dirty communist, cruel robber baron or just someone who wants to grill. As a curiosity, market prices also go down quite a bit if there’s too many homes for the number of people wanting it.
 

So I recently watched the "Crusades were justified" video from Paxtube and I decided to give this other video a chance, and out of the door he starts character assassinating Pax. I don't know much about Pax but this is a shit way to open a debunking video. He makes sure you hate who Pax is before hearing out what Pax says.
 
Thank god I was looking for this since lot of people were talking about it on twitter. If I only got the LOTR video as well.

In other news SecondThought got kicked off Nebula for saying kill the jews
Very funny to me, thats the second known guy who got into drama with Nebula. When is Nebula gonna blow up in the Internationale Cliques face, place your bets.

So I recently watched the "Crusades were justified" video from Paxtube and I decided to give this other video a chance, and out of the door he starts character assassinating Pax. I don't know much about Pax but this is a shit way to open a debunking video. He makes sure you hate who Pax is before hearing out what Pax says.
Ive been seeing this guys videos. He has a very weird way of analysis, he portrays being unbiased but says that nobody can be so its better to be biased. One thing which caught my attention was when he said history is the process of constantly reevaluating past information and drafting conclusions based on present context, I think it was the TIKHistory video or the Academia video. Thats very strange framing cause as a communist you have an intent to redefine history constantly as you move into the future, so "X killed Y" will not remain "X killed Y" but will become "X killed Y because of". A good example is how the definition of colonialism has changed among many other semantic changes across academia to be a thing only coming out of white western people, every time people accused communists of colonialism like with Soviet invasions, Cuban invasions, Vietnam and Pol Pot, China and Tibet, Gamergate and the Internet the definition always changed. Colonialism, when I studied primary school, was basically taking other peoples spaces and resources against their consent and trying to assert dominance over said other people through things like cultural and bureaucratic impositions.
 
Last edited:

So I recently watched the "Crusades were justified" video from Paxtube and I decided to give this other video a chance, and out of the door he starts character assassinating Pax. I don't know much about Pax but this is a shit way to open a debunking video. He makes sure you hate who Pax is before hearing out what Pax says.
That is because leftists work like that. They want de-legitimize Pax or anyone else like him so that every word coming out of people like Pax, you would automatically not believe because you've been conditioned to mistrust him. Radical leftists use such attacks just as much as some right-wingers do, except since this idiot probably can't argue out of a paper bag if it came down to a debate on how bad the Crusades were, so they start off their pedestrian arguments by attacking their opponent's credibility to buttress their otherwise milk-toast points. Points that could easily be disproven by some random schmuck actually reading about the Crusades.

Here's a thing you should know; the Muslim armies that defeated the Crusaders were slave-soldiers. Not free men. As in, the only way the Muslims actually won against the Crusaders was through the use of brainwashed cannon fodder, not true warriors who were respected and given honors.
 
Back
Top Bottom