Canadian Cancer Society apologizes for not calling cervix “front hole” in non-binary disclaimer

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
article/archive

On a web page dedicated to cervical cancer, the Canadian Cancer Society is apologizing for referring to the cervix by its technical name rather than euphemisms such as “front hole.”

The agency also conceded that “men can have these body parts too.”

“Trans, non-binary and gender-diverse people face significant barriers to accessing healthcare and are less likely than cisgender people to be screened for cancer,” wrote the Canadian Cancer Society in a page on cervical cancer screening for LGBTQ people.

In a “words matter” section on the organization’s official website, the Canadian Cancer Society atoned for the fact that some non-binary and transgender people might find the term “cervix” offensive and preferred to use the term “front hole” to refer to female genitalia.

“We recognize that many trans men and non-binary people may have mixed feelings about or feel distanced from words like ‘cervix.’ You may prefer other words, such as ‘front hole.’ We recognize the limitations of the words we’ve used while also acknowledging the need for simplicity,” the Canadian Cancer Society wrote.

True North reached out to the Canadian Cancer Society for comment but did not receive a response.

Women’s rights activists argue that the terminology is both objectifying and derogatory. British gender-critical writer Julie Burchill accused LGBT activists of erasing women by adopting the terms.

“Both ‘bonus hole’ and ‘front hole’ are recommended as trans-friendly alternatives to vagina. Trans ideologues have long tried to erase or appropriate any word that is specific to females – from woman to mother and now vagina. And they have gained a foothold in our schools and in our media. Now gynaecological-health providers are swallowing the stupid pills, too,” argued Burchill in a 2023 essay published to Spiked.

The term “front hole” and “bonus hole” have been popularized by LGBTQ activists as a replacement for the biologically correct term “vagina.”

In 2022, controversy erupted after the Boston Children’s Hospital used the term. Other organizations dedicated to women’s health have also adopted the offensive term.

“A transgender male teen may still have a vagina. He won’t call it a vagina. He may use the term ‘front hole’ or a different term,” said Dr. Elizabeth Boskey in a video by the hospital.
 
Nobody should have to pay money or taxes for medical treatment from people who get their medical knowledge from teenagers and non-medically trained activists.

If this isn’t going to be based strictly on serious hard science then doctors and witch doctors should be given exactly equal respect.
 
Even if they apologized for being Canadian, they wouldn't mean it.

If MAID could just be taken to its inevitable conclusion:

 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Nobody should have to pay money or taxes for medical treatment from people who get their medical knowledge from teenagers and non-medically trained activists.

If this isn’t going to be based strictly on serious hard science then doctors and witch doctors should be given exactly equal respect.
And barbers should be allowed to practice dental work again.
 
The terms sound more like something the stereotypical incel would use when ranting about women lmao.

If we are embracing the ridiculousness of this all, I like the idea of calling a vagina the Bonus Hole (i.e. the 'good' hole)

I wonder what the Malus Hole (i.e. the 'bad' hole) might be...
 
“Trans, non-binary and gender-diverse people face significant barriers to accessing healthcare and are less likely than cisgender people to be screened for cancer,” wrote the Canadian Cancer Society in a page on cervical cancer screening for LGBTQ people.
Sò these people will avoid having necessary procedures done and won't take the proper medical precautions, all because using and hearing biological terms for the body parts they were born with makes it harder for them to live out their fantasy.

That's the only barrier they face, the fact that medical professionals are taught factual terminology and use proven methods acquired through years of experimentation, research, and experience instead of using ridiculous slang and euphemisms that immature lunatics came up with 3 weeks ago.

And we're supposed to pretend that these people aren't mentally ill and are expected to cater to their delusions.
 
Both ‘bonus hole’ and ‘front hole’ are recommended as trans-friendly alternatives to vagina

Are "front hole", "bonus hole" dysphemisms for the vagina or dysphemisms for the cervix, or are those indeed wildcard terms that cover everything pertaining the female genitalia? Can we rely on scholars of Advanced Biology to figure it out?

If a pooner is so hurt by words that she refuses cancer screening or treatment, I call it Darwinism in action.
 
Back