Business Citi rescinds policy that restricted dealings with sellers of firearms - Wall Street bank had put rules in place following Parkland school shooting in 2018

Citi rescinds policy that restricted dealings with sellers of firearms
Financial Times (archive.ph)
By Akila Quinio
2025-06-03 17:43:58GMT

Citigroup has revoked a policy curbing its dealings with companies that sell firearms in the latest sign of how corporate America is shifting its approach on major political issues under pressure from Donald Trump.

The Wall Street bank on Tuesday changed its code of conduct to state that it “does not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation” and revoked a rule it had put in place in 2018 to restrict its relationship with firearms sellers.

Citi’s decision to remove its firearms policy represents a shift on an issue that has long been a lightning rod in American politics and culture.

Trump has said the government will review gun policies made during his predecessor Joe Biden’s administration that may infringe on Americans’ constitutional rights to possess weapons. He has also been a strong critic of corporate policies that support social causes.

New York-based Citi had implemented the policy in 2018 after the Parkland school shooting in Florida, which left 17 people dead in one of the worst incidents of its kind in US history.

The group said at the time that the policy was put in place because “as a society, we all know that something needs to change. And as a company, we feel we must do our part”.

Mike Corbat, who was then Citi’s chief executive, also touted the policy in the group’s 2018 annual shareholder meeting, saying it was “intended to preserve the rights of responsible gun owners like myself, while relying on best sales practices to keep firearms out of the wrong hands”.

The policy required clients and partners of the bank not to sell firearms to people under the age of 21 or to those who had not passed a background check. It also required that dealers not sell bump stocks or high-capacity magazines.

Citi also said it would change its policies to “clearly state that we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation in the same way we are clear that we do not discriminate on the basis of other traits such as race and religion”. It added that “this will codify what we’ve long practised”.

The change comes after Trump has claimed that some US banks had declined to provide services based on political affiliation.

Citi cited “concerns that are being raised regarding ‘fair access’ to banking services” and “regulatory developments, recent executive orders and federal legislation” for its decision to change its policies.

It said the rules regarding firearms had been “intended to promote the adoption of best sales practices as prudent risk management” but that it “didn’t address the manufacturing of firearms”.

“Many retailers have been following these best practices, and we hope communities and lawmakers will continue to seek out ways to prevent the tragic consequences of gun violence,” Citi said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YarrBlueballs
I don't fucking care if they rolled it back, there needs to be legislation that will stop them from just rolling it back when it is politically convenient. Why should the firearms industry trust Citi again at this point when that glaring hole is still open? What happens the next time there's a school shooting and political activists use that as a wedge issue and are given expanded funding to pressure banks again? Right now is the perfect chance for the GOP to actually lay something down, if they fall for this "the businesses will self-regulate" shit once again, then it is doomed to keep happening.
 
Time for Null to apply for another bank account and see what happens.
 
Debanking is the most faggy thing in clown world, despite Trump's own family getting in the shit list I fear he will drag his feet and not enact any kind of legislation to prevent it, especially with him culling the consumer financial protection bureau.
Realistically there's only so much he can do before they put on the pressure for some random bullshit again.
 
fuck allowing them to drop it of their own free will
this needs the national guard with guns there like bussing in them kids
 
consumer financial protection bureau
Proposed by Liz Warren before and then authorized in supposed reaction to the 2008 financial disaster. Officially existed for only close to 15 years now. Hasn't been some solid mainstay in government forever, and I'd question what good it's done. We do need protections but most of what's been in place is rotten.
 
Why were they even allowed to have such a policy?

Because it was in the interest of Powers That Be to attack the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution. And just like with their attacks on the 1st. they found that pressuring people by taking away their money via removing them from the banking system was not illegal or settled law so they tried that.
 
I don't fucking care if they rolled it back, there needs to be legislation that will stop them from just rolling it back when it is politically convenient. Why should the firearms industry trust Citi again at this point when that glaring hole is still open? What happens the next time there's a school shooting and political activists use that as a wedge issue and are given expanded funding to pressure banks again? Right now is the perfect chance for the GOP to actually lay something down, if they fall for this "the businesses will self-regulate" shit once again, then it is doomed to keep happening.
It is, sadly, an extremely effective tactic to use against anyone you dislike. I wouldn't be surprised if people in the GOP's side are salivating at being able to use it for their own gain.
 
terrible decision, i'm sure everyone on kiwifarms would rather allow debanking than let lolicons have bank accounts.
 
we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation
Uh huh....

The policy required clients and partners of the bank not to sell firearms to people under the age of 21 or to those who had not passed a background check. It also required that dealers not sell bump stocks or high-capacity magazines.
But you do discriminate against people who wish to buy perfectly legal weapon accessories you don't like... submit to background checks the law doesn't require, or who are legal adults who still somehow? Despite all your proselytizing? Still want to own a gun at the same time it becomes legal for them to do so instead of waiting an arbitrary three extra years to apparently "think it over".

In other words? You ARE discriminating on the basis of political affiliation, albeit the made-up one you imagine every person who wishes to buy a gun has.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: clipartfan92
It is, sadly, an extremely effective tactic to use against anyone you dislike. I wouldn't be surprised if people in the GOP's side are salivating at being able to use it for their own gain.
Yeah, they are probably champing at the bit to use it on anybody critical of Israel. Gotta make sure that AIPAC money doesn't stop.
 
I don't fucking care if they rolled it back, there needs to be legislation that will stop them from just rolling it back when it is politically convenient. Why should the firearms industry trust Citi again at this point when that glaring hole is still open? What happens the next time there's a school shooting and political activists use that as a wedge issue and are given expanded funding to pressure banks again? Right now is the perfect chance for the GOP to actually lay something down, if they fall for this "the businesses will self-regulate" shit once again, then it is doomed to keep happening.
Yeah there are already laws about this
18 U.S.C. § 241
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
42 U.S.C. § 1985
(3)Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.
 
Back