CN China’s Newest Nuclear Submarine Sank, Setting Back Its Military Modernization - Pierside accident came as Beijing attempts to expand its navy

By Michael R. Gordon
Sept. 26, 2024 11:00 am ET


China’s fleet of warships is eclipsing the U.S. As tensions between the two global powers grow, the U.S. is looking to South Korea, one of its biggest allies in Asia, to help increase its battleship supply. Photo: HD Hyundai Heavy Industries

WASHINGTON—China’s newest nuclear-powered attack submarine sank in the spring, a major setback for one of the country’s priority weapons programs, U.S. officials said.

The episode, which Chinese authorities scrambled to cover up and hasn’t previously been disclosed, occurred at a shipyard near Wuhan in late May or early June.

It comes as China has been pushing to expand its navy, including its fleet of nuclear-powered submarines.

The Pentagon has cast China as its principal long-term “pacing challenge,” and U.S. officials say that Beijing has been using political and military pressure to try to coerce Taiwan, a separately governed island that Beijing claims as part of its territory.

China says its goal in building a world-class military is to deter aggression and safeguard its overseas interests. A spokesman for the Chinese embassy didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

im-14384513.jpg
A satellite image of Wuchang Shipyard in Wuhan, China, on June 13. Photo: Planet Labs PBC

The U.S. doesn’t know if the sub was carrying nuclear fuel at the time it sank, but experts outside the U.S. government said that was likely.

Undersea technology has long been an area of U.S. advantage, but China has been pushing hard to narrow the gap.

China has been moving to diversify the production of nuclear-powered submarines. Production has been centered in the northeastern city of Huludao, but China is now moving to manufacture nuclear-powered attack submarines at the Wuchang Shipyard near Wuhan.

Beijing had 48 diesel-powered attack subs and six nuclear-powered attack subs at the end of 2022, according to a Pentagon report issued last year on China’s military power,

That report said that China’s aim in developing new attack submarines, surface ships and naval aircraft is to counter efforts by the U.S. and its partners to come to Taiwan’s aid during a conflict and to achieve “maritime superiority” within the first island chain, a string of territory from the Japanese archipelago through Taiwan and the Philippines to the South China Sea.

The Zhou-class vessel that sank is the first of a new class of Chinese nuclear-powered subs and features a distinctive X-shaped stern, which is designed to make the vessel more maneuverable.

The sub was built by China State Shipbuilding Corp., a state-owned company, and was observed alongside a pier on the Yangtze River in late May when it was undergoing its final equipping before going to sea.

After the sinking, large floating cranes arrived in early June to salvage the sub from the river bed, according to satellite photos of the site.

im-33829361.jpg
A satellite image of Wuchang Shipyard on May 16. Photo: Planet Labs PBC

im-52538874.jpg
A satellite image of Wuchang Shipyard on June 15. Photo: Planet Labs PBC

“The sinking of a new nuclear sub that was produced at a new yard will slow China’s plans to grow its nuclear submarine fleet,” said Brent Sadler, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington think tank, and a retired U.S. Navy nuclear submarine officer. “This is significant.”

Neither the People’s Liberation Army, as the Chinese military is known, nor local authorities, have acknowledged the episode.

“It’s not surprising that the PLA Navy would try to conceal the fact that their new first-in-class nuclear-powered attack submarine sank pierside,” said a senior U.S. defense official. “In addition to the obvious questions about training standards and equipment quality, the incident raises deeper questions about the PLA’s internal accountability and oversight of China’s defense industry, which has long been plagued by corruption.”

The first public indication that something was amiss at the shipyard near Wuhan came in the summer when Thomas Shugart, a former U.S. submarine officer and an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, wrote a series of social-media posts noting the unusual activity of the floating cranes, which was captured by commercial satellite imagery.

Shugart surmised that there might have been an incident that involved a new type of submarine, but he didn’t know at the time that it was nuclear-powered.

“Can you imagine a U.S. nuclear submarine sinking in San Diego and the government hushes it up and doesn’t tell anybody about it? I mean, Holy Cow!” Shugart said in an interview this week with The Wall Street Journal.

While the submarine was salvaged, it will likely take many months before it can be put to sea.

“The whole boat would be full of water,” Shugart said. “You’d have to clean out all the electronics. The electric motors may need to be replaced. It would be a lot of work.”

American officials haven’t detected any indication that Chinese officials have sampled the water or nearby environment for radiation. It is possible Chinese personnel were killed or injured when the sub sank, but U.S. officials say they don’t know if there were casualties.

Shugart said that the risk of a nuclear leak was likely to be low as the sub hadn’t ventured out to sea and its reactors were probably not operating at a high power level.

The U.S. has suffered similar setbacks, which proved costly. In 1969, the nuclear-powered USS Guitarro was moored at a shipyard in California when it sank following a series of mistakes by construction workers. It wasn’t officially commissioned until 32 months after its sinking.

Source (Archive)
 
Turns out that no matter how much money and how many academic sounding peons you throw at an endeavour, when the entire system is built on the principals of aggressively enforced "everything is fine" positivity and "pass the buck and let the next guy deal with the consequences" apathy, with those transgressing by voicing open concern or criticism to higher ups or outsiders, or owning a problem and trying to fix it themselves, getting silenced and shitcanned by everyone above, around, and beneath them, catastrophic and miserable failure is inevitable, and can only be delayed temporarily by pouring ever more absurd amounts of funding and manpower into the fault lines to try and make shit stick long enough so that it doesn't collapse on your watch.

But enough about [INSERT CURRENTYEAR FRANCHISE HERE], we're here to discuss the latest chink fuckup

Chinese build quality at work. Nothing more than tin cans
It aint like anyone involved in the planning, construction, and continued manning of these subs had/has any expectation of this shit being used in actual combat, and if this does wind up happening then they will simply blame the other guys who worked on it and run for the hills
 
Turns out that no matter how much money and how many academic sounding peons you throw at an endeavour, when the entire system is built on the principals of aggressively enforced "everything is fine" positivity and "pass the buck and let the next guy deal with the consequences" apathy, with those transgressing by voicing open concern or criticism to higher ups or outsiders, or owning a problem and trying to fix it themselves, getting silenced and shitcanned by everyone above, around, and beneath them, catastrophic and miserable failure is inevitable, and can only be delayed temporarily by pouring ever more absurd amounts of funding and manpower into the fault lines to try and make shit stick long enough so that it doesn't collapse on your watch.

But enough about [INSERT CURRENTYEAR FRANCHISE HERE], we're here to discuss the latest chink fuckup


It aint like anyone involved in the planning, construction, and continued manning of these subs had/has any expectation of this shit being used in actual combat, and if this does wind up happening then they will simply blame the other guys who worked on it and run for the hills
Having worked with Chinese steel and associated materials in my work, you have no idea how right you are. Chinks take as many shortcuts possible as long as the product technically still works. The Culture is built on it. I'm not surprised that nuclear sub sank, I'm only surprised it didn't happen sooner. They build tin cans to look tough, but it's only through quantity that they are a threat.
 
The US Navy's main advantage over the Chinkanese People's Liberation Army Navy is not that we have way more modern aircraft carriers and ~60 years of experience using them/refining design

It's our submarines and modern missile destroyers/cruisers that we have ~60 years of experience using/refining design

Red chinks are rushing as fast as they can to build and operate their first generation of carriers (let's be generous and say they have ~20 years experience) and second generation (let's be generous and say they have ~30 years experience) of modern destroyers/cruisers/submarines. And they're red chinks, so yeah their shit is gonna be fucky way more than ours is
 
The U.S. has suffered similar setbacks, which proved costly. In 1969, the nuclear-powered USS Guitarro was moored at a shipyard in California when it sank following a series of mistakes by construction workers. It wasn’t officially commissioned until 32 months after its sinking.
Uncertain whether they went back to a 55 year old incident to give the impression that it's all ancient history for the US and those dunb chinkies know nothing but the Bonhomme Richard incident was only four years ago. A dockyard fire wrote off an amphibious assault ship. The investigation found:

Repeated failures: A cascade of failures, including inadequate training, insufficient firefighting equipment, and poor communication, led to the botched response.
Inoperable fire stations: Roughly 87% of the ship’s fire stations were out of commission at the time of the blaze.
Unprepared crew: The Bonhomme Richard’s crew was not ready for a fire of this magnitude.
Systemic reforms not followed: The Navy’s reforms implemented after a 2012 shipyard fire that destroyed the submarine Miami were not implemented, contributing to the Bonhomme Richard’s demise.
Disjointed response: The initial firefighting response was disjointed, poorly coordinated, and confusing.

It incidentally draws attention to a submarine loss in 2012 as well.
 
Perfect time to share this hilarity. A compilation of chinesium stuff breaking apart and doing chinesium things.

EDIT: Because youtube is being a nigger and this is the second time that's happened with the videos I'm sharing today, replaced it with a downloaded video and as an archive. Fuck you, youtube
 
Last edited:
Back